is DERBY-854 related to the recently fixed issue with readonly databases and upgrade?

[Mike Matrigali <mi...@sbcglobal.net>]

Alex Miller wrote:
> I think DERBY-854 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-854) is
> critical for working with read-only databases in embedded mode.
> Currently, the JDBC DatabaseMetaData methods are completely broken when
> running in this mode.  Thus, read-only databases cannot work with any
> tool that imports metadata (which includes most JDBC tools I'm aware
> of).  
> 
> Please vote for this bug if you would like to use read-only databases
> from a zip file.  My company would love to ship some example databases
> in this way but have given up on Derby due to this bug.  
> 
> Alex Miller
> Chief Architect
> MetaMatrix
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rick Hillegas [mailto:Richard.Hillegas@Sun.COM] 
> Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 12:13 PM
> To: Derby Discussion; Derby Development
> Subject: upcoming 10.2 release
> 
> Dear Derby user community,
> 
> Yesterday, the Derby developers started a discussion about the timing
> and contents of the next (10.2) release. A feature freeze date of April
> 7 was suggested although we have not settled on this date yet. I would
> estimate that the actual release would appear around two months after
> feature freeze.
> 
> Please let us know about any bugs which are particularly important to
> you and which you would like to see fixed in this release.
> 
> Thanks,
> -Rick
> 
> 

Re: is DERBY-854 related to the recently fixed issue with readonly databases and upgrade?

[Mike Matrigali <mi...@sbcglobal.net>]

Just looking at the stack trace in DERBY-854 it has the feel of the system
trying to do the automatic upgrade between point releases of stored
procedures on a read only db. It is a total guess at what it going
on.  Note all I did was read the stack trace
in the 854 and happened to remember the  description of the bug you
fixed - not even sure which bug it was at this point.

Satheesh Bandaram wrote:

> Mike, I missed your question... which was in the subject. The issue I
> fixed is different... It was about soft upgrade failing on readonly
> database.
> 
> Satheesh
> 
> Mike Matrigali wrote:
> 
> 
>>Alex Miller wrote:
>>
>>
>>>I think DERBY-854 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-854) is
>>>critical for working with read-only databases in embedded mode.
>>>Currently, the JDBC DatabaseMetaData methods are completely broken when
>>>running in this mode.  Thus, read-only databases cannot work with any
>>>tool that imports metadata (which includes most JDBC tools I'm aware
>>>of). 
>>>Please vote for this bug if you would like to use read-only databases
>>>from a zip file.  My company would love to ship some example databases
>>>in this way but have given up on Derby due to this bug. 
>>>Alex Miller
>>>Chief Architect
>>>MetaMatrix
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Rick Hillegas [mailto:Richard.Hillegas@Sun.COM] Sent: Tuesday,
>>>February 14, 2006 12:13 PM
>>>To: Derby Discussion; Derby Development
>>>Subject: upcoming 10.2 release
>>>
>>>Dear Derby user community,
>>>
>>>Yesterday, the Derby developers started a discussion about the timing
>>>and contents of the next (10.2) release. A feature freeze date of April
>>>7 was suggested although we have not settled on this date yet. I would
>>>estimate that the actual release would appear around two months after
>>>feature freeze.
>>>
>>>Please let us know about any bugs which are particularly important to
>>>you and which you would like to see fixed in this release.
>>>
>>>Thanks,
>>>-Rick
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
> 
> 

Re: is DERBY-854 related to the recently fixed issue with readonly databases and upgrade?

[Satheesh Bandaram <sa...@Sourcery.Org>]

Mike, I missed your question... which was in the subject. The issue I
fixed is different... It was about soft upgrade failing on readonly
database.

Satheesh

Mike Matrigali wrote:

>
> Alex Miller wrote:
>
>> I think DERBY-854 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-854) is
>> critical for working with read-only databases in embedded mode.
>> Currently, the JDBC DatabaseMetaData methods are completely broken when
>> running in this mode.  Thus, read-only databases cannot work with any
>> tool that imports metadata (which includes most JDBC tools I'm aware
>> of). 
>> Please vote for this bug if you would like to use read-only databases
>> from a zip file.  My company would love to ship some example databases
>> in this way but have given up on Derby due to this bug. 
>> Alex Miller
>> Chief Architect
>> MetaMatrix
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Rick Hillegas [mailto:Richard.Hillegas@Sun.COM] Sent: Tuesday,
>> February 14, 2006 12:13 PM
>> To: Derby Discussion; Derby Development
>> Subject: upcoming 10.2 release
>>
>> Dear Derby user community,
>>
>> Yesterday, the Derby developers started a discussion about the timing
>> and contents of the next (10.2) release. A feature freeze date of April
>> 7 was suggested although we have not settled on this date yet. I would
>> estimate that the actual release would appear around two months after
>> feature freeze.
>>
>> Please let us know about any bugs which are particularly important to
>> you and which you would like to see fixed in this release.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -Rick
>>
>>
>
>
>