You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@crunch.apache.org by "Josh Wills (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/05/28 05:18:02 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (CRUNCH-355) Rename jobs to show how many stages have done before job submission

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CRUNCH-355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Josh Wills updated CRUNCH-355:
------------------------------

    Attachment: CRUNCH-355.patch

Wrote a patch for this that keeps the jobID the same, but adds a sequence number so that the (n/m) counts are correct based on the order that the jobs are kicked off in at runtime.

> Rename jobs to show how many stages have done before job submission
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CRUNCH-355
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CRUNCH-355
>             Project: Crunch
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Core
>            Reporter: Chao Shi
>            Assignee: Josh Wills
>         Attachments: CRUNCH-355.patch
>
>
> The naming mechanism introduced in CRUNCH-262 has a flaw. It adds (m/n) to the end of job name, where m is the current stage number at planning time and n is the total number of stages.
> Suppose in the following case, where A takes a long time to run, when B is submitted, C and D have completed. As there are 3 jobs done, we should expect B to be (4/5) rather than (2/5) or (3/5).
> {code}
> A   C
> |   |
> B   D
>  \ /
>   E
> {/code}
> In planning time, we don't have a clue which stage will complete earlier. So I think it better to assign it at runtime.
> One problem here is that the user may access to Job instance before it submits. So he may observe a sudden change of job name.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)