You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@apr.apache.org by tr...@apache.org on 2010/05/24 18:56:08 UTC

svn commit: r947713 - /apr/apr/trunk/STATUS

Author: trawick
Date: Mon May 24 16:56:07 2010
New Revision: 947713

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=947713&view=rev
Log:
axe ancient notes about ancient FreeBSD threading

Submitted by: pgollucci

Modified:
    apr/apr/trunk/STATUS

Modified: apr/apr/trunk/STATUS
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/apr/apr/trunk/STATUS?rev=947713&r1=947712&r2=947713&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- apr/apr/trunk/STATUS [utf-8] (original)
+++ apr/apr/trunk/STATUS [utf-8] Mon May 24 16:56:07 2010
@@ -383,20 +383,6 @@ RELEASE NON-SHOWSTOPPERS BUT WOULD BE RE
         what "reasonable" should be, so be conservative, only increase this as
         necessary.
 
-    * Generate a good bug report to send to the FreeBSD hackers that details
-      the problems we have seen with threads and system calls (specifically
-      sendfile data is corrupted).  From our analysis so far, we don't think 
-      that this is an APR issue, but rather a FreeBSD kernel issue.  Our
-      current solution is to just disable threads across the board on
-      FreeBSD.
-
-      MsgID: <20...@ebuilt.com>
-        Status: Fixed in -CURRENT.  MFC in about a week.  Continuing
-                testing with threads on FreeBSD.
-
-                FreeBSD PR kern/32684:
-                  http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/32684
-
     * There are some optimizations that can be done to the new
       apr_proc_*() functions (on UNIX). One that may reduce pointer
       indirection would be to make the apr_proc_mutex_unix_lock_methods_t