You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to commits@subversion.apache.org by lg...@apache.org on 2010/01/19 18:46:09 UTC

svn commit: r900864 - /subversion/branches/1.6.x/STATUS

Author: lgo
Date: Tue Jan 19 17:46:07 2010
New Revision: 900864

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=900864&view=rev
Log:
* STATUS: Vote for serfassertion fix, approving.

Modified:
    subversion/branches/1.6.x/STATUS

Modified: subversion/branches/1.6.x/STATUS
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/branches/1.6.x/STATUS?rev=900864&r1=900863&r2=900864&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- subversion/branches/1.6.x/STATUS (original)
+++ subversion/branches/1.6.x/STATUS Tue Jan 19 17:46:07 2010
@@ -178,14 +178,6 @@
    Votes:
      +1: kameshj
      
- * ^/subversion/branches/1.6.x-1.6.8-serfassertion
-   Fix the assertion as seen while running the tests over svn_ra_serf by
-   canonicalizing the basecoll_url before returning it.  See
-   http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2010-01/0295.shtml for discussion.
-   Justification:
-     Failing assertions are bad.
-   Votes:
-     +1: rhuijben, pburba
 
 Veto-blocked changes:
 =====================
@@ -223,3 +215,12 @@
 
 Approved changes:
 =================
+
+ * ^/subversion/branches/1.6.x-1.6.8-serfassertion
+   Fix the assertion as seen while running the tests over svn_ra_serf by
+   canonicalizing the basecoll_url before returning it.  See
+   http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2010-01/0295.shtml for discussion.
+   Justification:
+     Failing assertions are bad.
+   Votes:
+     +1: rhuijben, pburba, lgo