pre-2.0.0-M1 tasks

[Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com>]

Hi guys,

as it was discussed last week, we think it's now time to cut a release 
for ADS. The fact is that it will just be an intermediate release, not 
one we can tell our users to depend on, but for us, it's important to 
have a working base.

I have started to reshuffle the issues, and created 2 more versions :
2.0.0-M1 : for configuration in DIT
2.0.0-M2 : for replication
2.0.0-M3 : for administrative model

IMO, it's important to assin one major feature to each milestone, but 
that does not mean we will not fix other issues nor we won't add some 
new features, it's just convenient.

Currently, we have started a bug parade, and try to fix as many as we 
can, but I think we should start to cut the release this week.

Any thoughts about this plan ?

-- 
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com

Re: pre-2.0.0-M1 tasks

[Alex Karasulu <ak...@apache.org>]

On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com>wrote:

> On 6/1/11 8:53 AM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
>
>> This sounds good to me too but I don't want to be locked into it. If
>> additional things are added or it shifts in direction I'm fine with that.
>> I
>> just don't want to commit to a specific agenda right now before the
>> technical challenges are fully clear to me.
>>
>
> There is no way we will get stuck into this agenda. This is just a
> proposal, to give some perspective.
>
> As usual, we are very able to change things and move around priorities.
> Thanks god !
>
> But having a roadmap helps us to focus on what is important.


OK I figured just wanted to make sure we explicitly are not locking into
anything.

Thanks for the feedback.

Alex

Re: pre-2.0.0-M1 tasks

[Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com>]

On 6/1/11 8:53 AM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
> This sounds good to me too but I don't want to be locked into it. If
> additional things are added or it shifts in direction I'm fine with that. I
> just don't want to commit to a specific agenda right now before the
> technical challenges are fully clear to me.

There is no way we will get stuck into this agenda. This is just a 
proposal, to give some perspective.

As usual, we are very able to change things and move around priorities. 
Thanks god !

But having a roadmap helps us to focus on what is important.

-- 
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com

Re: pre-2.0.0-M1 tasks

[Alex Karasulu <ak...@apache.org>]

This sounds good to me too but I don't want to be locked into it. If
additional things are added or it shifts in direction I'm fine with that. I
just don't want to commit to a specific agenda right now before the
technical challenges are fully clear to me.

Thanks,
Alex

On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 11:50 AM, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot <pa...@marcelot.net>wrote:

> Sounds very good to me.
>
> Clear path for us and our users willing to evaluate the future of ApacheDS.
>
> +1
>
> Regards,
> Pierre-Arnaud
>
> On 30 mai 2011, at 15:43, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
>
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > as it was discussed last week, we think it's now time to cut a release
> for ADS. The fact is that it will just be an intermediate release, not one
> we can tell our users to depend on, but for us, it's important to have a
> working base.
> >
> > I have started to reshuffle the issues, and created 2 more versions :
> > 2.0.0-M1 : for configuration in DIT
> > 2.0.0-M2 : for replication
> > 2.0.0-M3 : for administrative model
> >
> > IMO, it's important to assin one major feature to each milestone, but
> that does not mean we will not fix other issues nor we won't add some new
> features, it's just convenient.
> >
> > Currently, we have started a bug parade, and try to fix as many as we
> can, but I think we should start to cut the release this week.
> >
> > Any thoughts about this plan ?
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Cordialement,
> > Emmanuel Lécharny
> > www.iktek.com
> >
>
>

Re: pre-2.0.0-M1 tasks

[Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot <pa...@marcelot.net>]

Sounds very good to me.

Clear path for us and our users willing to evaluate the future of ApacheDS.

+1

Regards,
Pierre-Arnaud

On 30 mai 2011, at 15:43, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:

> Hi guys,
> 
> as it was discussed last week, we think it's now time to cut a release for ADS. The fact is that it will just be an intermediate release, not one we can tell our users to depend on, but for us, it's important to have a working base.
> 
> I have started to reshuffle the issues, and created 2 more versions :
> 2.0.0-M1 : for configuration in DIT
> 2.0.0-M2 : for replication
> 2.0.0-M3 : for administrative model
> 
> IMO, it's important to assin one major feature to each milestone, but that does not mean we will not fix other issues nor we won't add some new features, it's just convenient.
> 
> Currently, we have started a bug parade, and try to fix as many as we can, but I think we should start to cut the release this week.
> 
> Any thoughts about this plan ?
> 
> -- 
> Regards,
> Cordialement,
> Emmanuel Lécharny
> www.iktek.com
> 

Re: pre-2.0.0-M1 tasks

[Kiran Ayyagari <ka...@apache.org>]

On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 7:13 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> as it was discussed last week, we think it's now time to cut a release for
> ADS. The fact is that it will just be an intermediate release, not one we
> can tell our users to depend on, but for us, it's important to have a
> working base.
>
> I have started to reshuffle the issues, and created 2 more versions :
> 2.0.0-M1 : for configuration in DIT
> 2.0.0-M2 : for replication
> 2.0.0-M3 : for administrative model
>
+1
> IMO, it's important to assin one major feature to each milestone, but that
> does not mean we will not fix other issues nor we won't add some new
> features, it's just convenient.
>
> Currently, we have started a bug parade, and try to fix as many as we can,
> but I think we should start to cut the release this week.
>
> Any thoughts about this plan ?
>
> --
> Regards,
> Cordialement,
> Emmanuel Lécharny
> www.iktek.com
>
>



-- 
Kiran Ayyagari