You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@openoffice.apache.org by Helen Robson <he...@yahoo.co.uk.INVALID> on 2019/10/27 23:36:22 UTC
Mac system Catalina
Could you tell me when OpenOffice will be updated to run on Mac System Catalina?
Thank you
H Robson
Sent from my iPad
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Mac system Catalina
Posted by Peter Kovacs <pe...@apache.org>.
Yes please try. If you have issues we can check on solutions. :)
Am 28. Oktober 2019 18:09:52 MEZ schrieb Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>:
>I will use Xcode11 to notarize it... It's worth a shot to see if that
>works :)
>
>> On Oct 28, 2019, at 1:07 PM, Matthias Seidel
><ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>>
>> Am 28.10.19 um 18:01 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>> It appears that one can notarize an App after bistro
>(https://developer.apple.com/documentation/xcode/notarizing_your_app_before_distribution/customizing_the_notarization_workflow)...
>>>
>>> I will try w/ the current 4.1.7 dmgs
>>
>> That's interesting, but will they notarize it with XCode 7?
>>
>>>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>>>
>>
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Mac system Catalina
Posted by Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de>.
Am 28.10.19 um 18:09 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> I will use Xcode11 to notarize it... It's worth a shot to see if that works :)
Yes, give it a try. ;-)
I am curious if you get instant feedback or if we have to wait for a
response. That would be a time factor to consider for our releases...
>
>> On Oct 28, 2019, at 1:07 PM, Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>>
>> Am 28.10.19 um 18:01 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>> It appears that one can notarize an App after bistro (https://developer.apple.com/documentation/xcode/notarizing_your_app_before_distribution/customizing_the_notarization_workflow)...
>>>
>>> I will try w/ the current 4.1.7 dmgs
>> That's interesting, but will they notarize it with XCode 7?
>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>
Re: Mac system Catalina
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
I will use Xcode11 to notarize it... It's worth a shot to see if that works :)
> On Oct 28, 2019, at 1:07 PM, Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>
> Am 28.10.19 um 18:01 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> It appears that one can notarize an App after bistro (https://developer.apple.com/documentation/xcode/notarizing_your_app_before_distribution/customizing_the_notarization_workflow)...
>>
>> I will try w/ the current 4.1.7 dmgs
>
> That's interesting, but will they notarize it with XCode 7?
>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Mac system Catalina
Posted by Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de>.
Am 28.10.19 um 18:01 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> It appears that one can notarize an App after bistro (https://developer.apple.com/documentation/xcode/notarizing_your_app_before_distribution/customizing_the_notarization_workflow)...
>
> I will try w/ the current 4.1.7 dmgs
That's interesting, but will they notarize it with XCode 7?
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>
Re: Mac system Catalina
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
It appears that one can notarize an App after bistro (https://developer.apple.com/documentation/xcode/notarizing_your_app_before_distribution/customizing_the_notarization_workflow)...
I will try w/ the current 4.1.7 dmgs
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Mac system Catalina
Posted by Peter Kovacs <pe...@apache.org>.
Jim,
Can you try notarization with xcode 10 or do we still need code changes?
Am 28. Oktober 2019 17:33:26 MEZ schrieb Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>:
>
>
>> On Oct 28, 2019, at 12:16 PM, Pedro Lino <pe...@mailbox.org>
>wrote:
>>
>> Hi Jim, all
>>
>>
>>> On October 28, 2019 at 3:34 PM Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>
>wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Oct 28, 2019, at 11:29 AM, Branko Čibej <br...@apache.org>
>wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Even I saw reports on this very list to the tune that, without
>proper
>>>> notarization, apps won't work on Catalina.
>>>
>>> Not quite true. You can still run non-notarized apps on Catalina...
>it is just harder than before to "bypass" GateKeeper. One way is to
>alt-click Open the App. Another is to select it and then choose Open
>from the Finder.
>>
>> That seems to be a workaround for advanced users. If you/we want
>ordinary Apple users to continue to use OpenOffice then this
>notarization of the x64 build needs to be solved ASAP.
>> The same applies to the Windows installer validation.
>> I believe these two issues should be enough reason for a 4.1.8
>release.
>>
>
>We have, in fact, been setting things up to allow us to do such
>Notarization... I have an Apache DevID now, in addition to my personal
>one.
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Mac system Catalina
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
> On Oct 28, 2019, at 12:16 PM, Pedro Lino <pe...@mailbox.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Jim, all
>
>
>> On October 28, 2019 at 3:34 PM Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Oct 28, 2019, at 11:29 AM, Branko Čibej <br...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Even I saw reports on this very list to the tune that, without proper
>>> notarization, apps won't work on Catalina.
>>
>> Not quite true. You can still run non-notarized apps on Catalina... it is just harder than before to "bypass" GateKeeper. One way is to alt-click Open the App. Another is to select it and then choose Open from the Finder.
>
> That seems to be a workaround for advanced users. If you/we want ordinary Apple users to continue to use OpenOffice then this notarization of the x64 build needs to be solved ASAP.
> The same applies to the Windows installer validation.
> I believe these two issues should be enough reason for a 4.1.8 release.
>
We have, in fact, been setting things up to allow us to do such Notarization... I have an Apache DevID now, in addition to my personal one.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Code Signing Certificate for Windows (was Re: Mac system Catalina)
Posted by Greg Stein <gs...@gmail.com>.
Yes, we do, and our yearly order even includes some certs for AOO :-)
I'll provide the contact of our volunteer cert manager, privately to the
PMC.
Cheers,
Greg Stein
Infrastructure Administrator, ASF
On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 11:54 AM Peter Kovacs <pe...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> Do we have a service for windows certifications? I remember some service
> with Symantec. I'd that works with MSN can you give pointers?
>
> Thx for the support!
>
> All the best
> Peter
>
> Am 29. Oktober 2019 11:13:53 MEZ schrieb Pedro Lino <
> pedro.lino@mailbox.org>:
>>
>> Hi all
>>
>> On October 28, 2019 at 10:32 PM Dave Fisher <wa...@comcast.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> There is an offer from Microsoft for Apache committers to get a free MSDN license. If that gives access to the proper signing keys then that would be the way to go.
>>>
>>
>> Is it possible for one of the PMC members to find out if there are exceptions for non-profit organizations such as Apache?
>>
>> Warning: I'm not a developer so maybe some interpretations could be wrong
>>
>> As far as I can investigate in MSDN blogs, all developers buy their certificates from various providers (Comodo, Symantec, Thawte, etc) and Microsoft only certifies it's own binaries (which to me is a bit suspicious but they do own the game :) )
>>
>> https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/ieinternals/2011/03/22/everything-you-need-to-know-about-authenticode-code-signing/
>> https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/drivers/dashboard/get-a-code-signing-certificate
>> https://aboutssl.org/cheap-code-signing-certificate-providers/
>>
>> Developers can create their local certificates but only for testing
>>
>> https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/appxpkg/how-to-create-a-package-signing-certificate
>>
>> Hope this helps,
>> Pedro
>>
>> On Oct 28, 2019, at 3:22 PM, Peter Kovacs <Pe...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I do not want to spend money on this service, without having tried with infra or Microsoft directly.
>>>> I am sure the ASF has something. And if not I am sure Microsoft gives us access at better conditions then the 3rd party offer.
>>>>
>>>> Am 28. Oktober 2019 20:59:15 MEZ schrieb Pedro Lino <pe...@mailbox.org>:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Peter
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> For Windows it would help in a first step if someone can search
>>>>>>
>>>>> the resources on MSN and post links of the validation process described
>>>>> by MS.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> This is what is needed for Windows Certification: a Code Signing
>>>>> Certificate
>>>>> https://www.ksoftware.net/code-signing-certificates
>>>>>
>>>>> Giving that this is a distributed project, I would say that the OV Code
>>>>> Signing is the most appropriate (otherwise only one person will have
>>>>> the encrypted hardware token)
>>>>>
>>>>> Hope this helps.
>>>>>
>>>>> Does Apache OpenOffice have any funds?
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Pedro
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 28. Oktober 2019 17:45:35 MEZ schrieb Matthias Seidel <
>>>>>>
>>>>> matthias.seidel@hamburg.de mailto:matthias.seidel@hamburg.de >:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Pedro,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Am 28.10.19 um 17:40 schrieb Pedro Lino:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you volunteer? Remember, we all are only volunteers...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ;-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I believe these two issues should be enough
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> reason for a 4.1.8 release.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Welcome to the team!
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I don't understand the cynicism.
>>>>>>>>> I believe I have contributed quite a bit with translation, bug
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> reporting and build testing. Apparently that is not enough for
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> project?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Too bad!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Well, someone has to deliver...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No cynicism, it was just an invitation.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>> Pedro
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>>
>>
Re: Code Signing Certificate for Windows (was Re: Mac system Catalina)
Posted by Peter Kovacs <pe...@apache.org>.
Hi Greg,
Do we have a service for windows certifications? I remember some service with Symantec. I'd that works with MSN can you give pointers?
Thx for the support!
All the best
Peter
Am 29. Oktober 2019 11:13:53 MEZ schrieb Pedro Lino <pe...@mailbox.org>:
>Hi all
>
>> On October 28, 2019 at 10:32 PM Dave Fisher <wa...@comcast.net>
>wrote:
>>
>> There is an offer from Microsoft for Apache committers to get a free
>MSDN license. If that gives access to the proper signing keys then that
>would be the way to go.
>
>Is it possible for one of the PMC members to find out if there are
>exceptions for non-profit organizations such as Apache?
>
>Warning: I'm not a developer so maybe some interpretations could be
>wrong
>
>As far as I can investigate in MSDN blogs, all developers buy their
>certificates from various providers (Comodo, Symantec, Thawte, etc) and
>Microsoft only certifies it's own binaries (which to me is a bit
>suspicious but they do own the game :) )
>
>https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/ieinternals/2011/03/22/everything-you-need-to-know-about-authenticode-code-signing/
>https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/drivers/dashboard/get-a-code-signing-certificate
>https://aboutssl.org/cheap-code-signing-certificate-providers/
>
>Developers can create their local certificates but only for testing
>
>https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/appxpkg/how-to-create-a-package-signing-certificate
>
>Hope this helps,
>Pedro
>
>> > On Oct 28, 2019, at 3:22 PM, Peter Kovacs <Pe...@apache.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > I do not want to spend money on this service, without having tried
>with infra or Microsoft directly.
>> > I am sure the ASF has something. And if not I am sure Microsoft
>gives us access at better conditions then the 3rd party offer.
>> >
>> > Am 28. Oktober 2019 20:59:15 MEZ schrieb Pedro Lino
><pe...@mailbox.org>:
>> >> Hi Peter
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>> For Windows it would help in a first step if someone can
>search
>> >> the resources on MSN and post links of the validation process
>described
>> >> by MS.
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> This is what is needed for Windows Certification: a Code Signing
>> >> Certificate
>> >> https://www.ksoftware.net/code-signing-certificates
>> >>
>> >> Giving that this is a distributed project, I would say that the OV
>Code
>> >> Signing is the most appropriate (otherwise only one person will
>have
>> >> the encrypted hardware token)
>> >>
>> >> Hope this helps.
>> >>
>> >> Does Apache OpenOffice have any funds?
>> >>
>> >> Regards,
>> >> Pedro
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>> Am 28. Oktober 2019 17:45:35 MEZ schrieb Matthias Seidel <
>> >> matthias.seidel@hamburg.de mailto:matthias.seidel@hamburg.de >:
>> >>>> Hi Pedro,
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> Am 28.10.19 um 17:40 schrieb Pedro Lino:
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Do you volunteer? Remember, we all are only volunteers...
>> >>>>> ;-)
>> >>>>>>>>> I believe these two issues should be enough
>> >>>>> reason for a 4.1.8 release.
>> >>>>>>>>> Welcome to the team!
>> >>>>>> I don't understand the cynicism.
>> >>>>>> I believe I have contributed quite a bit with translation, bug
>> >>>>> reporting and build testing. Apparently that is not enough for
>> >>> this
>> >>>>> project?
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Too bad!
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Well, someone has to deliver...
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> No cynicism, it was just an invitation.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Regards,
>> >>>>>> Pedro
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
Code Signing Certificate for Windows (was Re: Mac system Catalina)
Posted by Pedro Lino <pe...@mailbox.org>.
Hi all
> On October 28, 2019 at 10:32 PM Dave Fisher <wa...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> There is an offer from Microsoft for Apache committers to get a free MSDN license. If that gives access to the proper signing keys then that would be the way to go.
Is it possible for one of the PMC members to find out if there are exceptions for non-profit organizations such as Apache?
Warning: I'm not a developer so maybe some interpretations could be wrong
As far as I can investigate in MSDN blogs, all developers buy their certificates from various providers (Comodo, Symantec, Thawte, etc) and Microsoft only certifies it's own binaries (which to me is a bit suspicious but they do own the game :) )
https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/ieinternals/2011/03/22/everything-you-need-to-know-about-authenticode-code-signing/
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/drivers/dashboard/get-a-code-signing-certificate
https://aboutssl.org/cheap-code-signing-certificate-providers/
Developers can create their local certificates but only for testing
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/appxpkg/how-to-create-a-package-signing-certificate
Hope this helps,
Pedro
> > On Oct 28, 2019, at 3:22 PM, Peter Kovacs <Pe...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > I do not want to spend money on this service, without having tried with infra or Microsoft directly.
> > I am sure the ASF has something. And if not I am sure Microsoft gives us access at better conditions then the 3rd party offer.
> >
> > Am 28. Oktober 2019 20:59:15 MEZ schrieb Pedro Lino <pe...@mailbox.org>:
> >> Hi Peter
> >>
> >>
> >>> For Windows it would help in a first step if someone can search
> >> the resources on MSN and post links of the validation process described
> >> by MS.
> >>>
> >>
> >> This is what is needed for Windows Certification: a Code Signing
> >> Certificate
> >> https://www.ksoftware.net/code-signing-certificates
> >>
> >> Giving that this is a distributed project, I would say that the OV Code
> >> Signing is the most appropriate (otherwise only one person will have
> >> the encrypted hardware token)
> >>
> >> Hope this helps.
> >>
> >> Does Apache OpenOffice have any funds?
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Pedro
> >>
> >>
> >>> Am 28. Oktober 2019 17:45:35 MEZ schrieb Matthias Seidel <
> >> matthias.seidel@hamburg.de mailto:matthias.seidel@hamburg.de >:
> >>>> Hi Pedro,
> >>>>
> >>>>> Am 28.10.19 um 17:40 schrieb Pedro Lino:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Do you volunteer? Remember, we all are only volunteers...
> >>>>> ;-)
> >>>>>>>>> I believe these two issues should be enough
> >>>>> reason for a 4.1.8 release.
> >>>>>>>>> Welcome to the team!
> >>>>>> I don't understand the cynicism.
> >>>>>> I believe I have contributed quite a bit with translation, bug
> >>>>> reporting and build testing. Apparently that is not enough for
> >>> this
> >>>>> project?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Too bad!
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Well, someone has to deliver...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> No cynicism, it was just an invitation.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>> Pedro
> >>>>>>
> >>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Mac system Catalina
Posted by Dave Fisher <wa...@comcast.net>.
Hi -
There is an offer from Microsoft for Apache committers to get a free MSDN license. If that gives access to the proper signing keys then that would be the way to go.
Regards,
Dave
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 28, 2019, at 3:22 PM, Peter Kovacs <Pe...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> I do not want to spend money on this service, without having tried with infra or Microsoft directly.
> I am sure the ASF has something. And if not I am sure Microsoft gives us access at better conditions then the 3rd party offer.
>
> Am 28. Oktober 2019 20:59:15 MEZ schrieb Pedro Lino <pe...@mailbox.org>:
>> Hi Peter
>>
>>
>>> For Windows it would help in a first step if someone can search
>> the resources on MSN and post links of the validation process described
>> by MS.
>>>
>>
>> This is what is needed for Windows Certification: a Code Signing
>> Certificate
>> https://www.ksoftware.net/code-signing-certificates
>>
>> Giving that this is a distributed project, I would say that the OV Code
>> Signing is the most appropriate (otherwise only one person will have
>> the encrypted hardware token)
>>
>> Hope this helps.
>>
>> Does Apache OpenOffice have any funds?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Pedro
>>
>>
>>> Am 28. Oktober 2019 17:45:35 MEZ schrieb Matthias Seidel <
>> matthias.seidel@hamburg.de mailto:matthias.seidel@hamburg.de >:
>>>> Hi Pedro,
>>>>
>>>>> Am 28.10.19 um 17:40 schrieb Pedro Lino:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Do you volunteer? Remember, we all are only volunteers...
>>>>> ;-)
>>>>>>>>> I believe these two issues should be enough
>>>>> reason for a 4.1.8 release.
>>>>>>>>> Welcome to the team!
>>>>>> I don't understand the cynicism.
>>>>>> I believe I have contributed quite a bit with translation, bug
>>>>> reporting and build testing. Apparently that is not enough for
>>> this
>>>>> project?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Too bad!
>>>>>
>>>>> Well, someone has to deliver...
>>>>>
>>>>> No cynicism, it was just an invitation.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Pedro
>>>>>>
>>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Mac system Catalina
Posted by Peter Kovacs <pe...@apache.org>.
I do not want to spend money on this service, without having tried with infra or Microsoft directly.
I am sure the ASF has something. And if not I am sure Microsoft gives us access at better conditions then the 3rd party offer.
Am 28. Oktober 2019 20:59:15 MEZ schrieb Pedro Lino <pe...@mailbox.org>:
>Hi Peter
>
>
>> For Windows it would help in a first step if someone can search
>the resources on MSN and post links of the validation process described
>by MS.
>>
>
>This is what is needed for Windows Certification: a Code Signing
>Certificate
>https://www.ksoftware.net/code-signing-certificates
>
>Giving that this is a distributed project, I would say that the OV Code
>Signing is the most appropriate (otherwise only one person will have
>the encrypted hardware token)
>
>Hope this helps.
>
>Does Apache OpenOffice have any funds?
>
>Regards,
>Pedro
>
>
>> Am 28. Oktober 2019 17:45:35 MEZ schrieb Matthias Seidel <
>matthias.seidel@hamburg.de mailto:matthias.seidel@hamburg.de >:
>> >Hi Pedro,
>> >
>> >Am 28.10.19 um 17:40 schrieb Pedro Lino:
>> >>> > >
>> >>>> > Do you volunteer? Remember, we all are only volunteers...
>> >;-)
>> >>> > > I believe these two issues should be enough
>> >reason for a 4.1.8 release.
>> >>>> > Welcome to the team!
>> >> I don't understand the cynicism.
>> >> I believe I have contributed quite a bit with translation, bug
>> >reporting and build testing. Apparently that is not enough for
>this
>> >project?
>> >>
>> >> Too bad!
>> >
>> >Well, someone has to deliver...
>> >
>> >No cynicism, it was just an invitation.
>> >
>> >>
>> >> Regards,
>> >> Pedro
>> >>
>>
Re: Mac system Catalina
Posted by Pedro Lino <pe...@mailbox.org>.
Hi Peter
> For Windows it would help in a first step if someone can search the resources on MSN and post links of the validation process described by MS.
>
This is what is needed for Windows Certification: a Code Signing Certificate
https://www.ksoftware.net/code-signing-certificates
Giving that this is a distributed project, I would say that the OV Code Signing is the most appropriate (otherwise only one person will have the encrypted hardware token)
Hope this helps.
Does Apache OpenOffice have any funds?
Regards,
Pedro
> Am 28. Oktober 2019 17:45:35 MEZ schrieb Matthias Seidel < matthias.seidel@hamburg.de mailto:matthias.seidel@hamburg.de >:
> >Hi Pedro,
> >
> >Am 28.10.19 um 17:40 schrieb Pedro Lino:
> >>> > >
> >>>> > Do you volunteer? Remember, we all are only volunteers...
> >;-)
> >>> > > I believe these two issues should be enough
> >reason for a 4.1.8 release.
> >>>> > Welcome to the team!
> >> I don't understand the cynicism.
> >> I believe I have contributed quite a bit with translation, bug
> >reporting and build testing. Apparently that is not enough for this
> >project?
> >>
> >> Too bad!
> >
> >Well, someone has to deliver...
> >
> >No cynicism, it was just an invitation.
> >
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Pedro
> >>
>
Re: Mac system Catalina
Posted by Peter Kovacs <pe...@apache.org>.
Guys calm down. The notarization is no easy thing to do. It is complex process, involving updates of dependencies and involves code changes.
I am trying to push the topic since 2016 for mac when I have joined. Now we are almost at it to solve this. It has been a team effort from the start where multiple people delivered bigger or smaller pieces to the puzzle. Fighting, claiming and other things do not bring us forward.
For Windows it would help in a first step if someone can search the resources on MSN and post links of the validation process described by MS.
Let's take this step by step.
Please!
Am 28. Oktober 2019 17:45:35 MEZ schrieb Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de>:
>Hi Pedro,
>
>Am 28.10.19 um 17:40 schrieb Pedro Lino:
>>> > >
>>>> > Do you volunteer? Remember, we all are only volunteers...
>;-)
>>> > > I believe these two issues should be enough
>reason for a 4.1.8 release.
>>>> > Welcome to the team!
>> I don't understand the cynicism.
>> I believe I have contributed quite a bit with translation, bug
>reporting and build testing. Apparently that is not enough for this
>project?
>>
>> Too bad!
>
>Well, someone has to deliver...
>
>No cynicism, it was just an invitation.
>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Pedro
>>
Re: Mac system Catalina
Posted by Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de>.
Hi Pedro,
Am 28.10.19 um 17:40 schrieb Pedro Lino:
>> > >
>>> > Do you volunteer? Remember, we all are only volunteers... ;-)
>> > > I believe these two issues should be enough reason for a 4.1.8 release.
>>> > Welcome to the team!
> I don't understand the cynicism.
> I believe I have contributed quite a bit with translation, bug reporting and build testing. Apparently that is not enough for this project?
>
> Too bad!
Well, someone has to deliver...
No cynicism, it was just an invitation.
>
> Regards,
> Pedro
>
Re: Mac system Catalina
Posted by Pedro Lino <pe...@mailbox.org>.
>
> > >
> >
> > > Do you volunteer? Remember, we all are only volunteers... ;-)
>
> > > I believe these two issues should be enough reason for a 4.1.8 release.
> >
> > > Welcome to the team!
>
I don't understand the cynicism.
I believe I have contributed quite a bit with translation, bug reporting and build testing. Apparently that is not enough for this project?
Too bad!
Regards,
Pedro
Re: Mac system Catalina
Posted by Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de>.
Hi Pedro,
Am 28.10.19 um 17:16 schrieb Pedro Lino:
> Hi Jim, all
>
>
>> On October 28, 2019 at 3:34 PM Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Oct 28, 2019, at 11:29 AM, Branko Čibej <br...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Even I saw reports on this very list to the tune that, without proper
>>> notarization, apps won't work on Catalina.
>> Not quite true. You can still run non-notarized apps on Catalina... it is just harder than before to "bypass" GateKeeper. One way is to alt-click Open the App. Another is to select it and then choose Open from the Finder.
> That seems to be a workaround for advanced users. If you/we want ordinary Apple users to continue to use OpenOffice then this notarization of the x64 build needs to be solved ASAP.
> The same applies to the Windows installer validation.
Do you volunteer? Remember, we all are only volunteers... ;-)
> I believe these two issues should be enough reason for a 4.1.8 release.
Welcome to the team!
Matthias
>
> Just my 2 cents
> Pedro
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>
Re: Mac system Catalina
Posted by Pedro Lino <pe...@mailbox.org>.
Hi Jim, all
> On October 28, 2019 at 3:34 PM Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> > On Oct 28, 2019, at 11:29 AM, Branko Čibej <br...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Even I saw reports on this very list to the tune that, without proper
> > notarization, apps won't work on Catalina.
>
> Not quite true. You can still run non-notarized apps on Catalina... it is just harder than before to "bypass" GateKeeper. One way is to alt-click Open the App. Another is to select it and then choose Open from the Finder.
That seems to be a workaround for advanced users. If you/we want ordinary Apple users to continue to use OpenOffice then this notarization of the x64 build needs to be solved ASAP.
The same applies to the Windows installer validation.
I believe these two issues should be enough reason for a 4.1.8 release.
Just my 2 cents
Pedro
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Mac system Catalina
Posted by Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de>.
Am 28.10.19 um 16:34 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>
>> On Oct 28, 2019, at 11:29 AM, Branko Čibej <br...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> Even I saw reports on this very list to the tune that, without proper
>> notarization, apps won't work on Catalina.
> Not quite true. You can still run non-notarized apps on Catalina... it is just harder than before to "bypass" GateKeeper. One way is to alt-click Open the App. Another is to select it and then choose Open from the Finder.
And what is more important, people have to install a *64-bit* version.
Downloading the latest release will be sufficient...
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>
Re: Mac system Catalina
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
> On Oct 28, 2019, at 11:29 AM, Branko Čibej <br...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Even I saw reports on this very list to the tune that, without proper
> notarization, apps won't work on Catalina.
Not quite true. You can still run non-notarized apps on Catalina... it is just harder than before to "bypass" GateKeeper. One way is to alt-click Open the App. Another is to select it and then choose Open from the Finder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Mac system Catalina
Posted by Branko Čibej <br...@apache.org>.
On 28.10.2019 07:40, Peter Kovacs wrote:
> Hi Helen,
>
> AFAIK the current version 4.1.7 should work, as all other versions did work before.
> Can you describe your issue in more detail?
Even I saw reports on this very list to the tune that, without proper
notarization, apps won't work on Catalina. AOO is not notarized by
Apple. Hence, user problems.
-- Brane
> Am 28. Oktober 2019 00:36:22 MEZ schrieb Helen Robson <he...@yahoo.co.uk.INVALID>:
>> Could you tell me when OpenOffice will be updated to run on Mac System
>> Catalina?
>> Thank you
>> H Robson
>>
>> Sent from my iPad
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Mac system Catalina
Posted by Peter Kovacs <pe...@apache.org>.
Hi Helen,
AFAIK the current version 4.1.7 should work, as all other versions did work before.
Can you describe your issue in more detail?
All the best
Peter
Am 28. Oktober 2019 00:36:22 MEZ schrieb Helen Robson <he...@yahoo.co.uk.INVALID>:
>Could you tell me when OpenOffice will be updated to run on Mac System
>Catalina?
>Thank you
>H Robson
>
>Sent from my iPad
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org