You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@wicket.apache.org by Johan Compagner <jc...@gmail.com> on 2007/10/03 12:49:45 UTC

wicket has still java6 still has unit test problems

Some are ajax responses we try to test:


<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><ajax-response><component
id="ajaxLabel1" ><![CDATA[<span wicket:id="ajaxLabel"
id="ajaxLabel1">Updated!</span>]]></component></ajax-response>

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><ajax-response><component
id="ajaxLabel1" ><![CDATA[<span id="ajaxLabel1"
wicket:id="ajaxLabel">Updated!</span>]]></component></ajax-response>

Those are just rawmarkup in our markupparser so it still doesn't equals.

Also the other problem is header contributions where we insert an id in the
tags that are in the panel html. Those also result in rawmarkup and because
of that they are not equalled correctly.

We should try to fix those so that unit test are not depending on the java
version we use...

johan

Re: wicket has still java6 still has unit test problems

Posted by Matej Knopp <ma...@gmail.com>.
Just posted a comment.

On 10/3/07, Johan Compagner <jc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> i have loads of stuff todo!
> for example anybody of you 2 have a good idea about this one:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-943
>
>
> On 10/3/07, Igor Vaynberg <ig...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > yes, +1 for johan to fix them!
> >
> > -igor
> >
> >
> > On 10/3/07, Matej Knopp <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > +1. Good luck, Johan!
> > >
> > > -Matej
> > >
> > > On 10/3/07, Johan Compagner <jc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Some are ajax responses we try to test:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><ajax-response><component
> > > > id="ajaxLabel1" ><![CDATA[<span wicket:id="ajaxLabel"
> > > > id="ajaxLabel1">Updated!</span>]]></component></ajax-response>
> > > >
> > > > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><ajax-response><component
> > > > id="ajaxLabel1" ><![CDATA[<span id="ajaxLabel1"
> > > > wicket:id="ajaxLabel">Updated!</span>]]></component></ajax-response>
> > > >
> > > > Those are just rawmarkup in our markupparser so it still doesn't
> > equals.
> > > >
> > > > Also the other problem is header contributions where we insert an id
> > in
> > > the
> > > > tags that are in the panel html. Those also result in rawmarkup and
> > > because
> > > > of that they are not equalled correctly.
> > > >
> > > > We should try to fix those so that unit test are not depending on the
> > > java
> > > > version we use...
> > > >
> > > > johan
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: wicket has still java6 still has unit test problems

Posted by Johan Compagner <jc...@gmail.com>.
i have loads of stuff todo!
for example anybody of you 2 have a good idea about this one:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-943


On 10/3/07, Igor Vaynberg <ig...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> yes, +1 for johan to fix them!
>
> -igor
>
>
> On 10/3/07, Matej Knopp <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > +1. Good luck, Johan!
> >
> > -Matej
> >
> > On 10/3/07, Johan Compagner <jc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Some are ajax responses we try to test:
> > >
> > >
> > > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><ajax-response><component
> > > id="ajaxLabel1" ><![CDATA[<span wicket:id="ajaxLabel"
> > > id="ajaxLabel1">Updated!</span>]]></component></ajax-response>
> > >
> > > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><ajax-response><component
> > > id="ajaxLabel1" ><![CDATA[<span id="ajaxLabel1"
> > > wicket:id="ajaxLabel">Updated!</span>]]></component></ajax-response>
> > >
> > > Those are just rawmarkup in our markupparser so it still doesn't
> equals.
> > >
> > > Also the other problem is header contributions where we insert an id
> in
> > the
> > > tags that are in the panel html. Those also result in rawmarkup and
> > because
> > > of that they are not equalled correctly.
> > >
> > > We should try to fix those so that unit test are not depending on the
> > java
> > > version we use...
> > >
> > > johan
> > >
> >
>

Re: wicket has still java6 still has unit test problems

Posted by Igor Vaynberg <ig...@gmail.com>.
yes, +1 for johan to fix them!

-igor


On 10/3/07, Matej Knopp <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1. Good luck, Johan!
>
> -Matej
>
> On 10/3/07, Johan Compagner <jc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Some are ajax responses we try to test:
> >
> >
> > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><ajax-response><component
> > id="ajaxLabel1" ><![CDATA[<span wicket:id="ajaxLabel"
> > id="ajaxLabel1">Updated!</span>]]></component></ajax-response>
> >
> > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><ajax-response><component
> > id="ajaxLabel1" ><![CDATA[<span id="ajaxLabel1"
> > wicket:id="ajaxLabel">Updated!</span>]]></component></ajax-response>
> >
> > Those are just rawmarkup in our markupparser so it still doesn't equals.
> >
> > Also the other problem is header contributions where we insert an id in
> the
> > tags that are in the panel html. Those also result in rawmarkup and
> because
> > of that they are not equalled correctly.
> >
> > We should try to fix those so that unit test are not depending on the
> java
> > version we use...
> >
> > johan
> >
>

Re: wicket has still java6 still has unit test problems

Posted by Matej Knopp <ma...@gmail.com>.
+1. Good luck, Johan!

-Matej

On 10/3/07, Johan Compagner <jc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Some are ajax responses we try to test:
>
>
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><ajax-response><component
> id="ajaxLabel1" ><![CDATA[<span wicket:id="ajaxLabel"
> id="ajaxLabel1">Updated!</span>]]></component></ajax-response>
>
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><ajax-response><component
> id="ajaxLabel1" ><![CDATA[<span id="ajaxLabel1"
> wicket:id="ajaxLabel">Updated!</span>]]></component></ajax-response>
>
> Those are just rawmarkup in our markupparser so it still doesn't equals.
>
> Also the other problem is header contributions where we insert an id in the
> tags that are in the panel html. Those also result in rawmarkup and because
> of that they are not equalled correctly.
>
> We should try to fix those so that unit test are not depending on the java
> version we use...
>
> johan
>