You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to repository@apache.org by Anou Manavalan <an...@hotmail.com> on 2003/10/31 16:06:30 UTC
RE: re Group was Argrement #1? : Layout (aka URL)
>
> > >Let's try to work this one through to completion:
> > > http://<host>/<group>/<type>/<id>[-<version>].ext
> > So what should group be
>
> > Given Noel's concern about Top Level Project and projects moving.
> > I think that leaves us with the java package name.
>
>Why?
>
> > Also to keep the listing smaller can group be something like
> > /apache/commons/beantuils or must it be apache-comons-beanutils.
>
> http://<host>/Apache/BeanUtils/jar/<id>[-<version>].ext
>
Here is a different view,
<host>/<group>/<project>/<type>/<id>-<version>[.ext]
I would like to see the group as completely different from the project name
but what the user is used to, like an "XML" group, "WebServices" group,
"Testing".... Thoughts ? Because sometimes, the project names don't say
what they are actually meant to do, and even if it says they could be
acronyms or something indirect, so having a meaningful group and then
whatever project falls under that will be a good one for the users.
And I think version should be mandatory, since that is the killer in the
java world.
regards,
-Anou
_________________________________________________________________
See when your friends are online with MSN Messenger 6.0. Download it now
FREE! http://msnmessenger-download.com