1.2 build (Was: RFC: Release Plan 2.0)

[Jochen Wiedmann <jo...@gmail.com>]

On Apr 12, 2005 12:23 PM, David Griffiths <dg...@hursley.ibm.com> wrote:

> Hi, I don't know whether this has been reported as a bug or not, but
> with xmlrpc-1.2-b1 the README says all you have to do to build is just
> type "ant". If I do that I get:

In the context of the 2.0 release plan, I tend to ignore this issue.

Outside of this context, this is mainly a documentation fix, I suggest
that you post a patch, which may then be added to the 1.2 branch.

Jochen

-- 
Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend.
Inside of a dog, its too dark to read.
(Groucho Marx)

Re: 1.2 build (Was: RFC: Release Plan 2.0)

[Martín Ferrari <ma...@gmail.com>]

No patch needed, all that's needed is a new tarball with the last CVS
checkout of the branch.

On 4/12/05, Jochen Wiedmann <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Apr 12, 2005 1:14 PM, Holger Hoffstätte <ho...@wizards.de> wrote:
> 
> > Nope. The currently released source build is broken, no documentation
> > involved.
> 
> I must admit, that I have never even had a look at 1.2 and do not want
> to spend too much time with it. I suggest that you post patches,
> preferrably in Jira. Please be so kind and make sure the version
> number is right. If Andrew doesn't integrate them, I'll do it later.
> We can also publish a formal 1.2 release. However, I'll definitely
> spend less time for that than for 2.0.
> 
> Sorry,
> 
> Jochen
> 
> --
> Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend.
> Inside of a dog, its too dark to read.
> (Groucho Marx)
> 


-- 
Martín Ferrari

Re: 1.2 build (Was: RFC: Release Plan 2.0)

[Jochen Wiedmann <jo...@gmail.com>]

On Apr 12, 2005 1:14 PM, Holger Hoffstätte <ho...@wizards.de> wrote:

> Nope. The currently released source build is broken, no documentation
> involved.

I must admit, that I have never even had a look at 1.2 and do not want
to spend too much time with it. I suggest that you post patches,
preferrably in Jira. Please be so kind and make sure the version
number is right. If Andrew doesn't integrate them, I'll do it later.
We can also publish a formal 1.2 release. However, I'll definitely
spend less time for that than for 2.0.


Sorry,

Jochen


-- 
Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend.
Inside of a dog, its too dark to read.
(Groucho Marx)

Re: 1.2 build (Was: RFC: Release Plan 2.0)

[Holger Hoffstätte <ho...@wizards.de>]

Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
> On Apr 12, 2005 12:23 PM, David Griffiths <dg...@hursley.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
>>Hi, I don't know whether this has been reported as a bug or not, but
>>with xmlrpc-1.2-b1 the README says all you have to do to build is just
>>type "ant". If I do that I get:
> 
> In the context of the 2.0 release plan, I tend to ignore this issue.

That's certainly your prerogative.

> Outside of this context, this is mainly a documentation fix, I suggest

Nope. The currently released source build is broken, no documentation
involved.

> that you post a patch, which may then be added to the 1.2 branch.

According to VioewCVS the "1.2 branch" is already fixed - the build file
in the unreleased 1.2b_2_ is correct. The 1.2b_1_ src tarball is not -
it's missing the default.properties file and the build.xml references
build.properties which are not even there.

-h