You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to issues@spark.apache.org by "Nick Pentreath (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/07/04 13:30:10 UTC

[jira] [Created] (SPARK-16365) Ideas for moving "mllib-local" forward

Nick Pentreath created SPARK-16365:
--------------------------------------

             Summary: Ideas for moving "mllib-local" forward
                 Key: SPARK-16365
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-16365
             Project: Spark
          Issue Type: Brainstorming
          Components: ML
            Reporter: Nick Pentreath


Since SPARK-13944 is all done, we should all think about what the "next steps" might be for {{mllib-local}}. E.g., it could be "improve Spark's linear algebra", or "investigate how we will implement local models/pipelines in Spark", etc.

This ticket is for comments, ideas, brainstormings and PoCs. The separation of linalg into a standalone project turned out to be significantly more complex than originally expected. So I vote we devote sufficient discussion and time to planning out the next move :)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@spark.apache.org