You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@turbine.apache.org by Sy...@swisscom.com on 2002/06/17 13:38:00 UTC
turbine 2.1 or 2.2
Hello folks,
I'm new in the world of Turbine and I want to install it on my development environment.
But can I install the next release, 2.2? Is it stable and ready for production?
Thank you
Sylvain
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: turbine 2.1 or 2.2
Posted by Slava Zimine <sl...@japgod.mine.nu>.
Yes, 2.2 is good in its basic functionality (integration with
velocity)
People reported problems with 2.2 when they tried to use some uncommong
services from fulcrum.
you can find their messages on the turbine-user mailing list.
I'm using turbine2.2 to develop a production site for a company. it's
nearly fone.
The caveit, i fell with turbine2.2 which i want you to avoid.
i've installed tdk2.2b1 which contains turbine2.2b1.jar
i've installed the newapp webapp example with the help of the
turbine-user mailing list message.
i've discovered later that a webapp with turbine2.2b1.jar had a
problem with IE (infinite redirects).
I've checked out the jakarta-turbine2 cvs module, compiled it to get
turbine2.2b2.jar
when i've remplaced the turbine2.2b1.jar by this in newapp/WEB-INF/lib
things worked nicely with IE too.
if you have problems to compile turbine2.2b2.jar i can mail it to you.
Salut de Geneve.
slava
On Mon, Jun 17, 2002 at 01:38:00PM +0200, Sylvain.Thevoz@swisscom.com wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> I'm new in the world of Turbine and I want to install it on my development environment.
>
> But can I install the next release, 2.2? Is it stable and ready for production?
>
> Thank you
> Sylvain
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
RE: turbine 2.1 or 2.2
Posted by Eric Pugh <ep...@upstate.com>.
There is no solution! T3 continues to use the embedded user/security stuff.
Which is great if the default turbine user and security is what you want,
but if you want to drop in your own user/security stuff, then it doesn't
work very well.. Pluggable user/security is something that comes up, and
then dies away... As far as the decoupled versus coupled torque issue, I am
not real sure.. Scarab drives a lot of the T3 requirements and development,
and I would look at cvs and scarab to see..
Eric
-----Original Message-----
From: Anthony W. Marino [mailto:anthony@AWMObjects.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 10:56 AM
To: Turbine Users List; Eric Pugh
Subject: Re: turbine 2.1 or 2.2
> My 2 cents is that 2.2 is much better then 2.1 because of all the bug
fixes
> (especially in the decoupled torque) EXCEPT for two things.. If you need
> to have users and security, and you want to use the decoupled torque, then
> you end up with two different ways of accessing the database... All your
> application code can use the decoupled torque, but all your security/user
> code needs to use the coupled torque code. However, if you are rolling
> your own security, or user stuff, then definitely go with 2.2.
>
What are the security solutions with T3?
> Having said all that, T2.1 is released, T2.2 is beta, but all the interest
> is T2.2. Also, have you looked at scarab? scarab.tigris.org is based on
> the T3 stuff and it seems pretty stable.
>
> Eric
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sylvain.Thevoz@swisscom.com [mailto:Sylvain.Thevoz@swisscom.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 12:38 PM
> To: turbine-user@jakarta.apache.org
> Subject: turbine 2.1 or 2.2
>
>
> Hello folks,
>
> I'm new in the world of Turbine and I want to install it on my development
> environment.
>
> But can I install the next release, 2.2? Is it stable and ready for
> production?
>
> Thank you
> Sylvain
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail:
<ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: turbine 2.1 or 2.2
Posted by "Anthony W. Marino" <an...@AWMObjects.com>.
> My 2 cents is that 2.2 is much better then 2.1 because of all the bug fixes
> (especially in the decoupled torque) EXCEPT for two things.. If you need
> to have users and security, and you want to use the decoupled torque, then
> you end up with two different ways of accessing the database... All your
> application code can use the decoupled torque, but all your security/user
> code needs to use the coupled torque code. However, if you are rolling
> your own security, or user stuff, then definitely go with 2.2.
>
What are the security solutions with T3?
> Having said all that, T2.1 is released, T2.2 is beta, but all the interest
> is T2.2. Also, have you looked at scarab? scarab.tigris.org is based on
> the T3 stuff and it seems pretty stable.
>
> Eric
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sylvain.Thevoz@swisscom.com [mailto:Sylvain.Thevoz@swisscom.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 12:38 PM
> To: turbine-user@jakarta.apache.org
> Subject: turbine 2.1 or 2.2
>
>
> Hello folks,
>
> I'm new in the world of Turbine and I want to install it on my development
> environment.
>
> But can I install the next release, 2.2? Is it stable and ready for
> production?
>
> Thank you
> Sylvain
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
RE: turbine 2.1 or 2.2
Posted by Eric Pugh <ep...@upstate.com>.
My 2 cents is that 2.2 is much better then 2.1 because of all the bug fixes
(especially in the decoupled torque) EXCEPT for two things.. If you need to
have users and security, and you want to use the decoupled torque, then you
end up with two different ways of accessing the database... All your
application code can use the decoupled torque, but all your security/user
code needs to use the coupled torque code. However, if you are rolling your
own security, or user stuff, then definitely go with 2.2.
Having said all that, T2.1 is released, T2.2 is beta, but all the interest
is T2.2. Also, have you looked at scarab? scarab.tigris.org is based on
the T3 stuff and it seems pretty stable.
Eric
-----Original Message-----
From: Sylvain.Thevoz@swisscom.com [mailto:Sylvain.Thevoz@swisscom.com]
Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 12:38 PM
To: turbine-user@jakarta.apache.org
Subject: turbine 2.1 or 2.2
Hello folks,
I'm new in the world of Turbine and I want to install it on my development
environment.
But can I install the next release, 2.2? Is it stable and ready for
production?
Thank you
Sylvain
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail:
<ma...@jakarta.apache.org>