You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tiles.apache.org by Antonio Petrelli <an...@gmail.com> on 2009/10/18 15:20:31 UTC
[VOTE] Tiles 2.2.1 Release Quality
The Tiles 2.2.1 test build has been available since 14 Oct 2009.
Release notes:
* https://issues.apache.org/struts/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10160&styleName=Html&version=21941
Distribution:
* http://people.apache.org/builds/tiles/2.2.1/
Maven 2 staging repository:
* http://people.apache.org/builds/tiles/2.2.1/m2-staging-repository/
If you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond with
a vote on its quality:
[ ] Leave at test build
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] General Availability (GA)
Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC
members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least
three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s.
[RESULT] Tiles 2.2.1 Release Quality
Posted by Antonio Petrelli <an...@gmail.com>.
Result of the vote:
+1 Beta: Antonio, Greg, Nathan.
Now I have no excuses, time to release :-D
Antonio
Re: [VOTE] Tiles 2.2.1 Release Quality
Posted by Nathan Bubna <nb...@gmail.com>.
+1 Beta (yeah, the veltools snapshot is quite stable. struggling for
time to get it released...)
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 6:24 AM, Antonio Petrelli
<an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2009/10/18 Antonio Petrelli <an...@gmail.com>:
>> [X] Beta
>
> +1 to Beta, IMO, because:
> * the previous version was of Alpha quality and a lot of packages (and
> their organization) have changed since then;
> * the velocity tools version it is based on is a snapshot.
>
> The latter probably is a cause to vote the release to be an alpha, but
> I suppose beta is more appropriate since Velocity Tools is pretty
> stable, in spite of its snapshot level.
>
> Antonio
>
Re: [VOTE] Tiles 2.2.1 Release Quality
Posted by Antonio Petrelli <an...@gmail.com>.
2009/10/26 Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com>:
> On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 6:24 AM, Antonio Petrelli
> <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> * the velocity tools version it is based on is a snapshot.
>>
>> The latter probably is a cause to vote the release to be an alpha, but
>> I suppose beta is more appropriate since Velocity Tools is pretty
>> stable, in spite of its snapshot level.
>
> How did you do a release with a snapshot dependency?
I used the -DignoreSnapshots=true parameter. I tried with:
-DallowTimestampedSnapshots=true
but it does not work at all, though I have a timestamped snapshot
dependency to Velocity Tools.
Antonio
Re: [VOTE] Tiles 2.2.1 Release Quality
Posted by Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com>.
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 6:24 AM, Antonio Petrelli
<an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> * the velocity tools version it is based on is a snapshot.
>
> The latter probably is a cause to vote the release to be an alpha, but
> I suppose beta is more appropriate since Velocity Tools is pretty
> stable, in spite of its snapshot level.
How did you do a release with a snapshot dependency?
--
Wendy
Re: [VOTE] Tiles 2.2.1 Release Quality
Posted by Antonio Petrelli <an...@gmail.com>.
2009/10/18 Antonio Petrelli <an...@gmail.com>:
> [X] Beta
+1 to Beta, IMO, because:
* the previous version was of Alpha quality and a lot of packages (and
their organization) have changed since then;
* the velocity tools version it is based on is a snapshot.
The latter probably is a cause to vote the release to be an alpha, but
I suppose beta is more appropriate since Velocity Tools is pretty
stable, in spite of its snapshot level.
Antonio
Re: [VOTE] Tiles 2.2.1 Release Quality
Posted by Greg Reddin <gr...@gmail.com>.
+1 Beta
Greg
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 8:20 AM, Antonio Petrelli
<an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The Tiles 2.2.1 test build has been available since 14 Oct 2009.
>
> Release notes:
>
> * https://issues.apache.org/struts/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10160&styleName=Html&version=21941
>
> Distribution:
>
> * http://people.apache.org/builds/tiles/2.2.1/
>
> Maven 2 staging repository:
>
> * http://people.apache.org/builds/tiles/2.2.1/m2-staging-repository/
>
> If you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond with
> a vote on its quality:
>
> [ ] Leave at test build
> [ ] Alpha
> [ ] Beta
> [ ] General Availability (GA)
>
>
> Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC
> members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least
> three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s.
>