You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@tuscany.apache.org by js...@apache.org on 2010/09/08 01:52:54 UTC
svn commit: r993560 - /tuscany/sandbox/sebastien/java/shell/
Author: jsdelfino
Date: Tue Sep 7 23:52:54 2010
New Revision: 993560
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=993560&view=rev
Log:
Sandbox to experiment with deployment and management commands.
Added:
tuscany/sandbox/sebastien/java/shell/ (props changed)
- copied from r993559, tuscany/sca-java-2.x/trunk/
Propchange: tuscany/sandbox/sebastien/java/shell/
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--- svn:ignore (added)
+++ svn:ignore Tue Sep 7 23:52:54 2010
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+target
+*.iws
+*.ipr
+*.iml
+.project
+.classpath
+derby.log
+maven.log
+velocity.log*
+junit*.properties
+surefire*.properties
+.settings
+.deployables
+.wtpmodules
+.externalToolBuilders
+maven-eclipse.xml
+Maven_Ant_Builder.launch
+
+
Propchange: tuscany/sandbox/sebastien/java/shell/
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--- svn:mergeinfo (added)
+++ svn:mergeinfo Tue Sep 7 23:52:54 2010
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+/tuscany/branches/sca-java-1.3:671193
+/tuscany/branches/sca-java-2.0-M3:786047*
Re: svn commit: r993560 - /tuscany/sandbox/sebastien/java/shell/
Posted by ant elder <an...@gmail.com>.
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 7:00 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
<js...@apache.org> wrote:
> ant elder wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 12:52 AM, <js...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Author: jsdelfino
>>> Date: Tue Sep 7 23:52:54 2010
>>> New Revision: 993560
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=993560&view=rev
>>> Log:
>>> Sandbox to experiment with deployment and management commands.
>>>
>>> Added:
>>> tuscany/sandbox/sebastien/java/shell/ (props changed)
>>> - copied from r993559, tuscany/sca-java-2.x/trunk/
>>>
>>
>> What are the reasons this couldn't be done in trunk?
>>
>> ...ant
>
> This sandbox is just to experiment. This experiment may lead to changes
> applicable to trunk (like some other small changes I've made in trunk
> recently) or lead to nothing at all. I don't know yet, as I'm experimenting
> :)
>
> So far I've made one small change to the shell sample in this sandbox [1], I
> have been using it with that change for a few days, and I'm getting
> comfortable with it so I may decide to make the same change in trunk, but
> I'm not sure yet.
>
> Using a sandbox also allows me to work and make small changes off a fixed
> revision instead of having to catch up and rebase on the moving trunk all
> the time, which I must admit is overwhelming when you only work on it part
> time a few hours a week.
>
> [1]
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/tuscany-commits/201009.mbox/%3C20100908000206.3243023888EA@eris.apache.org%3E
> --
> Jean-Sebastien
>
You don't really need a private sandbox fork of the entire trunk to
experiment with whether or not the shells contribution uri could be
optional or not do you? Just make the change in trunk and if it
doesn't work out it can be reverted. We've already been discussing
what the shell commands could be on the ML and whats currently been
said does have the contribution uri as optional.
...ant
Re: svn commit: r993560 - /tuscany/sandbox/sebastien/java/shell/
Posted by Jean-Sebastien Delfino <js...@apache.org>.
ant elder wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 12:52 AM, <js...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Author: jsdelfino
>> Date: Tue Sep 7 23:52:54 2010
>> New Revision: 993560
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=993560&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Sandbox to experiment with deployment and management commands.
>>
>> Added:
>> tuscany/sandbox/sebastien/java/shell/ (props changed)
>> - copied from r993559, tuscany/sca-java-2.x/trunk/
>>
>
> What are the reasons this couldn't be done in trunk?
>
> ...ant
This sandbox is just to experiment. This experiment may lead to changes
applicable to trunk (like some other small changes I've made in trunk
recently) or lead to nothing at all. I don't know yet, as I'm
experimenting :)
So far I've made one small change to the shell sample in this sandbox
[1], I have been using it with that change for a few days, and I'm
getting comfortable with it so I may decide to make the same change in
trunk, but I'm not sure yet.
Using a sandbox also allows me to work and make small changes off a
fixed revision instead of having to catch up and rebase on the moving
trunk all the time, which I must admit is overwhelming when you only
work on it part time a few hours a week.
[1]
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/tuscany-commits/201009.mbox/%3C20100908000206.3243023888EA@eris.apache.org%3E
--
Jean-Sebastien
Re: svn commit: r993560 - /tuscany/sandbox/sebastien/java/shell/
Posted by ant elder <an...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 12:52 AM, <js...@apache.org> wrote:
> Author: jsdelfino
> Date: Tue Sep 7 23:52:54 2010
> New Revision: 993560
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=993560&view=rev
> Log:
> Sandbox to experiment with deployment and management commands.
>
> Added:
> tuscany/sandbox/sebastien/java/shell/ (props changed)
> - copied from r993559, tuscany/sca-java-2.x/trunk/
>
What are the reasons this couldn't be done in trunk?
...ant