You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2007/11/12 10:36:45 UTC

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31936] - [PATCH] Fonts are rendered differently between pdf and awt

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31936>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31936


jeremias@apache.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED




------- Additional Comments From jeremias@apache.org  2007-11-12 01:36 -------
The latest changes [1] should achieve the intended goal of this entry as far as
it is currently possible. Improvements are certainly still possible, for example
for Type 1 fonts by implementing a PFB and/or PFA parser like FOray has. For
Type 1 fonts, the "full name" of a font is still not properly reported. An
additional idea in this context is to implement a "font substitution" section in
the configuration file which becomes somewhat necessary now that we have font
auto-detection.

[1] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=593189&view=rev

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.