Re: SVN and Eclipse

[Alex Blewitt <Al...@ioshq.com>]

Personally, I'm used to CVS and use it within Eclipse for my work.

However, I understand that there's an Eclipse plug-in that allows me to 
talk to SVN as well, in which case there's much less of a problem. Does 
it simply change the Team abstraction layer, or are there a whole bunch 
of different menus to drive it?

Alex.
On Wednesday, Aug 13, 2003, at 23:00 Europe/London, Noel J. Bergman 
wrote:

> Jeremy Boynes asked:
>> Greg Stein wrote:
>>> "sorry. no more CVS. it is a bitch to maintain. switch to SVN."
>
>> Should be be planning for this, and perhaps move now whilst we are 
>> small?
>
> Another thing to consider, but again Greg is the expert, is that this 
> is a
> huge umbrella with a lot of sub-projects.  Right now there is one 
> module.
> Moving between modules in CVS isn't a whole lot of fun, even if 
> doable.  SVN
> has a different model, which would make partitioning acces rights, and
> moving things around a WHOLE LOT easier.
>
> This project seems almost ideal to give Subversion a whirl, 
> considering how
> the project structure interacts with key differences between CVS and
> Subversion.
>
>> How hard would it be to move the javax.* stuff to a separate module
>> and put it in SVN?
>
> I believe that it just takes a request to infrastructure to set things 
> up,
> and then some quick lessons for everyone.  Subversion is already 
> running,
> and has a couple of sub-trees.
>
> 	--- Noel
>

Re: SVN and Eclipse

["Daniel S. Haischt" <me...@daniel.stefan.haischt.name>]

from the upcoming subversion book:

these are _portable_ svn clients:

svnup -> http://svnup.tigris.org/

jsvn -> http://www.alternatecomputing.com/jsvn/index.php3

there is RapidSVN but i do not know whether there is a
Mac OS X port. you should definitly look whether there
are some Fink packages available.

subversion book URL: http://svnbook.red-bean.com/ (p. 225)

regards

daniel s. haischt
--

Jeremy Boynes wrote:
> Do any of these plugins support MacOSX, or is there a GUI client available?
> 
> That appears to be the biggest issue with adopting SVN at the moment.
> 
> Thanks
> Jeremy
> 
> 
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:noel@devtech.com]
>>Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 3:33 PM
>>To: geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>Subject: RE: SVN and Eclipse
>>
>>
>>
>>>I understand that there's an Eclipse plug-in that allows me to 
>>
>>talk to SVN
>>
>>See: http://subclipse.tigris.org/
>>
>>See also the other projects at http://scm.tigris.org/
>>
>>	--- Noel
>>

[project management] Patches and code contributions...

[Danny Angus <da...@apache.org>]

Guys,

Is there a prefered way for code submissions to be made?
I'm thinking that there are a few folks around who have/will have quite a
few lines of code to submit in one go, is this just going to all be posted
to the list?
Or can we use Bugzilla?

There are two potential issues with posting to the list;
1 is much more load on people's mail bandwidth, particularly Apache.
2 is that it might be hard for the few comitters there are to see and
process every patch owing to the volume of traffic on the list.

d.

RE: SVN and Eclipse

[mk...@gmx.de]

Are there any plans of providing a 100% pure Java API without all the
hassles?

Cheers,
Mariano
> > subclipse is Win32-only
> 
> Only as distributed in the current build.  Just rebuild SVN-UP, as
> documented on the site.
> 
> 	--- Noel
> 

Re: SVN and Eclipse

[Alex Blewitt <Al...@ioshq.com>]

I don't fancy rebuilding subclipse's binaries whenever the SVN server 
gets updated. Still think it's worth waiting for SVN and SVN clients to 
get the inter-process communication sorted so that these recompilations 
aren't needed; especially during development phase, but also during 
normal use (going from SVN 1.0->1.1, for example).

Alex.

On Thursday, Aug 14, 2003, at 23:51 Europe/London, Noel J. Bergman 
wrote:

>> subclipse is Win32-only
>
> Only as distributed in the current build.  Just rebuild SVN-UP, as
> documented on the site.
>
> 	--- Noel
>

RE: SVN and Eclipse

["Noel J. Bergman" <no...@devtech.com>]

> subclipse is Win32-only

Only as distributed in the current build.  Just rebuild SVN-UP, as
documented on the site.

	--- Noel

Re: SVN and Eclipse

[Alex Blewitt <Al...@ioshq.com>]

No, subclipse is Win32-only.

SVN clients may exist, but there's no way I'd want to use a source 
management tool outside of Eclipse ...

Alex.

On Thursday, Aug 14, 2003, at 21:56 Europe/London, Jeremy Boynes wrote:

> Do any of these plugins support MacOSX, or is there a GUI client 
> available?
>
> That appears to be the biggest issue with adopting SVN at the moment.
>
> Thanks
> Jeremy
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:noel@devtech.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 3:33 PM
>> To: geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: RE: SVN and Eclipse
>>
>>
>>> I understand that there's an Eclipse plug-in that allows me to
>> talk to SVN
>>
>> See: http://subclipse.tigris.org/
>>
>> See also the other projects at http://scm.tigris.org/
>>
>> 	--- Noel
>>

RE: SVN and Eclipse

[Jeremy Boynes <je...@coredevelopers.net>]

Do any of these plugins support MacOSX, or is there a GUI client available?

That appears to be the biggest issue with adopting SVN at the moment.

Thanks
Jeremy

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:noel@devtech.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 3:33 PM
> To: geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: SVN and Eclipse
> 
> 
> > I understand that there's an Eclipse plug-in that allows me to 
> talk to SVN
> 
> See: http://subclipse.tigris.org/
> 
> See also the other projects at http://scm.tigris.org/
> 
> 	--- Noel
> 

RE: SVN and Eclipse

["Noel J. Bergman" <no...@devtech.com>]

> I understand that there's an Eclipse plug-in that allows me to talk to SVN

See: http://subclipse.tigris.org/

See also the other projects at http://scm.tigris.org/

	--- Noel