You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to pluto-dev@portals.apache.org by Elliot Metsger <em...@jhu.edu> on 2005/06/11 01:30:30 UTC
PLUTO-38
Hey all,
Could you take a look at http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PLUTO-38?
Even though PLUTO-38 is postponed until 1.1 i'm wondering if we could
get this patch included in 1.0.1-rc3? Should I open a new issue for -rc3?
Also, I could take the time to see if I can apply it against the
1.1-ALPHA code.
Thanks for taking a look,
Elliot
Re: PLUTO-38
Posted by "David H. DeWolf" <dd...@apache.org>.
No worries, I can't say that I do to a 'T' either. I'm an IntelliJ user
so I can't say that I have many config files for Eclipse. Perhaps
someone else will chime in with their config.
David
Elliot Metsger wrote:
> David,
>
> While the code isn't ugly I didn't follow
> http://portals.apache.org/development/code-standards.html to the letter
> (or is it byte?). If you want I can redo it to those coding standards.
>
> Do you or anyone have an eclipse config file to share which would
> configure the proper settings?
>
> Elliot
>
> Elliot Metsger wrote:
>
>> heheh no problem :) I just submitted the patch this evening; i'm not
>> convinced it solves the entire issue but it is a step.
>>
>> Thanks -
>> Elliot
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> David H. DeWolf wrote:
>>
>>> I've got a pretty packed weekend but will try to take a look at it
>>> early next week if no one beats me to it. Things on my end have been
>>> rather slow for the past couple of months due to a new job, but I
>>> think I'm starting to have some cycles again. . . sorry for the delay.
>>>
>>> David
>>>
>>> Elliot Metsger wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hey all,
>>>>
>>>> Could you take a look at http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PLUTO-38?
>>>>
>>>> Even though PLUTO-38 is postponed until 1.1 i'm wondering if we
>>>> could get this patch included in 1.0.1-rc3? Should I open a new
>>>> issue for -rc3?
>>>>
>>>> Also, I could take the time to see if I can apply it against the
>>>> 1.1-ALPHA code.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for taking a look,
>>>> Elliot
>>>>
>
Re: PLUTO-38
Posted by Elliot Metsger <em...@jhu.edu>.
David,
While the code isn't ugly I didn't follow
http://portals.apache.org/development/code-standards.html to the letter
(or is it byte?). If you want I can redo it to those coding standards.
Do you or anyone have an eclipse config file to share which would
configure the proper settings?
Elliot
Elliot Metsger wrote:
> heheh no problem :) I just submitted the patch this evening; i'm not
> convinced it solves the entire issue but it is a step.
>
> Thanks -
> Elliot
>
>
>
>
> David H. DeWolf wrote:
>
>> I've got a pretty packed weekend but will try to take a look at it
>> early next week if no one beats me to it. Things on my end have been
>> rather slow for the past couple of months due to a new job, but I
>> think I'm starting to have some cycles again. . . sorry for the delay.
>>
>> David
>>
>> Elliot Metsger wrote:
>>
>>> Hey all,
>>>
>>> Could you take a look at http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PLUTO-38?
>>>
>>> Even though PLUTO-38 is postponed until 1.1 i'm wondering if we could
>>> get this patch included in 1.0.1-rc3? Should I open a new issue for
>>> -rc3?
>>>
>>> Also, I could take the time to see if I can apply it against the
>>> 1.1-ALPHA code.
>>>
>>> Thanks for taking a look,
>>> Elliot
>>>
Re: PLUTO-38
Posted by Elliot Metsger <em...@jhu.edu>.
heheh no problem :) I just submitted the patch this evening; i'm not
convinced it solves the entire issue but it is a step.
Thanks -
Elliot
David H. DeWolf wrote:
> I've got a pretty packed weekend but will try to take a look at it early
> next week if no one beats me to it. Things on my end have been rather
> slow for the past couple of months due to a new job, but I think I'm
> starting to have some cycles again. . . sorry for the delay.
>
> David
>
> Elliot Metsger wrote:
>
>> Hey all,
>>
>> Could you take a look at http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PLUTO-38?
>>
>> Even though PLUTO-38 is postponed until 1.1 i'm wondering if we could
>> get this patch included in 1.0.1-rc3? Should I open a new issue for
>> -rc3?
>>
>> Also, I could take the time to see if I can apply it against the
>> 1.1-ALPHA code.
>>
>> Thanks for taking a look,
>> Elliot
>>
Re: PLUTO-38
Posted by "David H. DeWolf" <dd...@apache.org>.
I've got a pretty packed weekend but will try to take a look at it early
next week if no one beats me to it. Things on my end have been rather
slow for the past couple of months due to a new job, but I think I'm
starting to have some cycles again. . . sorry for the delay.
David
Elliot Metsger wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> Could you take a look at http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PLUTO-38?
>
> Even though PLUTO-38 is postponed until 1.1 i'm wondering if we could
> get this patch included in 1.0.1-rc3? Should I open a new issue for -rc3?
>
> Also, I could take the time to see if I can apply it against the
> 1.1-ALPHA code.
>
> Thanks for taking a look,
> Elliot
>