You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@flink.apache.org by "ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2021/03/02 07:48:00 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (FLINK-21128) Rethink how Kubernetes interfaces with our docker image

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21128?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

ASF GitHub Bot updated FLINK-21128:
-----------------------------------
    Labels: pull-request-available  (was: )

> Rethink how Kubernetes interfaces with our docker image
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-21128
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21128
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Deployment / Kubernetes, Deployment / Scripts
>            Reporter: Chesnay Schepler
>            Assignee: Yang Wang
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>             Fix For: 1.13.0
>
>
> Our native Kubernetes integration assembles a {{java}} command that is passed to the docker-script, which first does some magical stuff to create the classpath
> {code}
> # Set the Flink related environments
> export _FLINK_HOME_DETERMINED=true
> . $FLINK_HOME/bin/config.sh
> export FLINK_CLASSPATH="`constructFlinkClassPath`:$INTERNAL_HADOOP_CLASSPATHS"
> {code}
> and then evaluates the given java command.
> This magical stuff is a bit problematic for a few reasons:
> 1) it is _only_ required for Kubernetes to work; it should not be executed in any other case
> 2) it appears to be required for running anything in Flink that is not part of the docker-entrypoint API (e.g., jobmanager) when it isn't.
> 3) it unnecessarily spreads kubernetes-specific logic across the flink and flink-docker repositories.
> A simple change would be to introduce dedicated Kubernetes scripts into the distribution, which for starters will just import {{config.sh}}, export FLINK_CLASSPATH and evaluate the given command.
> In the long-run it would be good if we would not create a java command but instead relied on the existing scripts which do exactly that already.
> As is stands we're duplicating code across the distribution and the Kubernetes module, which already caused troubles when we did the log4j2 migration.
> Ideally we find a way to reuse the existing code in the Kubernetes module for generating these commands in the existing scripts, e.g., by moving them to the BashJavaUtils.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)