You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@harmony.apache.org by Geir Magnusson Jr <ge...@pobox.com> on 2006/03/01 13:07:28 UTC
[VOTE] Accept HARMONY-57 : Contribution of unit test code for a number
of components
All paperwork has been received. I'll be getting that into SVN today,
but lets get the voting kicked off...
Please vote on acceptance of the donation of ontribution of unit test
code for a number of components :
[ ] +1 Accept
[ ] -1 Don't accept (provide reason)
Vote will run 3 days or until all committers have voted.
Re: [VOTE] Accept HARMONY-57 : Contribution of unit test code for
a number of components
Posted by karan malhi <ka...@gmail.com>.
+1
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
> All paperwork has been received. I'll be getting that into SVN today,
> but lets get the voting kicked off...
>
> Please vote on acceptance of the donation of ontribution of unit test
> code for a number of components :
>
> [ ] +1 Accept
> [ ] -1 Don't accept (provide reason)
>
> Vote will run 3 days or until all committers have voted.
>
>
--
Karan Singh
Re: [VOTE] Accept HARMONY-57 : Contribution of unit test code for a number of components
Posted by Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>.
+1
On 3/1/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <ge...@pobox.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
> > All paperwork has been received. I'll be getting that into SVN today,
> > but lets get the voting kicked off...
> >
> > Please vote on acceptance of the donation of ontribution of unit test
> > code for a number of components :
> >
> > [ ] +1 Accept
> > [ ] -1 Don't accept (provide reason)
> >
> > Vote will run 3 days or until all committers have voted.
> >
> >
>
--
Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
Re: [VOTE] Accept HARMONY-57 : Contribution of unit test code for
a number of components
Posted by Geir Magnusson Jr <ge...@pobox.com>.
+1
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
> All paperwork has been received. I'll be getting that into SVN today,
> but lets get the voting kicked off...
>
> Please vote on acceptance of the donation of ontribution of unit test
> code for a number of components :
>
> [ ] +1 Accept
> [ ] -1 Don't accept (provide reason)
>
> Vote will run 3 days or until all committers have voted.
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Accept HARMONY-57 : Contribution of unit test code for
a number of components
Posted by Geir Magnusson Jr <ge...@pobox.com>.
Leo Simons wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 09:50:02AM -0500, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
>> Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
>>> can I vote a "blank statement +1" that you can use to move code into SVN?
>> I think that if you would like to make a +1 blanket statement, then
>> we'll count that in the future.
>
> In my mind, in terms of "people that have reviewed what is going on and
> what is going into SVN and that the paperwork is ok", it doesn't count.
> No statement in that case is better.
>
>>> I mean, if we have the paperwork, let's move the code in, whether or not
>>> we end up releasing it will require another vote anyway.
>> However, for awareness, oversight and participation, I think we still
>> should be voting code in.
>
> +1. "I trust Geir got it right" is bad since it creates a dependency on Geir
> and moreover doesn't scale well (and scaling, we need...). However, changing
> to a commit-then-review mode might help, and might scale better.
I understand what you mean but I assume that the "lump" contributions
will stop as work effort converts to be entirely w/in the project. (And
no "Geir got it right" is the wrong way to go...)
Also, as a podling, post-start code contributions have been the subject
of recent Incubator PMC concern and scrutiny, so lets keep the oversight.
We have a 3 day timeout for these, so if someone missed the vote, it's
ok, we just ensure that there are no vetos and 3 +1s.
geir
Re: [VOTE] Accept HARMONY-57 : Contribution of unit test code for
a number of components
Posted by Stefano Mazzocchi <st...@apache.org>.
Leo Simons wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 09:50:02AM -0500, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
>> Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
>>> can I vote a "blank statement +1" that you can use to move code into SVN?
>> I think that if you would like to make a +1 blanket statement, then
>> we'll count that in the future.
>
> In my mind, in terms of "people that have reviewed what is going on and
> what is going into SVN and that the paperwork is ok", it doesn't count.
> No statement in that case is better.
>
>>> I mean, if we have the paperwork, let's move the code in, whether or not
>>> we end up releasing it will require another vote anyway.
>> However, for awareness, oversight and participation, I think we still
>> should be voting code in.
>
> +1. "I trust Geir got it right" is bad since it creates a dependency on Geir
> and moreover doesn't scale well (and scaling, we need...). However, changing
> to a commit-then-review mode might help, and might scale better.
That's my point. "review then commit" is silly, it doesn't work.
we are voting to put stuff in svn, not to get it out as rubberstamped.
if we were to vote about anything that goes in SVN, we wouldn't be able
to do crap.
I don't know about you, but I have no time to check for all those big
chunks of code that get inside the repo... the 'input' filter is only
legal and/or political, not technical, and I have no real oversight on
what Geir does when he says "paperwork is in". But then again, if we had
to challenge in court everyone of Geir's assertions, we would never do
anything.
Therefore my umbrella +1 to get stuff in SVN if the person doing the
paperwork it's a mentor of this project and says it's cool.
Getting stuff out is a different matter entirely.
--
Stefano.
Re: [VOTE] Accept HARMONY-57 : Contribution of unit test code for a number of components
Posted by Leo Simons <ma...@leosimons.com>.
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 09:50:02AM -0500, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
> Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
> >can I vote a "blank statement +1" that you can use to move code into SVN?
>
> I think that if you would like to make a +1 blanket statement, then
> we'll count that in the future.
In my mind, in terms of "people that have reviewed what is going on and
what is going into SVN and that the paperwork is ok", it doesn't count.
No statement in that case is better.
> >I mean, if we have the paperwork, let's move the code in, whether or not
> >we end up releasing it will require another vote anyway.
>
> However, for awareness, oversight and participation, I think we still
> should be voting code in.
+1. "I trust Geir got it right" is bad since it creates a dependency on Geir
and moreover doesn't scale well (and scaling, we need...). However, changing
to a commit-then-review mode might help, and might scale better.
LSD
Re: [VOTE] Accept HARMONY-57 : Contribution of unit test code for
a number of components
Posted by Geir Magnusson Jr <ge...@pobox.com>.
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
> Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
>> All paperwork has been received. I'll be getting that into SVN today,
>> but lets get the voting kicked off...
>>
>> Please vote on acceptance of the donation of ontribution of unit test
>> code for a number of components :
>>
>> [ ] +1 Accept
>> [ ] -1 Don't accept (provide reason)
>>
>> Vote will run 3 days or until all committers have voted.
>
> +1
>
> can I vote a "blank statement +1" that you can use to move code into SVN?
I think that if you would like to make a +1 blanket statement, then
we'll count that in the future.
>
> I mean, if we have the paperwork, let's move the code in, whether or not
> we end up releasing it will require another vote anyway.
>
However, for awareness, oversight and participation, I think we still
should be voting code in.
geir
Re: [VOTE] Accept HARMONY-57 : Contribution of unit test code for
a number of components
Posted by Stefano Mazzocchi <st...@apache.org>.
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
> All paperwork has been received. I'll be getting that into SVN today,
> but lets get the voting kicked off...
>
> Please vote on acceptance of the donation of ontribution of unit test
> code for a number of components :
>
> [ ] +1 Accept
> [ ] -1 Don't accept (provide reason)
>
> Vote will run 3 days or until all committers have voted.
+1
can I vote a "blank statement +1" that you can use to move code into SVN?
I mean, if we have the paperwork, let's move the code in, whether or not
we end up releasing it will require another vote anyway.
--
Stefano.
[RESULT] Re: [VOTE] Accept HARMONY-57 : Contribution of unit test
code for a number of components
Posted by Geir Magnusson Jr <ge...@pobox.com>.
+1 from geir, tim, richard, dims, stefano, karan, leo, nathan
no dissenting.
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
> All paperwork has been received. I'll be getting that into SVN today,
> but lets get the voting kicked off...
>
> Please vote on acceptance of the donation of ontribution of unit test
> code for a number of components :
>
> [ ] +1 Accept
> [ ] -1 Don't accept (provide reason)
>
> Vote will run 3 days or until all committers have voted.
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Accept HARMONY-57 : Contribution of unit test code for
a number of components
Posted by Richard Liang <ri...@gmail.com>.
+1
Richard Liang
China Software Development Lab, IBM
Tim Ellison wrote:
> +1
>
> Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
>
>> All paperwork has been received. I'll be getting that into SVN today,
>> but lets get the voting kicked off...
>>
>> Please vote on acceptance of the donation of ontribution of unit test
>> code for a number of components :
>>
>> [ ] +1 Accept
>> [ ] -1 Don't accept (provide reason)
>>
>> Vote will run 3 days or until all committers have voted.
>>
>>
>>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Accept HARMONY-57 : Contribution of unit test code for
a number of components
Posted by Tim Ellison <t....@gmail.com>.
+1
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
> All paperwork has been received. I'll be getting that into SVN today,
> but lets get the voting kicked off...
>
> Please vote on acceptance of the donation of ontribution of unit test
> code for a number of components :
>
> [ ] +1 Accept
> [ ] -1 Don't accept (provide reason)
>
> Vote will run 3 days or until all committers have voted.
>
>
--
Tim Ellison (t.p.ellison@gmail.com)
IBM Java technology centre, UK.
Re: [VOTE] Accept HARMONY-57 : Contribution of unit test code for
a number of components
Posted by Geir Magnusson Jr <ge...@pobox.com>.
if there's something interesting to discuss, can we get it out of the
vote thread? Please?
geir
George Harley wrote:
> Nathan Beyer wrote:
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: George Harley [mailto:george.c.harley@googlemail.com]
>>> Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 3:49 AM
>>> To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept HARMONY-57 : Contribution of unit test
>>> code for
>>> a number of components
>>>
>>> Nathan Beyer wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> What's the plan on putting this in SVN? Will this be its own project or
>>>>
>>> will
>>>
>>>> it be distributed to the various classlib modules? The reason I ask is
>>>>
>>> that
>>>
>>>> there are a number of common classes and base classes, which would make
>>>> splitting the tests up a bit more challenging.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Hi Nathan,
>>>
>>> The submitted zip was put together with the intention that the unit test
>>> code would be able to slot into the existing modules layout in SVN.
>>> There is a separate folder/project called "Harmony_Tests" (intended to
>>> live under enhanced/classlib/trunk) in which as many shared resources as
>>> possible were grouped. This would be the best location for any common or
>>> ancestor classes to reside. Could you give me an example of some of
>>> these common and base classes that you have identified among the
>>> modules' test code ?
>>>
>>> Since it isn't in SVN it is IMHO too early to be raising JIRA issues for
>>> any refactoring of this unit test code but it would be helpful to know
>>> about what kind of splitting you have in mind.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> George
>>> IBM UK
>>>
>>
>> [Nathan Beyer] Sorry, I didn't intend to sound like I was raising an
>> issue. Just curious
>> and jumping the gun a bit perhaps. I didn't quite understand the
>> separation
>> of the module tests and the "Harmony_Tests" support project while I was
>> browsing over the code.
>>
>>
>
> Hi Nathan,
>
> Hey, enough of the "sorry" please. I didn't mean to sound touchy about
> your comments - sorry if it came across that way. I was just interested
> in hearing about your findings. All comments and questions are welcome
> round these parts.
>
> Best regards,
> George
> IBM UK
>
>>>> Assuming this gets checked in, let the list know if you'd like some
>>>> assistance refactoring and/or whatever to get this in the appropriate
>>>>
>>> shape.
>>>
>>>> -Nathan
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Geir Magnusson Jr [mailto:geir@pobox.com]
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 6:07 AM
>>>> To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>> Subject: [VOTE] Accept HARMONY-57 : Contribution of unit test code
>>>> for a
>>>> number of components
>>>>
>>>> All paperwork has been received. I'll be getting that into SVN today,
>>>> but lets get the voting kicked off...
>>>>
>>>> Please vote on acceptance of the donation of ontribution of unit test
>>>> code for a number of components :
>>>>
>>>> [ ] +1 Accept
>>>> [ ] -1 Don't accept (provide reason)
>>>>
>>>> Vote will run 3 days or until all committers have voted.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Accept HARMONY-57 : Contribution of unit test code for
a number of components
Posted by George Harley <ge...@googlemail.com>.
Nathan Beyer wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: George Harley [mailto:george.c.harley@googlemail.com]
>> Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 3:49 AM
>> To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept HARMONY-57 : Contribution of unit test code for
>> a number of components
>>
>> Nathan Beyer wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> What's the plan on putting this in SVN? Will this be its own project or
>>>
>> will
>>
>>> it be distributed to the various classlib modules? The reason I ask is
>>>
>> that
>>
>>> there are a number of common classes and base classes, which would make
>>> splitting the tests up a bit more challenging.
>>>
>>>
>> Hi Nathan,
>>
>> The submitted zip was put together with the intention that the unit test
>> code would be able to slot into the existing modules layout in SVN.
>> There is a separate folder/project called "Harmony_Tests" (intended to
>> live under enhanced/classlib/trunk) in which as many shared resources as
>> possible were grouped. This would be the best location for any common or
>> ancestor classes to reside. Could you give me an example of some of
>> these common and base classes that you have identified among the
>> modules' test code ?
>>
>> Since it isn't in SVN it is IMHO too early to be raising JIRA issues for
>> any refactoring of this unit test code but it would be helpful to know
>> about what kind of splitting you have in mind.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> George
>> IBM UK
>>
>
> [Nathan Beyer]
> Sorry, I didn't intend to sound like I was raising an issue. Just curious
> and jumping the gun a bit perhaps. I didn't quite understand the separation
> of the module tests and the "Harmony_Tests" support project while I was
> browsing over the code.
>
>
Hi Nathan,
Hey, enough of the "sorry" please. I didn't mean to sound touchy about
your comments - sorry if it came across that way. I was just interested
in hearing about your findings. All comments and questions are welcome
round these parts.
Best regards,
George
IBM UK
>>> Assuming this gets checked in, let the list know if you'd like some
>>> assistance refactoring and/or whatever to get this in the appropriate
>>>
>> shape.
>>
>>> -Nathan
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Geir Magnusson Jr [mailto:geir@pobox.com]
>>> Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 6:07 AM
>>> To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>> Subject: [VOTE] Accept HARMONY-57 : Contribution of unit test code for a
>>> number of components
>>>
>>> All paperwork has been received. I'll be getting that into SVN today,
>>> but lets get the voting kicked off...
>>>
>>> Please vote on acceptance of the donation of ontribution of unit test
>>> code for a number of components :
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 Accept
>>> [ ] -1 Don't accept (provide reason)
>>>
>>> Vote will run 3 days or until all committers have voted.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
RE: [VOTE] Accept HARMONY-57 : Contribution of unit test code for a number of components
Posted by Nathan Beyer <nb...@kc.rr.com>.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: George Harley [mailto:george.c.harley@googlemail.com]
> Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 3:49 AM
> To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept HARMONY-57 : Contribution of unit test code for
> a number of components
>
> Nathan Beyer wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > What's the plan on putting this in SVN? Will this be its own project or
> will
> > it be distributed to the various classlib modules? The reason I ask is
> that
> > there are a number of common classes and base classes, which would make
> > splitting the tests up a bit more challenging.
> >
>
> Hi Nathan,
>
> The submitted zip was put together with the intention that the unit test
> code would be able to slot into the existing modules layout in SVN.
> There is a separate folder/project called "Harmony_Tests" (intended to
> live under enhanced/classlib/trunk) in which as many shared resources as
> possible were grouped. This would be the best location for any common or
> ancestor classes to reside. Could you give me an example of some of
> these common and base classes that you have identified among the
> modules' test code ?
>
> Since it isn't in SVN it is IMHO too early to be raising JIRA issues for
> any refactoring of this unit test code but it would be helpful to know
> about what kind of splitting you have in mind.
>
> Best regards,
> George
> IBM UK
[Nathan Beyer]
Sorry, I didn't intend to sound like I was raising an issue. Just curious
and jumping the gun a bit perhaps. I didn't quite understand the separation
of the module tests and the "Harmony_Tests" support project while I was
browsing over the code.
>
> > Assuming this gets checked in, let the list know if you'd like some
> > assistance refactoring and/or whatever to get this in the appropriate
> shape.
> >
> > -Nathan
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Geir Magnusson Jr [mailto:geir@pobox.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 6:07 AM
> > To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: [VOTE] Accept HARMONY-57 : Contribution of unit test code for a
> > number of components
> >
> > All paperwork has been received. I'll be getting that into SVN today,
> > but lets get the voting kicked off...
> >
> > Please vote on acceptance of the donation of ontribution of unit test
> > code for a number of components :
> >
> > [ ] +1 Accept
> > [ ] -1 Don't accept (provide reason)
> >
> > Vote will run 3 days or until all committers have voted.
> >
> >
> >
Re: [VOTE] Accept HARMONY-57 : Contribution of unit test code for
a number of components
Posted by George Harley <ge...@googlemail.com>.
Nathan Beyer wrote:
> +1
>
> What's the plan on putting this in SVN? Will this be its own project or will
> it be distributed to the various classlib modules? The reason I ask is that
> there are a number of common classes and base classes, which would make
> splitting the tests up a bit more challenging.
>
Hi Nathan,
The submitted zip was put together with the intention that the unit test
code would be able to slot into the existing modules layout in SVN.
There is a separate folder/project called "Harmony_Tests" (intended to
live under enhanced/classlib/trunk) in which as many shared resources as
possible were grouped. This would be the best location for any common or
ancestor classes to reside. Could you give me an example of some of
these common and base classes that you have identified among the
modules' test code ?
Since it isn't in SVN it is IMHO too early to be raising JIRA issues for
any refactoring of this unit test code but it would be helpful to know
about what kind of splitting you have in mind.
Best regards,
George
IBM UK
> Assuming this gets checked in, let the list know if you'd like some
> assistance refactoring and/or whatever to get this in the appropriate shape.
>
> -Nathan
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Geir Magnusson Jr [mailto:geir@pobox.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 6:07 AM
> To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] Accept HARMONY-57 : Contribution of unit test code for a
> number of components
>
> All paperwork has been received. I'll be getting that into SVN today,
> but lets get the voting kicked off...
>
> Please vote on acceptance of the donation of ontribution of unit test
> code for a number of components :
>
> [ ] +1 Accept
> [ ] -1 Don't accept (provide reason)
>
> Vote will run 3 days or until all committers have voted.
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Accept HARMONY-57 : Contribution of unit test code for
a number of components
Posted by Paulex Yang <pa...@gmail.com>.
George Harley wrote:
> Paulex Yang wrote:
>> Nathan,
>>
>> Seems currently in SVN, the test cases are distributed to the various
>> classlib modules. How about we create a project named as
>> common/base/whatever to contain the common/base/whatever
>> utilities/tests which are very frequently used by many modules?
>
> See <Harmony-Unit-Tests.zip extract dir>/Harmony/Harmony_Tests
Ah, that's exactly what I mean. Thx a lot.
>
>
> Best regards,
> George
> IBM UK
>
>>
>> Nathan Beyer wrote:
>>> +1
>>>
>>> What's the plan on putting this in SVN? Will this be its own project
>>> or will
>>> it be distributed to the various classlib modules? The reason I ask
>>> is that
>>> there are a number of common classes and base classes, which would make
>>> splitting the tests up a bit more challenging.
>>>
>>> Assuming this gets checked in, let the list know if you'd like some
>>> assistance refactoring and/or whatever to get this in the
>>> appropriate shape.
>>>
>>> -Nathan
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Geir Magnusson Jr [mailto:geir@pobox.com] Sent: Wednesday,
>>> March 01, 2006 6:07 AM
>>> To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>> Subject: [VOTE] Accept HARMONY-57 : Contribution of unit test code
>>> for a
>>> number of components
>>>
>>> All paperwork has been received. I'll be getting that into SVN
>>> today, but lets get the voting kicked off...
>>>
>>> Please vote on acceptance of the donation of ontribution of unit
>>> test code for a number of components :
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 Accept
>>> [ ] -1 Don't accept (provide reason)
>>>
>>> Vote will run 3 days or until all committers have voted.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
--
Paulex Yang
China Software Development Lab
IBM
Re: [VOTE] Accept HARMONY-57 : Contribution of unit test code for
a number of components
Posted by George Harley <ge...@googlemail.com>.
Paulex Yang wrote:
> Nathan,
>
> Seems currently in SVN, the test cases are distributed to the various
> classlib modules. How about we create a project named as
> common/base/whatever to contain the common/base/whatever
> utilities/tests which are very frequently used by many modules?
See <Harmony-Unit-Tests.zip extract dir>/Harmony/Harmony_Tests
Best regards,
George
IBM UK
>
> Nathan Beyer wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> What's the plan on putting this in SVN? Will this be its own project
>> or will
>> it be distributed to the various classlib modules? The reason I ask
>> is that
>> there are a number of common classes and base classes, which would make
>> splitting the tests up a bit more challenging.
>>
>> Assuming this gets checked in, let the list know if you'd like some
>> assistance refactoring and/or whatever to get this in the appropriate
>> shape.
>>
>> -Nathan
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Geir Magnusson Jr [mailto:geir@pobox.com] Sent: Wednesday,
>> March 01, 2006 6:07 AM
>> To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: [VOTE] Accept HARMONY-57 : Contribution of unit test code for a
>> number of components
>>
>> All paperwork has been received. I'll be getting that into SVN
>> today, but lets get the voting kicked off...
>>
>> Please vote on acceptance of the donation of ontribution of unit test
>> code for a number of components :
>>
>> [ ] +1 Accept
>> [ ] -1 Don't accept (provide reason)
>>
>> Vote will run 3 days or until all committers have voted.
>>
>>
>>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Accept HARMONY-57 : Contribution of unit test code for
a number of components
Posted by Paulex Yang <pa...@gmail.com>.
Nathan,
Seems currently in SVN, the test cases are distributed to the various
classlib modules. How about we create a project named as
common/base/whatever to contain the common/base/whatever utilities/tests
which are very frequently used by many modules?
Nathan Beyer wrote:
> +1
>
> What's the plan on putting this in SVN? Will this be its own project or will
> it be distributed to the various classlib modules? The reason I ask is that
> there are a number of common classes and base classes, which would make
> splitting the tests up a bit more challenging.
>
> Assuming this gets checked in, let the list know if you'd like some
> assistance refactoring and/or whatever to get this in the appropriate shape.
>
> -Nathan
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Geir Magnusson Jr [mailto:geir@pobox.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 6:07 AM
> To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] Accept HARMONY-57 : Contribution of unit test code for a
> number of components
>
> All paperwork has been received. I'll be getting that into SVN today,
> but lets get the voting kicked off...
>
> Please vote on acceptance of the donation of ontribution of unit test
> code for a number of components :
>
> [ ] +1 Accept
> [ ] -1 Don't accept (provide reason)
>
> Vote will run 3 days or until all committers have voted.
>
>
>
--
Paulex Yang
China Software Development Lab
IBM
RE: [VOTE] Accept HARMONY-57 : Contribution of unit test code for a number of components
Posted by Nathan Beyer <nb...@kc.rr.com>.
+1
What's the plan on putting this in SVN? Will this be its own project or will
it be distributed to the various classlib modules? The reason I ask is that
there are a number of common classes and base classes, which would make
splitting the tests up a bit more challenging.
Assuming this gets checked in, let the list know if you'd like some
assistance refactoring and/or whatever to get this in the appropriate shape.
-Nathan
-----Original Message-----
From: Geir Magnusson Jr [mailto:geir@pobox.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 6:07 AM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Accept HARMONY-57 : Contribution of unit test code for a
number of components
All paperwork has been received. I'll be getting that into SVN today,
but lets get the voting kicked off...
Please vote on acceptance of the donation of ontribution of unit test
code for a number of components :
[ ] +1 Accept
[ ] -1 Don't accept (provide reason)
Vote will run 3 days or until all committers have voted.