maven: supplemental-model.xml

[Dale LaBossiere <dm...@gmail.com>]

Hi Chris,

I was trying to educate myself more about supplemental-model.xml and our need for it.

I may have missed something but it didn’t look to me like there was any default generated DEPENDENCY file info which was critical or at least very important to “override/fix”.  Do you disagree?
Did you review the info for our various connector’s external dependencies too?

I’m hoping we can do away with it and simplify our lives and subsequent maintenance burden :-)

Note, our bundles' LICENSE files and the license copies we made and bundle are accurate and not influenced by the contents of supplemental-model.xml.

So, your thoughts?

— Dale

Re: maven: supplemental-model.xml

[Dale LaBossiere <dm...@gmail.com>]

Hi Chris,

To keep things moving along, I decided that for now we can do without 
supplemental-model.xml so I delivered commit 29cb372 to remove remnants of it.
We can always revert the commit later if its need becomes clear.

— Dale

> On Oct 3, 2017, at 1:27 PM, Dale LaBossiere <dm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Chris,
> 
> I was trying to educate myself more about supplemental-model.xml and our need for it.
> 
> I may have missed something but it didn’t look to me like there was any default generated DEPENDENCY file info which was critical or at least very important to “override/fix”.  Do you disagree?
> Did you review the info for our various connector’s external dependencies too?
> 
> I’m hoping we can do away with it and simplify our lives and subsequent maintenance burden :-)
> 
> Note, our bundles' LICENSE files and the license copies we made and bundle are accurate and not influenced by the contents of supplemental-model.xml.
> 
> So, your thoughts?
> 
> — Dale
>