You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@subversion.apache.org by ph...@apache.org on 2014/04/24 13:26:26 UTC

svn commit: r1589663 - /subversion/branches/1.8.x/STATUS

Author: philip
Date: Thu Apr 24 11:26:25 2014
New Revision: 1589663

URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1589663
Log:
* STATUS: Cleanup after backport.pl misbehaviour, remove items
   merged in r1589577, r1589573 and r1589570.

Modified:
    subversion/branches/1.8.x/STATUS

Modified: subversion/branches/1.8.x/STATUS
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/branches/1.8.x/STATUS?rev=1589663&r1=1589662&r2=1589663&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- subversion/branches/1.8.x/STATUS (original)
+++ subversion/branches/1.8.x/STATUS Thu Apr 24 11:26:25 2014
@@ -292,42 +292,3 @@ Veto-blocked changes:
 
 Approved changes:
 =================
-
- * r1587968
-   Maintain data[len]=0 invariant for svn_string_t.
-   Justification:
-     Code may rely on null byte being present.
-   Notes:
-     Triggers a read beyond allocated memory on trunk but no known
-     misbehaviour on 1.8.
-   Votes:
-     +1: philip, rhuijben, stefan2
-
- * r1581810, 1584342
-   Fix issue 4412, locks lost from working copy with pre-1.6.17 servers.
-   Justification:
-     Regression from 1.7, makes using locks hard.
-   Notes:
-     r1584342 is the fix, r1581810 is a test that fails with a 1.6.16 server.
-   Branch:
-     ^/subversion/branches/1.8.x-r1584342
-    (merge before ^/subversion/branches/1.8.x-r1584592)
-   Votes:
-     +1: philip, rhuijben, stefan2
-
- * r1578273, r1578311, r1578326
-   Make svn_ra_get_locks() and svn_ra_get_lock() report not locked nodes
-   with a NULL svn_lock_t *, as documented.
-   Justification:
-     Many clients use the existence of an svn_lock_t on a node via info/status
-     as a boolean to note that there is a lock. But because we didn't properly
-     check the result we reported mostly empty svn_lock_t instances in more
-     cases. Even on directories!
-   Notes:
-     A branch is needed, because the serf lock handling code was refactored and
-     split to multiple files on trunk.
-   Branch:
-     ^/subversion/branches/1.8.x-r1578311
-   Votes:
-     +1: rhuijben, philip, stefan2
-