You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@activemq.apache.org by imranrazakhan <im...@gmail.com> on 2017/12/02 21:28:19 UTC
EnMasse vs activemq
HI,
do anyone knows difference between EnMasse vs activemq,
http://enmasse.io/
Regards
--
Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html
Re: EnMasse vs activemq
Posted by Ulf Lilleengen <lu...@redhat.com>.
Hi,
As Justin said, it's not really a direct alternative to ActiveMQ, and in
fact ActiveMQ Artemis is one of the core components in EnMasse.
EnMasse adds some management components to deal with scaling brokers
up/down in an OpenShift/Kubernetes environment + a higher level
configuration model to configure messaging infrastructure in a
declarative fashion. It also integrates the broker with the Apache Qpid
Dispatch Router.
Best regards,
Ulf
On 02. des. 2017 22:28, imranrazakhan wrote:
> HI,
>
> do anyone knows difference between EnMasse vs activemq,
>
> http://enmasse.io/
>
> Regards
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html
>
Re: EnMasse vs activemq
Posted by Justin Bertram <jb...@redhat.com>.
EnMasse includes a broker as part of its functionality (ActiveMQ Artemis in
this case) but it offers quite a lot more functionality beyond the broker
related to scalability and deployment. I don't think it's really valid to
compare EnMasse to an ActiveMQ broker directly.
Justin
On Sat, Dec 2, 2017 at 3:28 PM, imranrazakhan <im...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> HI,
>
> do anyone knows difference between EnMasse vs activemq,
>
> http://enmasse.io/
>
> Regards
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-
> f2341805.html
>