You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@pig.apache.org by Russell Jurney <ru...@gmail.com> on 2013/02/18 02:29:11 UTC
Pig 0.12 3 months after Pig 0.11?
Anyone up for doing a release 3-4 months after Pig 0.11, the way I think it
is 'supposed' to work? I want the new AvroStorage in my book, before it
comes out in print :)
--
Russell Jurney twitter.com/rjurney russell.jurney@gmail.com datasyndrome.com
Re: Pig 0.12 3 months after Pig 0.11?
Posted by Jonathan Coveney <jc...@gmail.com>.
I mean, I think everyone agrees in theory that more frequent releases is a
good thing...it's just a matter of getting effort behind that :) that said,
I think the first step is being a bit harsher on features that fall behind.
The biggest thing that drove back was "just one more feature, I'm almost
done." I am guilty of this :) That said, if we have more frequent releases
then that means it isn't as big of a deal if your patch slides into the
next release.
2013/2/18 Russell Jurney <ru...@gmail.com>
> This makes sense to me, and thank you for driving it. I am going to help
> doing docs and other things in little JIRAs.
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 6:22 PM, Cheolsoo Park <cheolsoo@cloudera.com
> >wrote:
>
> > I don't mind driving it if everyone agrees with the time frame.
> >
> > One thing that I want to clarify is that the new AvroStorage is not
> > backward compatible[1]. In addition, there are a couple of features that
> > the new AvroStorage is missing at the moment[2].
> >
> > So I was thinking that we keep the old AvroStorage in 0.12 and remove it
> at
> > a later release. In the meantime, we can port all the missing features
> and
> > encourage users to migrate to the new AvroStorage. Since the old and new
> > AvroStorages don't have the same namespace (i.e. the new one is built-in,
> > whereas the old one is in piggybank), I don't think that there will be
> > confusion. But please let me know if you disagree with me.
> >
> > [1]
> >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3015?focusedCommentId=13493550&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13493550
> > [2.1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-2875
> > [2.2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-2579
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 5:29 PM, Russell Jurney <
> russell.jurney@gmail.com
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > Anyone up for doing a release 3-4 months after Pig 0.11, the way I
> think
> > it
> > > is 'supposed' to work? I want the new AvroStorage in my book, before it
> > > comes out in print :)
> > >
> > > --
> > > Russell Jurney twitter.com/rjurney russell.jurney@gmail.com
> > > datasyndrome.com
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Russell Jurney twitter.com/rjurney russell.jurney@gmail.com
> datasyndrome.com
>
Re: Pig 0.12 3 months after Pig 0.11?
Posted by Russell Jurney <ru...@gmail.com>.
This makes sense to me, and thank you for driving it. I am going to help
doing docs and other things in little JIRAs.
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 6:22 PM, Cheolsoo Park <ch...@cloudera.com>wrote:
> I don't mind driving it if everyone agrees with the time frame.
>
> One thing that I want to clarify is that the new AvroStorage is not
> backward compatible[1]. In addition, there are a couple of features that
> the new AvroStorage is missing at the moment[2].
>
> So I was thinking that we keep the old AvroStorage in 0.12 and remove it at
> a later release. In the meantime, we can port all the missing features and
> encourage users to migrate to the new AvroStorage. Since the old and new
> AvroStorages don't have the same namespace (i.e. the new one is built-in,
> whereas the old one is in piggybank), I don't think that there will be
> confusion. But please let me know if you disagree with me.
>
> [1]
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3015?focusedCommentId=13493550&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13493550
> [2.1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-2875
> [2.2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-2579
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 5:29 PM, Russell Jurney <russell.jurney@gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > Anyone up for doing a release 3-4 months after Pig 0.11, the way I think
> it
> > is 'supposed' to work? I want the new AvroStorage in my book, before it
> > comes out in print :)
> >
> > --
> > Russell Jurney twitter.com/rjurney russell.jurney@gmail.com
> > datasyndrome.com
> >
>
--
Russell Jurney twitter.com/rjurney russell.jurney@gmail.com datasyndrome.com
Re: Pig 0.12 3 months after Pig 0.11?
Posted by Prashant Kommireddi <pr...@gmail.com>.
+1.
It would be great if we can have more frequent releases. Let me know
if I can help in anyway, would be glad to be involved in the process.
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 17, 2013, at 6:23 PM, Cheolsoo Park <ch...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> I don't mind driving it if everyone agrees with the time frame.
>
> One thing that I want to clarify is that the new AvroStorage is not
> backward compatible[1]. In addition, there are a couple of features that
> the new AvroStorage is missing at the moment[2].
>
> So I was thinking that we keep the old AvroStorage in 0.12 and remove it at
> a later release. In the meantime, we can port all the missing features and
> encourage users to migrate to the new AvroStorage. Since the old and new
> AvroStorages don't have the same namespace (i.e. the new one is built-in,
> whereas the old one is in piggybank), I don't think that there will be
> confusion. But please let me know if you disagree with me.
>
> [1]
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3015?focusedCommentId=13493550&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13493550
> [2.1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-2875
> [2.2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-2579
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 5:29 PM, Russell Jurney <ru...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Anyone up for doing a release 3-4 months after Pig 0.11, the way I think it
>> is 'supposed' to work? I want the new AvroStorage in my book, before it
>> comes out in print :)
>>
>> --
>> Russell Jurney twitter.com/rjurney russell.jurney@gmail.com
>> datasyndrome.com
>>
Re: Pig 0.12 3 months after Pig 0.11?
Posted by Cheolsoo Park <ch...@cloudera.com>.
I don't mind driving it if everyone agrees with the time frame.
One thing that I want to clarify is that the new AvroStorage is not
backward compatible[1]. In addition, there are a couple of features that
the new AvroStorage is missing at the moment[2].
So I was thinking that we keep the old AvroStorage in 0.12 and remove it at
a later release. In the meantime, we can port all the missing features and
encourage users to migrate to the new AvroStorage. Since the old and new
AvroStorages don't have the same namespace (i.e. the new one is built-in,
whereas the old one is in piggybank), I don't think that there will be
confusion. But please let me know if you disagree with me.
[1]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3015?focusedCommentId=13493550&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13493550
[2.1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-2875
[2.2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-2579
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 5:29 PM, Russell Jurney <ru...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Anyone up for doing a release 3-4 months after Pig 0.11, the way I think it
> is 'supposed' to work? I want the new AvroStorage in my book, before it
> comes out in print :)
>
> --
> Russell Jurney twitter.com/rjurney russell.jurney@gmail.com
> datasyndrome.com
>