You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@openoffice.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2013/07/10 21:21:07 UTC
[Bug 122718] New: Offset Function is not correctly converted in some
cases
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122718
Bug ID: 122718
Issue Type: DEFECT
Summary: Offset Function is not correctly converted in some
cases
Product: Calc
Version: AOO 3.4.1
Hardware: PC
OS: Windows 7
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: open-import
Assignee: issues@openoffice.apache.org
Reporter: fwebb02@msn.com
CC: issues@openoffice.apache.org
The Excel formula below is only partially correct in OpenOffice Calc. This
Excel statement works fine in Excel (and actually works fine in OpenOffice once
it is retyped). When the Excel file is opened in OpenOffice, the first Offset
is converted to V56 (at least in this case with the V$56: just prior to the
Offset function). The second Offset is fine in OpenOffice. I would guess that
the difference is due to the first Offset function being inside of the Sum
function. Since the Offset statement is converted to a cell reference that is
beside it, there is no standard way to search and replace this. There is an
error in the cell, but each cell must be reviewed and modified individually to
replace the original Offset function - then it works fine in OpenOffice Calc.
SUM(V$56:OFFSET(V460,-B473,0))+OFFSET(U460,-B473+1,0)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 122718] Offset Function is not correctly converted in some
cases
Posted by bu...@apache.org.
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122718
Edwin Sharp <el...@mail-page.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC| |elish@mail-page.com
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #1 from Edwin Sharp <el...@mail-page.com> ---
bug 101467 is even more severe with error 509.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 101467 ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.