1.1b5 cgi-bin

["Roy T. Fielding" <fi...@liege.ICS.UCI.EDU>]

I don't like the way that the cgi-bin is being shipped with
two non-executable test scripts.  I would much rather have cgi-bin
shipped empty and include a cgi-src with the two non-executable
test scripts and a Makefile.  That would be consistent with user
expectations (I think).  Comments?

.....Roy

Re: 1.1b5 cgi-bin

[Brian Behlendorf <br...@organic.com>]

On Mon, 1 Jul 1996, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> I don't like the way that the cgi-bin is being shipped with
> two non-executable test scripts.  I would much rather have cgi-bin
> shipped empty and include a cgi-src with the two non-executable
> test scripts and a Makefile.  That would be consistent with user
> expectations (I think).  Comments?

Actually, I think the current way is intuitive, but asking those of us who
have been around web servers for as long as we have what "intuitive" means
to the non-initiated is kinda silly.  I'll ask around.

	Brian

--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--
brian@organic.com  www.apache.org  hyperreal.com  http://www.organic.com/JOBS