You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@camel.apache.org by "Stig Rohde Døssing (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2019/07/16 17:52:00 UTC
[jira] [Created] (CAMEL-13752) Make a
BridgePropertyPlaceholderConfigurer equivalent for
PropertySourcePlaceholderConfigurer
Stig Rohde Døssing created CAMEL-13752:
------------------------------------------
Summary: Make a BridgePropertyPlaceholderConfigurer equivalent for PropertySourcePlaceholderConfigurer
Key: CAMEL-13752
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-13752
Project: Camel
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: camel-spring
Affects Versions: 3.0.0.M4, 2.24.1
Reporter: Stig Rohde Døssing
BridgePropertyPlaceholderConfigurer extends Spring's PropertyPlaceholderConfigurer. Spring recommends against using this class for new code, and has a replacement in the PropertySourcesPlaceholderConfigurer. The new class is a prerequisite for e.g. the @TestPropertySource annotation to work. Example usage here https://github.com/apache/camel/blob/camel-2.23.1/components/camel-test-spring/src/test/java/org/apache/camel/test/spring/CamelSpringRunnerTestPropertySourceTest.java
It's not obvious to me whether it would be safe to reimplement BridgePropertyPlaceholderConfigurer to extend PropertySourcesPlaceholderConfigurer instead. I'd guess it wouldn't be backwards compatible, otherwise Spring would probably have just reimplemented PropertyPlaceholderConfigurer.
I think we should add a new BridgePropertySourcesPlaceholderConfigurer that extends PropertySourcesPlaceholderConfigurer. This will allow users to use the Camel property bridging functionality, without losing the ability to override Spring properties in tests.
I am happy to work on this if the idea makes sense.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.14#76016)