You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@jackrabbit.apache.org by Michael Wechner <mi...@wyona.com> on 2010/11/15 17:32:02 UTC

Status of QOM again

Hi

I am considering to use the QOM API and have found the following status 
note from last year

http://jackrabbit.510166.n4.nabble.com/Query-Object-Model-status-QOM-td520519.html

and in order to get a better sense wanted to catch up with the current 
status.
Also it would be nice to hear about the pros and cons.

Any feedback is much appreciated.

Thanks

Michael

Re: Status of QOM again

Posted by Michael Wechner <mi...@wyona.com>.
On 11/15/10 5:35 PM, ChadDavis wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 9:32 AM, Michael Wechner
> <mi...@wyona.com>  wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> I am considering to use the QOM API and have found the following status note
>> from last year
>>
>> http://jackrabbit.510166.n4.nabble.com/Query-Object-Model-status-QOM-td520519.html
>>
>> and in order to get a better sense wanted to catch up with the current
>> status.
>> Also it would be nice to hear about the pros and cons.
> I was trying to use the JQOM interface earlier this year, and it
> seemed to be missing important pieces.   I can't precisely recall the
> problems, but I wrote them up in posts to this list.  See:
>
> http://markmail.org/search/?q=JQOM

thanks very much for sending this pointer
> I would be very interested to hear if these issues have been resolved.

I would assume that since your post was in July

http://markmail.org/message/mxp3yeeopockitom?q=JQOM#query:JQOM+page:1+mid:mxp3yeeopockitom+state:results

there are still some open issues by today, but it's up to each of us to 
help improve it:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2533
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2715

Are there any other known issues?

Thanks

Michael

Re: Status of QOM again

Posted by ChadDavis <ch...@gmail.com>.
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 9:32 AM, Michael Wechner
<mi...@wyona.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am considering to use the QOM API and have found the following status note
> from last year
>
> http://jackrabbit.510166.n4.nabble.com/Query-Object-Model-status-QOM-td520519.html
>
> and in order to get a better sense wanted to catch up with the current
> status.
> Also it would be nice to hear about the pros and cons.

I was trying to use the JQOM interface earlier this year, and it
seemed to be missing important pieces.   I can't precisely recall the
problems, but I wrote them up in posts to this list.  See:

http://markmail.org/search/?q=JQOM

I would be very interested to hear if these issues have been resolved.