You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to general@incubator.apache.org by Om <bi...@gmail.com> on 2012/10/30 21:16:44 UTC

[VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 1.0.8-incubating

Hi all,

After our first release as Apache Flex, we are following it up with the Apache
Flex SDK Installer (Incubating) AIR application.

The Apache Flex SDK Installer AIR application provides an easy,
single-click installation of the Apache Flex SDK and all its dependencies.
 This will make it suitable for working with   IDEs such as Adobe Flash
Builder, FDT, IntelliJ IDEA, FlashDevelop, etc.

The application downloads the following dependencies:

   - The AIR sdk (Windows vs. Mac) based on the current platform
   - Adobe Flash Player playerglobal.swc
   - SwfObject
   - Open Source Media Framework (OSMF)
   - Adobe Text Layout Format (TLF)

Optionally, the application will download these files as well:

   - Adobe BlazeDS
   - Adobe embedded font support


This release was voted upon on the flex-dev@incubator.apache.org list.  The
vote passed with 11 binding and 5 non-binding votes.  Here is the voting
thread:
http://markmail.org/thread/nbrflol6mkpu65ry

The source distributions for Windows and Mac are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~bigosmallm/installapacheflex_RC9/

The binary distributions as a convenience for the respective platforms,
available here:
http://people.apache.org/~bigosmallm/installapacheflex_RC9/binaries/

The PGP keys of the two release managers - OmPrakash Muppirala (Source kit
+ Windows binaries) and Erik de Bruin (Mac binaries) are available here:
http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/flex/KEYS

Here is the tag for the release:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/flex/utilities/tags/apache-flex-sdk-installer-1.0.8-RC9



Please vote:

[ ] +1  approve
[ ] +0  no opinion
[ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)

The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.

Regards,
OmPrakash Muppirala
Apache Flex PPMC Member

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 1.0.8-incubating

Posted by Om <bi...@gmail.com>.

Hi folks,

We need one more IPMC member vote for us to be able to ship this.  Can
someone please take a look when you get a chance?
I will be glad to answer any questions or concerns you may have.

Thanks,
Om


On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Om <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> After our first release as Apache Flex, we are following it up with the Apache
> Flex SDK Installer (Incubating) AIR application.
>
> The Apache Flex SDK Installer AIR application provides an easy,
> single-click installation of the Apache Flex SDK and all its dependencies.
>  This will make it suitable for working with   IDEs such as Adobe Flash
> Builder, FDT, IntelliJ IDEA, FlashDevelop, etc.
>
> The application downloads the following dependencies:
>
>    - The AIR sdk (Windows vs. Mac) based on the current platform
>    - Adobe Flash Player playerglobal.swc
>    - SwfObject
>    - Open Source Media Framework (OSMF)
>    - Adobe Text Layout Format (TLF)
>
> Optionally, the application will download these files as well:
>
>    - Adobe BlazeDS
>    - Adobe embedded font support
>
>
> This release was voted upon on the flex-dev@incubator.apache.org list.
>  The vote passed with 11 binding and 5 non-binding votes.  Here is the
> voting thread:
> http://markmail.org/thread/nbrflol6mkpu65ry
>
> The source distributions for Windows and Mac are available here:
> http://people.apache.org/~bigosmallm/installapacheflex_RC9/
>
> The binary distributions as a convenience for the respective platforms,
> available here:
> http://people.apache.org/~bigosmallm/installapacheflex_RC9/binaries/
>
> The PGP keys of the two release managers - OmPrakash Muppirala (Source kit
> + Windows binaries) and Erik de Bruin (Mac binaries) are available here:
> http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/flex/KEYS
>
> Here is the tag for the release:
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/flex/utilities/tags/apache-flex-sdk-installer-1.0.8-RC9
>
>
>
> Please vote:
>
> [ ] +1  approve
> [ ] +0  no opinion
> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>
> Regards,
> OmPrakash Muppirala
> Apache Flex PPMC Member
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 1.0.8-incubating

Posted by Om <bi...@gmail.com>.

>
> > The document at [3] in the section "Signing Basics" only seems to require
> > that the key be in the KEYS file.  Om's key is there at [4].
>
> See the linked document:
>
> http://www.apache.org/dev/openpgp.html#generation-final-steps-new-key
>
>

Thanks Sebb.  As I mentioned earlier, I have uploaded my key C1708693 to
hkp server keys.gnupg.net

I did a gpg --reflresh-keys and I see it listed there as well.

Thanks,
Om

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 1.0.8-incubating

Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.

On 1 November 2012 21:05, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 11/1/12 1:16 PM, "sebb" <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>>> The key C1708693 does not appear to be available from the normal
>>>> public PGP key servers.
>>>
>>> I presume you would like Om to publish his key.
>>
>> Yes, that is required so end users can fetch it if required.
>>
>> Also AIUI it is used by Nexus.
>>
> The document at [3] in the section "Signing Basics" only seems to require
> that the key be in the KEYS file.  Om's key is there at [4].

See the linked document:

http://www.apache.org/dev/openpgp.html#generation-final-steps-new-key

>
>
>> There should be an EOL at EOF.
>> I.e. the last line in source files should have an EOL.
>>
>> [Whether the EOL is LF or CRLF or CR is immaterial to this discussion.]
>>
>> Otherwise the files in the SVN tag aren't the same as the files in the
>> source archive.
>>
> "Should" or "must"?  Is this a release blocker?
>
> [3] http://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing
> [4] http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/flex/KEYS
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Alex Harui
> Flex SDK Team
> Adobe Systems, Inc.
> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 1.0.8-incubating

Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.



On 11/1/12 1:16 PM, "sebb" <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
 
>>> The key C1708693 does not appear to be available from the normal
>>> public PGP key servers.
>> 
>> I presume you would like Om to publish his key.
> 
> Yes, that is required so end users can fetch it if required.
> 
> Also AIUI it is used by Nexus.
> 
The document at [3] in the section "Signing Basics" only seems to require
that the key be in the KEYS file.  Om's key is there at [4].



> There should be an EOL at EOF.
> I.e. the last line in source files should have an EOL.
> 
> [Whether the EOL is LF or CRLF or CR is immaterial to this discussion.]
> 
> Otherwise the files in the SVN tag aren't the same as the files in the
> source archive.
> 
"Should" or "must"?  Is this a release blocker?

[3] http://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing
[4] http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/flex/KEYS

Thanks,
-- 
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 1.0.8-incubating

Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.

On 1 November 2012 20:03, Carol Frampton <cf...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 11/1/12 7 :16AM, "sebb" <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On 30 October 2012 20:16, Om <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> After our first release as Apache Flex, we are following it up with the
>>>Apache
>>> Flex SDK Installer (Incubating) AIR application.
>>>
>>> The Apache Flex SDK Installer AIR application provides an easy,
>>> single-click installation of the Apache Flex SDK and all its
>>>dependencies.
>>>  This will make it suitable for working with   IDEs such as Adobe Flash
>>> Builder, FDT, IntelliJ IDEA, FlashDevelop, etc.
>>>
>>> The application downloads the following dependencies:
>>>
>>>    - The AIR sdk (Windows vs. Mac) based on the current platform
>>>    - Adobe Flash Player playerglobal.swc
>>>    - SwfObject
>>>    - Open Source Media Framework (OSMF)
>>>    - Adobe Text Layout Format (TLF)
>>>
>>> Optionally, the application will download these files as well:
>>>
>>>    - Adobe BlazeDS
>>>    - Adobe embedded font support
>>>
>>>
>>> This release was voted upon on the flex-dev@incubator.apache.org list.
>>>The
>>> vote passed with 11 binding and 5 non-binding votes.  Here is the voting
>>> thread:
>>> http://markmail.org/thread/nbrflol6mkpu65ry
>>>
>>> The source distributions for Windows and Mac are available here:
>>> http://people.apache.org/~bigosmallm/installapacheflex_RC9/
>>>
>>> The binary distributions as a convenience for the respective platforms,
>>> available here:
>>> http://people.apache.org/~bigosmallm/installapacheflex_RC9/binaries/
>>>
>>> The PGP keys of the two release managers - OmPrakash Muppirala (Source
>>>kit
>>> + Windows binaries) and Erik de Bruin (Mac binaries) are available here:
>>> http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/flex/KEYS
>>>
>>> Here is the tag for the release:
>>>
>>>https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/flex/utilities/tags/apache-fle
>>>x-sdk-installer-1.0.8-RC9
>>
>>There are 3 directories under that tag; I would expect to find the
>>NOTICE, LICENSE and DISCLAIMER files at the top level rather than
>>under just one of them.
>>
>>The files do end up at the top level in the source archive, which is good.
>
> Does this have to be changed before you will vote for this release?
>
>>
>>Also, the installerBadge directory tree does not appear to be included
>>in the source archive - is that intentional?
>>If so, why is it in the tag?
>>
>>The key C1708693 does not appear to be available from the normal
>>public PGP key servers.
>
> I presume you would like Om to publish his key.

Yes, that is required so end users can fetch it if required.

Also AIUI it is used by Nexus.

>>Some of the source files don't have an EOL at EOF (e.g.
>>ApacheFlexToolsStyle.css) in the SVN tag whereas they do have an EOL
>>in the source archive.
>>This is a packaging error, which can be sorted by ensuring that source
>>files always have an EOL at EOF, or by changing the packaging
>>instructions to not add the missing EOLs.
>
> Per the incubation release guide [2], the line endings reflect the
> platform associated with the compression format.  The ant code which
> builds the source distributions is using the <fixcrlf> task to change the
> line endings to to CRLF for zip and LF for the tar.gz file.

That's not what I meant.

There should be an EOL at EOF.
I.e. the last line in source files should have an EOL.

[Whether the EOL is LF or CRLF or CR is immaterial to this discussion.]

Otherwise the files in the SVN tag aren't the same as the files in the
source archive.

> Carol
>
> [1]
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#notes-on-line-end
> ings
>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Please vote:
>>>
>>> [ ] +1  approve
>>> [ ] +0  no opinion
>>> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>>>
>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> OmPrakash Muppirala
>>> Apache Flex PPMC Member
>>
>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 1.0.8-incubating

Posted by Alexei Fedotov <al...@gmail.com>.

Carol,
There are usually two licenses - for a source release and for binary
distribution. Was the agreement you mentioned about source release
license?

--
With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями,
Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов,
http://dataved.ru/
+7 916 562 8095


On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 11:59 PM, Carol Frampton <cf...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 11/1/12 7 :36AM, "Alexei Fedotov" <al...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Hello OmPrakash,
>>
>>I have notices that the LICENSE file has few additions two Apache License:
>>
>>1. The second entry for Apache license.
>>2. Something like BSD license.
>>
>>The first item I cannot understand completely, the second one can be
>>resolved by adding BSD-like licensed files during build.
>>
>>So the question is why do you use non-standard LICENSE for the source
>>release?
>
> This is the LICENSE file for Apache Flex which was reviewed by our mentors
> prior to the release of Apache Flex 4.8.0-incubating.  If I am not
> mistaken, this is the format that Apache and Adobe agreed to when Adobe
> donated the code to Apache.
>
> Carol
>
>>
>>--
>>With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями,
>>Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов,
>>http://dataved.ru/
>>+7 916 562 8095
>>
>>
>>On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 3:16 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 30 October 2012 20:16, Om <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> After our first release as Apache Flex, we are following it up with
>>>>the Apache
>>>> Flex SDK Installer (Incubating) AIR application.
>>>>
>>>> The Apache Flex SDK Installer AIR application provides an easy,
>>>> single-click installation of the Apache Flex SDK and all its
>>>>dependencies.
>>>>  This will make it suitable for working with   IDEs such as Adobe Flash
>>>> Builder, FDT, IntelliJ IDEA, FlashDevelop, etc.
>>>>
>>>> The application downloads the following dependencies:
>>>>
>>>>    - The AIR sdk (Windows vs. Mac) based on the current platform
>>>>    - Adobe Flash Player playerglobal.swc
>>>>    - SwfObject
>>>>    - Open Source Media Framework (OSMF)
>>>>    - Adobe Text Layout Format (TLF)
>>>>
>>>> Optionally, the application will download these files as well:
>>>>
>>>>    - Adobe BlazeDS
>>>>    - Adobe embedded font support
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This release was voted upon on the flex-dev@incubator.apache.org list.
>>>> The
>>>> vote passed with 11 binding and 5 non-binding votes.  Here is the
>>>>voting
>>>> thread:
>>>> http://markmail.org/thread/nbrflol6mkpu65ry
>>>>
>>>> The source distributions for Windows and Mac are available here:
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~bigosmallm/installapacheflex_RC9/
>>>>
>>>> The binary distributions as a convenience for the respective platforms,
>>>> available here:
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~bigosmallm/installapacheflex_RC9/binaries/
>>>>
>>>> The PGP keys of the two release managers - OmPrakash Muppirala (Source
>>>>kit
>>>> + Windows binaries) and Erik de Bruin (Mac binaries) are available
>>>>here:
>>>> http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/flex/KEYS
>>>>
>>>> Here is the tag for the release:
>>>>
>>>>https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/flex/utilities/tags/apache-fl
>>>>ex-sdk-installer-1.0.8-RC9
>>>
>>> There are 3 directories under that tag; I would expect to find the
>>> NOTICE, LICENSE and DISCLAIMER files at the top level rather than
>>> under just one of them.
>>>
>>> The files do end up at the top level in the source archive, which is
>>>good.
>>>
>>> Also, the installerBadge directory tree does not appear to be included
>>> in the source archive - is that intentional?
>>> If so, why is it in the tag?
>>>
>>> The key C1708693 does not appear to be available from the normal
>>> public PGP key servers.
>>>
>>> Some of the source files don't have an EOL at EOF (e.g.
>>> ApacheFlexToolsStyle.css) in the SVN tag whereas they do have an EOL
>>> in the source archive.
>>> This is a packaging error, which can be sorted by ensuring that source
>>> files always have an EOL at EOF, or by changing the packaging
>>> instructions to not add the missing EOLs.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Please vote:
>>>>
>>>> [ ] +1  approve
>>>> [ ] +0  no opinion
>>>> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>>>>
>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> OmPrakash Muppirala
>>>> Apache Flex PPMC Member
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>
>>
>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 1.0.8-incubating

Posted by Bertrand Delacretaz <bd...@apache.org>.

Hi,

On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Alexei Fedotov
<al...@gmail.com> wrote:
> ...the question is why do you use non-standard LICENSE for the source release?...

It's similar to what httpd is doing - the Apache License first, then
licenses for included modules:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk/LICENSE

-Bertrand

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 1.0.8-incubating

Posted by Om <bi...@gmail.com>.

On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 4:36 AM, Alexei Fedotov <al...@gmail.com>wrote:

> Hello OmPrakash,
>
> I have notices that the LICENSE file has few additions two Apache License:
>
> 1. The second entry for Apache license.
> 2. Something like BSD license.
>
> The first item I cannot understand completely, the second one can be
> resolved by adding BSD-like licensed files during build.
>
> So the question is why do you use non-standard LICENSE for the source
> release?
>
>
Apart from the license for our source files itself, we are also packaging:

1.  Open-sans font which has an Apache V2 license [1]
2.  MD5Stream. and IntUtil.as which has a BSD license with an Adobe
Copyright notice [2]

This is why we added these two notices to the LICENSE.


[1] http://www.google.com/webfonts/specimen/Open+Sans
[2] https://github.com/mikechambers/as3corelib


> --
> With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями,
> Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов,
> http://dataved.ru/
> +7 916 562 8095
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 3:16 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 30 October 2012 20:16, Om <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> After our first release as Apache Flex, we are following it up with the
> Apache
> >> Flex SDK Installer (Incubating) AIR application.
> >>
> >> The Apache Flex SDK Installer AIR application provides an easy,
> >> single-click installation of the Apache Flex SDK and all its
> dependencies.
> >>  This will make it suitable for working with   IDEs such as Adobe Flash
> >> Builder, FDT, IntelliJ IDEA, FlashDevelop, etc.
> >>
> >> The application downloads the following dependencies:
> >>
> >>    - The AIR sdk (Windows vs. Mac) based on the current platform
> >>    - Adobe Flash Player playerglobal.swc
> >>    - SwfObject
> >>    - Open Source Media Framework (OSMF)
> >>    - Adobe Text Layout Format (TLF)
> >>
> >> Optionally, the application will download these files as well:
> >>
> >>    - Adobe BlazeDS
> >>    - Adobe embedded font support
> >>
> >>
> >> This release was voted upon on the flex-dev@incubator.apache.org list.
>  The
> >> vote passed with 11 binding and 5 non-binding votes.  Here is the voting
> >> thread:
> >> http://markmail.org/thread/nbrflol6mkpu65ry
> >>
> >> The source distributions for Windows and Mac are available here:
> >> http://people.apache.org/~bigosmallm/installapacheflex_RC9/
> >>
> >> The binary distributions as a convenience for the respective platforms,
> >> available here:
> >> http://people.apache.org/~bigosmallm/installapacheflex_RC9/binaries/
> >>
> >> The PGP keys of the two release managers - OmPrakash Muppirala (Source
> kit
> >> + Windows binaries) and Erik de Bruin (Mac binaries) are available here:
> >> http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/flex/KEYS
> >>
> >> Here is the tag for the release:
> >>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/flex/utilities/tags/apache-flex-sdk-installer-1.0.8-RC9
> >
> > There are 3 directories under that tag; I would expect to find the
> > NOTICE, LICENSE and DISCLAIMER files at the top level rather than
> > under just one of them.
> >
> > The files do end up at the top level in the source archive, which is
> good.
> >
> > Also, the installerBadge directory tree does not appear to be included
> > in the source archive - is that intentional?
> > If so, why is it in the tag?
> >
> > The key C1708693 does not appear to be available from the normal
> > public PGP key servers.
> >
> > Some of the source files don't have an EOL at EOF (e.g.
> > ApacheFlexToolsStyle.css) in the SVN tag whereas they do have an EOL
> > in the source archive.
> > This is a packaging error, which can be sorted by ensuring that source
> > files always have an EOL at EOF, or by changing the packaging
> > instructions to not add the missing EOLs.
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> Please vote:
> >>
> >> [ ] +1  approve
> >> [ ] +0  no opinion
> >> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> >>
> >> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> OmPrakash Muppirala
> >> Apache Flex PPMC Member
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 1.0.8-incubating

Posted by Om <bi...@gmail.com>.

On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 4:43 AM, Alexei Fedotov <al...@gmail.com>wrote:

> I have also found the following line of code:
> > ./installer/src/InstallApacheFlex.mxml:                 var
> licenseWindow:AdobeLicense = new AdobeLicense();
>
> Shouldn't you use new ApacheLicense() here?
>
>
There are some dependencies we download during the installation of the Flex
SDK which have an Adobe License.  In this case we show the Adobe License
screen/webpage to the end user.

Thanks,
Om


> --
> With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями,
> Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов,
> http://dataved.ru/
> +7 916 562 8095
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Alexei Fedotov <al...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Hello OmPrakash,
> >
> > I have notices that the LICENSE file has few additions two Apache
> License:
> >
> > 1. The second entry for Apache license.
> > 2. Something like BSD license.
> >
> > The first item I cannot understand completely, the second one can be
> > resolved by adding BSD-like licensed files during build.
> >
> > So the question is why do you use non-standard LICENSE for the source
> release?
> >
> > --
> > With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями,
> > Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов,
> > http://dataved.ru/
> > +7 916 562 8095
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 3:16 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On 30 October 2012 20:16, Om <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> After our first release as Apache Flex, we are following it up with
> the Apache
> >>> Flex SDK Installer (Incubating) AIR application.
> >>>
> >>> The Apache Flex SDK Installer AIR application provides an easy,
> >>> single-click installation of the Apache Flex SDK and all its
> dependencies.
> >>>  This will make it suitable for working with   IDEs such as Adobe Flash
> >>> Builder, FDT, IntelliJ IDEA, FlashDevelop, etc.
> >>>
> >>> The application downloads the following dependencies:
> >>>
> >>>    - The AIR sdk (Windows vs. Mac) based on the current platform
> >>>    - Adobe Flash Player playerglobal.swc
> >>>    - SwfObject
> >>>    - Open Source Media Framework (OSMF)
> >>>    - Adobe Text Layout Format (TLF)
> >>>
> >>> Optionally, the application will download these files as well:
> >>>
> >>>    - Adobe BlazeDS
> >>>    - Adobe embedded font support
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> This release was voted upon on the flex-dev@incubator.apache.orglist.  The
> >>> vote passed with 11 binding and 5 non-binding votes.  Here is the
> voting
> >>> thread:
> >>> http://markmail.org/thread/nbrflol6mkpu65ry
> >>>
> >>> The source distributions for Windows and Mac are available here:
> >>> http://people.apache.org/~bigosmallm/installapacheflex_RC9/
> >>>
> >>> The binary distributions as a convenience for the respective platforms,
> >>> available here:
> >>> http://people.apache.org/~bigosmallm/installapacheflex_RC9/binaries/
> >>>
> >>> The PGP keys of the two release managers - OmPrakash Muppirala (Source
> kit
> >>> + Windows binaries) and Erik de Bruin (Mac binaries) are available
> here:
> >>> http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/flex/KEYS
> >>>
> >>> Here is the tag for the release:
> >>>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/flex/utilities/tags/apache-flex-sdk-installer-1.0.8-RC9
> >>
> >> There are 3 directories under that tag; I would expect to find the
> >> NOTICE, LICENSE and DISCLAIMER files at the top level rather than
> >> under just one of them.
> >>
> >> The files do end up at the top level in the source archive, which is
> good.
> >>
> >> Also, the installerBadge directory tree does not appear to be included
> >> in the source archive - is that intentional?
> >> If so, why is it in the tag?
> >>
> >> The key C1708693 does not appear to be available from the normal
> >> public PGP key servers.
> >>
> >> Some of the source files don't have an EOL at EOF (e.g.
> >> ApacheFlexToolsStyle.css) in the SVN tag whereas they do have an EOL
> >> in the source archive.
> >> This is a packaging error, which can be sorted by ensuring that source
> >> files always have an EOL at EOF, or by changing the packaging
> >> instructions to not add the missing EOLs.
> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Please vote:
> >>>
> >>> [ ] +1  approve
> >>> [ ] +0  no opinion
> >>> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> >>>
> >>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>> OmPrakash Muppirala
> >>> Apache Flex PPMC Member
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 1.0.8-incubating

Posted by Carol Frampton <cf...@adobe.com>.


On 11/1/12 7 :43AM, "Alexei Fedotov" <al...@gmail.com> wrote:

>I have also found the following line of code:
>> ./installer/src/InstallApacheFlex.mxml:                 var
>>licenseWindow:AdobeLicense = new AdobeLicense();
>
>Shouldn't you use new ApacheLicense() here?

No, AdobeLicense is correct.  The installer is downloading and
"installing" Adobe software so it is displaying the required Adobe license
file which the user must acknowledge per this requirement:

* For add-ons under excluded licenses
<http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html#category-x>, the PMC may include
a feature within the product that allows the user to obtain third-party
add-ons if the feature also alerts the user of the associated license and
makes clear to users that the host site is not part of the Apache product
nor endorsed by the ASF.

in [1]


Carol

[1] http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html#labeling-reciprocity

>
>--
>With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями,
>Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов,
>http://dataved.ru/
>+7 916 562 8095
>
>
>On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Alexei Fedotov <al...@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>> Hello OmPrakash,
>>
>> I have notices that the LICENSE file has few additions two Apache
>>License:
>>
>> 1. The second entry for Apache license.
>> 2. Something like BSD license.
>>
>> The first item I cannot understand completely, the second one can be
>> resolved by adding BSD-like licensed files during build.
>>
>> So the question is why do you use non-standard LICENSE for the source
>>release?
>>
>> --
>> With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями,
>> Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов,
>> http://dataved.ru/
>> +7 916 562 8095
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 3:16 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 30 October 2012 20:16, Om <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> After our first release as Apache Flex, we are following it up with
>>>>the Apache
>>>> Flex SDK Installer (Incubating) AIR application.
>>>>
>>>> The Apache Flex SDK Installer AIR application provides an easy,
>>>> single-click installation of the Apache Flex SDK and all its
>>>>dependencies.
>>>>  This will make it suitable for working with   IDEs such as Adobe
>>>>Flash
>>>> Builder, FDT, IntelliJ IDEA, FlashDevelop, etc.
>>>>
>>>> The application downloads the following dependencies:
>>>>
>>>>    - The AIR sdk (Windows vs. Mac) based on the current platform
>>>>    - Adobe Flash Player playerglobal.swc
>>>>    - SwfObject
>>>>    - Open Source Media Framework (OSMF)
>>>>    - Adobe Text Layout Format (TLF)
>>>>
>>>> Optionally, the application will download these files as well:
>>>>
>>>>    - Adobe BlazeDS
>>>>    - Adobe embedded font support
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This release was voted upon on the flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>>list.  The
>>>> vote passed with 11 binding and 5 non-binding votes.  Here is the
>>>>voting
>>>> thread:
>>>> http://markmail.org/thread/nbrflol6mkpu65ry
>>>>
>>>> The source distributions for Windows and Mac are available here:
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~bigosmallm/installapacheflex_RC9/
>>>>
>>>> The binary distributions as a convenience for the respective
>>>>platforms,
>>>> available here:
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~bigosmallm/installapacheflex_RC9/binaries/
>>>>
>>>> The PGP keys of the two release managers - OmPrakash Muppirala
>>>>(Source kit
>>>> + Windows binaries) and Erik de Bruin (Mac binaries) are available
>>>>here:
>>>> http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/flex/KEYS
>>>>
>>>> Here is the tag for the release:
>>>> 
>>>>https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/flex/utilities/tags/apache-f
>>>>lex-sdk-installer-1.0.8-RC9
>>>
>>> There are 3 directories under that tag; I would expect to find the
>>> NOTICE, LICENSE and DISCLAIMER files at the top level rather than
>>> under just one of them.
>>>
>>> The files do end up at the top level in the source archive, which is
>>>good.
>>>
>>> Also, the installerBadge directory tree does not appear to be included
>>> in the source archive - is that intentional?
>>> If so, why is it in the tag?
>>>
>>> The key C1708693 does not appear to be available from the normal
>>> public PGP key servers.
>>>
>>> Some of the source files don't have an EOL at EOF (e.g.
>>> ApacheFlexToolsStyle.css) in the SVN tag whereas they do have an EOL
>>> in the source archive.
>>> This is a packaging error, which can be sorted by ensuring that source
>>> files always have an EOL at EOF, or by changing the packaging
>>> instructions to not add the missing EOLs.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Please vote:
>>>>
>>>> [ ] +1  approve
>>>> [ ] +0  no opinion
>>>> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>>>>
>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> OmPrakash Muppirala
>>>> Apache Flex PPMC Member
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 1.0.8-incubating

Posted by Alexei Fedotov <al...@gmail.com>.

I have also found the following line of code:
> ./installer/src/InstallApacheFlex.mxml:                 var licenseWindow:AdobeLicense = new AdobeLicense();

Shouldn't you use new ApacheLicense() here?

--
With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями,
Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов,
http://dataved.ru/
+7 916 562 8095


On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Alexei Fedotov <al...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello OmPrakash,
>
> I have notices that the LICENSE file has few additions two Apache License:
>
> 1. The second entry for Apache license.
> 2. Something like BSD license.
>
> The first item I cannot understand completely, the second one can be
> resolved by adding BSD-like licensed files during build.
>
> So the question is why do you use non-standard LICENSE for the source release?
>
> --
> With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями,
> Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов,
> http://dataved.ru/
> +7 916 562 8095
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 3:16 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 30 October 2012 20:16, Om <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> After our first release as Apache Flex, we are following it up with the Apache
>>> Flex SDK Installer (Incubating) AIR application.
>>>
>>> The Apache Flex SDK Installer AIR application provides an easy,
>>> single-click installation of the Apache Flex SDK and all its dependencies.
>>>  This will make it suitable for working with   IDEs such as Adobe Flash
>>> Builder, FDT, IntelliJ IDEA, FlashDevelop, etc.
>>>
>>> The application downloads the following dependencies:
>>>
>>>    - The AIR sdk (Windows vs. Mac) based on the current platform
>>>    - Adobe Flash Player playerglobal.swc
>>>    - SwfObject
>>>    - Open Source Media Framework (OSMF)
>>>    - Adobe Text Layout Format (TLF)
>>>
>>> Optionally, the application will download these files as well:
>>>
>>>    - Adobe BlazeDS
>>>    - Adobe embedded font support
>>>
>>>
>>> This release was voted upon on the flex-dev@incubator.apache.org list.  The
>>> vote passed with 11 binding and 5 non-binding votes.  Here is the voting
>>> thread:
>>> http://markmail.org/thread/nbrflol6mkpu65ry
>>>
>>> The source distributions for Windows and Mac are available here:
>>> http://people.apache.org/~bigosmallm/installapacheflex_RC9/
>>>
>>> The binary distributions as a convenience for the respective platforms,
>>> available here:
>>> http://people.apache.org/~bigosmallm/installapacheflex_RC9/binaries/
>>>
>>> The PGP keys of the two release managers - OmPrakash Muppirala (Source kit
>>> + Windows binaries) and Erik de Bruin (Mac binaries) are available here:
>>> http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/flex/KEYS
>>>
>>> Here is the tag for the release:
>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/flex/utilities/tags/apache-flex-sdk-installer-1.0.8-RC9
>>
>> There are 3 directories under that tag; I would expect to find the
>> NOTICE, LICENSE and DISCLAIMER files at the top level rather than
>> under just one of them.
>>
>> The files do end up at the top level in the source archive, which is good.
>>
>> Also, the installerBadge directory tree does not appear to be included
>> in the source archive - is that intentional?
>> If so, why is it in the tag?
>>
>> The key C1708693 does not appear to be available from the normal
>> public PGP key servers.
>>
>> Some of the source files don't have an EOL at EOF (e.g.
>> ApacheFlexToolsStyle.css) in the SVN tag whereas they do have an EOL
>> in the source archive.
>> This is a packaging error, which can be sorted by ensuring that source
>> files always have an EOL at EOF, or by changing the packaging
>> instructions to not add the missing EOLs.
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Please vote:
>>>
>>> [ ] +1  approve
>>> [ ] +0  no opinion
>>> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>>>
>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> OmPrakash Muppirala
>>> Apache Flex PPMC Member
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 1.0.8-incubating

Posted by Alexei Fedotov <al...@gmail.com>.

Thank you, Alex


On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 3:59 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 11/1/12 4:08 PM, "Alexei Fedotov" <al...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for explaining, I finally got Carol's point on installer.
>>
>> I still cannot fully understand the licensing. I have checked that
>> installer/src/com/adobe/utils/IntUtil.as (which is mentioned in LICENSE
>> file as Adobe licensed) contains Apache license header.
> After more digging, I think the issue is that IntUtil.as shouldn't have an
> Apache header.  It comes from external projects under Modified BSD.  Then I
> think it would make sense to have the Adobe/BSD license in the LICENSE file?
>
>>
>> Why do you need any additional attributions for Apache licensed file?
> After more digging, I think this is here because these are binary files
> that, while under Apache license, are not sourced from a.o, so technically,
> third-party.  It isn't clear from here [5] that if it is under Apache it
> doesn't have to be called out in the LICENSE file.
>>
>> BTW, file paths are incorrect in the LICENSE file.
> Agreed. But not critical?
>
> [5] http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#required-third-party-notices
>
> --
> Alex Harui
> Flex SDK Team
> Adobe Systems, Inc.
> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 1.0.8-incubating

Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.



On 11/1/12 4:08 PM, "Alexei Fedotov" <al...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks for explaining, I finally got Carol's point on installer.
> 
> I still cannot fully understand the licensing. I have checked that
> installer/src/com/adobe/utils/IntUtil.as (which is mentioned in LICENSE
> file as Adobe licensed) contains Apache license header.
After more digging, I think the issue is that IntUtil.as shouldn't have an
Apache header.  It comes from external projects under Modified BSD.  Then I
think it would make sense to have the Adobe/BSD license in the LICENSE file?

> 
> Why do you need any additional attributions for Apache licensed file?
After more digging, I think this is here because these are binary files
that, while under Apache license, are not sourced from a.o, so technically,
third-party.  It isn't clear from here [5] that if it is under Apache it
doesn't have to be called out in the LICENSE file.
> 
> BTW, file paths are incorrect in the LICENSE file.
Agreed. But not critical?

[5] http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#required-third-party-notices

-- 
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 1.0.8-incubating

Posted by Alexei Fedotov <al...@gmail.com>.

Thanks for explaining, I finally got Carol's point on installer.

I still cannot fully understand the licensing. I have checked that
installer/src/com/adobe/utils/IntUtil.as (which is mentioned in LICENSE
file as Adobe licensed) contains Apache license header.

Why do you need any additional attributions for Apache licensed file?

BTW, file paths are incorrect in the LICENSE file.

--
With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями,
Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов,
http://dataved.ru/
+7 916 562 8095


On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 2:47 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 11/1/12 3:04 PM, "Alexei Fedotov" <al...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> First, I'm not a lawyer. More experienced guys will tell us more.
>>
>> In our project (Openmeetings) we keep the files which are not Apache
>> licensed in different places, e.g. at googlecode, and collect them
>> during the build process via wget. We do not include them into a
>> source release.
>>
> OK, thanks.  We include our in the LICENSE file per this document [1]
> Where it says:
>
> "All the licenses on all the files to be included within a package should be
> included in the LICENSE document. This LICENSE (courtesy of Apache HTTPD) is
> a good example. The Apache License is at the top of the LICENSE document.
> After that, the license for each non-Apache licensed component is included,
> along with a clear explanation of which files that license applies to."
>
> We'll see if others have to say, but I think we are conforming.
>
> [1]
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-lice
> nse
> --
> Alex Harui
> Flex SDK Team
> Adobe Systems, Inc.
> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 1.0.8-incubating

Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.

On 11/1/12 3:04 PM, "Alexei Fedotov" <al...@gmail.com> wrote:

> First, I'm not a lawyer. More experienced guys will tell us more.
> 
> In our project (Openmeetings) we keep the files which are not Apache
> licensed in different places, e.g. at googlecode, and collect them
> during the build process via wget. We do not include them into a
> source release.
> 
OK, thanks.  We include our in the LICENSE file per this document [1]
Where it says:

"All the licenses on all the files to be included within a package should be
included in the LICENSE document. This LICENSE (courtesy of Apache HTTPD) is
a good example. The Apache License is at the top of the LICENSE document.
After that, the license for each non-Apache licensed component is included,
along with a clear explanation of which files that license applies to."

We'll see if others have to say, but I think we are conforming.

[1] 
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-lice
nse
-- 
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 1.0.8-incubating

Posted by Alexei Fedotov <al...@gmail.com>.

First, I'm not a lawyer. More experienced guys will tell us more.

In our project (Openmeetings) we keep the files which are not Apache
licensed in different places, e.g. at googlecode, and collect them
during the build process via wget. We do not include them into a
source release.

--
With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями,
Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов,
http://dataved.ru/
+7 916 562 8095


On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 1:58 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 11/1/12 2:50 PM, "Alexei Fedotov" <al...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I mention ./LICENSE file from the source release and naturally assume
>> this is the source release license.
>> Then I assume Apache source release should be generally Apache
>> licensed. This is not necessarily true for a binary release which can
>> contain compatibly licensed components.
>>
> Hi Alexei,
>
> I think there may in fact be a problem with the LICENSE file and the
> Open_Sans font.
>
> However, I I am confused about what steps we are supposed to execute to
> address your second concern.  I'm not sure what you mean by "adding
> BSD-like...".
>
> There are two files in the source release that have a BSD license using the
> Modified BSD template and substituting Adobe as the organization.  Why isn't
> what we did the correct way to handle this?
>>>>> 2. Something like BSD license.
>>>>>
>>>>> The first item I cannot understand completely, the second one can be
>>>>> resolved by adding BSD-like licensed files during build.
>>>>>
>>>>> So the question is why do you use non-standard LICENSE for the source
>>>>> release?
>
>
> --
> Alex Harui
> Flex SDK Team
> Adobe Systems, Inc.
> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 1.0.8-incubating

Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.



On 11/1/12 2:50 PM, "Alexei Fedotov" <al...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I mention ./LICENSE file from the source release and naturally assume
> this is the source release license.
> Then I assume Apache source release should be generally Apache
> licensed. This is not necessarily true for a binary release which can
> contain compatibly licensed components.
> 
Hi Alexei,

I think there may in fact be a problem with the LICENSE file and the
Open_Sans font.

However, I I am confused about what steps we are supposed to execute to
address your second concern.  I'm not sure what you mean by "adding
BSD-like...".

There are two files in the source release that have a BSD license using the
Modified BSD template and substituting Adobe as the organization.  Why isn't
what we did the correct way to handle this?
>>>> 2. Something like BSD license.
>>>> 
>>>> The first item I cannot understand completely, the second one can be
>>>> resolved by adding BSD-like licensed files during build.
>>>> 
>>>> So the question is why do you use non-standard LICENSE for the source
>>>> release?


-- 
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 1.0.8-incubating

Posted by Alexei Fedotov <al...@gmail.com>.

I mention ./LICENSE file from the source release and naturally assume
this is the source release license.
Then I assume Apache source release should be generally Apache
licensed. This is not necessarily true for a binary release which can
contain compatibly licensed components.

--
With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями,
Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов,
http://dataved.ru/
+7 916 562 8095


On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 1:43 AM, Carol Frampton <cf...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 11/1/12 3 :59PM, "Carol Frampton" <cf...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>On 11/1/12 7 :36AM, "Alexei Fedotov" <al...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Hello OmPrakash,
>>>
>>>I have notices that the LICENSE file has few additions two Apache
>>>License:
>>>
>>>1. The second entry for Apache license.
>>>2. Something like BSD license.
>>>
>>>The first item I cannot understand completely, the second one can be
>>>resolved by adding BSD-like licensed files during build.
>>>
>>>So the question is why do you use non-standard LICENSE for the source
>>>release?
>>
>>This is the LICENSE file for Apache Flex which was reviewed by our mentors
>>prior to the release of Apache Flex 4.8.0-incubating.  If I am not
>>mistaken, this is the format that Apache and Adobe agreed to when Adobe
>>donated the code to Apache.
>
> Ignore my comment.  I was looking at the LICENSE file for the SDK rather
> than the installer.
>
> Carol
>
>>
>>Carol
>>
>>>
>>>--
>>>With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями,
>>>Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов,
>>>http://dataved.ru/
>>>+7 916 562 8095
>>>
>>>
>>>On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 3:16 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On 30 October 2012 20:16, Om <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> After our first release as Apache Flex, we are following it up with
>>>>>the Apache
>>>>> Flex SDK Installer (Incubating) AIR application.
>>>>>
>>>>> The Apache Flex SDK Installer AIR application provides an easy,
>>>>> single-click installation of the Apache Flex SDK and all its
>>>>>dependencies.
>>>>>  This will make it suitable for working with   IDEs such as Adobe
>>>>>Flash
>>>>> Builder, FDT, IntelliJ IDEA, FlashDevelop, etc.
>>>>>
>>>>> The application downloads the following dependencies:
>>>>>
>>>>>    - The AIR sdk (Windows vs. Mac) based on the current platform
>>>>>    - Adobe Flash Player playerglobal.swc
>>>>>    - SwfObject
>>>>>    - Open Source Media Framework (OSMF)
>>>>>    - Adobe Text Layout Format (TLF)
>>>>>
>>>>> Optionally, the application will download these files as well:
>>>>>
>>>>>    - Adobe BlazeDS
>>>>>    - Adobe embedded font support
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> This release was voted upon on the flex-dev@incubator.apache.org list.
>>>>> The
>>>>> vote passed with 11 binding and 5 non-binding votes.  Here is the
>>>>>voting
>>>>> thread:
>>>>> http://markmail.org/thread/nbrflol6mkpu65ry
>>>>>
>>>>> The source distributions for Windows and Mac are available here:
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~bigosmallm/installapacheflex_RC9/
>>>>>
>>>>> The binary distributions as a convenience for the respective
>>>>>platforms,
>>>>> available here:
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~bigosmallm/installapacheflex_RC9/binaries/
>>>>>
>>>>> The PGP keys of the two release managers - OmPrakash Muppirala (Source
>>>>>kit
>>>>> + Windows binaries) and Erik de Bruin (Mac binaries) are available
>>>>>here:
>>>>> http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/flex/KEYS
>>>>>
>>>>> Here is the tag for the release:
>>>>>
>>>>>https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/flex/utilities/tags/apache-f
>>>>>l
>>>>>ex-sdk-installer-1.0.8-RC9
>>>>
>>>> There are 3 directories under that tag; I would expect to find the
>>>> NOTICE, LICENSE and DISCLAIMER files at the top level rather than
>>>> under just one of them.
>>>>
>>>> The files do end up at the top level in the source archive, which is
>>>>good.
>>>>
>>>> Also, the installerBadge directory tree does not appear to be included
>>>> in the source archive - is that intentional?
>>>> If so, why is it in the tag?
>>>>
>>>> The key C1708693 does not appear to be available from the normal
>>>> public PGP key servers.
>>>>
>>>> Some of the source files don't have an EOL at EOF (e.g.
>>>> ApacheFlexToolsStyle.css) in the SVN tag whereas they do have an EOL
>>>> in the source archive.
>>>> This is a packaging error, which can be sorted by ensuring that source
>>>> files always have an EOL at EOF, or by changing the packaging
>>>> instructions to not add the missing EOLs.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Please vote:
>>>>>
>>>>> [ ] +1  approve
>>>>> [ ] +0  no opinion
>>>>> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>>>>>
>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> OmPrakash Muppirala
>>>>> Apache Flex PPMC Member
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>>
>>>
>>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>>For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>
>>
>>
>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 1.0.8-incubating

Posted by Carol Frampton <cf...@adobe.com>.


On 11/1/12 3 :59PM, "Carol Frampton" <cf...@adobe.com> wrote:

>
>
>On 11/1/12 7 :36AM, "Alexei Fedotov" <al...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Hello OmPrakash,
>>
>>I have notices that the LICENSE file has few additions two Apache
>>License:
>>
>>1. The second entry for Apache license.
>>2. Something like BSD license.
>>
>>The first item I cannot understand completely, the second one can be
>>resolved by adding BSD-like licensed files during build.
>>
>>So the question is why do you use non-standard LICENSE for the source
>>release?
>
>This is the LICENSE file for Apache Flex which was reviewed by our mentors
>prior to the release of Apache Flex 4.8.0-incubating.  If I am not
>mistaken, this is the format that Apache and Adobe agreed to when Adobe
>donated the code to Apache.

Ignore my comment.  I was looking at the LICENSE file for the SDK rather
than the installer.

Carol

>
>Carol
>
>>
>>--
>>With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями,
>>Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов,
>>http://dataved.ru/
>>+7 916 562 8095
>>
>>
>>On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 3:16 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 30 October 2012 20:16, Om <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> After our first release as Apache Flex, we are following it up with
>>>>the Apache
>>>> Flex SDK Installer (Incubating) AIR application.
>>>>
>>>> The Apache Flex SDK Installer AIR application provides an easy,
>>>> single-click installation of the Apache Flex SDK and all its
>>>>dependencies.
>>>>  This will make it suitable for working with   IDEs such as Adobe
>>>>Flash
>>>> Builder, FDT, IntelliJ IDEA, FlashDevelop, etc.
>>>>
>>>> The application downloads the following dependencies:
>>>>
>>>>    - The AIR sdk (Windows vs. Mac) based on the current platform
>>>>    - Adobe Flash Player playerglobal.swc
>>>>    - SwfObject
>>>>    - Open Source Media Framework (OSMF)
>>>>    - Adobe Text Layout Format (TLF)
>>>>
>>>> Optionally, the application will download these files as well:
>>>>
>>>>    - Adobe BlazeDS
>>>>    - Adobe embedded font support
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This release was voted upon on the flex-dev@incubator.apache.org list.
>>>> The
>>>> vote passed with 11 binding and 5 non-binding votes.  Here is the
>>>>voting
>>>> thread:
>>>> http://markmail.org/thread/nbrflol6mkpu65ry
>>>>
>>>> The source distributions for Windows and Mac are available here:
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~bigosmallm/installapacheflex_RC9/
>>>>
>>>> The binary distributions as a convenience for the respective
>>>>platforms,
>>>> available here:
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~bigosmallm/installapacheflex_RC9/binaries/
>>>>
>>>> The PGP keys of the two release managers - OmPrakash Muppirala (Source
>>>>kit
>>>> + Windows binaries) and Erik de Bruin (Mac binaries) are available
>>>>here:
>>>> http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/flex/KEYS
>>>>
>>>> Here is the tag for the release:
>>>> 
>>>>https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/flex/utilities/tags/apache-f
>>>>l
>>>>ex-sdk-installer-1.0.8-RC9
>>>
>>> There are 3 directories under that tag; I would expect to find the
>>> NOTICE, LICENSE and DISCLAIMER files at the top level rather than
>>> under just one of them.
>>>
>>> The files do end up at the top level in the source archive, which is
>>>good.
>>>
>>> Also, the installerBadge directory tree does not appear to be included
>>> in the source archive - is that intentional?
>>> If so, why is it in the tag?
>>>
>>> The key C1708693 does not appear to be available from the normal
>>> public PGP key servers.
>>>
>>> Some of the source files don't have an EOL at EOF (e.g.
>>> ApacheFlexToolsStyle.css) in the SVN tag whereas they do have an EOL
>>> in the source archive.
>>> This is a packaging error, which can be sorted by ensuring that source
>>> files always have an EOL at EOF, or by changing the packaging
>>> instructions to not add the missing EOLs.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Please vote:
>>>>
>>>> [ ] +1  approve
>>>> [ ] +0  no opinion
>>>> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>>>>
>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> OmPrakash Muppirala
>>>> Apache Flex PPMC Member
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>
>>
>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 1.0.8-incubating

Posted by Carol Frampton <cf...@adobe.com>.


On 11/1/12 7 :36AM, "Alexei Fedotov" <al...@gmail.com> wrote:

>Hello OmPrakash,
>
>I have notices that the LICENSE file has few additions two Apache License:
>
>1. The second entry for Apache license.
>2. Something like BSD license.
>
>The first item I cannot understand completely, the second one can be
>resolved by adding BSD-like licensed files during build.
>
>So the question is why do you use non-standard LICENSE for the source
>release?

This is the LICENSE file for Apache Flex which was reviewed by our mentors
prior to the release of Apache Flex 4.8.0-incubating.  If I am not
mistaken, this is the format that Apache and Adobe agreed to when Adobe
donated the code to Apache.

Carol

>
>--
>With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями,
>Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов,
>http://dataved.ru/
>+7 916 562 8095
>
>
>On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 3:16 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 30 October 2012 20:16, Om <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> After our first release as Apache Flex, we are following it up with
>>>the Apache
>>> Flex SDK Installer (Incubating) AIR application.
>>>
>>> The Apache Flex SDK Installer AIR application provides an easy,
>>> single-click installation of the Apache Flex SDK and all its
>>>dependencies.
>>>  This will make it suitable for working with   IDEs such as Adobe Flash
>>> Builder, FDT, IntelliJ IDEA, FlashDevelop, etc.
>>>
>>> The application downloads the following dependencies:
>>>
>>>    - The AIR sdk (Windows vs. Mac) based on the current platform
>>>    - Adobe Flash Player playerglobal.swc
>>>    - SwfObject
>>>    - Open Source Media Framework (OSMF)
>>>    - Adobe Text Layout Format (TLF)
>>>
>>> Optionally, the application will download these files as well:
>>>
>>>    - Adobe BlazeDS
>>>    - Adobe embedded font support
>>>
>>>
>>> This release was voted upon on the flex-dev@incubator.apache.org list.
>>> The
>>> vote passed with 11 binding and 5 non-binding votes.  Here is the
>>>voting
>>> thread:
>>> http://markmail.org/thread/nbrflol6mkpu65ry
>>>
>>> The source distributions for Windows and Mac are available here:
>>> http://people.apache.org/~bigosmallm/installapacheflex_RC9/
>>>
>>> The binary distributions as a convenience for the respective platforms,
>>> available here:
>>> http://people.apache.org/~bigosmallm/installapacheflex_RC9/binaries/
>>>
>>> The PGP keys of the two release managers - OmPrakash Muppirala (Source
>>>kit
>>> + Windows binaries) and Erik de Bruin (Mac binaries) are available
>>>here:
>>> http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/flex/KEYS
>>>
>>> Here is the tag for the release:
>>> 
>>>https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/flex/utilities/tags/apache-fl
>>>ex-sdk-installer-1.0.8-RC9
>>
>> There are 3 directories under that tag; I would expect to find the
>> NOTICE, LICENSE and DISCLAIMER files at the top level rather than
>> under just one of them.
>>
>> The files do end up at the top level in the source archive, which is
>>good.
>>
>> Also, the installerBadge directory tree does not appear to be included
>> in the source archive - is that intentional?
>> If so, why is it in the tag?
>>
>> The key C1708693 does not appear to be available from the normal
>> public PGP key servers.
>>
>> Some of the source files don't have an EOL at EOF (e.g.
>> ApacheFlexToolsStyle.css) in the SVN tag whereas they do have an EOL
>> in the source archive.
>> This is a packaging error, which can be sorted by ensuring that source
>> files always have an EOL at EOF, or by changing the packaging
>> instructions to not add the missing EOLs.
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Please vote:
>>>
>>> [ ] +1  approve
>>> [ ] +0  no opinion
>>> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>>>
>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> OmPrakash Muppirala
>>> Apache Flex PPMC Member
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 1.0.8-incubating

Posted by Alexei Fedotov <al...@gmail.com>.

Hello OmPrakash,

I have notices that the LICENSE file has few additions two Apache License:

1. The second entry for Apache license.
2. Something like BSD license.

The first item I cannot understand completely, the second one can be
resolved by adding BSD-like licensed files during build.

So the question is why do you use non-standard LICENSE for the source release?

--
With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями,
Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов,
http://dataved.ru/
+7 916 562 8095


On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 3:16 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 30 October 2012 20:16, Om <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> After our first release as Apache Flex, we are following it up with the Apache
>> Flex SDK Installer (Incubating) AIR application.
>>
>> The Apache Flex SDK Installer AIR application provides an easy,
>> single-click installation of the Apache Flex SDK and all its dependencies.
>>  This will make it suitable for working with   IDEs such as Adobe Flash
>> Builder, FDT, IntelliJ IDEA, FlashDevelop, etc.
>>
>> The application downloads the following dependencies:
>>
>>    - The AIR sdk (Windows vs. Mac) based on the current platform
>>    - Adobe Flash Player playerglobal.swc
>>    - SwfObject
>>    - Open Source Media Framework (OSMF)
>>    - Adobe Text Layout Format (TLF)
>>
>> Optionally, the application will download these files as well:
>>
>>    - Adobe BlazeDS
>>    - Adobe embedded font support
>>
>>
>> This release was voted upon on the flex-dev@incubator.apache.org list.  The
>> vote passed with 11 binding and 5 non-binding votes.  Here is the voting
>> thread:
>> http://markmail.org/thread/nbrflol6mkpu65ry
>>
>> The source distributions for Windows and Mac are available here:
>> http://people.apache.org/~bigosmallm/installapacheflex_RC9/
>>
>> The binary distributions as a convenience for the respective platforms,
>> available here:
>> http://people.apache.org/~bigosmallm/installapacheflex_RC9/binaries/
>>
>> The PGP keys of the two release managers - OmPrakash Muppirala (Source kit
>> + Windows binaries) and Erik de Bruin (Mac binaries) are available here:
>> http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/flex/KEYS
>>
>> Here is the tag for the release:
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/flex/utilities/tags/apache-flex-sdk-installer-1.0.8-RC9
>
> There are 3 directories under that tag; I would expect to find the
> NOTICE, LICENSE and DISCLAIMER files at the top level rather than
> under just one of them.
>
> The files do end up at the top level in the source archive, which is good.
>
> Also, the installerBadge directory tree does not appear to be included
> in the source archive - is that intentional?
> If so, why is it in the tag?
>
> The key C1708693 does not appear to be available from the normal
> public PGP key servers.
>
> Some of the source files don't have an EOL at EOF (e.g.
> ApacheFlexToolsStyle.css) in the SVN tag whereas they do have an EOL
> in the source archive.
> This is a packaging error, which can be sorted by ensuring that source
> files always have an EOL at EOF, or by changing the packaging
> instructions to not add the missing EOLs.
>
>>
>>
>> Please vote:
>>
>> [ ] +1  approve
>> [ ] +0  no opinion
>> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>>
>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>
>> Regards,
>> OmPrakash Muppirala
>> Apache Flex PPMC Member
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 1.0.8-incubating

Posted by Alexei Fedotov <al...@gmail.com>.

Great, thanks.

--
With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями,
Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов,
http://dataved.ru/
+7 916 562 8095


On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 6:28 PM, Om <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes, we have addressed that issue.  We reinstated the original license text
> for the headers in MD5Stream.as and IntUtil.as
>
> Thanks,
> Om
> On Nov 5, 2012 2:35 AM, "Alexei Fedotov" <al...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello Om,
>>
>> Alex wrote,
>> > After more digging, I think the issue is that IntUtil.as shouldn't have
>> an Apache header.  It comes from external projects under Modified BSD.
>>
>> Do you plan to fix this?
>>
>> --
>> With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями,
>> Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов,
>> http://dataved.ru/
>> +7 916 562 8095
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 1:50 AM, Om <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > For the record, these are issues we are fixing in the next RC:
>> >
>> > 1.  incorrect headers in MD5Stream.as and IntUtil.as
>> > 2.  incorrect path to MD5Stream.as and IntUtil.as in the LICENSE file
>> > 3.  incorrect license for the open_sans fonts in the LICENSE file
>> > 4.  incorrect path to the open_sans fonts in the LICENSE file
>> > 5.  in the distro the NOTICE, LICENSE and DISCLAIMER files are at root
>> but in
>> > svn they are under the installer directory - we pulled them up to root
>> when
>> > we packaged everything.
>> >
>> > Please let us know if anything else needs to be addressed.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Om
>> >
>> > On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Om <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> In light of all the issues uncovered, I am closing this vote thread.  We
>> >> are working on fixing the issues and will be back with a new vote
>> thread.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> Om
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 4:09 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz <
>> >> bdelacretaz@apache.org> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 11:55 AM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> > ...If I were the RM, I would add the missing EOLs at EOF and create
>> >>> another RC....
>> >>>
>> >>> I see your point about the distributed files not being *binary
>> >>> identical* to the svn tag, but I personally consider source files to
>> >>> be identical if diff -b (i.e. ignore changes in the amount of
>> >>> whitespace) says they are.
>> >>>
>> >>> So, in this case, I definitely don't see this as a blocker, just
>> >>> something to fix for a future release.
>> >>>
>> >>> -Bertrand
>> >>>
>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 1.0.8-incubating

Posted by Om <bi...@gmail.com>.

Yes, we have addressed that issue.  We reinstated the original license text
for the headers in MD5Stream.as and IntUtil.as

Thanks,
Om
On Nov 5, 2012 2:35 AM, "Alexei Fedotov" <al...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello Om,
>
> Alex wrote,
> > After more digging, I think the issue is that IntUtil.as shouldn't have
> an Apache header.  It comes from external projects under Modified BSD.
>
> Do you plan to fix this?
>
> --
> With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями,
> Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов,
> http://dataved.ru/
> +7 916 562 8095
>
>
> On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 1:50 AM, Om <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > For the record, these are issues we are fixing in the next RC:
> >
> > 1.  incorrect headers in MD5Stream.as and IntUtil.as
> > 2.  incorrect path to MD5Stream.as and IntUtil.as in the LICENSE file
> > 3.  incorrect license for the open_sans fonts in the LICENSE file
> > 4.  incorrect path to the open_sans fonts in the LICENSE file
> > 5.  in the distro the NOTICE, LICENSE and DISCLAIMER files are at root
> but in
> > svn they are under the installer directory - we pulled them up to root
> when
> > we packaged everything.
> >
> > Please let us know if anything else needs to be addressed.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Om
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Om <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> In light of all the issues uncovered, I am closing this vote thread.  We
> >> are working on fixing the issues and will be back with a new vote
> thread.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Om
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 4:09 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz <
> >> bdelacretaz@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 11:55 AM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> > ...If I were the RM, I would add the missing EOLs at EOF and create
> >>> another RC....
> >>>
> >>> I see your point about the distributed files not being *binary
> >>> identical* to the svn tag, but I personally consider source files to
> >>> be identical if diff -b (i.e. ignore changes in the amount of
> >>> whitespace) says they are.
> >>>
> >>> So, in this case, I definitely don't see this as a blocker, just
> >>> something to fix for a future release.
> >>>
> >>> -Bertrand
> >>>
> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 1.0.8-incubating

Posted by Alexei Fedotov <al...@gmail.com>.

Hello Om,

Alex wrote,
> After more digging, I think the issue is that IntUtil.as shouldn't have an Apache header.  It comes from external projects under Modified BSD.

Do you plan to fix this?

--
With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями,
Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов,
http://dataved.ru/
+7 916 562 8095


On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 1:50 AM, Om <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> For the record, these are issues we are fixing in the next RC:
>
> 1.  incorrect headers in MD5Stream.as and IntUtil.as
> 2.  incorrect path to MD5Stream.as and IntUtil.as in the LICENSE file
> 3.  incorrect license for the open_sans fonts in the LICENSE file
> 4.  incorrect path to the open_sans fonts in the LICENSE file
> 5.  in the distro the NOTICE, LICENSE and DISCLAIMER files are at root but in
> svn they are under the installer directory - we pulled them up to root when
> we packaged everything.
>
> Please let us know if anything else needs to be addressed.
>
> Thanks,
> Om
>
> On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Om <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> In light of all the issues uncovered, I am closing this vote thread.  We
>> are working on fixing the issues and will be back with a new vote thread.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Om
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 4:09 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz <
>> bdelacretaz@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 11:55 AM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > ...If I were the RM, I would add the missing EOLs at EOF and create
>>> another RC....
>>>
>>> I see your point about the distributed files not being *binary
>>> identical* to the svn tag, but I personally consider source files to
>>> be identical if diff -b (i.e. ignore changes in the amount of
>>> whitespace) says they are.
>>>
>>> So, in this case, I definitely don't see this as a blocker, just
>>> something to fix for a future release.
>>>
>>> -Bertrand
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 1.0.8-incubating

Posted by Om <bi...@gmail.com>.

For the record, these are issues we are fixing in the next RC:

1.  incorrect headers in MD5Stream.as and IntUtil.as
2.  incorrect path to MD5Stream.as and IntUtil.as in the LICENSE file
3.  incorrect license for the open_sans fonts in the LICENSE file
4.  incorrect path to the open_sans fonts in the LICENSE file
5.  in the distro the NOTICE, LICENSE and DISCLAIMER files are at root but in
svn they are under the installer directory - we pulled them up to root when
we packaged everything.

Please let us know if anything else needs to be addressed.

Thanks,
Om

On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Om <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:

> In light of all the issues uncovered, I am closing this vote thread.  We
> are working on fixing the issues and will be back with a new vote thread.
>
> Thanks,
> Om
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 4:09 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz <
> bdelacretaz@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 11:55 AM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > ...If I were the RM, I would add the missing EOLs at EOF and create
>> another RC....
>>
>> I see your point about the distributed files not being *binary
>> identical* to the svn tag, but I personally consider source files to
>> be identical if diff -b (i.e. ignore changes in the amount of
>> whitespace) says they are.
>>
>> So, in this case, I definitely don't see this as a blocker, just
>> something to fix for a future release.
>>
>> -Bertrand
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 1.0.8-incubating

Posted by Om <bi...@gmail.com>.

In light of all the issues uncovered, I am closing this vote thread.  We
are working on fixing the issues and will be back with a new vote thread.

Thanks,
Om

On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 4:09 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
<bd...@apache.org>wrote:

> On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 11:55 AM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > ...If I were the RM, I would add the missing EOLs at EOF and create
> another RC....
>
> I see your point about the distributed files not being *binary
> identical* to the svn tag, but I personally consider source files to
> be identical if diff -b (i.e. ignore changes in the amount of
> whitespace) says they are.
>
> So, in this case, I definitely don't see this as a blocker, just
> something to fix for a future release.
>
> -Bertrand
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 1.0.8-incubating

Posted by Bertrand Delacretaz <bd...@apache.org>.

On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 11:55 AM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> ...If I were the RM, I would add the missing EOLs at EOF and create another RC....

I see your point about the distributed files not being *binary
identical* to the svn tag, but I personally consider source files to
be identical if diff -b (i.e. ignore changes in the amount of
whitespace) says they are.

So, in this case, I definitely don't see this as a blocker, just
something to fix for a future release.

-Bertrand

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 1.0.8-incubating

Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.

On 1 November 2012 18:15, Om <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for taking a look :-)  Responses inline:
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 4:16 AM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 30 October 2012 20:16, Om <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > After our first release as Apache Flex, we are following it up with the
>> Apache
>> > Flex SDK Installer (Incubating) AIR application.
>> >
>> > The Apache Flex SDK Installer AIR application provides an easy,
>> > single-click installation of the Apache Flex SDK and all its
>> dependencies.
>> >  This will make it suitable for working with   IDEs such as Adobe Flash
>> > Builder, FDT, IntelliJ IDEA, FlashDevelop, etc.
>> >
>> > The application downloads the following dependencies:
>> >
>> >    - The AIR sdk (Windows vs. Mac) based on the current platform
>> >    - Adobe Flash Player playerglobal.swc
>> >    - SwfObject
>> >    - Open Source Media Framework (OSMF)
>> >    - Adobe Text Layout Format (TLF)
>> >
>> > Optionally, the application will download these files as well:
>> >
>> >    - Adobe BlazeDS
>> >    - Adobe embedded font support
>> >
>> >
>> > This release was voted upon on the flex-dev@incubator.apache.org list.
>>  The
>> > vote passed with 11 binding and 5 non-binding votes.  Here is the voting
>> > thread:
>> > http://markmail.org/thread/nbrflol6mkpu65ry
>> >
>> > The source distributions for Windows and Mac are available here:
>> > http://people.apache.org/~bigosmallm/installapacheflex_RC9/
>> >
>> > The binary distributions as a convenience for the respective platforms,
>> > available here:
>> > http://people.apache.org/~bigosmallm/installapacheflex_RC9/binaries/
>> >
>> > The PGP keys of the two release managers - OmPrakash Muppirala (Source
>> kit
>> > + Windows binaries) and Erik de Bruin (Mac binaries) are available here:
>> > http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/flex/KEYS
>> >
>> > Here is the tag for the release:
>> >
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/flex/utilities/tags/apache-flex-sdk-installer-1.0.8-RC9
>>
>> There are 3 directories under that tag; I would expect to find the
>> NOTICE, LICENSE and DISCLAIMER files at the top level rather than
>> under just one of them.
>>
>
> Fixed.
>
>
>>
>> The files do end up at the top level in the source archive, which is good.
>>
>> Also, the installerBadge directory tree does not appear to be included
>> in the source archive - is that intentional?
>> If so, why is it in the tag?
>>
>
> It is intentional, we are not releasing the source of installerbadge since
> we dont expect anyone to build it from the source.
> I have removed installerbadge from the tag now.
>
>
>
>>
>> The key C1708693 does not appear to be available from the normal
>> public PGP key servers.
>>
>
> Fixed.
>
> C:\>gpg --send-key C1708693
> gpg: sending key C1708693 to hkp server keys.gnupg.net
>
>
>
>>
>> Some of the source files don't have an EOL at EOF (e.g.
>> ApacheFlexToolsStyle.css) in the SVN tag whereas they do have an EOL
>> in the source archive.
>> This is a packaging error, which can be sorted by ensuring that source
>> files always have an EOL at EOF, or by changing the packaging
>> instructions to not add the missing EOLs.
>>
>>
> While working with the source from SVN, no one has had problems.

Not relevant to this discussion.

> We explicitly set the EOL at EOF while packaging just in case.

Which means that the source archive does not match the SVN tag.

> Is it okay if I create a bug for this and work on it after the release?  I
> hope this is not a blocker issue.

If I were the RM, I would add the missing EOLs at EOF and create another RC.

> Thanks again for your time!
>
> Regards,
> Om

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 1.0.8-incubating

Posted by Om <bi...@gmail.com>.

Thanks for taking a look :-)  Responses inline:


On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 4:16 AM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 30 October 2012 20:16, Om <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After our first release as Apache Flex, we are following it up with the
> Apache
> > Flex SDK Installer (Incubating) AIR application.
> >
> > The Apache Flex SDK Installer AIR application provides an easy,
> > single-click installation of the Apache Flex SDK and all its
> dependencies.
> >  This will make it suitable for working with   IDEs such as Adobe Flash
> > Builder, FDT, IntelliJ IDEA, FlashDevelop, etc.
> >
> > The application downloads the following dependencies:
> >
> >    - The AIR sdk (Windows vs. Mac) based on the current platform
> >    - Adobe Flash Player playerglobal.swc
> >    - SwfObject
> >    - Open Source Media Framework (OSMF)
> >    - Adobe Text Layout Format (TLF)
> >
> > Optionally, the application will download these files as well:
> >
> >    - Adobe BlazeDS
> >    - Adobe embedded font support
> >
> >
> > This release was voted upon on the flex-dev@incubator.apache.org list.
>  The
> > vote passed with 11 binding and 5 non-binding votes.  Here is the voting
> > thread:
> > http://markmail.org/thread/nbrflol6mkpu65ry
> >
> > The source distributions for Windows and Mac are available here:
> > http://people.apache.org/~bigosmallm/installapacheflex_RC9/
> >
> > The binary distributions as a convenience for the respective platforms,
> > available here:
> > http://people.apache.org/~bigosmallm/installapacheflex_RC9/binaries/
> >
> > The PGP keys of the two release managers - OmPrakash Muppirala (Source
> kit
> > + Windows binaries) and Erik de Bruin (Mac binaries) are available here:
> > http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/flex/KEYS
> >
> > Here is the tag for the release:
> >
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/flex/utilities/tags/apache-flex-sdk-installer-1.0.8-RC9
>
> There are 3 directories under that tag; I would expect to find the
> NOTICE, LICENSE and DISCLAIMER files at the top level rather than
> under just one of them.
>

Fixed.


>
> The files do end up at the top level in the source archive, which is good.
>
> Also, the installerBadge directory tree does not appear to be included
> in the source archive - is that intentional?
> If so, why is it in the tag?
>

It is intentional, we are not releasing the source of installerbadge since
we dont expect anyone to build it from the source.
I have removed installerbadge from the tag now.



>
> The key C1708693 does not appear to be available from the normal
> public PGP key servers.
>

Fixed.

C:\>gpg --send-key C1708693
gpg: sending key C1708693 to hkp server keys.gnupg.net



>
> Some of the source files don't have an EOL at EOF (e.g.
> ApacheFlexToolsStyle.css) in the SVN tag whereas they do have an EOL
> in the source archive.
> This is a packaging error, which can be sorted by ensuring that source
> files always have an EOL at EOF, or by changing the packaging
> instructions to not add the missing EOLs.
>
>
While working with the source from SVN, no one has had problems.  We
explicitly set the EOL at EOF while packaging just in case.
Is it okay if I create a bug for this and work on it after the release?  I
hope this is not a blocker issue.

Thanks again for your time!

Regards,
Om

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 1.0.8-incubating

Posted by Carol Frampton <cf...@adobe.com>.


On 11/1/12 7 :16AM, "sebb" <se...@gmail.com> wrote:

>On 30 October 2012 20:16, Om <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> After our first release as Apache Flex, we are following it up with the
>>Apache
>> Flex SDK Installer (Incubating) AIR application.
>>
>> The Apache Flex SDK Installer AIR application provides an easy,
>> single-click installation of the Apache Flex SDK and all its
>>dependencies.
>>  This will make it suitable for working with   IDEs such as Adobe Flash
>> Builder, FDT, IntelliJ IDEA, FlashDevelop, etc.
>>
>> The application downloads the following dependencies:
>>
>>    - The AIR sdk (Windows vs. Mac) based on the current platform
>>    - Adobe Flash Player playerglobal.swc
>>    - SwfObject
>>    - Open Source Media Framework (OSMF)
>>    - Adobe Text Layout Format (TLF)
>>
>> Optionally, the application will download these files as well:
>>
>>    - Adobe BlazeDS
>>    - Adobe embedded font support
>>
>>
>> This release was voted upon on the flex-dev@incubator.apache.org list.
>>The
>> vote passed with 11 binding and 5 non-binding votes.  Here is the voting
>> thread:
>> http://markmail.org/thread/nbrflol6mkpu65ry
>>
>> The source distributions for Windows and Mac are available here:
>> http://people.apache.org/~bigosmallm/installapacheflex_RC9/
>>
>> The binary distributions as a convenience for the respective platforms,
>> available here:
>> http://people.apache.org/~bigosmallm/installapacheflex_RC9/binaries/
>>
>> The PGP keys of the two release managers - OmPrakash Muppirala (Source
>>kit
>> + Windows binaries) and Erik de Bruin (Mac binaries) are available here:
>> http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/flex/KEYS
>>
>> Here is the tag for the release:
>> 
>>https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/flex/utilities/tags/apache-fle
>>x-sdk-installer-1.0.8-RC9
>
>There are 3 directories under that tag; I would expect to find the
>NOTICE, LICENSE and DISCLAIMER files at the top level rather than
>under just one of them.
>
>The files do end up at the top level in the source archive, which is good.

Does this have to be changed before you will vote for this release?

>
>Also, the installerBadge directory tree does not appear to be included
>in the source archive - is that intentional?
>If so, why is it in the tag?
>
>The key C1708693 does not appear to be available from the normal
>public PGP key servers.

I presume you would like Om to publish his key.

>Some of the source files don't have an EOL at EOF (e.g.
>ApacheFlexToolsStyle.css) in the SVN tag whereas they do have an EOL
>in the source archive.
>This is a packaging error, which can be sorted by ensuring that source
>files always have an EOL at EOF, or by changing the packaging
>instructions to not add the missing EOLs.

Per the incubation release guide [2], the line endings reflect the
platform associated with the compression format.  The ant code which
builds the source distributions is using the <fixcrlf> task to change the
line endings to to CRLF for zip and LF for the tar.gz file.

Carol

[1] 
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#notes-on-line-end
ings

>
>>
>>
>> Please vote:
>>
>> [ ] +1  approve
>> [ ] +0  no opinion
>> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>>
>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>
>> Regards,
>> OmPrakash Muppirala
>> Apache Flex PPMC Member
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 1.0.8-incubating

Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.

On 30 October 2012 20:16, Om <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After our first release as Apache Flex, we are following it up with the Apache
> Flex SDK Installer (Incubating) AIR application.
>
> The Apache Flex SDK Installer AIR application provides an easy,
> single-click installation of the Apache Flex SDK and all its dependencies.
>  This will make it suitable for working with   IDEs such as Adobe Flash
> Builder, FDT, IntelliJ IDEA, FlashDevelop, etc.
>
> The application downloads the following dependencies:
>
>    - The AIR sdk (Windows vs. Mac) based on the current platform
>    - Adobe Flash Player playerglobal.swc
>    - SwfObject
>    - Open Source Media Framework (OSMF)
>    - Adobe Text Layout Format (TLF)
>
> Optionally, the application will download these files as well:
>
>    - Adobe BlazeDS
>    - Adobe embedded font support
>
>
> This release was voted upon on the flex-dev@incubator.apache.org list.  The
> vote passed with 11 binding and 5 non-binding votes.  Here is the voting
> thread:
> http://markmail.org/thread/nbrflol6mkpu65ry
>
> The source distributions for Windows and Mac are available here:
> http://people.apache.org/~bigosmallm/installapacheflex_RC9/
>
> The binary distributions as a convenience for the respective platforms,
> available here:
> http://people.apache.org/~bigosmallm/installapacheflex_RC9/binaries/
>
> The PGP keys of the two release managers - OmPrakash Muppirala (Source kit
> + Windows binaries) and Erik de Bruin (Mac binaries) are available here:
> http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/flex/KEYS
>
> Here is the tag for the release:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/flex/utilities/tags/apache-flex-sdk-installer-1.0.8-RC9

There are 3 directories under that tag; I would expect to find the
NOTICE, LICENSE and DISCLAIMER files at the top level rather than
under just one of them.

The files do end up at the top level in the source archive, which is good.

Also, the installerBadge directory tree does not appear to be included
in the source archive - is that intentional?
If so, why is it in the tag?

The key C1708693 does not appear to be available from the normal
public PGP key servers.

Some of the source files don't have an EOL at EOF (e.g.
ApacheFlexToolsStyle.css) in the SVN tag whereas they do have an EOL
in the source archive.
This is a packaging error, which can be sorted by ensuring that source
files always have an EOL at EOF, or by changing the packaging
instructions to not add the missing EOLs.

>
>
> Please vote:
>
> [ ] +1  approve
> [ ] +0  no opinion
> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>
> Regards,
> OmPrakash Muppirala
> Apache Flex PPMC Member

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org