You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@openwebbeans.apache.org by Lars-Fredrik Smedberg <it...@gmail.com> on 2014/12/29 16:25:56 UTC
Scope of class containing non-static @Produces methods
Hi
Might have touched this question before but in that case I cannot find the
answer.
I'm wondering what the scope of a class containing non-static @Produces
methods are if not explicitly specified? @RequestScoped?
Does the scope of the class containing the @Produces method in any way
affect the scope of the bean being produced?
Any references to the CDI spec would be great to
Regards
Lars-Fredrik
--
Med vänlig hälsning / Best regards
Lars-Fredrik Smedberg
STATEMENT OF CONFIDENTIALITY:
The information contained in this electronic message and any
attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the
address(es) and may contain confidential or privileged information. If
you are not the intended recipient, please notify Lars-Fredrik Smedberg
immediately at itsmeden@gmail.com, and destroy all copies of this
message and any attachments.
Re: Scope of class containing non-static @Produces methods
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
Not AFAIK, which one are you thinking about?
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-12-29 18:21 GMT+01:00 Lars-Fredrik Smedberg <it...@gmail.com>:
> @Romain
>
> Are there any limitations on having a @RequestScoped producer bean that also
> @Observes CDI events (and that way each instance will only receive events
> posted on the same thread)?
>
> Regards
> LF
>
> On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 6:17 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> yes (for all)
>>
>>
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> @rmannibucau
>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>
>>
>> 2014-12-29 18:15 GMT+01:00 Lars-Fredrik Smedberg <it...@gmail.com>:
>> > Hi Romain
>> >
>> > So @Dependent as the default scope for the producer does that mean that
>> > a
>> > seperate instance of the producer class (the class containing the
>> > non-static
>> > @Producer method) will be create for each produced value?
>> >
>> > If I for example annotate the producer class @ApplicationScoped and let
>> > it
>> > contain a @Produces method without a scope annotation the produced value
>> > will still be @Dependent right?
>> >
>> > Regards
>> > LF
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 4:28 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
>> > <rm...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi
>> >>
>> >> default scope is @Dependent producer and produced value.
>> >>
>> >> Does it affects? depends. basically the produced value will be
>> >> produced using the contextual producer instance this means if you have
>> >> some state the produced value depends on then it will change the
>> >> produced value otherwise it will not change anything excepted it will
>> >> create one producer instance by "produce" invocation.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> >> @rmannibucau
>> >> http://www.tomitribe.com
>> >> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>> >> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> 2014-12-29 16:25 GMT+01:00 Lars-Fredrik Smedberg <it...@gmail.com>:
>> >> > Hi
>> >> >
>> >> > Might have touched this question before but in that case I cannot
>> >> > find
>> >> > the
>> >> > answer.
>> >> >
>> >> > I'm wondering what the scope of a class containing non-static
>> >> > @Produces
>> >> > methods are if not explicitly specified? @RequestScoped?
>> >> > Does the scope of the class containing the @Produces method in any
>> >> > way
>> >> > affect the scope of the bean being produced?
>> >> >
>> >> > Any references to the CDI spec would be great to
>> >> >
>> >> > Regards
>> >> > Lars-Fredrik
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > Med vänlig hälsning / Best regards
>> >> >
>> >> > Lars-Fredrik Smedberg
>> >> >
>> >> > STATEMENT OF CONFIDENTIALITY:
>> >> > The information contained in this electronic message and any
>> >> > attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the
>> >> > address(es) and may contain confidential or privileged information.
>> >> > If
>> >> > you are not the intended recipient, please notify Lars-Fredrik
>> >> > Smedberg
>> >> > immediately at itsmeden@gmail.com, and destroy all copies of this
>> >> > message and any attachments.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Med vänlig hälsning / Best regards
>> >
>> > Lars-Fredrik Smedberg
>> >
>> > STATEMENT OF CONFIDENTIALITY:
>> > The information contained in this electronic message and any
>> > attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the
>> > address(es) and may contain confidential or privileged information. If
>> > you are not the intended recipient, please notify Lars-Fredrik Smedberg
>> > immediately at itsmeden@gmail.com, and destroy all copies of this
>> > message and any attachments.
>
>
>
>
> --
> Med vänlig hälsning / Best regards
>
> Lars-Fredrik Smedberg
>
> STATEMENT OF CONFIDENTIALITY:
> The information contained in this electronic message and any
> attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the
> address(es) and may contain confidential or privileged information. If
> you are not the intended recipient, please notify Lars-Fredrik Smedberg
> immediately at itsmeden@gmail.com, and destroy all copies of this
> message and any attachments.
Re: Scope of class containing non-static @Produces methods
Posted by Lars-Fredrik Smedberg <it...@gmail.com>.
@Romain
Are there any limitations on having a @RequestScoped producer bean that
also @Observes CDI events (and that way each instance will only receive
events posted on the same thread)?
Regards
LF
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 6:17 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> yes (for all)
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau
> http://www.tomitribe.com
> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>
>
> 2014-12-29 18:15 GMT+01:00 Lars-Fredrik Smedberg <it...@gmail.com>:
> > Hi Romain
> >
> > So @Dependent as the default scope for the producer does that mean that a
> > seperate instance of the producer class (the class containing the
> non-static
> > @Producer method) will be create for each produced value?
> >
> > If I for example annotate the producer class @ApplicationScoped and let
> it
> > contain a @Produces method without a scope annotation the produced value
> > will still be @Dependent right?
> >
> > Regards
> > LF
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 4:28 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> rmannibucau@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> default scope is @Dependent producer and produced value.
> >>
> >> Does it affects? depends. basically the produced value will be
> >> produced using the contextual producer instance this means if you have
> >> some state the produced value depends on then it will change the
> >> produced value otherwise it will not change anything excepted it will
> >> create one producer instance by "produce" invocation.
> >>
> >>
> >> Romain Manni-Bucau
> >> @rmannibucau
> >> http://www.tomitribe.com
> >> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
> >> https://github.com/rmannibucau
> >>
> >>
> >> 2014-12-29 16:25 GMT+01:00 Lars-Fredrik Smedberg <it...@gmail.com>:
> >> > Hi
> >> >
> >> > Might have touched this question before but in that case I cannot find
> >> > the
> >> > answer.
> >> >
> >> > I'm wondering what the scope of a class containing non-static
> @Produces
> >> > methods are if not explicitly specified? @RequestScoped?
> >> > Does the scope of the class containing the @Produces method in any way
> >> > affect the scope of the bean being produced?
> >> >
> >> > Any references to the CDI spec would be great to
> >> >
> >> > Regards
> >> > Lars-Fredrik
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Med vänlig hälsning / Best regards
> >> >
> >> > Lars-Fredrik Smedberg
> >> >
> >> > STATEMENT OF CONFIDENTIALITY:
> >> > The information contained in this electronic message and any
> >> > attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the
> >> > address(es) and may contain confidential or privileged information. If
> >> > you are not the intended recipient, please notify Lars-Fredrik
> Smedberg
> >> > immediately at itsmeden@gmail.com, and destroy all copies of this
> >> > message and any attachments.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Med vänlig hälsning / Best regards
> >
> > Lars-Fredrik Smedberg
> >
> > STATEMENT OF CONFIDENTIALITY:
> > The information contained in this electronic message and any
> > attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the
> > address(es) and may contain confidential or privileged information. If
> > you are not the intended recipient, please notify Lars-Fredrik Smedberg
> > immediately at itsmeden@gmail.com, and destroy all copies of this
> > message and any attachments.
>
--
Med vänlig hälsning / Best regards
Lars-Fredrik Smedberg
STATEMENT OF CONFIDENTIALITY:
The information contained in this electronic message and any
attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the
address(es) and may contain confidential or privileged information. If
you are not the intended recipient, please notify Lars-Fredrik Smedberg
immediately at itsmeden@gmail.com, and destroy all copies of this
message and any attachments.
Re: Scope of class containing non-static @Produces methods
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
http://docs.jboss.org/cdi/spec/1.2/cdi-spec.html#default_scope
http://docs.jboss.org/cdi/spec/1.2/cdi-spec.html#producer_method etc I
guess
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-12-29 18:19 GMT+01:00 Lars-Fredrik Smedberg <it...@gmail.com>:
> Thanks Romain, btw do you have a pointer into the CDI spec where I can read
> more?
>
> Regards
> LF
>
> On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 6:17 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> yes (for all)
>>
>>
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> @rmannibucau
>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>
>>
>> 2014-12-29 18:15 GMT+01:00 Lars-Fredrik Smedberg <it...@gmail.com>:
>> > Hi Romain
>> >
>> > So @Dependent as the default scope for the producer does that mean that
>> > a
>> > seperate instance of the producer class (the class containing the
>> > non-static
>> > @Producer method) will be create for each produced value?
>> >
>> > If I for example annotate the producer class @ApplicationScoped and let
>> > it
>> > contain a @Produces method without a scope annotation the produced value
>> > will still be @Dependent right?
>> >
>> > Regards
>> > LF
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 4:28 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
>> > <rm...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi
>> >>
>> >> default scope is @Dependent producer and produced value.
>> >>
>> >> Does it affects? depends. basically the produced value will be
>> >> produced using the contextual producer instance this means if you have
>> >> some state the produced value depends on then it will change the
>> >> produced value otherwise it will not change anything excepted it will
>> >> create one producer instance by "produce" invocation.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> >> @rmannibucau
>> >> http://www.tomitribe.com
>> >> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>> >> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> 2014-12-29 16:25 GMT+01:00 Lars-Fredrik Smedberg <it...@gmail.com>:
>> >> > Hi
>> >> >
>> >> > Might have touched this question before but in that case I cannot
>> >> > find
>> >> > the
>> >> > answer.
>> >> >
>> >> > I'm wondering what the scope of a class containing non-static
>> >> > @Produces
>> >> > methods are if not explicitly specified? @RequestScoped?
>> >> > Does the scope of the class containing the @Produces method in any
>> >> > way
>> >> > affect the scope of the bean being produced?
>> >> >
>> >> > Any references to the CDI spec would be great to
>> >> >
>> >> > Regards
>> >> > Lars-Fredrik
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > Med vänlig hälsning / Best regards
>> >> >
>> >> > Lars-Fredrik Smedberg
>> >> >
>> >> > STATEMENT OF CONFIDENTIALITY:
>> >> > The information contained in this electronic message and any
>> >> > attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the
>> >> > address(es) and may contain confidential or privileged information.
>> >> > If
>> >> > you are not the intended recipient, please notify Lars-Fredrik
>> >> > Smedberg
>> >> > immediately at itsmeden@gmail.com, and destroy all copies of this
>> >> > message and any attachments.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Med vänlig hälsning / Best regards
>> >
>> > Lars-Fredrik Smedberg
>> >
>> > STATEMENT OF CONFIDENTIALITY:
>> > The information contained in this electronic message and any
>> > attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the
>> > address(es) and may contain confidential or privileged information. If
>> > you are not the intended recipient, please notify Lars-Fredrik Smedberg
>> > immediately at itsmeden@gmail.com, and destroy all copies of this
>> > message and any attachments.
>
>
>
>
> --
> Med vänlig hälsning / Best regards
>
> Lars-Fredrik Smedberg
>
> STATEMENT OF CONFIDENTIALITY:
> The information contained in this electronic message and any
> attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the
> address(es) and may contain confidential or privileged information. If
> you are not the intended recipient, please notify Lars-Fredrik Smedberg
> immediately at itsmeden@gmail.com, and destroy all copies of this
> message and any attachments.
Re: Scope of class containing non-static @Produces methods
Posted by Lars-Fredrik Smedberg <it...@gmail.com>.
Thanks Romain, btw do you have a pointer into the CDI spec where I can read
more?
Regards
LF
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 6:17 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> yes (for all)
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau
> http://www.tomitribe.com
> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>
>
> 2014-12-29 18:15 GMT+01:00 Lars-Fredrik Smedberg <it...@gmail.com>:
> > Hi Romain
> >
> > So @Dependent as the default scope for the producer does that mean that a
> > seperate instance of the producer class (the class containing the
> non-static
> > @Producer method) will be create for each produced value?
> >
> > If I for example annotate the producer class @ApplicationScoped and let
> it
> > contain a @Produces method without a scope annotation the produced value
> > will still be @Dependent right?
> >
> > Regards
> > LF
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 4:28 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> rmannibucau@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> default scope is @Dependent producer and produced value.
> >>
> >> Does it affects? depends. basically the produced value will be
> >> produced using the contextual producer instance this means if you have
> >> some state the produced value depends on then it will change the
> >> produced value otherwise it will not change anything excepted it will
> >> create one producer instance by "produce" invocation.
> >>
> >>
> >> Romain Manni-Bucau
> >> @rmannibucau
> >> http://www.tomitribe.com
> >> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
> >> https://github.com/rmannibucau
> >>
> >>
> >> 2014-12-29 16:25 GMT+01:00 Lars-Fredrik Smedberg <it...@gmail.com>:
> >> > Hi
> >> >
> >> > Might have touched this question before but in that case I cannot find
> >> > the
> >> > answer.
> >> >
> >> > I'm wondering what the scope of a class containing non-static
> @Produces
> >> > methods are if not explicitly specified? @RequestScoped?
> >> > Does the scope of the class containing the @Produces method in any way
> >> > affect the scope of the bean being produced?
> >> >
> >> > Any references to the CDI spec would be great to
> >> >
> >> > Regards
> >> > Lars-Fredrik
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Med vänlig hälsning / Best regards
> >> >
> >> > Lars-Fredrik Smedberg
> >> >
> >> > STATEMENT OF CONFIDENTIALITY:
> >> > The information contained in this electronic message and any
> >> > attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the
> >> > address(es) and may contain confidential or privileged information. If
> >> > you are not the intended recipient, please notify Lars-Fredrik
> Smedberg
> >> > immediately at itsmeden@gmail.com, and destroy all copies of this
> >> > message and any attachments.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Med vänlig hälsning / Best regards
> >
> > Lars-Fredrik Smedberg
> >
> > STATEMENT OF CONFIDENTIALITY:
> > The information contained in this electronic message and any
> > attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the
> > address(es) and may contain confidential or privileged information. If
> > you are not the intended recipient, please notify Lars-Fredrik Smedberg
> > immediately at itsmeden@gmail.com, and destroy all copies of this
> > message and any attachments.
>
--
Med vänlig hälsning / Best regards
Lars-Fredrik Smedberg
STATEMENT OF CONFIDENTIALITY:
The information contained in this electronic message and any
attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the
address(es) and may contain confidential or privileged information. If
you are not the intended recipient, please notify Lars-Fredrik Smedberg
immediately at itsmeden@gmail.com, and destroy all copies of this
message and any attachments.
Re: Scope of class containing non-static @Produces methods
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
yes (for all)
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-12-29 18:15 GMT+01:00 Lars-Fredrik Smedberg <it...@gmail.com>:
> Hi Romain
>
> So @Dependent as the default scope for the producer does that mean that a
> seperate instance of the producer class (the class containing the non-static
> @Producer method) will be create for each produced value?
>
> If I for example annotate the producer class @ApplicationScoped and let it
> contain a @Produces method without a scope annotation the produced value
> will still be @Dependent right?
>
> Regards
> LF
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 4:28 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> default scope is @Dependent producer and produced value.
>>
>> Does it affects? depends. basically the produced value will be
>> produced using the contextual producer instance this means if you have
>> some state the produced value depends on then it will change the
>> produced value otherwise it will not change anything excepted it will
>> create one producer instance by "produce" invocation.
>>
>>
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> @rmannibucau
>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>
>>
>> 2014-12-29 16:25 GMT+01:00 Lars-Fredrik Smedberg <it...@gmail.com>:
>> > Hi
>> >
>> > Might have touched this question before but in that case I cannot find
>> > the
>> > answer.
>> >
>> > I'm wondering what the scope of a class containing non-static @Produces
>> > methods are if not explicitly specified? @RequestScoped?
>> > Does the scope of the class containing the @Produces method in any way
>> > affect the scope of the bean being produced?
>> >
>> > Any references to the CDI spec would be great to
>> >
>> > Regards
>> > Lars-Fredrik
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Med vänlig hälsning / Best regards
>> >
>> > Lars-Fredrik Smedberg
>> >
>> > STATEMENT OF CONFIDENTIALITY:
>> > The information contained in this electronic message and any
>> > attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the
>> > address(es) and may contain confidential or privileged information. If
>> > you are not the intended recipient, please notify Lars-Fredrik Smedberg
>> > immediately at itsmeden@gmail.com, and destroy all copies of this
>> > message and any attachments.
>
>
>
>
> --
> Med vänlig hälsning / Best regards
>
> Lars-Fredrik Smedberg
>
> STATEMENT OF CONFIDENTIALITY:
> The information contained in this electronic message and any
> attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the
> address(es) and may contain confidential or privileged information. If
> you are not the intended recipient, please notify Lars-Fredrik Smedberg
> immediately at itsmeden@gmail.com, and destroy all copies of this
> message and any attachments.
Re: Scope of class containing non-static @Produces methods
Posted by Lars-Fredrik Smedberg <it...@gmail.com>.
Hi Romain
So @Dependent as the default scope for the producer does that mean that a
seperate instance of the producer class (the class containing the
non-static @Producer method) will be create for each produced value?
If I for example annotate the producer class @ApplicationScoped and let it
contain a @Produces method without a scope annotation the produced value
will still be @Dependent right?
Regards
LF
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 4:28 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi
>
> default scope is @Dependent producer and produced value.
>
> Does it affects? depends. basically the produced value will be
> produced using the contextual producer instance this means if you have
> some state the produced value depends on then it will change the
> produced value otherwise it will not change anything excepted it will
> create one producer instance by "produce" invocation.
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau
> http://www.tomitribe.com
> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>
>
> 2014-12-29 16:25 GMT+01:00 Lars-Fredrik Smedberg <it...@gmail.com>:
> > Hi
> >
> > Might have touched this question before but in that case I cannot find
> the
> > answer.
> >
> > I'm wondering what the scope of a class containing non-static @Produces
> > methods are if not explicitly specified? @RequestScoped?
> > Does the scope of the class containing the @Produces method in any way
> > affect the scope of the bean being produced?
> >
> > Any references to the CDI spec would be great to
> >
> > Regards
> > Lars-Fredrik
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Med vänlig hälsning / Best regards
> >
> > Lars-Fredrik Smedberg
> >
> > STATEMENT OF CONFIDENTIALITY:
> > The information contained in this electronic message and any
> > attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the
> > address(es) and may contain confidential or privileged information. If
> > you are not the intended recipient, please notify Lars-Fredrik Smedberg
> > immediately at itsmeden@gmail.com, and destroy all copies of this
> > message and any attachments.
>
--
Med vänlig hälsning / Best regards
Lars-Fredrik Smedberg
STATEMENT OF CONFIDENTIALITY:
The information contained in this electronic message and any
attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the
address(es) and may contain confidential or privileged information. If
you are not the intended recipient, please notify Lars-Fredrik Smedberg
immediately at itsmeden@gmail.com, and destroy all copies of this
message and any attachments.
Re: Scope of class containing non-static @Produces methods
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
Hi
default scope is @Dependent producer and produced value.
Does it affects? depends. basically the produced value will be
produced using the contextual producer instance this means if you have
some state the produced value depends on then it will change the
produced value otherwise it will not change anything excepted it will
create one producer instance by "produce" invocation.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-12-29 16:25 GMT+01:00 Lars-Fredrik Smedberg <it...@gmail.com>:
> Hi
>
> Might have touched this question before but in that case I cannot find the
> answer.
>
> I'm wondering what the scope of a class containing non-static @Produces
> methods are if not explicitly specified? @RequestScoped?
> Does the scope of the class containing the @Produces method in any way
> affect the scope of the bean being produced?
>
> Any references to the CDI spec would be great to
>
> Regards
> Lars-Fredrik
>
>
>
> --
> Med vänlig hälsning / Best regards
>
> Lars-Fredrik Smedberg
>
> STATEMENT OF CONFIDENTIALITY:
> The information contained in this electronic message and any
> attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the
> address(es) and may contain confidential or privileged information. If
> you are not the intended recipient, please notify Lars-Fredrik Smedberg
> immediately at itsmeden@gmail.com, and destroy all copies of this
> message and any attachments.