You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@hbase.apache.org by Stack <st...@duboce.net> on 2015/08/27 19:22:57 UTC

Proposal: Matteo for 2.0.0 RM

Last night at the HBase dev workshop, during discussion of 2.0.0 (what will
be in it, when will it come out), it was noted that there is as yet no RM
for hbase-2.0.0.

A bunch of us suggested Matteo and he was up for it.

Folks good with that? Anyone else interested in being RM?

+1 on Matteo from me,
St.Ack

Re: Proposal: Matteo for 2.0.0 RM

Posted by Stephen Jiang <sy...@gmail.com>.
+1

On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 7:36 AM, Jonathan Hsieh <jo...@cloudera.com> wrote:

> +1.
>
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 6:49 AM, Nicolas Liochon <nk...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 12:59 AM, <la...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >       From: Stack <st...@duboce.net>
> > >  To: HBase Dev List <de...@hbase.apache.org>
> > >  Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2015 10:22 AM
> > >  Subject: Proposal: Matteo for 2.0.0 RM
> > >
> > > Last night at the HBase dev workshop, during discussion of 2.0.0 (what
> > will
> > > be in it, when will it come out), it was noted that there is as yet no
> RM
> > > for hbase-2.0.0.
> > >
> > > A bunch of us suggested Matteo and he was up for it.
> > >
> > > Folks good with that? Anyone else interested in being RM?
> > >
> > > +1 on Matteo from me,
> > > St.Ack
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> // Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
> // HBase Tech Lead, Software Engineer, Cloudera
> // jon@cloudera.com // @jmhsieh
>

Re: Proposal: Matteo for 2.0.0 RM

Posted by Jonathan Hsieh <jo...@cloudera.com>.
+1.

On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 6:49 AM, Nicolas Liochon <nk...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1
>
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 12:59 AM, <la...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >       From: Stack <st...@duboce.net>
> >  To: HBase Dev List <de...@hbase.apache.org>
> >  Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2015 10:22 AM
> >  Subject: Proposal: Matteo for 2.0.0 RM
> >
> > Last night at the HBase dev workshop, during discussion of 2.0.0 (what
> will
> > be in it, when will it come out), it was noted that there is as yet no RM
> > for hbase-2.0.0.
> >
> > A bunch of us suggested Matteo and he was up for it.
> >
> > Folks good with that? Anyone else interested in being RM?
> >
> > +1 on Matteo from me,
> > St.Ack
> >
> >
> >
> >
>



-- 
// Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
// HBase Tech Lead, Software Engineer, Cloudera
// jon@cloudera.com // @jmhsieh

Re: Proposal: Matteo for 2.0.0 RM

Posted by Nicolas Liochon <nk...@gmail.com>.
+1

On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 12:59 AM, <la...@apache.org> wrote:

> +1
>       From: Stack <st...@duboce.net>
>  To: HBase Dev List <de...@hbase.apache.org>
>  Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2015 10:22 AM
>  Subject: Proposal: Matteo for 2.0.0 RM
>
> Last night at the HBase dev workshop, during discussion of 2.0.0 (what will
> be in it, when will it come out), it was noted that there is as yet no RM
> for hbase-2.0.0.
>
> A bunch of us suggested Matteo and he was up for it.
>
> Folks good with that? Anyone else interested in being RM?
>
> +1 on Matteo from me,
> St.Ack
>
>
>
>

Re: Proposal: Matteo for 2.0.0 RM

Posted by la...@apache.org.
+1
      From: Stack <st...@duboce.net>
 To: HBase Dev List <de...@hbase.apache.org> 
 Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2015 10:22 AM
 Subject: Proposal: Matteo for 2.0.0 RM
   
Last night at the HBase dev workshop, during discussion of 2.0.0 (what will
be in it, when will it come out), it was noted that there is as yet no RM
for hbase-2.0.0.

A bunch of us suggested Matteo and he was up for it.

Folks good with that? Anyone else interested in being RM?

+1 on Matteo from me,
St.Ack


   

Re: Proposal: Matteo for 2.0.0 RM

Posted by Nick Dimiduk <nd...@apache.org>.
Sounds good to me. Have at it Matteo!

On Thursday, August 27, 2015, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:

> Last night at the HBase dev workshop, during discussion of 2.0.0 (what will
> be in it, when will it come out), it was noted that there is as yet no RM
> for hbase-2.0.0.
>
> A bunch of us suggested Matteo and he was up for it.
>
> Folks good with that? Anyone else interested in being RM?
>
> +1 on Matteo from me,
> St.Ack
>

Re: Proposal: Matteo for 2.0.0 RM

Posted by Jerry He <je...@gmail.com>.
Good work for you, Matteo.  +1

On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Srikanth Srungarapu <srikanth235@gmail.com
> wrote:

> +1
>
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 11:29 AM Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 10:22 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> >
> > > Last night at the HBase dev workshop, during discussion of 2.0.0 (what
> > will
> > > be in it, when will it come out), it was noted that there is as yet no
> RM
> > > for hbase-2.0.0.
> > >
> > > A bunch of us suggested Matteo and he was up for it.
> > >
> > > Folks good with that? Anyone else interested in being RM?
> > >
> > > +1 on Matteo from me,
> > > St.Ack
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> >
> >    - Andy
> >
> > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> > (via Tom White)
> >
> --
> Thanks,
> Srikanth.
>

Re: Proposal: Matteo for 2.0.0 RM

Posted by Srikanth Srungarapu <sr...@gmail.com>.
+1

On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 11:29 AM Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org> wrote:

> +1
>
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 10:22 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>
> > Last night at the HBase dev workshop, during discussion of 2.0.0 (what
> will
> > be in it, when will it come out), it was noted that there is as yet no RM
> > for hbase-2.0.0.
> >
> > A bunch of us suggested Matteo and he was up for it.
> >
> > Folks good with that? Anyone else interested in being RM?
> >
> > +1 on Matteo from me,
> > St.Ack
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
>    - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)
>
-- 
Thanks,
Srikanth.

Re: Proposal: Matteo for 2.0.0 RM

Posted by Esteban Gutierrez <es...@cloudera.com>.
+1

--
Cloudera, Inc.


On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
wrote:

> +1
>
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 10:22 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>
> > Last night at the HBase dev workshop, during discussion of 2.0.0 (what
> will
> > be in it, when will it come out), it was noted that there is as yet no RM
> > for hbase-2.0.0.
> >
> > A bunch of us suggested Matteo and he was up for it.
> >
> > Folks good with that? Anyone else interested in being RM?
> >
> > +1 on Matteo from me,
> > St.Ack
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
>    - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)
>

Re: Proposal: Matteo for 2.0.0 RM

Posted by Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>.
+1

On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 10:22 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:

> Last night at the HBase dev workshop, during discussion of 2.0.0 (what will
> be in it, when will it come out), it was noted that there is as yet no RM
> for hbase-2.0.0.
>
> A bunch of us suggested Matteo and he was up for it.
>
> Folks good with that? Anyone else interested in being RM?
>
> +1 on Matteo from me,
> St.Ack
>



-- 
Best regards,

   - Andy

Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)

Re: Proposal: Matteo for 2.0.0 RM

Posted by Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>.
+1 as well



> On Aug 27, 2015, at 10:50 AM, Elliott Clark <ec...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
>> On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 10:22 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>> 
>> Folks good with that?
> 
> 
> +1 for Matteo for 2.0/Master RM

Re: Proposal: Matteo for 2.0.0 RM

Posted by Mikhail Antonov <ol...@gmail.com>.
+1 for Matteo (non-binding)

On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 10:59 AM, Enis Söztutar <en...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1.
>
> Enis
>
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 10:50 AM, Elliott Clark <ec...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 10:22 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>>
>> > Folks good with that?
>>
>>
>> +1 for Matteo for 2.0/Master RM
>>



-- 
Thanks,
Michael Antonov

Re: Proposal: Matteo for 2.0.0 RM

Posted by Enis Söztutar <en...@apache.org>.
+1.

Enis

On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 10:50 AM, Elliott Clark <ec...@apache.org> wrote:

> On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 10:22 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>
> > Folks good with that?
>
>
> +1 for Matteo for 2.0/Master RM
>

Re: Proposal: Matteo for 2.0.0 RM

Posted by Elliott Clark <ec...@apache.org>.
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 10:22 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:

> Folks good with that?


+1 for Matteo for 2.0/Master RM