You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to sanselan-dev@incubator.apache.org by Charles Matthew Chen <ch...@gmail.com> on 2007/11/18 20:09:42 UTC
Re: svn commit: r596008 [1/15] - in /incubator/sanselan/trunk/src: main/java/org/apache/sanselan/ main/java/org/apache/sanselan/color/ main/java/org/apache/sanselan/common/ main/java/org/apache/sanselan/common/byteSources/ main/java/org/apache/sansel
Ah, I misunderstood this comment:
> >
> Hmm, I'm not sure if this is a good idea to use the Apache package
> namespace for a non Apache release. So to avoid any confusion and
> problems I guess it would be better to upload an older release which
> uses the old package names.
>
> Carsten
> --
> Carsten Ziegeler
> cziegeler@apache.org
>
I'll undo the package structure change.
Charles.
On Nov 18, 2007 2:43 PM, Craig L Russell <Cr...@sun.com> wrote:
> I agree with Jeremias. If there was maintenance to be done, it could
> have been branched.
>
> Craig
>
>
> On Nov 18, 2007, at 9:30 AM, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
>
> > Charles,
> >
> > Why exactly did you revert the package renaming? If it's just for
> > doing
> > a maintenance release with the old package structure, a branch would
> > have been better. In the end it has to be org.apache.sanselan.
> >
> > Jeremias Maerki
> >
> >
> >
> > On 17.11.2007 22:58:40 cmchen wrote:
> >> Author: cmchen
> >> Date: Sat Nov 17 13:58:22 2007
> >> New Revision: 596008
> >>
> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=596008&view=rev
> >> Log:
> >> restored original package structure (from org.apache.sanselan.* ->
> >> org.cmc.sanselan.*).
> > <snip/>
>
> Craig Russell
> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>
>
Re: svn commit: r596008 [1/15] - in /incubator/sanselan/trunk/src:
main/java/org/apache/sanselan/ main/java/org/apache/sanselan/color/ main/java/org/apache/sanselan/common/
main/java/org/apache/sanselan/common/byteSources/ main/java/org/apache/sansel
Posted by Carsten Ziegeler <cz...@apache.org>.
Charles Matthew Chen schrieb:
> In retrospect, its entirely clear what Carsten meant - if the build
> was going to be released on fightingquaker.com (not the apache
> incubator), the package names should reflect that. I don't think any
> change to the apache repo was meant to be suggested.
>
Yes, that's exactly what I meant :)
I'm currently on vacation and I'll be back in business in early December.
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler
cziegeler@apache.org
Re: svn commit: r596008 [1/15] - in /incubator/sanselan/trunk/src: main/java/org/apache/sanselan/ main/java/org/apache/sanselan/color/ main/java/org/apache/sanselan/common/ main/java/org/apache/sanselan/common/byteSources/ main/java/org/apache/sansel
Posted by Charles Matthew Chen <ch...@gmail.com>.
In retrospect, its entirely clear what Carsten meant - if the build
was going to be released on fightingquaker.com (not the apache
incubator), the package names should reflect that. I don't think any
change to the apache repo was meant to be suggested.
Charles.
On Nov 18, 2007 3:40 PM, Craig L Russell <Cr...@sun.com> wrote:
> Hi Charles,
>
> On Nov 18, 2007, at 12:09 PM, Charles Matthew Chen wrote:
>
> > Ah, I misunderstood this comment:
> >
> >>>
> >> Hmm, I'm not sure if this is a good idea to use the Apache package
> >> namespace for a non Apache release. So to avoid any confusion and
> >> problems I guess it would be better to upload an older release which
> >> uses the old package names.
>
> Now that you point it out, I can't understand the comment either.
>
> If there are still some issues to be clarified maybe we can summarize
> them and have a discussion.
>
> Craig
>
>
> >>
> >> Carsten
> >> --
> >> Carsten Ziegeler
> >> cziegeler@apache.org
> >>
> >
> > I'll undo the package structure change.
> >
> > Charles.
> >
> > On Nov 18, 2007 2:43 PM, Craig L Russell <Cr...@sun.com>
> > wrote:
> >> I agree with Jeremias. If there was maintenance to be done, it could
> >> have been branched.
> >>
> >> Craig
> >>
> >>
> >> On Nov 18, 2007, at 9:30 AM, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> >>
> >>> Charles,
> >>>
> >>> Why exactly did you revert the package renaming? If it's just for
> >>> doing
> >>> a maintenance release with the old package structure, a branch would
> >>> have been better. In the end it has to be org.apache.sanselan.
> >>>
> >>> Jeremias Maerki
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 17.11.2007 22:58:40 cmchen wrote:
> >>>> Author: cmchen
> >>>> Date: Sat Nov 17 13:58:22 2007
> >>>> New Revision: 596008
> >>>>
> >>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=596008&view=rev
> >>>> Log:
> >>>> restored original package structure (from org.apache.sanselan.* ->
> >>>> org.cmc.sanselan.*).
> >>> <snip/>
> >>
> >> Craig Russell
> >> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/
> >> jdo
> >> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
> >> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
> >>
> >>
>
> Craig Russell
> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>
>
Re: svn commit: r596008 [1/15] - in /incubator/sanselan/trunk/src:
main/java/org/apache/sanselan/ main/java/org/apache/sanselan/color/
main/java/org/apache/sanselan/common/
main/java/org/apache/sanselan/common/byteSources/ main/java/org/apache/sansel
Posted by Craig L Russell <Cr...@Sun.COM>.
Hi Charles,
On Nov 18, 2007, at 12:09 PM, Charles Matthew Chen wrote:
> Ah, I misunderstood this comment:
>
>>>
>> Hmm, I'm not sure if this is a good idea to use the Apache package
>> namespace for a non Apache release. So to avoid any confusion and
>> problems I guess it would be better to upload an older release which
>> uses the old package names.
Now that you point it out, I can't understand the comment either.
If there are still some issues to be clarified maybe we can summarize
them and have a discussion.
Craig
>>
>> Carsten
>> --
>> Carsten Ziegeler
>> cziegeler@apache.org
>>
>
> I'll undo the package structure change.
>
> Charles.
>
> On Nov 18, 2007 2:43 PM, Craig L Russell <Cr...@sun.com>
> wrote:
>> I agree with Jeremias. If there was maintenance to be done, it could
>> have been branched.
>>
>> Craig
>>
>>
>> On Nov 18, 2007, at 9:30 AM, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
>>
>>> Charles,
>>>
>>> Why exactly did you revert the package renaming? If it's just for
>>> doing
>>> a maintenance release with the old package structure, a branch would
>>> have been better. In the end it has to be org.apache.sanselan.
>>>
>>> Jeremias Maerki
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 17.11.2007 22:58:40 cmchen wrote:
>>>> Author: cmchen
>>>> Date: Sat Nov 17 13:58:22 2007
>>>> New Revision: 596008
>>>>
>>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=596008&view=rev
>>>> Log:
>>>> restored original package structure (from org.apache.sanselan.* ->
>>>> org.cmc.sanselan.*).
>>> <snip/>
>>
>> Craig Russell
>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/
>> jdo
>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>
>>
Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!