You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@apr.apache.org by tr...@apache.org on 2010/05/24 18:56:08 UTC
svn commit: r947713 - /apr/apr/trunk/STATUS
Author: trawick
Date: Mon May 24 16:56:07 2010
New Revision: 947713
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=947713&view=rev
Log:
axe ancient notes about ancient FreeBSD threading
Submitted by: pgollucci
Modified:
apr/apr/trunk/STATUS
Modified: apr/apr/trunk/STATUS
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/apr/apr/trunk/STATUS?rev=947713&r1=947712&r2=947713&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- apr/apr/trunk/STATUS [utf-8] (original)
+++ apr/apr/trunk/STATUS [utf-8] Mon May 24 16:56:07 2010
@@ -383,20 +383,6 @@ RELEASE NON-SHOWSTOPPERS BUT WOULD BE RE
what "reasonable" should be, so be conservative, only increase this as
necessary.
- * Generate a good bug report to send to the FreeBSD hackers that details
- the problems we have seen with threads and system calls (specifically
- sendfile data is corrupted). From our analysis so far, we don't think
- that this is an APR issue, but rather a FreeBSD kernel issue. Our
- current solution is to just disable threads across the board on
- FreeBSD.
-
- MsgID: <20...@ebuilt.com>
- Status: Fixed in -CURRENT. MFC in about a week. Continuing
- testing with threads on FreeBSD.
-
- FreeBSD PR kern/32684:
- http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/32684
-
* There are some optimizations that can be done to the new
apr_proc_*() functions (on UNIX). One that may reduce pointer
indirection would be to make the apr_proc_mutex_unix_lock_methods_t