You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to java-user@lucene.apache.org by Mark Miller <ma...@gmail.com> on 2009/06/10 21:54:08 UTC
Lucene 2.9 Release
>
>So... how about we try to wrap up 2.9/3.0 and ship with what we have,
>now? It's been 8 months since 2.4.0 was released, and 2.9's got plenty
>of new stuff, and we are all itching to remove these deprecated APIs,
>switch to Java 1.5, etc.
>
>We should try to finish the issues that are open and underway... but I
>think many of the issues marked 2.9 now, especially those not even
>started, should not in fact block 2.9.
>
>Mike
We would all, I think, like Lucene 2.9 to release soon.
Unfortunately, there are 56 open issues assigned to 2.9. They won't all
likely make it.
We have got to start pruning down the list.
If you are not going to be able to get to / finish an issue in a very
near time frame, could you help us all out and move the issue to 3.0?
Trying to finish any issues that are close would also be great
obviously, but as a beginning, if we could just get a better handle (eg
less issues to consider)
on what we have to finish off, that would be great.
I'm going to go though a bit and see if their are any obvious candidates
to push off soon.
I suppose, if there is something that you really want to be sure is in
2.9, and its not likely to be finished shortly, you should probably
speak up too.
--
- Mark
http://www.lucidimagination.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: Lucene 2.9 Release
Posted by Michael McCandless <lu...@mikemccandless.com>.
Also, conversely, if you know of important issues that should be fixed
for 2.9, please go and check that the "Fix Version" in Jira is in fact
set to 2.9...
Mike
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 8:41 AM, Mark Miller<ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Okay, its only been a short time and we have already whittled the list down
> from 56 to 42. I think we have covered most of the easy calls. If you know
> an issue your involved in won't likely be done soon, please help us out and
> take off the version or push it to 3.1.
>
> Next time I go through, I'm going to concentrate on pushing back on those
> issues that have yet to find an assignee. Please assign yourself if you plan
> on fishing an unassigned issue off for 2.9.
>
> Ill wait a few days at least.
>
> - Mark
>
>
> Mark Miller wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> So... how about we try to wrap up 2.9/3.0 and ship with what we have,
>>> now? It's been 8 months since 2.4.0 was released, and 2.9's got plenty
>>> of new stuff, and we are all itching to remove these deprecated APIs,
>>> switch to Java 1.5, etc.
>>>
>>> We should try to finish the issues that are open and underway... but I
>>> think many of the issues marked 2.9 now, especially those not even
>>> started, should not in fact block 2.9.
>>>
>>> Mike
>>
>>
>>
>> We would all, I think, like Lucene 2.9 to release soon.
>>
>> Unfortunately, there are 56 open issues assigned to 2.9. They won't all
>> likely make it.
>>
>> We have got to start pruning down the list.
>>
>> If you are not going to be able to get to / finish an issue in a very near
>> time frame, could you help us all out and move the issue to 3.0?
>>
>> Trying to finish any issues that are close would also be great obviously,
>> but as a beginning, if we could just get a better handle (eg less issues to
>> consider)
>> on what we have to finish off, that would be great.
>>
>> I'm going to go though a bit and see if their are any obvious candidates
>> to push off soon.
>>
>> I suppose, if there is something that you really want to be sure is in
>> 2.9, and its not likely to be finished shortly, you should probably speak up
>> too.
>>
>
>
> --
> - Mark
>
> http://www.lucidimagination.com
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: Lucene 2.9 Release
Posted by Mark Miller <ma...@gmail.com>.
Okay, its only been a short time and we have already whittled the list
down from 56 to 42. I think we have covered most of the easy calls. If
you know an issue your involved in won't likely be done soon, please
help us out and take off the version or push it to 3.1.
Next time I go through, I'm going to concentrate on pushing back on
those issues that have yet to find an assignee. Please assign yourself
if you plan on fishing an unassigned issue off for 2.9.
Ill wait a few days at least.
- Mark
Mark Miller wrote:
>
>>
>> So... how about we try to wrap up 2.9/3.0 and ship with what we have,
>> now? It's been 8 months since 2.4.0 was released, and 2.9's got plenty
>> of new stuff, and we are all itching to remove these deprecated APIs,
>> switch to Java 1.5, etc.
>>
>> We should try to finish the issues that are open and underway... but I
>> think many of the issues marked 2.9 now, especially those not even
>> started, should not in fact block 2.9.
>>
>> Mike
>
>
>
> We would all, I think, like Lucene 2.9 to release soon.
>
> Unfortunately, there are 56 open issues assigned to 2.9. They won't
> all likely make it.
>
> We have got to start pruning down the list.
>
> If you are not going to be able to get to / finish an issue in a very
> near time frame, could you help us all out and move the issue to 3.0?
>
> Trying to finish any issues that are close would also be great
> obviously, but as a beginning, if we could just get a better handle
> (eg less issues to consider)
> on what we have to finish off, that would be great.
>
> I'm going to go though a bit and see if their are any obvious
> candidates to push off soon.
>
> I suppose, if there is something that you really want to be sure is in
> 2.9, and its not likely to be finished shortly, you should probably
> speak up too.
>
--
- Mark
http://www.lucidimagination.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org