You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to mirrors@apache.org by Joshua Slive <jo...@slive.ca> on 2003/01/19 17:26:34 UTC
Re: Tagged and Rolled 2.0.44
Just as an interesting data point based on the new 2.0.44 release being
put in the dist directory last evening:
Of our 159 mirrors, 125 have picked up the release over-night.
Perhaps we should make nightly updates a requirement rather than a
recommendation?
Joshua.
Re: Tagged and Rolled 2.0.44
Posted by Dirk-Willem van Gulik <di...@webweaving.org>.
> it would be even better if there was the ability for the apache.org
> mirroring system to do a "push signal" as a number of other archives
> now do (e.g gnome) via ssh. though maybe not for 159 mirrors if you think
> the overhead would be too much (i do) but this comes back to dividing up
> mirrors into "tier1" and "tier2" and then making a push signalling sync
> via ssh mandatory for a tier1.
Perhaps easier to temporarily take a mirror out of the redirect loop
automatically.
Dw
Re: Tagged and Rolled 2.0.44
Posted by Dirk-Willem van Gulik <di...@webweaving.org>.
> it would be even better if there was the ability for the apache.org
> mirroring system to do a "push signal" as a number of other archives
> now do (e.g gnome) via ssh. though maybe not for 159 mirrors if you think
> the overhead would be too much (i do) but this comes back to dividing up
> mirrors into "tier1" and "tier2" and then making a push signalling sync
> via ssh mandatory for a tier1.
Perhaps easier to temporarily take a mirror out of the redirect loop
automatically.
Dw
Re: Tagged and Rolled 2.0.44
Posted by jason andrade <ja...@rtfmconsult.com>.
On Sun, 19 Jan 2003, Joshua Slive wrote:
> Just as an interesting data point based on the new 2.0.44 release being
> put in the dist directory last evening:
>
> Of our 159 mirrors, 125 have picked up the release over-night.
>
> Perhaps we should make nightly updates a requirement rather than a
> recommendation?
it would be even better if there was the ability for the apache.org
mirroring system to do a "push signal" as a number of other archives
now do (e.g gnome) via ssh. though maybe not for 159 mirrors if you think
the overhead would be too much (i do) but this comes back to dividing up
mirrors into "tier1" and "tier2" and then making a push signalling sync
via ssh mandatory for a tier1.
my $0.02 and merely a suggestion..
regards,
-jason
Re: Tagged and Rolled 2.0.44
Posted by jason andrade <ja...@rtfmconsult.com>.
On Sun, 19 Jan 2003, Joshua Slive wrote:
> Just as an interesting data point based on the new 2.0.44 release being
> put in the dist directory last evening:
>
> Of our 159 mirrors, 125 have picked up the release over-night.
>
> Perhaps we should make nightly updates a requirement rather than a
> recommendation?
it would be even better if there was the ability for the apache.org
mirroring system to do a "push signal" as a number of other archives
now do (e.g gnome) via ssh. though maybe not for 159 mirrors if you think
the overhead would be too much (i do) but this comes back to dividing up
mirrors into "tier1" and "tier2" and then making a push signalling sync
via ssh mandatory for a tier1.
my $0.02 and merely a suggestion..
regards,
-jason
Re: Tagged and Rolled 2.0.44
Posted by Pieter De Wit <pi...@vodacom.co.za>.
I am happy with this.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joshua Slive" <jo...@slive.ca>
To: <de...@httpd.apache.org>
Cc: <in...@apache.org>; <mi...@apache.org>
Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2003 6:26 PM
Subject: Re: Tagged and Rolled 2.0.44
> Just as an interesting data point based on the new 2.0.44 release being
> put in the dist directory last evening:
>
> Of our 159 mirrors, 125 have picked up the release over-night.
>
> Perhaps we should make nightly updates a requirement rather than a
> recommendation?
>
> Joshua.
>
Re: Tagged and Rolled 2.0.44
Posted by Dirk-Willem van Gulik <di...@webweaving.org>.
Or perhaps make a little plot; and see at what point somethign like 95%
has copied it across.
DW.
On Sun, 19 Jan 2003, Joshua Slive wrote:
> Just as an interesting data point based on the new 2.0.44 release being
> put in the dist directory last evening:
>
> Of our 159 mirrors, 125 have picked up the release over-night.
>
> Perhaps we should make nightly updates a requirement rather than a
> recommendation?
>
> Joshua.
>
Re: Tagged and Rolled 2.0.44
Posted by Dirk-Willem van Gulik <di...@webweaving.org>.
Or perhaps make a little plot; and see at what point somethign like 95%
has copied it across.
DW.
On Sun, 19 Jan 2003, Joshua Slive wrote:
> Just as an interesting data point based on the new 2.0.44 release being
> put in the dist directory last evening:
>
> Of our 159 mirrors, 125 have picked up the release over-night.
>
> Perhaps we should make nightly updates a requirement rather than a
> recommendation?
>
> Joshua.
>