You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com> on 2000/12/22 18:53:51 UTC
1.3.15...
I'd like to propose a code freeze on 1.3.15-dev. Right now, we
need to look at the byte range issue (there's a patch on the
table) but, I'm sure, that people are busy right now, so I
don't foresee us tagging and rolling until the 26th or so.
I want to avoid bits and pieces being added in for now on.
There's that issue that Sascha mentioned about semaphore
locking being hosed that we need to address.
--
===========================================================================
Jim Jagielski [|] jim@jaguNET.com [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
"Casanova will have many weapons; To beat him you will
have to have more than forks and flatulence."
Re: 1.3.15...
Posted by Jie Gao <J....@isu.usyd.edu.au>.
On Fri, 29 Dec 2000, Jie Gao wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>
> > Are you quite certain it did so before? On which platform is apache
> > running? Which platform exposed the NFS? Does the behavior return
> > if you go back to 1.3.12, or might you have updated the NFS?
Sorry, I missed a couple of questions and there's a correction:
- Which platform exposed the NFS?
Apache is on: SunOS 5.7 Generic_106541-12 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-60
Files NFS-mounted from: SunOS 5.7 Generic_106541-12 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-80
- or might you have updated the NFS?
No, not recently; not since Apache is installed.
And I don't quite understand the impact of upgrading of NFS in relation to
this. Can you elaborate?
Thanks,
Jie
> OK, I am supplying all the info requested by all who replied here in
> this message:
>
> - Platform:
>
> SunOS 5.7 Generic_106541-12 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-80
> Server Version: Apache/1.3.14 (Unix)
>
> - Yes, I have this in my config (Yes, I know this is stupid, but I
> inherited this and cannot change it, and this may be the cause of
> the problem?):
>
> AddHandler server-parsed .shtml htm html
>
> - No, no "Last-Modified:" header was sent out either.
>
> - No, I don't know whether this was the case with previous versions
> of Apache; I stumbled on this discovery only by chance.
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Jie
>
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Jie Gao" <J....@isu.usyd.edu.au>
> > To: <ne...@apache.org>
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2000 1:00 AM
> > Subject: Re: 1.3.15...
> >
> >
> > > On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, Jie Gao wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I've found 1.3.14 has stopped sending the ETag: and ccept-Ranges:
> > > > headers for .html documents.
> > > >
> > > > Any idea why?
> > >
> > > Sorry, let me revise that: it doesn't seem to send those headers
> > > for NFS mounted files.
> > >
> > >
> > > Jie
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
>
Re: 1.3.15...
Posted by Jie Gao <J....@isu.usyd.edu.au>.
On Thu, 28 Dec 2000, Ask Bjoern Hansen wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Dec 2000, Jie Gao wrote:
>
> > - Yes, I have this in my config (Yes, I know this is stupid, but I
> > inherited this and cannot change it, and this may be the cause of
> > the problem?):
> >
> > AddHandler server-parsed .shtml htm html
>
> yes, that is the cause of the problem.
OK. End of story then. :-)
> > - No, no "Last-Modified:" header was sent out either.
>
> You can fix that part with the XBitHack option.
That's a hard decision to make: Solaris's priority_paging mechanism
does not cache those files that have the exec bits set. So it's a
matter of who I should shift the load to... :-) i/o is expensive to
me at the moment.
Thanks to all who tried to help and Best regards to you all!
Jie
Re: 1.3.15...
Posted by Ask Bjoern Hansen <as...@valueclick.com>.
On Fri, 29 Dec 2000, Jie Gao wrote:
> - Yes, I have this in my config (Yes, I know this is stupid, but I
> inherited this and cannot change it, and this may be the cause of
> the problem?):
>
> AddHandler server-parsed .shtml htm html
yes, that is the cause of the problem.
> - No, no "Last-Modified:" header was sent out either.
You can fix that part with the XBitHack option.
- ask
--
ask bjoern hansen - <http://ask.netcetera.dk/>
more than 70M impressions per day, <http://valueclick.com>
RE: 1.3.15...
Posted by Jie Gao <J....@isu.usyd.edu.au>.
On Thu, 28 Dec 2000, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Please test a prior version, since we need to know if this is specific
> to a version of apache or specific to a version of your nfs client.
I have justed tested 1.3.9, and got the same results. Looks like it's
Solaris's problem?
Regards,
Jie
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jie Gao [mailto:J.Gao@isu.usyd.edu.au]
> > Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2000 6:27 PM
> > To: new-httpd@apache.org
> > Subject: Re: 1.3.15...
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> >
> > > Are you quite certain it did so before? On which platform is apache
> > > running? Which platform exposed the NFS? Does the behavior return
> > > if you go back to 1.3.12, or might you have updated the NFS?
> >
> > OK, I am supplying all the info requested by all who replied here in
> > this message:
> >
> > - Platform:
> >
> > SunOS 5.7 Generic_106541-12 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-80
> > Server Version: Apache/1.3.14 (Unix)
> >
> > - Yes, I have this in my config (Yes, I know this is stupid, but I
> > inherited this and cannot change it, and this may be the cause of
> > the problem?):
> >
> > AddHandler server-parsed .shtml htm html
> >
> > - No, no "Last-Modified:" header was sent out either.
> >
> > - No, I don't know whether this was the case with previous versions
> > of Apache; I stumbled on this discovery only by chance.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> >
> > Jie
> >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Jie Gao" <J....@isu.usyd.edu.au>
> > > To: <ne...@apache.org>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2000 1:00 AM
> > > Subject: Re: 1.3.15...
> > >
> > >
> > > > On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, Jie Gao wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > I've found 1.3.14 has stopped sending the ETag: and
> > ccept-Ranges:
> > > > > headers for .html documents.
> > > > >
> > > > > Any idea why?
> > > >
> > > > Sorry, let me revise that: it doesn't seem to send those headers
> > > > for NFS mounted files.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Jie
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
RE: 1.3.15...
Posted by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>.
Please test a prior version, since we need to know if this is specific
to a version of apache or specific to a version of your nfs client.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jie Gao [mailto:J.Gao@isu.usyd.edu.au]
> Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2000 6:27 PM
> To: new-httpd@apache.org
> Subject: Re: 1.3.15...
>
>
> On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>
> > Are you quite certain it did so before? On which platform is apache
> > running? Which platform exposed the NFS? Does the behavior return
> > if you go back to 1.3.12, or might you have updated the NFS?
>
> OK, I am supplying all the info requested by all who replied here in
> this message:
>
> - Platform:
>
> SunOS 5.7 Generic_106541-12 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-80
> Server Version: Apache/1.3.14 (Unix)
>
> - Yes, I have this in my config (Yes, I know this is stupid, but I
> inherited this and cannot change it, and this may be the cause of
> the problem?):
>
> AddHandler server-parsed .shtml htm html
>
> - No, no "Last-Modified:" header was sent out either.
>
> - No, I don't know whether this was the case with previous versions
> of Apache; I stumbled on this discovery only by chance.
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Jie
>
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Jie Gao" <J....@isu.usyd.edu.au>
> > To: <ne...@apache.org>
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2000 1:00 AM
> > Subject: Re: 1.3.15...
> >
> >
> > > On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, Jie Gao wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I've found 1.3.14 has stopped sending the ETag: and
> ccept-Ranges:
> > > > headers for .html documents.
> > > >
> > > > Any idea why?
> > >
> > > Sorry, let me revise that: it doesn't seem to send those headers
> > > for NFS mounted files.
> > >
> > >
> > > Jie
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
>
Re: 1.3.15...
Posted by Jie Gao <J....@isu.usyd.edu.au>.
On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Are you quite certain it did so before? On which platform is apache
> running? Which platform exposed the NFS? Does the behavior return
> if you go back to 1.3.12, or might you have updated the NFS?
OK, I am supplying all the info requested by all who replied here in
this message:
- Platform:
SunOS 5.7 Generic_106541-12 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-80
Server Version: Apache/1.3.14 (Unix)
- Yes, I have this in my config (Yes, I know this is stupid, but I
inherited this and cannot change it, and this may be the cause of
the problem?):
AddHandler server-parsed .shtml htm html
- No, no "Last-Modified:" header was sent out either.
- No, I don't know whether this was the case with previous versions
of Apache; I stumbled on this discovery only by chance.
Regards,
Jie
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jie Gao" <J....@isu.usyd.edu.au>
> To: <ne...@apache.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2000 1:00 AM
> Subject: Re: 1.3.15...
>
>
> > On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, Jie Gao wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I've found 1.3.14 has stopped sending the ETag: and ccept-Ranges:
> > > headers for .html documents.
> > >
> > > Any idea why?
> >
> > Sorry, let me revise that: it doesn't seem to send those headers
> > for NFS mounted files.
> >
> >
> > Jie
> >
> >
>
>
Re: 1.3.15...
Posted by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@lnd.com>.
Are you quite certain it did so before? On which platform is apache
running? Which platform exposed the NFS? Does the behavior return
if you go back to 1.3.12, or might you have updated the NFS?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jie Gao" <J....@isu.usyd.edu.au>
To: <ne...@apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2000 1:00 AM
Subject: Re: 1.3.15...
> On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, Jie Gao wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've found 1.3.14 has stopped sending the ETag: and ccept-Ranges:
> > headers for .html documents.
> >
> > Any idea why?
>
> Sorry, let me revise that: it doesn't seem to send those headers
> for NFS mounted files.
>
>
> Jie
>
>
Re: 1.3.15...
Posted by Jie Gao <J....@isu.usyd.edu.au>.
On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, Jie Gao wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've found 1.3.14 has stopped sending the ETag: and ccept-Ranges:
> headers for .html documents.
>
> Any idea why?
Sorry, let me revise that: it doesn't seem to send those headers
for NFS mounted files.
Jie
Re: ActivePerl Build 630 and Apache 1.1.13
Posted by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@lnd.com>.
Not here, this list is for development...
Please inquire on news:comp.infosystems.www.servers.ms-windows
----- Original Message -----
From: "jupu" <ju...@sofico.be>
To: <ne...@apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2000 12:59 AM
Subject: ActivePerl Build 630 and Apache 1.1.13
>
> Any one who can help me setup these to to run perl CGI scripts on a win-98
> platform ?
>
> Jurgen
>
>
ActivePerl Build 630 and Apache 1.1.13
Posted by jupu <ju...@sofico.be>.
Any one who can help me setup these to to run perl CGI scripts on a win-98
platform ?
Jurgen
Re: 1.3.15...
Posted by Jie Gao <J....@isu.usyd.edu.au>.
Hi,
I've found 1.3.14 has stopped sending the ETag: and ccept-Ranges:
headers for .html documents.
Any idea why?
Thanks,
Jie
Re: 1.3.15...
Posted by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>.
I noted on the list an issue that would allow Win32 to be configured
with an arg list which can be reconfigured with the -k config option,
but I've been mobile and lost W2K for a couple days (the 98 backup
partition didn't have all the email set up... plus the matter of getting
out and shopping :-)
If that patch can go in, tested, by 4pm CST Tuesday, I presume there
is no objection? I've responded to Greg and Ryan's comments, and saw
no other objections.
I am following up with Andrew over a Win98/95 issue (95 works for one
set of code, 98 for the other). A little debugging and we should be
good to go (this affects only the experimental 9x run-as-service.)
I appreciate your dedication to moving this out the door, and am in the
full-caution mode (that's why I'd sent the byterange patch to the list,
I'd like a 100% review from yourself and Tony.)
Bill
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Jagielski" <ji...@jaguNET.com>
To: <ne...@apache.org>
Sent: Friday, December 22, 2000 11:53 AM
Subject: 1.3.15...
> I'd like to propose a code freeze on 1.3.15-dev. Right now, we
> need to look at the byte range issue (there's a patch on the
> table) but, I'm sure, that people are busy right now, so I
> don't foresee us tagging and rolling until the 26th or so.
> I want to avoid bits and pieces being added in for now on.
> There's that issue that Sascha mentioned about semaphore
> locking being hosed that we need to address.
> --
> ===========================================================================
> Jim Jagielski [|] jim@jaguNET.com [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
> "Casanova will have many weapons; To beat him you will
> have to have more than forks and flatulence."
>