sendpartial is false?

["Noel J. Bergman" <no...@devtech.com>]

Anyone know why this is still defaulting to false instead of true?  I use
true in my own config.xml.

	--- Noel


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org

Re: sendpartial is false?

[Stefano Bagnara <ap...@bago.org>]

Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> Anyone know why this is still defaulting to false instead of true?  I use
> true in my own config.xml.
> 
> 	--- Noel

I also use true in my main production server.

That said I never tested it too much because less than 1% of my outgoing 
mail have multiple recipients.

I would be +1 to invert the default value on trunk.
We should not change 2.3 now.

Stefano


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org

Re: sendpartial is false?

[Serge Knystautas <sk...@gmail.com>]

On 7/23/06, Stefano Bagnara <ap...@bago.org> wrote:
> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > Anyone know why this is still defaulting to false instead of true?  I use
> > true in my own config.xml.
> >
> >       --- Noel
>
> I also use true in my main production server.
>
> That said I never tested it too much because less than 1% of my outgoing
> mail have multiple recipients.
>
> I would be +1 to invert the default value on trunk.
> We should not change 2.3 now.

Same here.  AFAIK, it was safer to have it default false because we
were unclear how it would do in widespread production usage.  +1 to
change.

-- 
Serge Knystautas
Lokitech >> software . strategy . design >> http://www.lokitech.com
p. 301.656.5501
e. sergek@lokitech.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org