You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by Jacek Laskowski <ja...@laskowski.net.pl> on 2006/04/02 10:13:50 UTC
What about moving applications into its own source tree?
Hi,
While migrating the applications to M2 I came up with the idea to move
that directory to its own repository, just like daytrader or devtools,
off Geronimo the application server tree. What do you think?
Jacek
--
Jacek Laskowski
http://www.laskowski.org.pl
Re: What about moving applications into its own source tree?
Posted by Prasad Kashyap <go...@gmail.com>.
+1
This is a good idea. This will help us in building up a rich library
of samples. Contributors could provide samples prototyping the latest
techonlogies and their usage in Geronimo. I believe we will find us
more adopters and converts.
+1
Cheers
Prasad
On 4/4/06, Jacek Laskowski <ja...@laskowski.net.pl> wrote:
> On 4/3/06, Matt Hogstrom <ma...@hogstrom.org> wrote:
>
> > Should move out to samples someplace
> > drwxr-xr-x 18 hogstrom hogstrom 612 Apr 2 16:23 magicGball
> > drwxr-xr-x 14 hogstrom hogstrom 476 Apr 2 16:23 demo
> > drwxr-xr-x 12 hogstrom hogstrom 408 Apr 2 16:23 ldap-realm-demo
> > drwxr-xr-x 14 hogstrom hogstrom 476 Apr 2 16:23 welcome
>
> So, my take would be to create 'samples' repo with their own build
> cycle (depending on the version they're aiming at) with these 4
> directories. The aim of the repo would be to provide sample
> applications so that newcomers can taste 'Geronimo flavour' ;) Of
> course, the more maven-wise staff accompaning them the better. People
> who want to contribute to Geronimo could start with these sample
> applications and after having gained enough Geronimo experience from
> the end-user perspective, they could be 'promoted' to more advanced
> staff in Geronimo's trunk. I'm pretty sure there're some future
> contributors as well as (mere) end-users who would benefit from such a
> route.
>
> I'll call for a vote if it sounds reasonable.
>
> Jacek
>
> --
> Jacek Laskowski
> http://www.laskowski.org.pl
>
Re: What about moving applications into its own source tree?
Posted by Jacek Laskowski <ja...@laskowski.net.pl>.
On 4/3/06, Matt Hogstrom <ma...@hogstrom.org> wrote:
> Should move out to samples someplace
> drwxr-xr-x 18 hogstrom hogstrom 612 Apr 2 16:23 magicGball
> drwxr-xr-x 14 hogstrom hogstrom 476 Apr 2 16:23 demo
> drwxr-xr-x 12 hogstrom hogstrom 408 Apr 2 16:23 ldap-realm-demo
> drwxr-xr-x 14 hogstrom hogstrom 476 Apr 2 16:23 welcome
So, my take would be to create 'samples' repo with their own build
cycle (depending on the version they're aiming at) with these 4
directories. The aim of the repo would be to provide sample
applications so that newcomers can taste 'Geronimo flavour' ;) Of
course, the more maven-wise staff accompaning them the better. People
who want to contribute to Geronimo could start with these sample
applications and after having gained enough Geronimo experience from
the end-user perspective, they could be 'promoted' to more advanced
staff in Geronimo's trunk. I'm pretty sure there're some future
contributors as well as (mere) end-users who would benefit from such a
route.
I'll call for a vote if it sounds reasonable.
Jacek
--
Jacek Laskowski
http://www.laskowski.org.pl
Re: What about moving applications into its own source tree?
Posted by Matt Hogstrom <ma...@hogstrom.org>.
Here are some additional thoughts. I think the console would stay as Paul
indicated as well as the jmxdebug (isn't there a better version out there?
Simon?) Not sure about the UDDI stuff.
Here is what might remain:
drwxr-xr-x 11 hogstrom hogstrom 374 Mar 17 11:20 console-core
drwxr-xr-x 11 hogstrom hogstrom 374 Mar 17 11:21 console-ear
drwxr-xr-x 11 hogstrom hogstrom 374 Mar 28 10:52 console-framework
drwxr-xr-x 11 hogstrom hogstrom 374 Mar 28 10:52 console-standard
drwxr-xr-x 14 hogstrom hogstrom 476 Apr 2 16:23 jmxdebug
drwxr-xr-x 14 hogstrom hogstrom 476 Apr 2 16:23 remote-deploy
drwxr-xr-x 14 hogstrom hogstrom 476 Apr 2 16:23 remote-deploy-lib
drwxr-xr-x 12 hogstrom hogstrom 408 Apr 2 16:23 uddi-db
drwxr-xr-x 14 hogstrom hogstrom 476 Apr 2 16:23 uddi-server
Already moving out
drwxr-xr-x 17 hogstrom hogstrom 578 Mar 28 10:52 daytrader
Should move out to samples someplace
drwxr-xr-x 18 hogstrom hogstrom 612 Apr 2 16:23 magicGball
drwxr-xr-x 14 hogstrom hogstrom 476 Apr 2 16:23 demo
drwxr-xr-x 12 hogstrom hogstrom 408 Apr 2 16:23 ldap-realm-demo
drwxr-xr-x 14 hogstrom hogstrom 476 Apr 2 16:23 welcome
Paul McMahan wrote:
> Hi Jacek, since the console application is so intricately tied to the
> kernel and deployment APIs and since it is also an important part of
> the resulting assemblies I think it would be best to keep at least
> that one application in the same repository as the application server.
>
> Best wishes,
> Paul
>
> On 4/2/06, Jacek Laskowski <ja...@laskowski.net.pl> wrote:
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>While migrating the applications to M2 I came up with the idea to move
>>that directory to its own repository, just like daytrader or devtools,
>>off Geronimo the application server tree. What do you think?
>>
>>Jacek
>>
>>--
>>Jacek Laskowski
>>http://www.laskowski.org.pl
>>
>
>
>
>
Re: What about moving applications into its own source tree?
Posted by Paul McMahan <pa...@gmail.com>.
Hi Jacek, since the console application is so intricately tied to the
kernel and deployment APIs and since it is also an important part of
the resulting assemblies I think it would be best to keep at least
that one application in the same repository as the application server.
Best wishes,
Paul
On 4/2/06, Jacek Laskowski <ja...@laskowski.net.pl> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While migrating the applications to M2 I came up with the idea to move
> that directory to its own repository, just like daytrader or devtools,
> off Geronimo the application server tree. What do you think?
>
> Jacek
>
> --
> Jacek Laskowski
> http://www.laskowski.org.pl
>