You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@subversion.apache.org by Karl Heinz Marbaise <kh...@gmx.de> on 2009/03/16 15:57:34 UTC
CHANGEs File for Subversion 1.6 - Questions - API Change
Hi,
i've found the following entry which indicated an merge to 1.6 branch....
Does this mean to have developer visible change entry ?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r35993 | hwright | 2009-02-19 17:05:23 +0100 (Thu, 19 Feb 2009) | 7 lines
Changed paths:
M /branches/1.6.x
M /branches/1.6.x/STATUS
M /branches/1.6.x/subversion/libsvn_fs_fs/tree.c
Merge r35950 from trunk:
* r35950
Make fsfs implementation of svn_fs_commit_txn adhere to API promises.
Votes:
+1: pburba, rhuijben, gstein
based on the associated log entry:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r35950 | pburba | 2009-02-18 03:38:45 +0100 (Wed, 18 Feb 2009) | 5 lines
Make fsfs implementation of svn_fs_commit_txn adhere to API promises.
* subversion/libsvn_fs_fs/tree.c
(svn_fs_fs__commit_txn): If the commit fails then the *NEW_REV argument
should be SVN_INVALID_REVNUM.
I would say yes ?
Kind regards
Karl Heinz Marbaise
--
SoftwareEntwicklung Beratung Schulung Tel.: +49 (0) 2405 / 415 893
Dipl.Ing.(FH) Karl Heinz Marbaise ICQ#: 135949029
Hauptstrasse 177 USt.IdNr: DE191347579
52146 Würselen http://www.soebes.de
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=1334068
Re: CHANGEs File for Subversion 1.6 - Questions - API Change
Posted by "Hyrum K. Wright" <hy...@mail.utexas.edu>.
On Mar 16, 2009, at 10:57 AM, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i've found the following entry which indicated an merge to 1.6
> branch....
> Does this mean to have developer visible change entry ?
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> r35993 | hwright | 2009-02-19 17:05:23 +0100 (Thu, 19 Feb 2009) | 7
> lines
> Changed paths:
> M /branches/1.6.x
> M /branches/1.6.x/STATUS
> M /branches/1.6.x/subversion/libsvn_fs_fs/tree.c
>
> Merge r35950 from trunk:
>
> * r35950
> Make fsfs implementation of svn_fs_commit_txn adhere to API
> promises.
> Votes:
> +1: pburba, rhuijben, gstein
>
> based on the associated log entry:
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> r35950 | pburba | 2009-02-18 03:38:45 +0100 (Wed, 18 Feb 2009) | 5
> lines
>
> Make fsfs implementation of svn_fs_commit_txn adhere to API promises.
>
> * subversion/libsvn_fs_fs/tree.c
> (svn_fs_fs__commit_txn): If the commit fails then the *NEW_REV
> argument
> should be SVN_INVALID_REVNUM.
>
> I would say yes ?
I would agree.
-Hyrum
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=1334079