You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@couchdb.apache.org by Ido Ran <id...@gmail.com> on 2010/09/10 17:58:13 UTC
SproutCore as CouchApp
Hi,
I would like to know if it is possible (even just in theory at this point in
time) to deploy SproutCore application as CouchApp.
>From what I've understand SproutCore are static content once they are build
and to deploy them on web-server like apache you just copy the files to the
server.
CouchApp are also static files so it should be possible.
SproutCore has all the great controls, MVC and DataStore that are missing
(in my view) from CouchApp today.
Using SproutCore together with CouchApp and CouchDB can be great solution.
Thank you,
Ido
Re: SproutCore as CouchApp
Posted by Ido Ran <id...@gmail.com>.
GOOD NEWS.
I'm happy to say that I've managed to deploy SproutCore app as CouchApp.
Although it is only the generated application (Welcome to SproutCore! app)
but SproutCore app non the less.
Those are the steps I use to do it:
1. use sc-init scapp
2. build the app using sc-build scapp -rc (this will build the app in
tmp/build/static).
3. use couchapp generate cdbapp
4. copy tmp/build/static into cdbapp/_attachments
5. open both index.html and javascript.js in /static/scapp/en/ABCD-EFG/ and
add /cdbapp/_design/cdbapp/ before every /static (this direct SC to load
resources from our CouchDB and not from root of our server).
6. push the application to CouchDB.
I have post question in the SproutCore google group to ask how to change the
build script to put the full path in.
http://groups.google.com/group/sproutcore/browse_thread/thread/f83fb94f9c8f8370
This is exciting, hopefully it will be more common way of work soon.
Ido
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 6:49 PM, Ido Ran <id...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm back from vacation and I wonder if in the meantime someone has actually
> manage to deploy SC app on CouchDB?
> Last time I try the sc-build create 2 MB file in each folter of my
> deployment directory which made the push take forever, and even when I push
> it to localhost it did not run after that.
>
> Thank you,
> Ido
>
>
> On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 4:11 PM, Chris Anderson <jc...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 3:07 AM, Ido Ran <id...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > I plan on deploy my application on either CouchOne or CloudAnt so the
>> first
>> > option is not available there (to my understanding).
>> > The second one seem to be possible. I'll try it and let you know.
>> >
>> > What do you think in general about the idea of using SproutCore as
>> front-end
>> > and CouchDB as backend?
>>
>> there are others who have done this before. I have a feeling if you
>> use the SC build script, then push the product, you will have a much
>> smaller app bundle.
>>
>> > It will be hard to recreate all controls in evently, does it?
>>
>> yes that would be like squeezing oranges in an attempt to build a
>> movie theater... evently is just a shortcut for writing jquery code,
>> and a convenient way to package widgets as reusable objects.
>>
>> Chris
>>
>> >
>> > Ido
>> >
>> > On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 7:03 AM, Dave Cottlehuber <da...@muse.net.nz>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> On 18 September 2010 04:50, Ido Ran <id...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > Hi,
>> >> > I have some new things I've found.
>> >> > 1. SproutCore build is very large. 62MB large. The reason is that as
>> part
>> >> of
>> >> > the build they provide the SproutCore libraries, and every part of
>> the
>> >> > library (like core_tools, datastore, datejs) have file
>> >> > name javascript-packed.js which is 2.2MB (for every language). That
>> what
>> >> > make the couchapp push take so long. When I work on my local machine
>> it
>> >> > still take long, but not that long. I guess I may have did something
>> >> wrong
>> >> > during the build but I'm not sure.
>> >> >
>> >> > 2. After I manage to push the application into CouchDB I'm sorry to
>> say
>> >> that
>> >> > the application didn't work due to failure of loading JavaScript
>> files.
>> >> >
>> >> > :5984/static/sproutcore/testing/en/current/javascript.js?1284229073<
>> >>
>> http://localhost:5984/static/sproutcore/testing/en/current/javascript.js?1284229073
>> >> >Failed
>> >> > to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 (Object
>> Not
>> >> > Found)
>> >> > The url I use to load the application is *
>> >> >
>> >>
>> http://localhost:5984/raccon/_design/raccon/static/hello_world/en/current/index.html
>> >> > *
>> >> >
>> >> > **As you can see it try to load the libraries directly from the root
>> of
>> >> the
>> >> > server, not the design document location.
>> >> >
>> >> > If some can help in any one of those issues it will be great.
>> >> >
>> >> > Thank you,
>> >> > Ido
>> >>
>> >> Hi Ido
>> >>
>> >> Sorry small children helping with keyboard here.. only half the email.
>> >> Would using the rewrite handler help?
>> >>
>> >> http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Rewriting_urls
>> >> or possibly
>> >> http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/How_to_change_the_front_page
>> >>
>> >> cheers
>> >> Dave
>> >>
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Chris Anderson
>> http://jchrisa.net
>> http://couch.io
>>
>
>
Re: SproutCore as CouchApp
Posted by Ido Ran <id...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
I'm back from vacation and I wonder if in the meantime someone has actually
manage to deploy SC app on CouchDB?
Last time I try the sc-build create 2 MB file in each folter of my
deployment directory which made the push take forever, and even when I push
it to localhost it did not run after that.
Thank you,
Ido
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 4:11 PM, Chris Anderson <jc...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 3:07 AM, Ido Ran <id...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I plan on deploy my application on either CouchOne or CloudAnt so the
> first
> > option is not available there (to my understanding).
> > The second one seem to be possible. I'll try it and let you know.
> >
> > What do you think in general about the idea of using SproutCore as
> front-end
> > and CouchDB as backend?
>
> there are others who have done this before. I have a feeling if you
> use the SC build script, then push the product, you will have a much
> smaller app bundle.
>
> > It will be hard to recreate all controls in evently, does it?
>
> yes that would be like squeezing oranges in an attempt to build a
> movie theater... evently is just a shortcut for writing jquery code,
> and a convenient way to package widgets as reusable objects.
>
> Chris
>
> >
> > Ido
> >
> > On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 7:03 AM, Dave Cottlehuber <da...@muse.net.nz>
> wrote:
> >
> >> On 18 September 2010 04:50, Ido Ran <id...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >> > I have some new things I've found.
> >> > 1. SproutCore build is very large. 62MB large. The reason is that as
> part
> >> of
> >> > the build they provide the SproutCore libraries, and every part of the
> >> > library (like core_tools, datastore, datejs) have file
> >> > name javascript-packed.js which is 2.2MB (for every language). That
> what
> >> > make the couchapp push take so long. When I work on my local machine
> it
> >> > still take long, but not that long. I guess I may have did something
> >> wrong
> >> > during the build but I'm not sure.
> >> >
> >> > 2. After I manage to push the application into CouchDB I'm sorry to
> say
> >> that
> >> > the application didn't work due to failure of loading JavaScript
> files.
> >> >
> >> > :5984/static/sproutcore/testing/en/current/javascript.js?1284229073<
> >>
> http://localhost:5984/static/sproutcore/testing/en/current/javascript.js?1284229073
> >> >Failed
> >> > to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 (Object
> Not
> >> > Found)
> >> > The url I use to load the application is *
> >> >
> >>
> http://localhost:5984/raccon/_design/raccon/static/hello_world/en/current/index.html
> >> > *
> >> >
> >> > **As you can see it try to load the libraries directly from the root
> of
> >> the
> >> > server, not the design document location.
> >> >
> >> > If some can help in any one of those issues it will be great.
> >> >
> >> > Thank you,
> >> > Ido
> >>
> >> Hi Ido
> >>
> >> Sorry small children helping with keyboard here.. only half the email.
> >> Would using the rewrite handler help?
> >>
> >> http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Rewriting_urls
> >> or possibly
> >> http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/How_to_change_the_front_page
> >>
> >> cheers
> >> Dave
> >>
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Chris Anderson
> http://jchrisa.net
> http://couch.io
>
Re: SproutCore as CouchApp
Posted by Chris Anderson <jc...@apache.org>.
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 3:07 AM, Ido Ran <id...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I plan on deploy my application on either CouchOne or CloudAnt so the first
> option is not available there (to my understanding).
> The second one seem to be possible. I'll try it and let you know.
>
> What do you think in general about the idea of using SproutCore as front-end
> and CouchDB as backend?
there are others who have done this before. I have a feeling if you
use the SC build script, then push the product, you will have a much
smaller app bundle.
> It will be hard to recreate all controls in evently, does it?
yes that would be like squeezing oranges in an attempt to build a
movie theater... evently is just a shortcut for writing jquery code,
and a convenient way to package widgets as reusable objects.
Chris
>
> Ido
>
> On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 7:03 AM, Dave Cottlehuber <da...@muse.net.nz> wrote:
>
>> On 18 September 2010 04:50, Ido Ran <id...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> > I have some new things I've found.
>> > 1. SproutCore build is very large. 62MB large. The reason is that as part
>> of
>> > the build they provide the SproutCore libraries, and every part of the
>> > library (like core_tools, datastore, datejs) have file
>> > name javascript-packed.js which is 2.2MB (for every language). That what
>> > make the couchapp push take so long. When I work on my local machine it
>> > still take long, but not that long. I guess I may have did something
>> wrong
>> > during the build but I'm not sure.
>> >
>> > 2. After I manage to push the application into CouchDB I'm sorry to say
>> that
>> > the application didn't work due to failure of loading JavaScript files.
>> >
>> > :5984/static/sproutcore/testing/en/current/javascript.js?1284229073<
>> http://localhost:5984/static/sproutcore/testing/en/current/javascript.js?1284229073
>> >Failed
>> > to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 (Object Not
>> > Found)
>> > The url I use to load the application is *
>> >
>> http://localhost:5984/raccon/_design/raccon/static/hello_world/en/current/index.html
>> > *
>> >
>> > **As you can see it try to load the libraries directly from the root of
>> the
>> > server, not the design document location.
>> >
>> > If some can help in any one of those issues it will be great.
>> >
>> > Thank you,
>> > Ido
>>
>> Hi Ido
>>
>> Sorry small children helping with keyboard here.. only half the email.
>> Would using the rewrite handler help?
>>
>> http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Rewriting_urls
>> or possibly
>> http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/How_to_change_the_front_page
>>
>> cheers
>> Dave
>>
>
--
Chris Anderson
http://jchrisa.net
http://couch.io
Re: SproutCore as CouchApp
Posted by Benoit Chesneau <bc...@gmail.com>.
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 12:07 PM, Ido Ran <id...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I plan on deploy my application on either CouchOne or CloudAnt so the first
> option is not available there (to my understanding).
> The second one seem to be possible. I'll try it and let you know.
>
> What do you think in general about the idea of using SproutCore as front-end
> and CouchDB as backend?
> It will be hard to recreate all controls in evently, does it?
>
> Ido
rewrite is available on both. But anyway i've most of teh sproutcore
extension running . Should be available next week on my repo. Size
isn't a problem, since it's saved as attachments then cached.
Couchapp script take care of not sending the attachments twice if they
didn't change, so the first push may be big but other aren't. If you
want you can also build a sproutcore doc containing all attachments
and reuse it in your other apps.
- benoit
Re: SproutCore as CouchApp
Posted by Ido Ran <id...@gmail.com>.
I plan on deploy my application on either CouchOne or CloudAnt so the first
option is not available there (to my understanding).
The second one seem to be possible. I'll try it and let you know.
What do you think in general about the idea of using SproutCore as front-end
and CouchDB as backend?
It will be hard to recreate all controls in evently, does it?
Ido
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 7:03 AM, Dave Cottlehuber <da...@muse.net.nz> wrote:
> On 18 September 2010 04:50, Ido Ran <id...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I have some new things I've found.
> > 1. SproutCore build is very large. 62MB large. The reason is that as part
> of
> > the build they provide the SproutCore libraries, and every part of the
> > library (like core_tools, datastore, datejs) have file
> > name javascript-packed.js which is 2.2MB (for every language). That what
> > make the couchapp push take so long. When I work on my local machine it
> > still take long, but not that long. I guess I may have did something
> wrong
> > during the build but I'm not sure.
> >
> > 2. After I manage to push the application into CouchDB I'm sorry to say
> that
> > the application didn't work due to failure of loading JavaScript files.
> >
> > :5984/static/sproutcore/testing/en/current/javascript.js?1284229073<
> http://localhost:5984/static/sproutcore/testing/en/current/javascript.js?1284229073
> >Failed
> > to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 (Object Not
> > Found)
> > The url I use to load the application is *
> >
> http://localhost:5984/raccon/_design/raccon/static/hello_world/en/current/index.html
> > *
> >
> > **As you can see it try to load the libraries directly from the root of
> the
> > server, not the design document location.
> >
> > If some can help in any one of those issues it will be great.
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Ido
>
> Hi Ido
>
> Sorry small children helping with keyboard here.. only half the email.
> Would using the rewrite handler help?
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Rewriting_urls
> or possibly
> http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/How_to_change_the_front_page
>
> cheers
> Dave
>
Re: SproutCore as CouchApp
Posted by Dave Cottlehuber <da...@muse.net.nz>.
On 18 September 2010 04:50, Ido Ran <id...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> I have some new things I've found.
> 1. SproutCore build is very large. 62MB large. The reason is that as part of
> the build they provide the SproutCore libraries, and every part of the
> library (like core_tools, datastore, datejs) have file
> name javascript-packed.js which is 2.2MB (for every language). That what
> make the couchapp push take so long. When I work on my local machine it
> still take long, but not that long. I guess I may have did something wrong
> during the build but I'm not sure.
>
> 2. After I manage to push the application into CouchDB I'm sorry to say that
> the application didn't work due to failure of loading JavaScript files.
>
> :5984/static/sproutcore/testing/en/current/javascript.js?1284229073<http://localhost:5984/static/sproutcore/testing/en/current/javascript.js?1284229073>Failed
> to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 (Object Not
> Found)
> The url I use to load the application is *
> http://localhost:5984/raccon/_design/raccon/static/hello_world/en/current/index.html
> *
>
> **As you can see it try to load the libraries directly from the root of the
> server, not the design document location.
>
> If some can help in any one of those issues it will be great.
>
> Thank you,
> Ido
Hi Ido
Sorry small children helping with keyboard here.. only half the email.
Would using the rewrite handler help?
http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Rewriting_urls
or possibly
http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/How_to_change_the_front_page
cheers
Dave
Re: SproutCore as CouchApp
Posted by Dave Cottlehuber <da...@muse.net.nz>.
On 18 September 2010 04:50, Ido Ran <id...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> I have some new things I've found.
> 1. SproutCore build is very large. 62MB large. The reason is that as part of
> the build they provide the SproutCore libraries, and every part of the
> library (like core_tools, datastore, datejs) have file
> name javascript-packed.js which is 2.2MB (for every language). That what
> make the couchapp push take so long. When I work on my local machine it
> still take long, but not that long. I guess I may have did something wrong
> during the build but I'm not sure.
>
> 2. After I manage to push the application into CouchDB I'm sorry to say that
> the application didn't work due to failure of loading JavaScript files.
>
> :5984/static/sproutcore/testing/en/current/javascript.js?1284229073<http://localhost:5984/static/sproutcore/testing/en/current/javascript.js?1284229073>Failed
> to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 (Object Not
> Found)
> The url I use to load the application is *
> http://localhost:5984/raccon/_design/raccon/static/hello_world/en/current/index.html
> *
>
> **As you can see it try to load the libraries directly from the root of the
> server, not the design document location.
>
> If some can help in any one of those issues it will be great.
>
> Thank you,
> Ido
Would using the rewrite handler help?
http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/How_to_change_the_front_page
Re: SproutCore as CouchApp
Posted by Ido Ran <id...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
I have some new things I've found.
1. SproutCore build is very large. 62MB large. The reason is that as part of
the build they provide the SproutCore libraries, and every part of the
library (like core_tools, datastore, datejs) have file
name javascript-packed.js which is 2.2MB (for every language). That what
make the couchapp push take so long. When I work on my local machine it
still take long, but not that long. I guess I may have did something wrong
during the build but I'm not sure.
2. After I manage to push the application into CouchDB I'm sorry to say that
the application didn't work due to failure of loading JavaScript files.
:5984/static/sproutcore/testing/en/current/javascript.js?1284229073<http://localhost:5984/static/sproutcore/testing/en/current/javascript.js?1284229073>Failed
to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 (Object Not
Found)
The url I use to load the application is *
http://localhost:5984/raccon/_design/raccon/static/hello_world/en/current/index.html
*
**As you can see it try to load the libraries directly from the root of the
server, not the design document location.
If some can help in any one of those issues it will be great.
Thank you,
Ido
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Ido Ran <id...@gmail.com> wrote:
> One more thing: it looks like geoffreyd fork Sproutcore repository and
> integrate CouchDB server into it.
> http://github.com/geoffreyd/sproutcore
>
> Check it out see if it works for you.
>
> Ido
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 11:40 AM, Ido Ran <id...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> I share your excitement but I still have to tell you using SproutCore is
>> not as easy as it first seem, at least not to me.
>> Also I've found this project:
>> http://github.com/geoffreyd/sproutcore-couchdb. At first I thought it is
>> a DataSource for CouchDB which is the part you need to connect SproutCore
>> application to CouchDB backend but when I look into it it is something else,
>> close but not DataSource.
>>
>> I'll keep post here if it will develop.
>>
>> Ido
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 11:28 AM, Benoit Chesneau <bc...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> this thread is interresting :
>>>
>>>
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/sproutcore/browse_thread/thread/fe1d7da4d028af2c?pli=1
>>>
>>
>>
>
Re: SproutCore as CouchApp
Posted by Ido Ran <id...@gmail.com>.
One more thing: it looks like geoffreyd fork Sproutcore repository and
integrate CouchDB server into it.
http://github.com/geoffreyd/sproutcore
Check it out see if it works for you.
Ido
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 11:40 AM, Ido Ran <id...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> I share your excitement but I still have to tell you using SproutCore is
> not as easy as it first seem, at least not to me.
> Also I've found this project:
> http://github.com/geoffreyd/sproutcore-couchdb. At first I thought it is a
> DataSource for CouchDB which is the part you need to connect SproutCore
> application to CouchDB backend but when I look into it it is something else,
> close but not DataSource.
>
> I'll keep post here if it will develop.
>
> Ido
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 11:28 AM, Benoit Chesneau <bc...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> this thread is interresting :
>>
>>
>> http://groups.google.com/group/sproutcore/browse_thread/thread/fe1d7da4d028af2c?pli=1
>>
>
>
Re: SproutCore as CouchApp
Posted by Ido Ran <id...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
I share your excitement but I still have to tell you using SproutCore is not
as easy as it first seem, at least not to me.
Also I've found this project: http://github.com/geoffreyd/sproutcore-couchdb.
At first I thought it is a DataSource for CouchDB which is the part you need
to connect SproutCore application to CouchDB backend but when I look into it
it is something else, close but not DataSource.
I'll keep post here if it will develop.
Ido
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 11:28 AM, Benoit Chesneau <bc...@gmail.com>wrote:
> this thread is interresting :
>
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/sproutcore/browse_thread/thread/fe1d7da4d028af2c?pli=1
>
Re: SproutCore as CouchApp
Posted by Benoit Chesneau <bc...@gmail.com>.
this thread is interresting :
http://groups.google.com/group/sproutcore/browse_thread/thread/fe1d7da4d028af2c?pli=1
Re: SproutCore as CouchApp
Posted by Benoit Chesneau <bc...@gmail.com>.
On Wednesday, September 15, 2010, Russell Branca <ch...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Keep us posted on how this works for you. I would love to see a blog
> post about the end result and what it took to make it happen.
>
> I'm very intrigued by the idea of having a full javascript application
> stack. CouchDB, Node.js and jQuery take you a long way, but its still
> missing a solid javascript UI framework to finish off the stack, which
> is where something like sproutcore would be great. I'm also especially
> interested in sproutcore with today's news that Yehuda Katz and Carl
> Lerche both left engine yard to go work on sproutcore. Very excited to
> see what happens.
>
>
yup indeed and he said it will be more opensource which is really good.
> -Russell
>
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 11:27 PM, Benoit Chesneau <bc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sunday, September 12, 2010, Ido Ran <id...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I'll be glad to, but I'm not sure how to get the trace.
>>> There was no output in the command line.
>>>
>>> Ido
>>>
>>
>> try to run couchapp push with -v, there is also a debug setting now
>> that could help.
>>
>
Re: SproutCore as CouchApp
Posted by Russell Branca <ch...@gmail.com>.
Keep us posted on how this works for you. I would love to see a blog
post about the end result and what it took to make it happen.
I'm very intrigued by the idea of having a full javascript application
stack. CouchDB, Node.js and jQuery take you a long way, but its still
missing a solid javascript UI framework to finish off the stack, which
is where something like sproutcore would be great. I'm also especially
interested in sproutcore with today's news that Yehuda Katz and Carl
Lerche both left engine yard to go work on sproutcore. Very excited to
see what happens.
-Russell
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 11:27 PM, Benoit Chesneau <bc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sunday, September 12, 2010, Ido Ran <id...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I'll be glad to, but I'm not sure how to get the trace.
>> There was no output in the command line.
>>
>> Ido
>>
>
> try to run couchapp push with -v, there is also a debug setting now
> that could help.
>
Re: SproutCore as CouchApp
Posted by Benoit Chesneau <bc...@gmail.com>.
On Sunday, September 12, 2010, Ido Ran <id...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'll be glad to, but I'm not sure how to get the trace.
> There was no output in the command line.
>
> Ido
>
try to run couchapp push with -v, there is also a debug setting now
that could help.
Re: SproutCore as CouchApp
Posted by Ido Ran <id...@gmail.com>.
I'll be glad to, but I'm not sure how to get the trace.
There was no output in the command line.
Ido
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Benoit Chesneau <bc...@gmail.com>wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 9:25 PM, Ido Ran <id...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I've try to deploy SproutCore as CouchApp but fail - I guess I've done
> > something wrong.
> >
> > I've create new SproutCore application using *sc-init*
> > **I've tested the app using *sc-server *and it is simple hello world app
> > working.
> > I've cd into *tmp/debug/build*
> > **I've execute *couchapp init*
> > **I've execute *couchapp push http://<my_couchone_address>*
> > *
> > *
> > I've got a lot of warnings and it looks like the command just stuck.
> >
> > Should I do it other way?
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Ido
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 9:22 PM, Ido Ran <id...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Thank you all.
> >>
> >> One thing that might be a problem is that SproutCore generate files in
> >> directories with long numbers and then they advice to use hard link from
> the
> >> root of the virtual context in the web server to the actual directory
> name.
> >> Do you think it will be possible to use virtual host of CouchDB to have
> >> "the same thing" like hard-link (or soft link for that mater)?
> >>
> >> Thank you,
> >> Ido
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 8:59 PM, James Hayton <
> theboss@purplebulldog.com>wrote:
> >>
> >>> I have done it and can say it works really well. Security was a huge
> >>> concern I ran into and ultimately the reason I had to add a middle
> tier, but
> >>> otherwise it was all good.
> >>>
> >>> James
> >>>
> >>> Sent Via iPhone
> >>>
> >>> On Sep 10, 2010, at 10:47 AM, Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > I hate "me too" posts, but this sounds REALLY interesting.
> >>> >
> >>> > I hope you keep us updated with your progress!
> >>> >
> >>> > On 10 Sep 2010, at 16:58, Ido Ran wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> >> Hi,
> >>> >> I would like to know if it is possible (even just in theory at this
> >>> point in
> >>> >> time) to deploy SproutCore application as CouchApp.
> >>> >> From what I've understand SproutCore are static content once they
> are
> >>> build
> >>> >> and to deploy them on web-server like apache you just copy the files
> to
> >>> the
> >>> >> server.
> >>> >> CouchApp are also static files so it should be possible.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> SproutCore has all the great controls, MVC and DataStore that are
> >>> missing
> >>> >> (in my view) from CouchApp today.
> >>> >> Using SproutCore together with CouchApp and CouchDB can be great
> >>> solution.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Thank you,
> >>> >> Ido
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> Publish the trace could help, could you paste it somewhere a give us the
> link?
>
> - benoit
>
Re: SproutCore as CouchApp
Posted by Benoit Chesneau <bc...@gmail.com>.
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 9:25 PM, Ido Ran <id...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> I've try to deploy SproutCore as CouchApp but fail - I guess I've done
> something wrong.
>
> I've create new SproutCore application using *sc-init*
> **I've tested the app using *sc-server *and it is simple hello world app
> working.
> I've cd into *tmp/debug/build*
> **I've execute *couchapp init*
> **I've execute *couchapp push http://<my_couchone_address>*
> *
> *
> I've got a lot of warnings and it looks like the command just stuck.
>
> Should I do it other way?
>
> Thank you,
> Ido
>
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 9:22 PM, Ido Ran <id...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Thank you all.
>>
>> One thing that might be a problem is that SproutCore generate files in
>> directories with long numbers and then they advice to use hard link from the
>> root of the virtual context in the web server to the actual directory name.
>> Do you think it will be possible to use virtual host of CouchDB to have
>> "the same thing" like hard-link (or soft link for that mater)?
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Ido
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 8:59 PM, James Hayton <th...@purplebulldog.com>wrote:
>>
>>> I have done it and can say it works really well. Security was a huge
>>> concern I ran into and ultimately the reason I had to add a middle tier, but
>>> otherwise it was all good.
>>>
>>> James
>>>
>>> Sent Via iPhone
>>>
>>> On Sep 10, 2010, at 10:47 AM, Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> > I hate "me too" posts, but this sounds REALLY interesting.
>>> >
>>> > I hope you keep us updated with your progress!
>>> >
>>> > On 10 Sep 2010, at 16:58, Ido Ran wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> Hi,
>>> >> I would like to know if it is possible (even just in theory at this
>>> point in
>>> >> time) to deploy SproutCore application as CouchApp.
>>> >> From what I've understand SproutCore are static content once they are
>>> build
>>> >> and to deploy them on web-server like apache you just copy the files to
>>> the
>>> >> server.
>>> >> CouchApp are also static files so it should be possible.
>>> >>
>>> >> SproutCore has all the great controls, MVC and DataStore that are
>>> missing
>>> >> (in my view) from CouchApp today.
>>> >> Using SproutCore together with CouchApp and CouchDB can be great
>>> solution.
>>> >>
>>> >> Thank you,
>>> >> Ido
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>
>
Publish the trace could help, could you paste it somewhere a give us the link?
- benoit
Re: SproutCore as CouchApp
Posted by Ido Ran <id...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
It does sound like putting it into _attachments it the way.
But I've try it and couchapp push again seem to be stuck. It does not print
any warning message but does not upload any design document either.
I'll try it some more and publish the URL.
Thank you,
Ido
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 1:29 AM, Dave Cottlehuber <da...@muse.net.nz> wrote:
> On 12 September 2010 07:25, Ido Ran <id...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I've try to deploy SproutCore as CouchApp but fail - I guess I've done
> > something wrong.
> >
> > I've create new SproutCore application using *sc-init*
> > **I've tested the app using *sc-server *and it is simple hello world app
> > working.
> > I've cd into *tmp/debug/build*
> > **I've execute *couchapp init*
> > **I've execute *couchapp push http://<my_couchone_address>*
> > *
> > *
> > I've got a lot of warnings and it looks like the command just stuck.
> >
> > Should I do it other way?
>
> Ido,
>
> I suspect your /tmp/debug/build folder is missing lots of couchapp
> foo, and your URL is too short. I don't know sproutcore (I am watching
> to see here) but normally, I'd go:
>
> couchapp generate raccoon
> cd raccoon
> # copy stuff in here somewhere, maybe in your case into ./_attachments
> couchapp push http://admin@passwd:muse.couchone.com:5984/raccoon
> # better is to sort out my .couchapprc instead & just do
> couchapp push
>
> Does this help?
>
> If you get it working are you OK for me to clone/replicate your app to
> have a look at it? what's its URL?
>
> cheers
> Dave
>
Re: SproutCore as CouchApp
Posted by Dave Cottlehuber <da...@muse.net.nz>.
On 12 September 2010 07:25, Ido Ran <id...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> I've try to deploy SproutCore as CouchApp but fail - I guess I've done
> something wrong.
>
> I've create new SproutCore application using *sc-init*
> **I've tested the app using *sc-server *and it is simple hello world app
> working.
> I've cd into *tmp/debug/build*
> **I've execute *couchapp init*
> **I've execute *couchapp push http://<my_couchone_address>*
> *
> *
> I've got a lot of warnings and it looks like the command just stuck.
>
> Should I do it other way?
Ido,
I suspect your /tmp/debug/build folder is missing lots of couchapp
foo, and your URL is too short. I don't know sproutcore (I am watching
to see here) but normally, I'd go:
couchapp generate raccoon
cd raccoon
# copy stuff in here somewhere, maybe in your case into ./_attachments
couchapp push http://admin@passwd:muse.couchone.com:5984/raccoon
# better is to sort out my .couchapprc instead & just do
couchapp push
Does this help?
If you get it working are you OK for me to clone/replicate your app to
have a look at it? what's its URL?
cheers
Dave
Re: SproutCore as CouchApp
Posted by Ido Ran <id...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
I've try to deploy SproutCore as CouchApp but fail - I guess I've done
something wrong.
I've create new SproutCore application using *sc-init*
**I've tested the app using *sc-server *and it is simple hello world app
working.
I've cd into *tmp/debug/build*
**I've execute *couchapp init*
**I've execute *couchapp push http://<my_couchone_address>*
*
*
I've got a lot of warnings and it looks like the command just stuck.
Should I do it other way?
Thank you,
Ido
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 9:22 PM, Ido Ran <id...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thank you all.
>
> One thing that might be a problem is that SproutCore generate files in
> directories with long numbers and then they advice to use hard link from the
> root of the virtual context in the web server to the actual directory name.
> Do you think it will be possible to use virtual host of CouchDB to have
> "the same thing" like hard-link (or soft link for that mater)?
>
> Thank you,
> Ido
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 8:59 PM, James Hayton <th...@purplebulldog.com>wrote:
>
>> I have done it and can say it works really well. Security was a huge
>> concern I ran into and ultimately the reason I had to add a middle tier, but
>> otherwise it was all good.
>>
>> James
>>
>> Sent Via iPhone
>>
>> On Sep 10, 2010, at 10:47 AM, Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> > I hate "me too" posts, but this sounds REALLY interesting.
>> >
>> > I hope you keep us updated with your progress!
>> >
>> > On 10 Sep 2010, at 16:58, Ido Ran wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi,
>> >> I would like to know if it is possible (even just in theory at this
>> point in
>> >> time) to deploy SproutCore application as CouchApp.
>> >> From what I've understand SproutCore are static content once they are
>> build
>> >> and to deploy them on web-server like apache you just copy the files to
>> the
>> >> server.
>> >> CouchApp are also static files so it should be possible.
>> >>
>> >> SproutCore has all the great controls, MVC and DataStore that are
>> missing
>> >> (in my view) from CouchApp today.
>> >> Using SproutCore together with CouchApp and CouchDB can be great
>> solution.
>> >>
>> >> Thank you,
>> >> Ido
>> >
>>
>
>
Re: SproutCore as CouchApp
Posted by Ido Ran <id...@gmail.com>.
Thank you all.
One thing that might be a problem is that SproutCore generate files in
directories with long numbers and then they advice to use hard link from the
root of the virtual context in the web server to the actual directory name.
Do you think it will be possible to use virtual host of CouchDB to have "the
same thing" like hard-link (or soft link for that mater)?
Thank you,
Ido
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 8:59 PM, James Hayton <th...@purplebulldog.com>wrote:
> I have done it and can say it works really well. Security was a huge
> concern I ran into and ultimately the reason I had to add a middle tier, but
> otherwise it was all good.
>
> James
>
> Sent Via iPhone
>
> On Sep 10, 2010, at 10:47 AM, Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > I hate "me too" posts, but this sounds REALLY interesting.
> >
> > I hope you keep us updated with your progress!
> >
> > On 10 Sep 2010, at 16:58, Ido Ran wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >> I would like to know if it is possible (even just in theory at this
> point in
> >> time) to deploy SproutCore application as CouchApp.
> >> From what I've understand SproutCore are static content once they are
> build
> >> and to deploy them on web-server like apache you just copy the files to
> the
> >> server.
> >> CouchApp are also static files so it should be possible.
> >>
> >> SproutCore has all the great controls, MVC and DataStore that are
> missing
> >> (in my view) from CouchApp today.
> >> Using SproutCore together with CouchApp and CouchDB can be great
> solution.
> >>
> >> Thank you,
> >> Ido
> >
>
Re: SproutCore as CouchApp
Posted by James Hayton <th...@purplebulldog.com>.
I have done it and can say it works really well. Security was a huge concern I ran into and ultimately the reason I had to add a middle tier, but otherwise it was all good.
James
Sent Via iPhone
On Sep 10, 2010, at 10:47 AM, Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
> I hate "me too" posts, but this sounds REALLY interesting.
>
> I hope you keep us updated with your progress!
>
> On 10 Sep 2010, at 16:58, Ido Ran wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> I would like to know if it is possible (even just in theory at this point in
>> time) to deploy SproutCore application as CouchApp.
>> From what I've understand SproutCore are static content once they are build
>> and to deploy them on web-server like apache you just copy the files to the
>> server.
>> CouchApp are also static files so it should be possible.
>>
>> SproutCore has all the great controls, MVC and DataStore that are missing
>> (in my view) from CouchApp today.
>> Using SproutCore together with CouchApp and CouchDB can be great solution.
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Ido
>
Re: SproutCore as CouchApp
Posted by Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org>.
I hate "me too" posts, but this sounds REALLY interesting.
I hope you keep us updated with your progress!
On 10 Sep 2010, at 16:58, Ido Ran wrote:
> Hi,
> I would like to know if it is possible (even just in theory at this point in
> time) to deploy SproutCore application as CouchApp.
> From what I've understand SproutCore are static content once they are build
> and to deploy them on web-server like apache you just copy the files to the
> server.
> CouchApp are also static files so it should be possible.
>
> SproutCore has all the great controls, MVC and DataStore that are missing
> (in my view) from CouchApp today.
> Using SproutCore together with CouchApp and CouchDB can be great solution.
>
> Thank you,
> Ido
Re: SproutCore as CouchApp
Posted by Thomas Rampelberg <py...@gmail.com>.
Should actually be really easy, couchapp makes working with stuff like
that ridiculously simple. Just setup a couchapp and put the SproutCore
files in and you should be good to go.
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Ido Ran <id...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> I would like to know if it is possible (even just in theory at this point in
> time) to deploy SproutCore application as CouchApp.
> From what I've understand SproutCore are static content once they are build
> and to deploy them on web-server like apache you just copy the files to the
> server.
> CouchApp are also static files so it should be possible.
>
> SproutCore has all the great controls, MVC and DataStore that are missing
> (in my view) from CouchApp today.
> Using SproutCore together with CouchApp and CouchDB can be great solution.
>
> Thank you,
> Ido
>
Re: SproutCore as CouchApp
Posted by Benoit Chesneau <bc...@gmail.com>.
On Friday, September 10, 2010, Ido Ran <id...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> I would like to know if it is possible (even just in theory at this point in
> time) to deploy SproutCore application as CouchApp.
> From what I've understand SproutCore are static content once they are build
> and to deploy them on web-server like apache you just copy the files to the
> server.
> CouchApp are also static files so it should be possible.
>
> SproutCore has all the great controls, MVC and DataStore that are missing
> (in my view) from CouchApp today.
> Using SproutCore together with CouchApp and CouchDB can be great solution.
>
> Thank you,
> Ido
>
i'm thinking to provide a couchapp extension for it, so It will ease
the deployement. The hard part in it is the write of a datasource
connector for couchdb in sproutcore. There isn't one by default. I
would bee interrested by any difficulties you went in deploying it on
couchdb right now that could help :)
-benoit