You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by Blason rock <bl...@gmail.com> on 2013/04/25 21:09:27 UTC
PreRBL with spamassasdon
Hi folks,
Curious to know if i can implement prerbl with SA? What i mean is with SA
as soon as sombody connects on port 25 SA should check if the connected
host is part of any RBL and then process connection accordingly.
Re: PreRBL with spamassasdon
Posted by Benny Pedersen <me...@junc.eu>.
Blason rock skrev den 2013-04-25 21:09:
> Curious to know if i can implement prerbl with SA?
no this is impposible :)
> What i mean is with SA as soon as sombody connects on port 25 SA
> should check if
> the connected host is part of any RBL and then process connection
> accordingly.
if you dont tell more i can only guess that you dont use spamas-milter
?
--
senders that put my email into body content will deliver it to my own
trashcan, so if you like to get reply, dont do it
RE: PreRBL with spamassasdon
Posted by Quanah Gibson-Mount <qu...@zimbra.com>.
--On Thursday, April 25, 2013 11:19 PM +0200 Karsten Bräckelmann
<gu...@rudersport.de> wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-04-26 at 01:10 +0530, Blason rock wrote:
>> Yeah that was good source of information. Or rather let me rephrase
>> the question, if anyone has tried prerbl with zimbra? I m sure there
>> are usrers who might have implemented prerbl with postfix in zimbra,
>> are there any?
>
> Color me ignorant, but since Zimbra uses Postfix, what makes you believe
> you need a special Zimbra solution?
>
> Anyway, if you really dislike generic Postfix documentation, just try to
> google for "zimbra rbl" instead of "postfix rbl".
Yes, I don't really understand why this question is on the SA list at
all... I'd have suggested the Zimbra forums as a starting point.
<http://wiki.zimbra.com/wiki/Zimbra_MTA> covers RBLs.
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Sr. Member of Technical Staff
Zimbra, Inc
A Division of VMware, Inc.
--------------------
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
Re: PreRBL with spamassasdon
Posted by Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uh...@fantomas.sk>.
On 27.04.13 09:50, Blason rock wrote:
>Oh yeah. I rather should have posted my question in zimbra mailing list.
>But any way i found the answer; its pretty easy to integrate prerbl with
>postfix.
Yes, and it's not SA issue but the MTA's.
However, many users prefer only using SA and not any SMTP-time RBLs, because
of possible false positives.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. -- Benjamin Franklin, 1759
RE: PreRBL with spamassasdon
Posted by Blason rock <bl...@gmail.com>.
Oh yeah. I rather should have posted my question in zimbra mailing list.
But any way i found the answer; its pretty easy to integrate prerbl with
postfix.
On 27 Apr 2013 07:01, "Benny Pedersen" <me...@junc.eu> wrote:
> Karsten Bräckelmann skrev den 2013-04-25 23:19:
>
> Color me ignorant, but since Zimbra uses Postfix, what makes you believe
>> you need a special Zimbra solution?
>>
>
> is zimbra not just the webui for postfix ? :)
>
> > > Since a couple of years they have something thats called google. :)
>>>
>>
> this page could be blocked in dns ?
>
> just kidding :=)
>
> --
> senders that put my email into body content will deliver it to my own
> trashcan, so if you like to get reply, dont do it
>
RE: PreRBL with spamassasdon
Posted by Benny Pedersen <me...@junc.eu>.
Karsten Bräckelmann skrev den 2013-04-25 23:19:
> Color me ignorant, but since Zimbra uses Postfix, what makes you
> believe
> you need a special Zimbra solution?
is zimbra not just the webui for postfix ? :)
>> > > Since a couple of years they have something thats called google.
>> :)
this page could be blocked in dns ?
just kidding :=)
--
senders that put my email into body content will deliver it to my own
trashcan, so if you like to get reply, dont do it
RE: PreRBL with spamassasdon
Posted by Karsten Bräckelmann <gu...@rudersport.de>.
On Fri, 2013-04-26 at 01:10 +0530, Blason rock wrote:
> Yeah that was good source of information. Or rather let me rephrase
> the question, if anyone has tried prerbl with zimbra? I m sure there
> are usrers who might have implemented prerbl with postfix in zimbra,
> are there any?
Color me ignorant, but since Zimbra uses Postfix, what makes you believe
you need a special Zimbra solution?
Anyway, if you really dislike generic Postfix documentation, just try to
google for "zimbra rbl" instead of "postfix rbl".
> > > Since a couple of years they have something thats called google. :)
--
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu\0.@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
RE: PreRBL with spamassasdon
Posted by Benny Pedersen <me...@junc.eu>.
Blason rock skrev den 2013-04-25 21:40:
> Yeah that was good source of information. Or rather let me rephrase
> the question, if anyone has tried prerbl with zimbra?
asking on a diff maillist ?
if you need advice to spamassassin fell free to ask here, if you need
help with postfix, or zimbra ask on there maillists :)
> I m sure there are usrers who might have implemented prerbl with
> postfix in zimbra,
> are there any?
if you end doing ip test in mta stage, then you can disable dnseval
pluging in spamassassin, free up resources to be used in more memory to
other wasting things :)
--
senders that put my email into body content will deliver it to my own
trashcan, so if you like to get reply, dont do it
RE: PreRBL with spamassasdon
Posted by Blason rock <bl...@gmail.com>.
Yeah that was good source of information. Or rather let me rephrase the
question, if anyone has tried prerbl with zimbra? I m sure there are
usrers who might have implemented prerbl with postfix in zimbra, are there
any?
On 26 Apr 2013 01:00, "Tony Nelson" <tn...@starpoint.com> wrote:
> Recently there was a good thread about postscreen and rbl. I just
> updated my config and have seen a decent improvement.****
>
> ** **
>
> Here is the starter message:
> http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/postfix/2013-04/0468.html****
>
> ** **
>
> Hope this helps,****
>
> Tony****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Raymond Dijkxhoorn [mailto:raymond@prolocation.net]
> *Sent:* Thursday, April 25, 2013 3:26 PM
> *To:* Blason rock
> *Cc:* users@spamassassin.apache.org
> *Subject:* Re: PreRBL with spamassasdon****
>
> ** **
>
> Hai!****
>
> ** **
>
> Since a couple of years they have something thats called google. :)****
>
> ** **
>
> The first hit on 'rbl and postfix' gives:****
>
> ** **
>
>
> http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/postfix-spam-filtering-with-blacklists-howto.html
>
> Thanks,****
>
> Raymond Dijkxhoorn, Prolocation****
>
> ** **
>
> Op 25 apr. 2013 om 21:20 heeft Blason rock <bl...@gmail.com> het
> volgende geschreven:****
>
> So any clue or if anyone has done it with postfix?****
>
> On 26 Apr 2013 00:45, "Raymond Dijkxhoorn" <ra...@prolocation.net>
> wrote:****
>
> Hai!****
>
> ** **
>
> Grin.****
>
> ** **
>
> Your MTA most likely supports RBL's.****
>
>
> Thanks,****
>
> Raymond Dijkxhoorn, Prolocation****
>
> ** **
>
> Op 25 apr. 2013 om 21:09 heeft Blason rock <bl...@gmail.com> het
> volgende geschreven:****
>
> Hi folks,****
>
> Curious to know if i can implement prerbl with SA? What i mean is with SA
> as soon as sombody connects on port 25 SA should check if the connected
> host is part of any RBL and then process connection accordingly.****
>
>
> ------------------------------
> Since 1982, Starpoint Solutions has been a trusted source of human capital
> and solutions. We are committed to our clients, employees, environment,
> community and social concerns. We foster an inclusive culture based on
> trust, respect, honesty and solid performance. Learn more about Starpoint
> and our social responsibility at
> http://www.starpoint.com/social_responsibility
>
> ------------------------------
> This email message from Starpoint Solutions LLC is for the sole use of the
> intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged
> information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is
> prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the
> sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
> Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not
> relate to the official business of Starpoint Solutions shall be understood
> as neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
RE: PreRBL with spamassasdon
Posted by Tony Nelson <tn...@starpoint.com>.
Recently there was a good thread about postscreen and rbl. I just updated my config and have seen a decent improvement.
Here is the starter message: http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/postfix/2013-04/0468.html
Hope this helps,
Tony
From: Raymond Dijkxhoorn [mailto:raymond@prolocation.net]
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2013 3:26 PM
To: Blason rock
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: PreRBL with spamassasdon
Hai!
Since a couple of years they have something thats called google. :)
The first hit on 'rbl and postfix' gives:
http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/postfix-spam-filtering-with-blacklists-howto.html
Thanks,
Raymond Dijkxhoorn, Prolocation
Op 25 apr. 2013 om 21:20 heeft Blason rock <bl...@gmail.com>> het volgende geschreven:
So any clue or if anyone has done it with postfix?
On 26 Apr 2013 00:45, "Raymond Dijkxhoorn" <ra...@prolocation.net>> wrote:
Hai!
Grin.
Your MTA most likely supports RBL's.
Thanks,
Raymond Dijkxhoorn, Prolocation
Op 25 apr. 2013 om 21:09 heeft Blason rock <bl...@gmail.com>> het volgende geschreven:
Hi folks,
Curious to know if i can implement prerbl with SA? What i mean is with SA as soon as sombody connects on port 25 SA should check if the connected host is part of any RBL and then process connection accordingly.
________________________________
Since 1982, Starpoint Solutions has been a trusted source of human capital and solutions. We are committed to our clients, employees, environment, community and social concerns. We foster an inclusive culture based on trust, respect, honesty and solid performance. Learn more about Starpoint and our social responsibility at http://www.starpoint.com/social_responsibility
________________________________
This email message from Starpoint Solutions LLC is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of Starpoint Solutions shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.
Re: PreRBL with spamassasdon
Posted by Raymond Dijkxhoorn <ra...@prolocation.net>.
Hai!
Since a couple of years they have something thats called google. :)
The first hit on 'rbl and postfix' gives:
http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/postfix-spam-filtering-with-blacklists-howto.html
Thanks,
Raymond Dijkxhoorn, Prolocation
Op 25 apr. 2013 om 21:20 heeft Blason rock <bl...@gmail.com> het volgende geschreven:
> So any clue or if anyone has done it with postfix?
>
> On 26 Apr 2013 00:45, "Raymond Dijkxhoorn" <ra...@prolocation.net> wrote:
>> Hai!
>>
>> Grin.
>>
>> Your MTA most likely supports RBL's.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Raymond Dijkxhoorn, Prolocation
>>
>> Op 25 apr. 2013 om 21:09 heeft Blason rock <bl...@gmail.com> het volgende geschreven:
>>
>>> Hi folks,
>>>
>>> Curious to know if i can implement prerbl with SA? What i mean is with SA as soon as sombody connects on port 25 SA should check if the connected host is part of any RBL and then process connection accordingly.
Re: PreRBL with spamassasdon
Posted by Blason rock <bl...@gmail.com>.
So any clue or if anyone has done it with postfix?
On 26 Apr 2013 00:45, "Raymond Dijkxhoorn" <ra...@prolocation.net> wrote:
> Hai!
>
> Grin.
>
> Your MTA most likely supports RBL's.
>
> Thanks,
> Raymond Dijkxhoorn, Prolocation
>
> Op 25 apr. 2013 om 21:09 heeft Blason rock <bl...@gmail.com> het
> volgende geschreven:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> Curious to know if i can implement prerbl with SA? What i mean is with SA
> as soon as sombody connects on port 25 SA should check if the connected
> host is part of any RBL and then process connection accordingly.
>
>
Re: PreRBL with spamassasdon
Posted by Raymond Dijkxhoorn <ra...@prolocation.net>.
Hai!
Grin.
Your MTA most likely supports RBL's.
Thanks,
Raymond Dijkxhoorn, Prolocation
Op 25 apr. 2013 om 21:09 heeft Blason rock <bl...@gmail.com> het volgende geschreven:
> Hi folks,
>
> Curious to know if i can implement prerbl with SA? What i mean is with SA as soon as sombody connects on port 25 SA should check if the connected host is part of any RBL and then process connection accordingly.