You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@cloudstack.apache.org by Valdinei Rodrigues dos Reis <ne...@unesp.br> on 2015/03/27 16:55:25 UTC
Non-RFC1918 Guest Network
Hi there.
My company has a policy anti-NAT, so I need to allocate public prefix for use in my guest network.
The problem is that Cloudstack 4.3 does not allow a non-RFC1918 prefix in zone creation.
What am i doing wrong? Or is a CS "feature"?
Thanks in advance and best regards.
Valdinei Rodrigues
nei@unesp.br
(11)5627-0467
Re: Non-RFC1918 Guest Network
Posted by Valdinei Rodrigues dos Reis <ne...@unesp.br>.
Hi Nux.
Thank you.
I will try it and give a feedback later.
Best regards.
Valdinei Rodrigues
nei@unesp.br
(11)5627-0467
----- Mensagem original -----
De: "Nux!" <nu...@li.nux.ro>
Para: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Enviadas: Sexta-feira, 27 de março de 2015 13:41:14
Assunto: Re: Non-RFC1918 Guest Network
Hello,
Then you could use a Basic zone or an Advanced Zone with Security Groups; though there are some limitations to them (no VPN/LB/multiple networks/etc).
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Valdinei Rodrigues dos Reis" <ne...@unesp.br>
> To: "users cloudstack" <us...@cloudstack.apache.org>
> Sent: Friday, 27 March, 2015 15:55:25
> Subject: Non-RFC1918 Guest Network
> Hi there.
>
> My company has a policy anti-NAT, so I need to allocate public prefix for use in
> my guest network.
>
> The problem is that Cloudstack 4.3 does not allow a non-RFC1918 prefix in zone
> creation.
>
> What am i doing wrong? Or is a CS "feature"?
>
> Thanks in advance and best regards.
>
>
> Valdinei Rodrigues
> nei@unesp.br
> (11)5627-0467
Re: Non-RFC1918 Guest Network
Posted by Nux! <nu...@li.nux.ro>.
Hello,
Then you could use a Basic zone or an Advanced Zone with Security Groups; though there are some limitations to them (no VPN/LB/multiple networks/etc).
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Valdinei Rodrigues dos Reis" <ne...@unesp.br>
> To: "users cloudstack" <us...@cloudstack.apache.org>
> Sent: Friday, 27 March, 2015 15:55:25
> Subject: Non-RFC1918 Guest Network
> Hi there.
>
> My company has a policy anti-NAT, so I need to allocate public prefix for use in
> my guest network.
>
> The problem is that Cloudstack 4.3 does not allow a non-RFC1918 prefix in zone
> creation.
>
> What am i doing wrong? Or is a CS "feature"?
>
> Thanks in advance and best regards.
>
>
> Valdinei Rodrigues
> nei@unesp.br
> (11)5627-0467
Re: Non-RFC1918 Guest Network
Posted by Valdinei Rodrigues dos Reis <ne...@unesp.br>.
Hi Erik.
So, We think that isn't a good idea users creating their networks. Only admin will create networks.
Thanks.
Valdinei Rodrigues
nei@unesp.br
(11)5627-0467
----- Mensagem original -----
De: "Erik Weber" <te...@gmail.com>
Para: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Enviadas: Sexta-feira, 27 de março de 2015 14:07:10
Assunto: Re: Non-RFC1918 Guest Network
Are you going to rely on users being able to make new networks, or will
they be created by an admin?
In the latter case you could just enter anything valid and use shared
networks.
Erik
Den fredag 27. mars 2015 skrev Valdinei Rodrigues dos Reis <ne...@unesp.br>
følgende:
> Hi there.
>
> My company has a policy anti-NAT, so I need to allocate public prefix for
> use in my guest network.
>
> The problem is that Cloudstack 4.3 does not allow a non-RFC1918 prefix in
> zone creation.
>
> What am i doing wrong? Or is a CS "feature"?
>
> Thanks in advance and best regards.
>
>
> Valdinei Rodrigues
> nei@unesp.br <javascript:;>
> (11)5627-0467
>
>
>
Re: Non-RFC1918 Guest Network
Posted by Erik Weber <te...@gmail.com>.
Are you going to rely on users being able to make new networks, or will
they be created by an admin?
In the latter case you could just enter anything valid and use shared
networks.
Erik
Den fredag 27. mars 2015 skrev Valdinei Rodrigues dos Reis <ne...@unesp.br>
følgende:
> Hi there.
>
> My company has a policy anti-NAT, so I need to allocate public prefix for
> use in my guest network.
>
> The problem is that Cloudstack 4.3 does not allow a non-RFC1918 prefix in
> zone creation.
>
> What am i doing wrong? Or is a CS "feature"?
>
> Thanks in advance and best regards.
>
>
> Valdinei Rodrigues
> nei@unesp.br <javascript:;>
> (11)5627-0467
>
>
>
Re: Non-RFC1918 Guest Network
Posted by Sanjeev N <sa...@apache.org>.
Do you want to use the same Public CIDR for both public and guest traffic?
If yes, it is not allowed.
On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 9:43 PM, Sam Ceylani <sa...@mistercertified.com>
wrote:
> I tried to create a shared network with Public IPs and on that web form
> only "Guest" xenserver network label is available. Our Public network is
> Is on "Public" label, is there a workaround for this problem, I checked
> api solution but I couldn’t resolve it, ty
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sanjeev N [mailto:sanjeev@apache.org]
> Sent: Sunday, March 29, 2015 2:47 AM
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Non-RFC1918 Guest Network
>
> The expectation is that in advanced zone we will be using private CIDRs.
> That's why it is not allowing. If you don't want to use NAT you can create
> shared network with your CIDR and deploy VMS in it On Mar 27, 2015 9:25 PM,
> "Valdinei Rodrigues dos Reis" <ne...@unesp.br> wrote:
>
> > Hi there.
> >
> > My company has a policy anti-NAT, so I need to allocate public prefix
> > for use in my guest network.
> >
> > The problem is that Cloudstack 4.3 does not allow a non-RFC1918 prefix
> > in zone creation.
> >
> > What am i doing wrong? Or is a CS "feature"?
> >
> > Thanks in advance and best regards.
> >
> >
> > Valdinei Rodrigues
> > nei@unesp.br
> > (11)5627-0467
> >
> >
> >
>
RE: Non-RFC1918 Guest Network
Posted by Sam Ceylani <sa...@mistercertified.com>.
I tried to create a shared network with Public IPs and on that web form only "Guest" xenserver network label is available. Our Public network is
Is on "Public" label, is there a workaround for this problem, I checked api solution but I couldn’t resolve it, ty
-----Original Message-----
From: Sanjeev N [mailto:sanjeev@apache.org]
Sent: Sunday, March 29, 2015 2:47 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Non-RFC1918 Guest Network
The expectation is that in advanced zone we will be using private CIDRs.
That's why it is not allowing. If you don't want to use NAT you can create shared network with your CIDR and deploy VMS in it On Mar 27, 2015 9:25 PM, "Valdinei Rodrigues dos Reis" <ne...@unesp.br> wrote:
> Hi there.
>
> My company has a policy anti-NAT, so I need to allocate public prefix
> for use in my guest network.
>
> The problem is that Cloudstack 4.3 does not allow a non-RFC1918 prefix
> in zone creation.
>
> What am i doing wrong? Or is a CS "feature"?
>
> Thanks in advance and best regards.
>
>
> Valdinei Rodrigues
> nei@unesp.br
> (11)5627-0467
>
>
>
Re: Non-RFC1918 Guest Network
Posted by Sanjeev N <sa...@apache.org>.
The expectation is that in advanced zone we will be using private CIDRs.
That's why it is not allowing. If you don't want to use NAT you can create
shared network with your CIDR and deploy VMS in it
On Mar 27, 2015 9:25 PM, "Valdinei Rodrigues dos Reis" <ne...@unesp.br> wrote:
> Hi there.
>
> My company has a policy anti-NAT, so I need to allocate public prefix for
> use in my guest network.
>
> The problem is that Cloudstack 4.3 does not allow a non-RFC1918 prefix in
> zone creation.
>
> What am i doing wrong? Or is a CS "feature"?
>
> Thanks in advance and best regards.
>
>
> Valdinei Rodrigues
> nei@unesp.br
> (11)5627-0467
>
>
>