[jira] [Commented] (JCRVLT-403) Clarify usage of package type "application" for overlays

["Konrad Windszus (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-403?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17020973#comment-17020973 ] 

Konrad Windszus commented on JCRVLT-403:
----------------------------------------

[~tripod] What is your idea for the described use case?

> Clarify usage of package type "application" for overlays
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JCRVLT-403
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-403
>             Project: Jackrabbit FileVault
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Konrad Windszus
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 3.4.4
>
>
> According to JCRVLT-170 it is not allowed to use {{includes}} or {{excludes}} below a filter rule for {{application}} packages. This is a pretty common pattern though for including overlays in an apps package to enforce creating the ancestor nodes with the right type.
> See also https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-170?focusedCommentId=17016199&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-17016199
> The use case of two different apps packages providing overlays below the same ancestor node should be supported (with both apps packages not knowing anything about each other) and still ensuring that the right node type is being created for ancestors.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)