You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@wicket.apache.org by Jeremy Thomerson <je...@wickettraining.com> on 2008/11/18 17:21:08 UTC
Continuum Build Server Set Up
Devs,
In response to the problems with TeamCity and Sourceforge, I installed a
Continuum instance on my server last night. I added Wicket and several
Wicket Stuff projects. It seems to be running fine, except that most
projects are missing the SCM tag from their POM, or have it incorrectly
configured.
I don't mind going in and fixing or adding the SCM tag on all of the
projects that are currently on TeamCity and setting them up on this
Continuum server. But since those aren't my projects, I wanted to run it
past the group first. What do you think? We could do this and let it run
for a while as a test.
http://www.wickettraining.com/continuum
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
Re: Continuum Build Server Set Up
Posted by Jeremy Thomerson <je...@wickettraining.com>.
And, as an example, look at this pom:
https://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket-stuff/trunk/wicketstuff-calendarviews/pom.xml
The important part that is messed up or missing from most is that connection
URL in the SCM tag. Take the one from that pom and modify accordingly
(change your project folder).
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 1:47 PM, Jeremy Thomerson <jeremy@wickettraining.com
> wrote:
> Send me a list of which are yours and I'll try them as samples.
>
> --
> Jeremy Thomerson
> http://www.wickettraining.com
>
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 1:20 PM, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael <
> nino.martinez@jayway.dk> wrote:
>
>> Sure fine by me, and good initiative! I'll try to see if I can fix my own
>> projects, can you provide a sniplet on how it should look?
>>
>> regards Nino
>>
>> Jeremy Thomerson wrote:
>>
>>> Yes - you're right. Overall, I think it will be much less intrusive to
>>> just
>>> add or fix the SCM tag in each project. Once I hear back whether anyone
>>> is
>>> in agreement with this or not, I can proceed (or not).
>>>
>>> At some point in the future we should probably discuss some way of
>>> creating
>>> at least a group of the core projects in wicket-stuff that all build and
>>> release together, on the same schedule as Wicket. But I don't want to
>>> muddy
>>> this build server discussion with that, and I don't have the mental or
>>> time
>>> bandwidth to work through that right now.
>>>
>>> So, what does everyone think? Can I update pom files to have correct SCM
>>> info and add them to Continuum on my server?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> -Wicket for love
>>
>> Nino Martinez Wael
>> Java Specialist @ Jayway DK
>> http://www.jayway.dk
>> +45 2936 7684
>>
>>
>
>
Re: Continuum Build Server Set Up
Posted by Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael <ni...@jayway.dk>.
Ones the template for the other :)
So wicket-persistence-template are a template for wicket-iolite , the
latter are an archetype...
Jeremy Thomerson wrote:
> Nino,
> I'm updating your poms and adding yours. I ran into a problem - you have
> wicket-persistence-template and wicket-iolite - both have the same group and
> artifact IDs.
>
> I'm going to wait to add them to the build server - can you tell me what
> the difference is? Maybe one should be renamed?
>
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 1:51 PM, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael <
> nino.martinez@jayway.dk> wrote:
>
>
>> http://wicketstuff.org/confluence/display/STUFFWIKI/Project+Maintainers
>>
>> I think those are some of them (where my name are on), there could be more
>> cant remember.. I think I've upgraded all to use 1-4 snapshot of wicket...
>>
>> Jeremy Thomerson wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Send me a list of which are yours and I'll try them as samples.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> --
>> -Wicket for love
>>
>> Nino Martinez Wael
>> Java Specialist @ Jayway DK
>> http://www.jayway.dk
>> +45 2936 7684
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
--
-Wicket for love
Nino Martinez Wael
Java Specialist @ Jayway DK
http://www.jayway.dk
+45 2936 7684
Re: Continuum Build Server Set Up
Posted by Jeremy Thomerson <je...@wickettraining.com>.
I copied that from wicketstuff-parent and used it as a test. Indeed, it
wasn't going to work with the way WS is structured now, so I removed it.
Thank you!
Jeremy Thomerson
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 2:24 AM, Martin Funk <ma...@googlemail.com>wrote:
> Hi Jeremy,
>
> just saw your commits on wicket-stuff.
>
> I allways like any attempt to get some more stucture into wicket-stuff.
>
> One thing I saw was the licences tag in the pom.xml
>
> http://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/wicket-stuff/trunk/pom.xml?revision=4329&view=markup&pathrev=4329
>
> 16 <licenses>
> 17 <!-- default license (to override if needed) -->
> 18 <license>
> 19 <name>The Apache Software License, Version
> 2.0</name>
> 20 <url>http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt
> </url>
> 21 <distribution>repo</distribution>
> 22 </license>
> 23 </licenses>
>
> Not sure if maven allows 'overriding' here you can only extend the list
> elements
> of a parent.pom, so the Apache License will show up in all its children.
> I'm not sure what legal issus this imposes if multiple liceses appear.
>
>
> mf
>
>
> 2008/11/18 Jeremy Thomerson <je...@wickettraining.com>
>
> > Okay, all of yours are added (includeing the persistence-template /
> > iolite).
> >
> > wicket-contrib-openlayers-examples doesn't compile
> >
> > The rest are all building fine.
> >
> > --
> > Jeremy Thomerson
> > http://www.wickettraining.com
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 2:25 PM, Jeremy Thomerson <
> > jeremy@wickettraining.com
> > > wrote:
> >
> > > Also:
> > >
> > > wicket-contrib-accordian is named "Wicket Contrib Openlayers"
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 2:20 PM, Jeremy Thomerson <
> > > jeremy@wickettraining.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Nino,
> > >> I'm updating your poms and adding yours. I ran into a problem - you
> > >> have wicket-persistence-template and wicket-iolite - both have the
> same
> > >> group and artifact IDs.
> > >>
> > >> I'm going to wait to add them to the build server - can you tell me
> > what
> > >> the difference is? Maybe one should be renamed?
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 1:51 PM, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
> <
> > >> nino.martinez@jayway.dk> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>>
> > http://wicketstuff.org/confluence/display/STUFFWIKI/Project+Maintainers
> > >>>
> > >>> I think those are some of them (where my name are on), there could be
> > >>> more cant remember.. I think I've upgraded all to use 1-4 snapshot of
> > >>> wicket...
> > >>>
> > >>> Jeremy Thomerson wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> Send me a list of which are yours and I'll try them as samples.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>> --
> > >>> -Wicket for love
> > >>>
> > >>> Nino Martinez Wael
> > >>> Java Specialist @ Jayway DK
> > >>> http://www.jayway.dk
> > >>> +45 2936 7684
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Jeremy Thomerson
> > >> http://www.wickettraining.com
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Jeremy Thomerson
> > > http://www.wickettraining.com
> > >
> >
>
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
Re: Continuum Build Server Set Up
Posted by Jeremy Thomerson <je...@wickettraining.com>.
Martin,
Just as a side note - I just verified that the license can be overridden
by child projects - simply define a different license and maven ignores the
parent license. I am trying to organize the projects in Wicket Stuff, and
have created a common core-parent. Please look here and note the comments I
have in the license section. This was verified with mvn site:site....
https://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket-stuff/trunk/wicketstuff-core/pom.xml
Thanks!
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 2:24 AM, Martin Funk <ma...@googlemail.com>wrote:
> Hi Jeremy,
>
> just saw your commits on wicket-stuff.
>
> I allways like any attempt to get some more stucture into wicket-stuff.
>
> One thing I saw was the licences tag in the pom.xml
>
> http://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/wicket-stuff/trunk/pom.xml?revision=4329&view=markup&pathrev=4329
>
> 16 <licenses>
> 17 <!-- default license (to override if needed) -->
> 18 <license>
> 19 <name>The Apache Software License, Version
> 2.0</name>
> 20 <url>http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt
> </url>
> 21 <distribution>repo</distribution>
> 22 </license>
> 23 </licenses>
>
> Not sure if maven allows 'overriding' here you can only extend the list
> elements
> of a parent.pom, so the Apache License will show up in all its children.
> I'm not sure what legal issus this imposes if multiple liceses appear.
>
>
> mf
>
>
> 2008/11/18 Jeremy Thomerson <je...@wickettraining.com>
>
> > Okay, all of yours are added (includeing the persistence-template /
> > iolite).
> >
> > wicket-contrib-openlayers-examples doesn't compile
> >
> > The rest are all building fine.
> >
> > --
> > Jeremy Thomerson
> > http://www.wickettraining.com
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 2:25 PM, Jeremy Thomerson <
> > jeremy@wickettraining.com
> > > wrote:
> >
> > > Also:
> > >
> > > wicket-contrib-accordian is named "Wicket Contrib Openlayers"
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 2:20 PM, Jeremy Thomerson <
> > > jeremy@wickettraining.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Nino,
> > >> I'm updating your poms and adding yours. I ran into a problem - you
> > >> have wicket-persistence-template and wicket-iolite - both have the
> same
> > >> group and artifact IDs.
> > >>
> > >> I'm going to wait to add them to the build server - can you tell me
> > what
> > >> the difference is? Maybe one should be renamed?
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 1:51 PM, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
> <
> > >> nino.martinez@jayway.dk> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>>
> > http://wicketstuff.org/confluence/display/STUFFWIKI/Project+Maintainers
> > >>>
> > >>> I think those are some of them (where my name are on), there could be
> > >>> more cant remember.. I think I've upgraded all to use 1-4 snapshot of
> > >>> wicket...
> > >>>
> > >>> Jeremy Thomerson wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> Send me a list of which are yours and I'll try them as samples.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>> --
> > >>> -Wicket for love
> > >>>
> > >>> Nino Martinez Wael
> > >>> Java Specialist @ Jayway DK
> > >>> http://www.jayway.dk
> > >>> +45 2936 7684
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Jeremy Thomerson
> > >> http://www.wickettraining.com
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Jeremy Thomerson
> > > http://www.wickettraining.com
> > >
> >
>
Re: Continuum Build Server Set Up
Posted by Martin Funk <ma...@googlemail.com>.
Hi Jeremy,
just saw your commits on wicket-stuff.
I allways like any attempt to get some more stucture into wicket-stuff.
One thing I saw was the licences tag in the pom.xml
http://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/wicket-stuff/trunk/pom.xml?revision=4329&view=markup&pathrev=4329
16 <licenses>
17 <!-- default license (to override if needed) -->
18 <license>
19 <name>The Apache Software License, Version 2.0</name>
20 <url>http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt</url>
21 <distribution>repo</distribution>
22 </license>
23 </licenses>
Not sure if maven allows 'overriding' here you can only extend the list elements
of a parent.pom, so the Apache License will show up in all its children.
I'm not sure what legal issus this imposes if multiple liceses appear.
mf
2008/11/18 Jeremy Thomerson <je...@wickettraining.com>
> Okay, all of yours are added (includeing the persistence-template /
> iolite).
>
> wicket-contrib-openlayers-examples doesn't compile
>
> The rest are all building fine.
>
> --
> Jeremy Thomerson
> http://www.wickettraining.com
>
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 2:25 PM, Jeremy Thomerson <
> jeremy@wickettraining.com
> > wrote:
>
> > Also:
> >
> > wicket-contrib-accordian is named "Wicket Contrib Openlayers"
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 2:20 PM, Jeremy Thomerson <
> > jeremy@wickettraining.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Nino,
> >> I'm updating your poms and adding yours. I ran into a problem - you
> >> have wicket-persistence-template and wicket-iolite - both have the same
> >> group and artifact IDs.
> >>
> >> I'm going to wait to add them to the build server - can you tell me
> what
> >> the difference is? Maybe one should be renamed?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 1:51 PM, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael <
> >> nino.martinez@jayway.dk> wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> http://wicketstuff.org/confluence/display/STUFFWIKI/Project+Maintainers
> >>>
> >>> I think those are some of them (where my name are on), there could be
> >>> more cant remember.. I think I've upgraded all to use 1-4 snapshot of
> >>> wicket...
> >>>
> >>> Jeremy Thomerson wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Send me a list of which are yours and I'll try them as samples.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> -Wicket for love
> >>>
> >>> Nino Martinez Wael
> >>> Java Specialist @ Jayway DK
> >>> http://www.jayway.dk
> >>> +45 2936 7684
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Jeremy Thomerson
> >> http://www.wickettraining.com
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Jeremy Thomerson
> > http://www.wickettraining.com
> >
>
Re: Continuum Build Server Set Up
Posted by Jeremy Thomerson <je...@wickettraining.com>.
Okay, all of yours are added (includeing the persistence-template /
iolite).
wicket-contrib-openlayers-examples doesn't compile
The rest are all building fine.
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 2:25 PM, Jeremy Thomerson <jeremy@wickettraining.com
> wrote:
> Also:
>
> wicket-contrib-accordian is named "Wicket Contrib Openlayers"
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 2:20 PM, Jeremy Thomerson <
> jeremy@wickettraining.com> wrote:
>
>> Nino,
>> I'm updating your poms and adding yours. I ran into a problem - you
>> have wicket-persistence-template and wicket-iolite - both have the same
>> group and artifact IDs.
>>
>> I'm going to wait to add them to the build server - can you tell me what
>> the difference is? Maybe one should be renamed?
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 1:51 PM, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael <
>> nino.martinez@jayway.dk> wrote:
>>
>>> http://wicketstuff.org/confluence/display/STUFFWIKI/Project+Maintainers
>>>
>>> I think those are some of them (where my name are on), there could be
>>> more cant remember.. I think I've upgraded all to use 1-4 snapshot of
>>> wicket...
>>>
>>> Jeremy Thomerson wrote:
>>>
>>>> Send me a list of which are yours and I'll try them as samples.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> -Wicket for love
>>>
>>> Nino Martinez Wael
>>> Java Specialist @ Jayway DK
>>> http://www.jayway.dk
>>> +45 2936 7684
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Jeremy Thomerson
>> http://www.wickettraining.com
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Jeremy Thomerson
> http://www.wickettraining.com
>
Re: Continuum Build Server Set Up
Posted by Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael <ni...@jayway.dk>.
Argh! been too fast there...
Jeremy Thomerson wrote:
> Also:
>
> wicket-contrib-accordian is named "Wicket Contrib Openlayers"
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 2:20 PM, Jeremy Thomerson <jeremy@wickettraining.com
>
>> wrote:
>>
>
>
>> Nino,
>> I'm updating your poms and adding yours. I ran into a problem - you have
>> wicket-persistence-template and wicket-iolite - both have the same group and
>> artifact IDs.
>>
>> I'm going to wait to add them to the build server - can you tell me what
>> the difference is? Maybe one should be renamed?
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 1:51 PM, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael <
>> nino.martinez@jayway.dk> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> http://wicketstuff.org/confluence/display/STUFFWIKI/Project+Maintainers
>>>
>>> I think those are some of them (where my name are on), there could be more
>>> cant remember.. I think I've upgraded all to use 1-4 snapshot of wicket...
>>>
>>> Jeremy Thomerson wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Send me a list of which are yours and I'll try them as samples.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> --
>>> -Wicket for love
>>>
>>> Nino Martinez Wael
>>> Java Specialist @ Jayway DK
>>> http://www.jayway.dk
>>> +45 2936 7684
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> --
>> Jeremy Thomerson
>> http://www.wickettraining.com
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
--
-Wicket for love
Nino Martinez Wael
Java Specialist @ Jayway DK
http://www.jayway.dk
+45 2936 7684
Re: Continuum Build Server Set Up
Posted by Jeremy Thomerson <je...@wickettraining.com>.
Also:
wicket-contrib-accordian is named "Wicket Contrib Openlayers"
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 2:20 PM, Jeremy Thomerson <jeremy@wickettraining.com
> wrote:
> Nino,
> I'm updating your poms and adding yours. I ran into a problem - you have
> wicket-persistence-template and wicket-iolite - both have the same group and
> artifact IDs.
>
> I'm going to wait to add them to the build server - can you tell me what
> the difference is? Maybe one should be renamed?
>
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 1:51 PM, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael <
> nino.martinez@jayway.dk> wrote:
>
>> http://wicketstuff.org/confluence/display/STUFFWIKI/Project+Maintainers
>>
>> I think those are some of them (where my name are on), there could be more
>> cant remember.. I think I've upgraded all to use 1-4 snapshot of wicket...
>>
>> Jeremy Thomerson wrote:
>>
>>> Send me a list of which are yours and I'll try them as samples.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> -Wicket for love
>>
>> Nino Martinez Wael
>> Java Specialist @ Jayway DK
>> http://www.jayway.dk
>> +45 2936 7684
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Jeremy Thomerson
> http://www.wickettraining.com
>
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
Re: Continuum Build Server Set Up
Posted by Jeremy Thomerson <je...@wickettraining.com>.
Nino,
I'm updating your poms and adding yours. I ran into a problem - you have
wicket-persistence-template and wicket-iolite - both have the same group and
artifact IDs.
I'm going to wait to add them to the build server - can you tell me what
the difference is? Maybe one should be renamed?
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 1:51 PM, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael <
nino.martinez@jayway.dk> wrote:
> http://wicketstuff.org/confluence/display/STUFFWIKI/Project+Maintainers
>
> I think those are some of them (where my name are on), there could be more
> cant remember.. I think I've upgraded all to use 1-4 snapshot of wicket...
>
> Jeremy Thomerson wrote:
>
>> Send me a list of which are yours and I'll try them as samples.
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> -Wicket for love
>
> Nino Martinez Wael
> Java Specialist @ Jayway DK
> http://www.jayway.dk
> +45 2936 7684
>
>
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
Re: Continuum Build Server Set Up
Posted by Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael <ni...@jayway.dk>.
http://wicketstuff.org/confluence/display/STUFFWIKI/Project+Maintainers
I think those are some of them (where my name are on), there could be
more cant remember.. I think I've upgraded all to use 1-4 snapshot of
wicket...
Jeremy Thomerson wrote:
> Send me a list of which are yours and I'll try them as samples.
>
>
--
-Wicket for love
Nino Martinez Wael
Java Specialist @ Jayway DK
http://www.jayway.dk
+45 2936 7684
Re: Continuum Build Server Set Up
Posted by Jeremy Thomerson <je...@wickettraining.com>.
Send me a list of which are yours and I'll try them as samples.
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 1:20 PM, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael <
nino.martinez@jayway.dk> wrote:
> Sure fine by me, and good initiative! I'll try to see if I can fix my own
> projects, can you provide a sniplet on how it should look?
>
> regards Nino
>
> Jeremy Thomerson wrote:
>
>> Yes - you're right. Overall, I think it will be much less intrusive to
>> just
>> add or fix the SCM tag in each project. Once I hear back whether anyone
>> is
>> in agreement with this or not, I can proceed (or not).
>>
>> At some point in the future we should probably discuss some way of
>> creating
>> at least a group of the core projects in wicket-stuff that all build and
>> release together, on the same schedule as Wicket. But I don't want to
>> muddy
>> this build server discussion with that, and I don't have the mental or
>> time
>> bandwidth to work through that right now.
>>
>> So, what does everyone think? Can I update pom files to have correct SCM
>> info and add them to Continuum on my server?
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> -Wicket for love
>
> Nino Martinez Wael
> Java Specialist @ Jayway DK
> http://www.jayway.dk
> +45 2936 7684
>
>
Re: Continuum Build Server Set Up
Posted by Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael <ni...@jayway.dk>.
Sure fine by me, and good initiative! I'll try to see if I can fix my
own projects, can you provide a sniplet on how it should look?
regards Nino
Jeremy Thomerson wrote:
> Yes - you're right. Overall, I think it will be much less intrusive to just
> add or fix the SCM tag in each project. Once I hear back whether anyone is
> in agreement with this or not, I can proceed (or not).
>
> At some point in the future we should probably discuss some way of creating
> at least a group of the core projects in wicket-stuff that all build and
> release together, on the same schedule as Wicket. But I don't want to muddy
> this build server discussion with that, and I don't have the mental or time
> bandwidth to work through that right now.
>
> So, what does everyone think? Can I update pom files to have correct SCM
> info and add them to Continuum on my server?
>
>
--
-Wicket for love
Nino Martinez Wael
Java Specialist @ Jayway DK
http://www.jayway.dk
+45 2936 7684
Re: Continuum Build Server Set Up
Posted by Jeremy Thomerson <je...@wickettraining.com>.
Yes - you're right. Overall, I think it will be much less intrusive to just
add or fix the SCM tag in each project. Once I hear back whether anyone is
in agreement with this or not, I can proceed (or not).
At some point in the future we should probably discuss some way of creating
at least a group of the core projects in wicket-stuff that all build and
release together, on the same schedule as Wicket. But I don't want to muddy
this build server discussion with that, and I don't have the mental or time
bandwidth to work through that right now.
So, what does everyone think? Can I update pom files to have correct SCM
info and add them to Continuum on my server?
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 11:15 AM, James Carman
<ja...@carmanconsulting.com>wrote:
> If all of wicketstuff was branched/tagged together, this would work
> and you could let the release plugin automagically change it for you.
> But, since they all have their own lifecycle (their own
> trunk/branches/tags), then you need to configure them individually.
>
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 12:12 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
> <je...@wickettraining.com> wrote:
> > Oh, gotcha! I'll try a test with one of my projects and see, but I think
> > you're right.
> >
> > If so, I am still willing to add the SCM info to each pom if necessary -
> but
> > I still want approval of the crowd since those aren't my projects to
> alter.
> >
> > --
> > Jeremy Thomerson
> > http://www.wickettraining.com
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 11:07 AM, James Carman
> > <ja...@carmanconsulting.com>wrote:
> >
> >> I'm talking about the SCM url itself. It needs to change in the child
> >> when a branch/tag is created (because it now lives in a different
> >> place). Of course it would be able to find its parent (as long as
> >> it's in the local repository).
> >>
> >> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 12:04 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
> >> <je...@wickettraining.com> wrote:
> >> > I don't think it would if you defined it like this in each child...
> >> right?
> >> >
> >> > <parent> * * <groupId>*org.apache.wicket*</groupId>
> >> > * * <artifactId>*wicket-parent*</artifactId>
> >> > * * <version>*1.4-SNAPSHOT*</version>
> >> > * * </parent>
> >> >
> >> > Because it doesn't have a relative path, Maven just looks up the
> parent
> >> pom
> >> > like it looks up any other dependency. If you had a relative path,
> like
> >> > wicket does to its parent pom, then it would mess up.
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Jeremy Thomerson
> >> > http://www.wickettraining.com
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 10:59 AM, James Carman
> >> > <ja...@carmanconsulting.com>wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> The problem is that the entire tree isn't copied over together, so
> the
> >> >> SCM links get messed up when you do that.
> >> >>
> >> >> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 11:57 AM, Jeremy Thomerson
> >> >> <je...@wickettraining.com> wrote:
> >> >> > Tough to be sure - we could experiment.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 10:50 AM, James Carman
> >> >> > <ja...@carmanconsulting.com>wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> When you create a tag/branch of the child, the SCM setup wouldn't
> >> >> >> inherit correctly, though. Right?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Martijn Dashorst
> >> >> >> <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> > Could you structure the parent pom such that it sets up all
> child
> >> poms
> >> >> >> > correctly? Then it is just a matter of inheriting from the
> parent
> >> pom
> >> >> >> > for all projects.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > Martijn
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 5:21 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
> >> >> >> > <je...@wickettraining.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> Devs,
> >> >> >> >> In response to the problems with TeamCity and Sourceforge, I
> >> >> installed
> >> >> >> a
> >> >> >> >> Continuum instance on my server last night. I added Wicket and
> >> >> several
> >> >> >> >> Wicket Stuff projects. It seems to be running fine, except
> that
> >> most
> >> >> >> >> projects are missing the SCM tag from their POM, or have it
> >> >> incorrectly
> >> >> >> >> configured.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> I don't mind going in and fixing or adding the SCM tag on all
> of
> >> the
> >> >> >> >> projects that are currently on TeamCity and setting them up on
> >> this
> >> >> >> >> Continuum server. But since those aren't my projects, I wanted
> to
> >> >> run
> >> >> >> it
> >> >> >> >> past the group first. What do you think? We could do this and
> >> let
> >> >> it
> >> >> >> run
> >> >> >> >> for a while as a test.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> http://www.wickettraining.com/continuum
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> --
> >> >> >> >> Jeremy Thomerson
> >> >> >> >> http://www.wickettraining.com
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > --
> >> >> >> > Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best:
> >> >> http://wicketinaction.com
> >> >> >> > Apache Wicket 1.3.4 is released
> >> >> >> > Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > --
> >> >> > Jeremy Thomerson
> >> >> > http://www.wickettraining.com
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >
>
Re: Continuum Build Server Set Up
Posted by James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com>.
If all of wicketstuff was branched/tagged together, this would work
and you could let the release plugin automagically change it for you.
But, since they all have their own lifecycle (their own
trunk/branches/tags), then you need to configure them individually.
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 12:12 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
<je...@wickettraining.com> wrote:
> Oh, gotcha! I'll try a test with one of my projects and see, but I think
> you're right.
>
> If so, I am still willing to add the SCM info to each pom if necessary - but
> I still want approval of the crowd since those aren't my projects to alter.
>
> --
> Jeremy Thomerson
> http://www.wickettraining.com
>
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 11:07 AM, James Carman
> <ja...@carmanconsulting.com>wrote:
>
>> I'm talking about the SCM url itself. It needs to change in the child
>> when a branch/tag is created (because it now lives in a different
>> place). Of course it would be able to find its parent (as long as
>> it's in the local repository).
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 12:04 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
>> <je...@wickettraining.com> wrote:
>> > I don't think it would if you defined it like this in each child...
>> right?
>> >
>> > <parent> * * <groupId>*org.apache.wicket*</groupId>
>> > * * <artifactId>*wicket-parent*</artifactId>
>> > * * <version>*1.4-SNAPSHOT*</version>
>> > * * </parent>
>> >
>> > Because it doesn't have a relative path, Maven just looks up the parent
>> pom
>> > like it looks up any other dependency. If you had a relative path, like
>> > wicket does to its parent pom, then it would mess up.
>> >
>> > --
>> > Jeremy Thomerson
>> > http://www.wickettraining.com
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 10:59 AM, James Carman
>> > <ja...@carmanconsulting.com>wrote:
>> >
>> >> The problem is that the entire tree isn't copied over together, so the
>> >> SCM links get messed up when you do that.
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 11:57 AM, Jeremy Thomerson
>> >> <je...@wickettraining.com> wrote:
>> >> > Tough to be sure - we could experiment.
>> >> >
>> >> > On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 10:50 AM, James Carman
>> >> > <ja...@carmanconsulting.com>wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> When you create a tag/branch of the child, the SCM setup wouldn't
>> >> >> inherit correctly, though. Right?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Martijn Dashorst
>> >> >> <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> > Could you structure the parent pom such that it sets up all child
>> poms
>> >> >> > correctly? Then it is just a matter of inheriting from the parent
>> pom
>> >> >> > for all projects.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Martijn
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 5:21 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
>> >> >> > <je...@wickettraining.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >> Devs,
>> >> >> >> In response to the problems with TeamCity and Sourceforge, I
>> >> installed
>> >> >> a
>> >> >> >> Continuum instance on my server last night. I added Wicket and
>> >> several
>> >> >> >> Wicket Stuff projects. It seems to be running fine, except that
>> most
>> >> >> >> projects are missing the SCM tag from their POM, or have it
>> >> incorrectly
>> >> >> >> configured.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> I don't mind going in and fixing or adding the SCM tag on all of
>> the
>> >> >> >> projects that are currently on TeamCity and setting them up on
>> this
>> >> >> >> Continuum server. But since those aren't my projects, I wanted to
>> >> run
>> >> >> it
>> >> >> >> past the group first. What do you think? We could do this and
>> let
>> >> it
>> >> >> run
>> >> >> >> for a while as a test.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> http://www.wickettraining.com/continuum
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> --
>> >> >> >> Jeremy Thomerson
>> >> >> >> http://www.wickettraining.com
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > --
>> >> >> > Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best:
>> >> http://wicketinaction.com
>> >> >> > Apache Wicket 1.3.4 is released
>> >> >> > Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > Jeremy Thomerson
>> >> > http://www.wickettraining.com
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >
>>
>
Re: Continuum Build Server Set Up
Posted by Jeremy Thomerson <je...@wickettraining.com>.
Oh, gotcha! I'll try a test with one of my projects and see, but I think
you're right.
If so, I am still willing to add the SCM info to each pom if necessary - but
I still want approval of the crowd since those aren't my projects to alter.
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 11:07 AM, James Carman
<ja...@carmanconsulting.com>wrote:
> I'm talking about the SCM url itself. It needs to change in the child
> when a branch/tag is created (because it now lives in a different
> place). Of course it would be able to find its parent (as long as
> it's in the local repository).
>
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 12:04 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
> <je...@wickettraining.com> wrote:
> > I don't think it would if you defined it like this in each child...
> right?
> >
> > <parent> * * <groupId>*org.apache.wicket*</groupId>
> > * * <artifactId>*wicket-parent*</artifactId>
> > * * <version>*1.4-SNAPSHOT*</version>
> > * * </parent>
> >
> > Because it doesn't have a relative path, Maven just looks up the parent
> pom
> > like it looks up any other dependency. If you had a relative path, like
> > wicket does to its parent pom, then it would mess up.
> >
> > --
> > Jeremy Thomerson
> > http://www.wickettraining.com
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 10:59 AM, James Carman
> > <ja...@carmanconsulting.com>wrote:
> >
> >> The problem is that the entire tree isn't copied over together, so the
> >> SCM links get messed up when you do that.
> >>
> >> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 11:57 AM, Jeremy Thomerson
> >> <je...@wickettraining.com> wrote:
> >> > Tough to be sure - we could experiment.
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 10:50 AM, James Carman
> >> > <ja...@carmanconsulting.com>wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> When you create a tag/branch of the child, the SCM setup wouldn't
> >> >> inherit correctly, though. Right?
> >> >>
> >> >> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Martijn Dashorst
> >> >> <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> > Could you structure the parent pom such that it sets up all child
> poms
> >> >> > correctly? Then it is just a matter of inheriting from the parent
> pom
> >> >> > for all projects.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Martijn
> >> >> >
> >> >> > On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 5:21 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
> >> >> > <je...@wickettraining.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> Devs,
> >> >> >> In response to the problems with TeamCity and Sourceforge, I
> >> installed
> >> >> a
> >> >> >> Continuum instance on my server last night. I added Wicket and
> >> several
> >> >> >> Wicket Stuff projects. It seems to be running fine, except that
> most
> >> >> >> projects are missing the SCM tag from their POM, or have it
> >> incorrectly
> >> >> >> configured.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> I don't mind going in and fixing or adding the SCM tag on all of
> the
> >> >> >> projects that are currently on TeamCity and setting them up on
> this
> >> >> >> Continuum server. But since those aren't my projects, I wanted to
> >> run
> >> >> it
> >> >> >> past the group first. What do you think? We could do this and
> let
> >> it
> >> >> run
> >> >> >> for a while as a test.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> http://www.wickettraining.com/continuum
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> --
> >> >> >> Jeremy Thomerson
> >> >> >> http://www.wickettraining.com
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > --
> >> >> > Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best:
> >> http://wicketinaction.com
> >> >> > Apache Wicket 1.3.4 is released
> >> >> > Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Jeremy Thomerson
> >> > http://www.wickettraining.com
> >> >
> >>
> >
>
Re: Continuum Build Server Set Up
Posted by James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com>.
I'm talking about the SCM url itself. It needs to change in the child
when a branch/tag is created (because it now lives in a different
place). Of course it would be able to find its parent (as long as
it's in the local repository).
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 12:04 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
<je...@wickettraining.com> wrote:
> I don't think it would if you defined it like this in each child... right?
>
> <parent> * * <groupId>*org.apache.wicket*</groupId>
> * * <artifactId>*wicket-parent*</artifactId>
> * * <version>*1.4-SNAPSHOT*</version>
> * * </parent>
>
> Because it doesn't have a relative path, Maven just looks up the parent pom
> like it looks up any other dependency. If you had a relative path, like
> wicket does to its parent pom, then it would mess up.
>
> --
> Jeremy Thomerson
> http://www.wickettraining.com
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 10:59 AM, James Carman
> <ja...@carmanconsulting.com>wrote:
>
>> The problem is that the entire tree isn't copied over together, so the
>> SCM links get messed up when you do that.
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 11:57 AM, Jeremy Thomerson
>> <je...@wickettraining.com> wrote:
>> > Tough to be sure - we could experiment.
>> >
>> > On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 10:50 AM, James Carman
>> > <ja...@carmanconsulting.com>wrote:
>> >
>> >> When you create a tag/branch of the child, the SCM setup wouldn't
>> >> inherit correctly, though. Right?
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Martijn Dashorst
>> >> <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > Could you structure the parent pom such that it sets up all child poms
>> >> > correctly? Then it is just a matter of inheriting from the parent pom
>> >> > for all projects.
>> >> >
>> >> > Martijn
>> >> >
>> >> > On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 5:21 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
>> >> > <je...@wickettraining.com> wrote:
>> >> >> Devs,
>> >> >> In response to the problems with TeamCity and Sourceforge, I
>> installed
>> >> a
>> >> >> Continuum instance on my server last night. I added Wicket and
>> several
>> >> >> Wicket Stuff projects. It seems to be running fine, except that most
>> >> >> projects are missing the SCM tag from their POM, or have it
>> incorrectly
>> >> >> configured.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I don't mind going in and fixing or adding the SCM tag on all of the
>> >> >> projects that are currently on TeamCity and setting them up on this
>> >> >> Continuum server. But since those aren't my projects, I wanted to
>> run
>> >> it
>> >> >> past the group first. What do you think? We could do this and let
>> it
>> >> run
>> >> >> for a while as a test.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> http://www.wickettraining.com/continuum
>> >> >>
>> >> >> --
>> >> >> Jeremy Thomerson
>> >> >> http://www.wickettraining.com
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best:
>> http://wicketinaction.com
>> >> > Apache Wicket 1.3.4 is released
>> >> > Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Jeremy Thomerson
>> > http://www.wickettraining.com
>> >
>>
>
Re: Continuum Build Server Set Up
Posted by Jeremy Thomerson <je...@wickettraining.com>.
I don't think it would if you defined it like this in each child... right?
<parent> * * <groupId>*org.apache.wicket*</groupId>
* * <artifactId>*wicket-parent*</artifactId>
* * <version>*1.4-SNAPSHOT*</version>
* * </parent>
Because it doesn't have a relative path, Maven just looks up the parent pom
like it looks up any other dependency. If you had a relative path, like
wicket does to its parent pom, then it would mess up.
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 10:59 AM, James Carman
<ja...@carmanconsulting.com>wrote:
> The problem is that the entire tree isn't copied over together, so the
> SCM links get messed up when you do that.
>
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 11:57 AM, Jeremy Thomerson
> <je...@wickettraining.com> wrote:
> > Tough to be sure - we could experiment.
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 10:50 AM, James Carman
> > <ja...@carmanconsulting.com>wrote:
> >
> >> When you create a tag/branch of the child, the SCM setup wouldn't
> >> inherit correctly, though. Right?
> >>
> >> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Martijn Dashorst
> >> <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > Could you structure the parent pom such that it sets up all child poms
> >> > correctly? Then it is just a matter of inheriting from the parent pom
> >> > for all projects.
> >> >
> >> > Martijn
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 5:21 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
> >> > <je...@wickettraining.com> wrote:
> >> >> Devs,
> >> >> In response to the problems with TeamCity and Sourceforge, I
> installed
> >> a
> >> >> Continuum instance on my server last night. I added Wicket and
> several
> >> >> Wicket Stuff projects. It seems to be running fine, except that most
> >> >> projects are missing the SCM tag from their POM, or have it
> incorrectly
> >> >> configured.
> >> >>
> >> >> I don't mind going in and fixing or adding the SCM tag on all of the
> >> >> projects that are currently on TeamCity and setting them up on this
> >> >> Continuum server. But since those aren't my projects, I wanted to
> run
> >> it
> >> >> past the group first. What do you think? We could do this and let
> it
> >> run
> >> >> for a while as a test.
> >> >>
> >> >> http://www.wickettraining.com/continuum
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >> Jeremy Thomerson
> >> >> http://www.wickettraining.com
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best:
> http://wicketinaction.com
> >> > Apache Wicket 1.3.4 is released
> >> > Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Jeremy Thomerson
> > http://www.wickettraining.com
> >
>
Re: Continuum Build Server Set Up
Posted by James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com>.
The problem is that the entire tree isn't copied over together, so the
SCM links get messed up when you do that.
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 11:57 AM, Jeremy Thomerson
<je...@wickettraining.com> wrote:
> Tough to be sure - we could experiment.
>
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 10:50 AM, James Carman
> <ja...@carmanconsulting.com>wrote:
>
>> When you create a tag/branch of the child, the SCM setup wouldn't
>> inherit correctly, though. Right?
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Martijn Dashorst
>> <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Could you structure the parent pom such that it sets up all child poms
>> > correctly? Then it is just a matter of inheriting from the parent pom
>> > for all projects.
>> >
>> > Martijn
>> >
>> > On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 5:21 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
>> > <je...@wickettraining.com> wrote:
>> >> Devs,
>> >> In response to the problems with TeamCity and Sourceforge, I installed
>> a
>> >> Continuum instance on my server last night. I added Wicket and several
>> >> Wicket Stuff projects. It seems to be running fine, except that most
>> >> projects are missing the SCM tag from their POM, or have it incorrectly
>> >> configured.
>> >>
>> >> I don't mind going in and fixing or adding the SCM tag on all of the
>> >> projects that are currently on TeamCity and setting them up on this
>> >> Continuum server. But since those aren't my projects, I wanted to run
>> it
>> >> past the group first. What do you think? We could do this and let it
>> run
>> >> for a while as a test.
>> >>
>> >> http://www.wickettraining.com/continuum
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Jeremy Thomerson
>> >> http://www.wickettraining.com
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
>> > Apache Wicket 1.3.4 is released
>> > Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Jeremy Thomerson
> http://www.wickettraining.com
>
Re: Continuum Build Server Set Up
Posted by Jeremy Thomerson <je...@wickettraining.com>.
Tough to be sure - we could experiment.
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 10:50 AM, James Carman
<ja...@carmanconsulting.com>wrote:
> When you create a tag/branch of the child, the SCM setup wouldn't
> inherit correctly, though. Right?
>
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Martijn Dashorst
> <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Could you structure the parent pom such that it sets up all child poms
> > correctly? Then it is just a matter of inheriting from the parent pom
> > for all projects.
> >
> > Martijn
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 5:21 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
> > <je...@wickettraining.com> wrote:
> >> Devs,
> >> In response to the problems with TeamCity and Sourceforge, I installed
> a
> >> Continuum instance on my server last night. I added Wicket and several
> >> Wicket Stuff projects. It seems to be running fine, except that most
> >> projects are missing the SCM tag from their POM, or have it incorrectly
> >> configured.
> >>
> >> I don't mind going in and fixing or adding the SCM tag on all of the
> >> projects that are currently on TeamCity and setting them up on this
> >> Continuum server. But since those aren't my projects, I wanted to run
> it
> >> past the group first. What do you think? We could do this and let it
> run
> >> for a while as a test.
> >>
> >> http://www.wickettraining.com/continuum
> >>
> >> --
> >> Jeremy Thomerson
> >> http://www.wickettraining.com
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
> > Apache Wicket 1.3.4 is released
> > Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.
> >
>
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
Re: Continuum Build Server Set Up
Posted by James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com>.
When you create a tag/branch of the child, the SCM setup wouldn't
inherit correctly, though. Right?
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Martijn Dashorst
<ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Could you structure the parent pom such that it sets up all child poms
> correctly? Then it is just a matter of inheriting from the parent pom
> for all projects.
>
> Martijn
>
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 5:21 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
> <je...@wickettraining.com> wrote:
>> Devs,
>> In response to the problems with TeamCity and Sourceforge, I installed a
>> Continuum instance on my server last night. I added Wicket and several
>> Wicket Stuff projects. It seems to be running fine, except that most
>> projects are missing the SCM tag from their POM, or have it incorrectly
>> configured.
>>
>> I don't mind going in and fixing or adding the SCM tag on all of the
>> projects that are currently on TeamCity and setting them up on this
>> Continuum server. But since those aren't my projects, I wanted to run it
>> past the group first. What do you think? We could do this and let it run
>> for a while as a test.
>>
>> http://www.wickettraining.com/continuum
>>
>> --
>> Jeremy Thomerson
>> http://www.wickettraining.com
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
> Apache Wicket 1.3.4 is released
> Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.
>
Re: Continuum Build Server Set Up
Posted by Jeremy Thomerson <je...@wickettraining.com>.
Yes - and I think that's the best thing to do. To make this work, I would
do this:
- Create a pom.xml in wicketstuff trunk that sets up the SCM correctly
and relies on wicket 1.4-SNAPSHOT
- Delete the wicket-parent folder under trunk because it's not really
needed if we do this
- Each project then needs the pom changed to show that the parent of the
project is wicketstuff-parent (the pom I created in trunk)
- We can also remove the SCM config in each child pom because it will be
set up correctly in the parent. Other things could also probably be deleted
later - but that's not the goal of this, so we can wait on that.
Please review and let me know if you approve. If several of the core
committers are okay with this, I'll go ahead and do it.
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 10:44 AM, Martijn Dashorst <
martijn.dashorst@gmail.com> wrote:
> Could you structure the parent pom such that it sets up all child poms
> correctly? Then it is just a matter of inheriting from the parent pom
> for all projects.
>
> Martijn
>
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 5:21 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
> <je...@wickettraining.com> wrote:
> > Devs,
> > In response to the problems with TeamCity and Sourceforge, I installed a
> > Continuum instance on my server last night. I added Wicket and several
> > Wicket Stuff projects. It seems to be running fine, except that most
> > projects are missing the SCM tag from their POM, or have it incorrectly
> > configured.
> >
> > I don't mind going in and fixing or adding the SCM tag on all of the
> > projects that are currently on TeamCity and setting them up on this
> > Continuum server. But since those aren't my projects, I wanted to run it
> > past the group first. What do you think? We could do this and let it
> run
> > for a while as a test.
> >
> > http://www.wickettraining.com/continuum
> >
> > --
> > Jeremy Thomerson
> > http://www.wickettraining.com
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
> Apache Wicket 1.3.4 is released
> Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.
>
Re: Continuum Build Server Set Up
Posted by Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com>.
Could you structure the parent pom such that it sets up all child poms
correctly? Then it is just a matter of inheriting from the parent pom
for all projects.
Martijn
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 5:21 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
<je...@wickettraining.com> wrote:
> Devs,
> In response to the problems with TeamCity and Sourceforge, I installed a
> Continuum instance on my server last night. I added Wicket and several
> Wicket Stuff projects. It seems to be running fine, except that most
> projects are missing the SCM tag from their POM, or have it incorrectly
> configured.
>
> I don't mind going in and fixing or adding the SCM tag on all of the
> projects that are currently on TeamCity and setting them up on this
> Continuum server. But since those aren't my projects, I wanted to run it
> past the group first. What do you think? We could do this and let it run
> for a while as a test.
>
> http://www.wickettraining.com/continuum
>
> --
> Jeremy Thomerson
> http://www.wickettraining.com
>
--
Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
Apache Wicket 1.3.4 is released
Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.
Re: Continuum Build Server Set Up
Posted by Jeremy Thomerson <je...@wickettraining.com>.
So it seems to be running well. The only failure is on one project that has
compile errors.
What are the next steps? I don't mind running this on my server, but I
assume we need to set it up to export snapshot builds to maven repos, etc.
I am not familiar with what the TC setup was before. I don't know who owns
the server that wicketstuff.org is on, but I guess the other option is to
replace TC with Continuum on there.
What does everyone think?
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 10:21 AM, Jeremy Thomerson <
jeremy@wickettraining.com> wrote:
> Devs,
> In response to the problems with TeamCity and Sourceforge, I installed a
> Continuum instance on my server last night. I added Wicket and several
> Wicket Stuff projects. It seems to be running fine, except that most
> projects are missing the SCM tag from their POM, or have it incorrectly
> configured.
>
> I don't mind going in and fixing or adding the SCM tag on all of the
> projects that are currently on TeamCity and setting them up on this
> Continuum server. But since those aren't my projects, I wanted to run it
> past the group first. What do you think? We could do this and let it run
> for a while as a test.
>
> http://www.wickettraining.com/continuum
>
> --
> Jeremy Thomerson
> http://www.wickettraining.com
>