You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@uima.apache.org by Bai Shen <ba...@gmail.com> on 2014/02/18 16:10:07 UTC
ActiveMQ Errors
Firstly, the following files still refer to ActiveMQ 5.4.1
src/main/assembly/src.xml
src/main/examples/run_configuration/UIMA Run Remote Async AE.launch
src/main/eclipseProject/classpath
uimaj-as-activemq/src/main/java/org/apache/uima/aae/jmx/monitor/JmxMonitor.java
Secondly, I'm getting multiple SLF4J binding errors due to the inclusion of
activemq-all.jar and slf4j-log4j12-1.6.4.jar Is there a plan to change
this?
Lastly, there are problems with ActiveMQ 5.6 referring to nonexistent
artifacts. Will 2.5 use the fixed 5.7 version?
Thanks.
Re: ActiveMQ Errors
Posted by Jaroslaw Cwiklik <ui...@gmail.com>.
I just noticed that Apache Jenkins is failing now with
Waiting for Jenkins to finish collecting data[ERROR] Failed to execute goal
on project uimaj-as-activemq: Could not resolve dependencies for project
org.apache.uima:uimaj-as-activemq:jar:2.5.0-SNAPSHOT: The following
artifacts could not be resolved: net.sf.josql:josql:jar:1.5,
net.sf.josql:gentlyweb-utils:jar:1.5: Could not find artifact
net.sf.josql:josql:jar:1.5 in eclipsePlugins
This artifact must have been yanked recently from maven repos.
I guess this should expedite the fix :)
Jerry Cwiklik
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 12:52 PM, Jaroslaw Cwiklik <ui...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Got it. Thanks for clarifying this.
>
> Jerry Cwiklik
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Bai Shen <ba...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> I don't need a newer version of AMQ. I was attempting to fix the SLF4J
>> issue and had to change AMQ to 5.7 just to get everything to build. So
>> far
>> I haven't noticed any problems with using 5.7 instead of 5.6.
>>
>> The problem with the test cases is from removing the SLF4J dependencies
>> from the UIMA pom.
>>
>> Just wanted to clarify that they are two separate issues.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Jaroslaw Cwiklik <ui...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Just checked and it looks like the josql (SQL for Java Objects) is a
>> > dependency from activemq-optional. Will look into how to deal with this.
>> > Dont have an opinion on this yet.
>> >
>> > The AMQ 5.6 has been in heavy use in our production environment and
>> moving
>> > to a newer version will require thorough testing which takes time.
>> >
>> > There is a workaround if you need a newer version of AMQ for your
>> runtime.
>> > Simply install AMQ where you want and set ACTIVEMQ_HOME environment
>> > variable to the location of ActiveMQ you intend to use.
>> >
>> > Jerry Cwiklik
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Bai Shen <ba...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > No problem. I only stumbled across them due to the SLF4J and ActiveMQ
>> > 5.6
>> > > problems. :)
>> > >
>> > > While the problem with SLF4J is just a warning and not fatal, it can
>> > cause
>> > > problems because the SLF4J binding that is chosen is essentially done
>> at
>> > > random. I've been trying to remove the extra bindings that UIMA
>> inserts
>> > > and just use the default ActiveMQ ones, but that causes test failures.
>> > My
>> > > next step is to remove the ActiveMQ bindings but that necessitates
>> using
>> > > the individual jars instead of activemq-all.
>> > >
>> > > The ActiveMQ 5.6 problem I'm referring to is explained here.
>> > >
>> > >
>> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/12938083/what-where-is-net-sf-josql
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Jaroslaw Cwiklik <ui...@gmail.com>
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Hi, thanks for spotting references to 5.4.1. I will create JIRA and
>> fix
>> > > > these. The fixes will be in the next release.
>> > > >
>> > > > I will take a look at SLF4J to see if this can be fixed. From what I
>> > > > remember this is just a Warning not a Fatal
>> > > > condition. Nevertheless, its worth looking into. Will create JIRA to
>> > > > investigate.
>> > > >
>> > > > Could you clarify " there are problems with ActiveMQ 5.6 referring
>> to
>> > > > nonexistent
>> > > > artifacts"? I would like to know more detail about this.
>> > > >
>> > > > Jerry C
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Bai Shen <baishen.lists@gmail.com
>> >
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > Firstly, the following files still refer to ActiveMQ 5.4.1
>> > > > >
>> > > > > src/main/assembly/src.xml
>> > > > > src/main/examples/run_configuration/UIMA Run Remote Async
>> AE.launch
>> > > > > src/main/eclipseProject/classpath
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> uimaj-as-activemq/src/main/java/org/apache/uima/aae/jmx/monitor/JmxMonitor.java
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Secondly, I'm getting multiple SLF4J binding errors due to the
>> > > inclusion
>> > > > of
>> > > > > activemq-all.jar and slf4j-log4j12-1.6.4.jar Is there a plan to
>> > change
>> > > > > this?
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Lastly, there are problems with ActiveMQ 5.6 referring to
>> nonexistent
>> > > > > artifacts. Will 2.5 use the fixed 5.7 version?
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Thanks.
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>
Re: ActiveMQ Errors
Posted by Jaroslaw Cwiklik <ui...@gmail.com>.
Not sure if this helps but try mvn -U clean install.
I think mvn caches stuff.
Jerry Cwiklik
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 1:00 PM, Bai Shen <ba...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Also, upon running mvn clean install a second time, the test errors went
> away. So I'm not sure exactly what is going on there.
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 12:52 PM, Jaroslaw Cwiklik <ui...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Got it. Thanks for clarifying this.
> >
> > Jerry Cwiklik
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Bai Shen <ba...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I don't need a newer version of AMQ. I was attempting to fix the SLF4J
> > > issue and had to change AMQ to 5.7 just to get everything to build. So
> > far
> > > I haven't noticed any problems with using 5.7 instead of 5.6.
> > >
> > > The problem with the test cases is from removing the SLF4J dependencies
> > > from the UIMA pom.
> > >
> > > Just wanted to clarify that they are two separate issues.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Jaroslaw Cwiklik <ui...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Just checked and it looks like the josql (SQL for Java Objects) is a
> > > > dependency from activemq-optional. Will look into how to deal with
> > this.
> > > > Dont have an opinion on this yet.
> > > >
> > > > The AMQ 5.6 has been in heavy use in our production environment and
> > > moving
> > > > to a newer version will require thorough testing which takes time.
> > > >
> > > > There is a workaround if you need a newer version of AMQ for your
> > > runtime.
> > > > Simply install AMQ where you want and set ACTIVEMQ_HOME environment
> > > > variable to the location of ActiveMQ you intend to use.
> > > >
> > > > Jerry Cwiklik
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Bai Shen <ba...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > No problem. I only stumbled across them due to the SLF4J and
> > ActiveMQ
> > > > 5.6
> > > > > problems. :)
> > > > >
> > > > > While the problem with SLF4J is just a warning and not fatal, it
> can
> > > > cause
> > > > > problems because the SLF4J binding that is chosen is essentially
> done
> > > at
> > > > > random. I've been trying to remove the extra bindings that UIMA
> > > inserts
> > > > > and just use the default ActiveMQ ones, but that causes test
> > failures.
> > > > My
> > > > > next step is to remove the ActiveMQ bindings but that necessitates
> > > using
> > > > > the individual jars instead of activemq-all.
> > > > >
> > > > > The ActiveMQ 5.6 problem I'm referring to is explained here.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/12938083/what-where-is-net-sf-josql
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Jaroslaw Cwiklik <
> uimaee@gmail.com
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi, thanks for spotting references to 5.4.1. I will create JIRA
> and
> > > fix
> > > > > > these. The fixes will be in the next release.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I will take a look at SLF4J to see if this can be fixed. From
> what
> > I
> > > > > > remember this is just a Warning not a Fatal
> > > > > > condition. Nevertheless, its worth looking into. Will create JIRA
> > to
> > > > > > investigate.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Could you clarify " there are problems with ActiveMQ 5.6
> referring
> > to
> > > > > > nonexistent
> > > > > > artifacts"? I would like to know more detail about this.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Jerry C
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Bai Shen <
> > baishen.lists@gmail.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Firstly, the following files still refer to ActiveMQ 5.4.1
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > src/main/assembly/src.xml
> > > > > > > src/main/examples/run_configuration/UIMA Run Remote Async
> > AE.launch
> > > > > > > src/main/eclipseProject/classpath
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> uimaj-as-activemq/src/main/java/org/apache/uima/aae/jmx/monitor/JmxMonitor.java
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Secondly, I'm getting multiple SLF4J binding errors due to the
> > > > > inclusion
> > > > > > of
> > > > > > > activemq-all.jar and slf4j-log4j12-1.6.4.jar Is there a plan
> to
> > > > change
> > > > > > > this?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Lastly, there are problems with ActiveMQ 5.6 referring to
> > > nonexistent
> > > > > > > artifacts. Will 2.5 use the fixed 5.7 version?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: ActiveMQ Errors
Posted by Bai Shen <ba...@gmail.com>.
Also, upon running mvn clean install a second time, the test errors went
away. So I'm not sure exactly what is going on there.
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 12:52 PM, Jaroslaw Cwiklik <ui...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Got it. Thanks for clarifying this.
>
> Jerry Cwiklik
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Bai Shen <ba...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I don't need a newer version of AMQ. I was attempting to fix the SLF4J
> > issue and had to change AMQ to 5.7 just to get everything to build. So
> far
> > I haven't noticed any problems with using 5.7 instead of 5.6.
> >
> > The problem with the test cases is from removing the SLF4J dependencies
> > from the UIMA pom.
> >
> > Just wanted to clarify that they are two separate issues.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Jaroslaw Cwiklik <ui...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Just checked and it looks like the josql (SQL for Java Objects) is a
> > > dependency from activemq-optional. Will look into how to deal with
> this.
> > > Dont have an opinion on this yet.
> > >
> > > The AMQ 5.6 has been in heavy use in our production environment and
> > moving
> > > to a newer version will require thorough testing which takes time.
> > >
> > > There is a workaround if you need a newer version of AMQ for your
> > runtime.
> > > Simply install AMQ where you want and set ACTIVEMQ_HOME environment
> > > variable to the location of ActiveMQ you intend to use.
> > >
> > > Jerry Cwiklik
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Bai Shen <ba...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > No problem. I only stumbled across them due to the SLF4J and
> ActiveMQ
> > > 5.6
> > > > problems. :)
> > > >
> > > > While the problem with SLF4J is just a warning and not fatal, it can
> > > cause
> > > > problems because the SLF4J binding that is chosen is essentially done
> > at
> > > > random. I've been trying to remove the extra bindings that UIMA
> > inserts
> > > > and just use the default ActiveMQ ones, but that causes test
> failures.
> > > My
> > > > next step is to remove the ActiveMQ bindings but that necessitates
> > using
> > > > the individual jars instead of activemq-all.
> > > >
> > > > The ActiveMQ 5.6 problem I'm referring to is explained here.
> > > >
> > > >
> > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/12938083/what-where-is-net-sf-josql
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Jaroslaw Cwiklik <uimaee@gmail.com
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi, thanks for spotting references to 5.4.1. I will create JIRA and
> > fix
> > > > > these. The fixes will be in the next release.
> > > > >
> > > > > I will take a look at SLF4J to see if this can be fixed. From what
> I
> > > > > remember this is just a Warning not a Fatal
> > > > > condition. Nevertheless, its worth looking into. Will create JIRA
> to
> > > > > investigate.
> > > > >
> > > > > Could you clarify " there are problems with ActiveMQ 5.6 referring
> to
> > > > > nonexistent
> > > > > artifacts"? I would like to know more detail about this.
> > > > >
> > > > > Jerry C
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Bai Shen <
> baishen.lists@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Firstly, the following files still refer to ActiveMQ 5.4.1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > src/main/assembly/src.xml
> > > > > > src/main/examples/run_configuration/UIMA Run Remote Async
> AE.launch
> > > > > > src/main/eclipseProject/classpath
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> uimaj-as-activemq/src/main/java/org/apache/uima/aae/jmx/monitor/JmxMonitor.java
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Secondly, I'm getting multiple SLF4J binding errors due to the
> > > > inclusion
> > > > > of
> > > > > > activemq-all.jar and slf4j-log4j12-1.6.4.jar Is there a plan to
> > > change
> > > > > > this?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Lastly, there are problems with ActiveMQ 5.6 referring to
> > nonexistent
> > > > > > artifacts. Will 2.5 use the fixed 5.7 version?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: ActiveMQ Errors
Posted by Jaroslaw Cwiklik <ui...@gmail.com>.
Got it. Thanks for clarifying this.
Jerry Cwiklik
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Bai Shen <ba...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't need a newer version of AMQ. I was attempting to fix the SLF4J
> issue and had to change AMQ to 5.7 just to get everything to build. So far
> I haven't noticed any problems with using 5.7 instead of 5.6.
>
> The problem with the test cases is from removing the SLF4J dependencies
> from the UIMA pom.
>
> Just wanted to clarify that they are two separate issues.
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Jaroslaw Cwiklik <ui...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Just checked and it looks like the josql (SQL for Java Objects) is a
> > dependency from activemq-optional. Will look into how to deal with this.
> > Dont have an opinion on this yet.
> >
> > The AMQ 5.6 has been in heavy use in our production environment and
> moving
> > to a newer version will require thorough testing which takes time.
> >
> > There is a workaround if you need a newer version of AMQ for your
> runtime.
> > Simply install AMQ where you want and set ACTIVEMQ_HOME environment
> > variable to the location of ActiveMQ you intend to use.
> >
> > Jerry Cwiklik
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Bai Shen <ba...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > No problem. I only stumbled across them due to the SLF4J and ActiveMQ
> > 5.6
> > > problems. :)
> > >
> > > While the problem with SLF4J is just a warning and not fatal, it can
> > cause
> > > problems because the SLF4J binding that is chosen is essentially done
> at
> > > random. I've been trying to remove the extra bindings that UIMA
> inserts
> > > and just use the default ActiveMQ ones, but that causes test failures.
> > My
> > > next step is to remove the ActiveMQ bindings but that necessitates
> using
> > > the individual jars instead of activemq-all.
> > >
> > > The ActiveMQ 5.6 problem I'm referring to is explained here.
> > >
> > >
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/12938083/what-where-is-net-sf-josql
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Jaroslaw Cwiklik <ui...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi, thanks for spotting references to 5.4.1. I will create JIRA and
> fix
> > > > these. The fixes will be in the next release.
> > > >
> > > > I will take a look at SLF4J to see if this can be fixed. From what I
> > > > remember this is just a Warning not a Fatal
> > > > condition. Nevertheless, its worth looking into. Will create JIRA to
> > > > investigate.
> > > >
> > > > Could you clarify " there are problems with ActiveMQ 5.6 referring to
> > > > nonexistent
> > > > artifacts"? I would like to know more detail about this.
> > > >
> > > > Jerry C
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Bai Shen <ba...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Firstly, the following files still refer to ActiveMQ 5.4.1
> > > > >
> > > > > src/main/assembly/src.xml
> > > > > src/main/examples/run_configuration/UIMA Run Remote Async AE.launch
> > > > > src/main/eclipseProject/classpath
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> uimaj-as-activemq/src/main/java/org/apache/uima/aae/jmx/monitor/JmxMonitor.java
> > > > >
> > > > > Secondly, I'm getting multiple SLF4J binding errors due to the
> > > inclusion
> > > > of
> > > > > activemq-all.jar and slf4j-log4j12-1.6.4.jar Is there a plan to
> > change
> > > > > this?
> > > > >
> > > > > Lastly, there are problems with ActiveMQ 5.6 referring to
> nonexistent
> > > > > artifacts. Will 2.5 use the fixed 5.7 version?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: ActiveMQ Errors
Posted by Bai Shen <ba...@gmail.com>.
I don't need a newer version of AMQ. I was attempting to fix the SLF4J
issue and had to change AMQ to 5.7 just to get everything to build. So far
I haven't noticed any problems with using 5.7 instead of 5.6.
The problem with the test cases is from removing the SLF4J dependencies
from the UIMA pom.
Just wanted to clarify that they are two separate issues.
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Jaroslaw Cwiklik <ui...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Just checked and it looks like the josql (SQL for Java Objects) is a
> dependency from activemq-optional. Will look into how to deal with this.
> Dont have an opinion on this yet.
>
> The AMQ 5.6 has been in heavy use in our production environment and moving
> to a newer version will require thorough testing which takes time.
>
> There is a workaround if you need a newer version of AMQ for your runtime.
> Simply install AMQ where you want and set ACTIVEMQ_HOME environment
> variable to the location of ActiveMQ you intend to use.
>
> Jerry Cwiklik
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Bai Shen <ba...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > No problem. I only stumbled across them due to the SLF4J and ActiveMQ
> 5.6
> > problems. :)
> >
> > While the problem with SLF4J is just a warning and not fatal, it can
> cause
> > problems because the SLF4J binding that is chosen is essentially done at
> > random. I've been trying to remove the extra bindings that UIMA inserts
> > and just use the default ActiveMQ ones, but that causes test failures.
> My
> > next step is to remove the ActiveMQ bindings but that necessitates using
> > the individual jars instead of activemq-all.
> >
> > The ActiveMQ 5.6 problem I'm referring to is explained here.
> >
> > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/12938083/what-where-is-net-sf-josql
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Jaroslaw Cwiklik <ui...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi, thanks for spotting references to 5.4.1. I will create JIRA and fix
> > > these. The fixes will be in the next release.
> > >
> > > I will take a look at SLF4J to see if this can be fixed. From what I
> > > remember this is just a Warning not a Fatal
> > > condition. Nevertheless, its worth looking into. Will create JIRA to
> > > investigate.
> > >
> > > Could you clarify " there are problems with ActiveMQ 5.6 referring to
> > > nonexistent
> > > artifacts"? I would like to know more detail about this.
> > >
> > > Jerry C
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Bai Shen <ba...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Firstly, the following files still refer to ActiveMQ 5.4.1
> > > >
> > > > src/main/assembly/src.xml
> > > > src/main/examples/run_configuration/UIMA Run Remote Async AE.launch
> > > > src/main/eclipseProject/classpath
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> uimaj-as-activemq/src/main/java/org/apache/uima/aae/jmx/monitor/JmxMonitor.java
> > > >
> > > > Secondly, I'm getting multiple SLF4J binding errors due to the
> > inclusion
> > > of
> > > > activemq-all.jar and slf4j-log4j12-1.6.4.jar Is there a plan to
> change
> > > > this?
> > > >
> > > > Lastly, there are problems with ActiveMQ 5.6 referring to nonexistent
> > > > artifacts. Will 2.5 use the fixed 5.7 version?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks.
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: ActiveMQ Errors
Posted by Jaroslaw Cwiklik <ui...@gmail.com>.
Just checked and it looks like the josql (SQL for Java Objects) is a
dependency from activemq-optional. Will look into how to deal with this.
Dont have an opinion on this yet.
The AMQ 5.6 has been in heavy use in our production environment and moving
to a newer version will require thorough testing which takes time.
There is a workaround if you need a newer version of AMQ for your runtime.
Simply install AMQ where you want and set ACTIVEMQ_HOME environment
variable to the location of ActiveMQ you intend to use.
Jerry Cwiklik
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Bai Shen <ba...@gmail.com> wrote:
> No problem. I only stumbled across them due to the SLF4J and ActiveMQ 5.6
> problems. :)
>
> While the problem with SLF4J is just a warning and not fatal, it can cause
> problems because the SLF4J binding that is chosen is essentially done at
> random. I've been trying to remove the extra bindings that UIMA inserts
> and just use the default ActiveMQ ones, but that causes test failures. My
> next step is to remove the ActiveMQ bindings but that necessitates using
> the individual jars instead of activemq-all.
>
> The ActiveMQ 5.6 problem I'm referring to is explained here.
>
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/12938083/what-where-is-net-sf-josql
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Jaroslaw Cwiklik <ui...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi, thanks for spotting references to 5.4.1. I will create JIRA and fix
> > these. The fixes will be in the next release.
> >
> > I will take a look at SLF4J to see if this can be fixed. From what I
> > remember this is just a Warning not a Fatal
> > condition. Nevertheless, its worth looking into. Will create JIRA to
> > investigate.
> >
> > Could you clarify " there are problems with ActiveMQ 5.6 referring to
> > nonexistent
> > artifacts"? I would like to know more detail about this.
> >
> > Jerry C
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Bai Shen <ba...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Firstly, the following files still refer to ActiveMQ 5.4.1
> > >
> > > src/main/assembly/src.xml
> > > src/main/examples/run_configuration/UIMA Run Remote Async AE.launch
> > > src/main/eclipseProject/classpath
> > >
> > >
> >
> uimaj-as-activemq/src/main/java/org/apache/uima/aae/jmx/monitor/JmxMonitor.java
> > >
> > > Secondly, I'm getting multiple SLF4J binding errors due to the
> inclusion
> > of
> > > activemq-all.jar and slf4j-log4j12-1.6.4.jar Is there a plan to change
> > > this?
> > >
> > > Lastly, there are problems with ActiveMQ 5.6 referring to nonexistent
> > > artifacts. Will 2.5 use the fixed 5.7 version?
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> >
>
Re: ActiveMQ Errors
Posted by Bai Shen <ba...@gmail.com>.
No problem. I only stumbled across them due to the SLF4J and ActiveMQ 5.6
problems. :)
While the problem with SLF4J is just a warning and not fatal, it can cause
problems because the SLF4J binding that is chosen is essentially done at
random. I've been trying to remove the extra bindings that UIMA inserts
and just use the default ActiveMQ ones, but that causes test failures. My
next step is to remove the ActiveMQ bindings but that necessitates using
the individual jars instead of activemq-all.
The ActiveMQ 5.6 problem I'm referring to is explained here.
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/12938083/what-where-is-net-sf-josql
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Jaroslaw Cwiklik <ui...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, thanks for spotting references to 5.4.1. I will create JIRA and fix
> these. The fixes will be in the next release.
>
> I will take a look at SLF4J to see if this can be fixed. From what I
> remember this is just a Warning not a Fatal
> condition. Nevertheless, its worth looking into. Will create JIRA to
> investigate.
>
> Could you clarify " there are problems with ActiveMQ 5.6 referring to
> nonexistent
> artifacts"? I would like to know more detail about this.
>
> Jerry C
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Bai Shen <ba...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Firstly, the following files still refer to ActiveMQ 5.4.1
> >
> > src/main/assembly/src.xml
> > src/main/examples/run_configuration/UIMA Run Remote Async AE.launch
> > src/main/eclipseProject/classpath
> >
> >
> uimaj-as-activemq/src/main/java/org/apache/uima/aae/jmx/monitor/JmxMonitor.java
> >
> > Secondly, I'm getting multiple SLF4J binding errors due to the inclusion
> of
> > activemq-all.jar and slf4j-log4j12-1.6.4.jar Is there a plan to change
> > this?
> >
> > Lastly, there are problems with ActiveMQ 5.6 referring to nonexistent
> > artifacts. Will 2.5 use the fixed 5.7 version?
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
>
Re: ActiveMQ Errors
Posted by Jaroslaw Cwiklik <ui...@gmail.com>.
Hi, thanks for spotting references to 5.4.1. I will create JIRA and fix
these. The fixes will be in the next release.
I will take a look at SLF4J to see if this can be fixed. From what I
remember this is just a Warning not a Fatal
condition. Nevertheless, its worth looking into. Will create JIRA to
investigate.
Could you clarify " there are problems with ActiveMQ 5.6 referring to
nonexistent
artifacts"? I would like to know more detail about this.
Jerry C
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Bai Shen <ba...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Firstly, the following files still refer to ActiveMQ 5.4.1
>
> src/main/assembly/src.xml
> src/main/examples/run_configuration/UIMA Run Remote Async AE.launch
> src/main/eclipseProject/classpath
>
> uimaj-as-activemq/src/main/java/org/apache/uima/aae/jmx/monitor/JmxMonitor.java
>
> Secondly, I'm getting multiple SLF4J binding errors due to the inclusion of
> activemq-all.jar and slf4j-log4j12-1.6.4.jar Is there a plan to change
> this?
>
> Lastly, there are problems with ActiveMQ 5.6 referring to nonexistent
> artifacts. Will 2.5 use the fixed 5.7 version?
>
> Thanks.
>