You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@spark.apache.org by Hyukjin Kwon <gu...@apache.org> on 2024/04/01 01:15:21 UTC
[VOTE] SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect)
Hi all,
I'd like to start the vote for SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark
Connect)
JIRA <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-47540>
Prototype <https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/45053>
SPIP doc
<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Pund40wGRuB72LX6L7cliMDVoXTPR-xx4IkPmMLaZXk/edit?usp=sharing>
Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours:
[ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP
[ ] +0
[ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because …
Thanks.
Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect)
Posted by Kent Yao <ya...@apache.org>.
+1(non-binding). Thank you, Hyukjin.
Kent Yao
Takuya UESHIN <ue...@happy-camper.st> 于2024年4月1日周一 18:04写道:
>
> +1
>
> On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 6:16 PM Hyukjin Kwon <gu...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'd like to start the vote for SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect)
>>
>> JIRA
>> Prototype
>> SPIP doc
>>
>> Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours:
>>
>> [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP
>> [ ] +0
>> [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because …
>>
>> Thanks.
>
>
>
> --
> Takuya UESHIN
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect)
Posted by Takuya UESHIN <ue...@happy-camper.st>.
+1
On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 6:16 PM Hyukjin Kwon <gu...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to start the vote for SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark
> Connect)
>
> JIRA <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-47540>
> Prototype <https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/45053>
> SPIP doc
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Pund40wGRuB72LX6L7cliMDVoXTPR-xx4IkPmMLaZXk/edit?usp=sharing>
>
> Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours:
>
> [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because …
>
> Thanks.
>
--
Takuya UESHIN
Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect)
Posted by Hyukjin Kwon <gu...@apache.org>.
Yes
On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 6:36 PM Femi Anthony <fe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> So, to clarify - the purpose of this package is to enable connectivity to
> a remote Spark cluster without having to install any local JVM
> dependencies, right ?
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Mar 31, 2024, at 10:07 PM, Haejoon Lee
> <ha...@databricks.com.invalid> wrote:
>
>
>
> +1
>
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 10:15 AM Hyukjin Kwon <gu...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'd like to start the vote for SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark
>> Connect)
>>
>> JIRA <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-47540>
>> Prototype <https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/45053>
>> SPIP doc
>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Pund40wGRuB72LX6L7cliMDVoXTPR-xx4IkPmMLaZXk/edit?usp=sharing>
>>
>> Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours:
>>
>> [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP
>> [ ] +0
>> [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because …
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect)
Posted by Femi Anthony <fe...@gmail.com>.
So, to clarify - the purpose of this package is to enable connectivity to a
remote Spark cluster without having to install any local JVM dependencies,
right ?
Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 31, 2024, at 10:07 PM, Haejoon Lee
> <ha...@databricks.com.invalid> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> +1
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 10:15 AM Hyukjin Kwon
> <[gurwls223@apache.org](mailto:gurwls223@apache.org)> wrote:
>
>
>> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to start the vote for SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark
> Connect)
>>
>>
> [JIRA](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-47540)
>>
>> [Prototype](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/45053)
>>
>> [SPIP
doc](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Pund40wGRuB72LX6L7cliMDVoXTPR-
xx4IkPmMLaZXk/edit?usp=sharing)
>
> Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours:
>
> [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because …
>
> Thanks.
Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect)
Posted by "L. C. Hsieh" <vi...@gmail.com>.
+1
Thanks Hyukjin.
On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 10:52 PM Dongjoon Hyun <do...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Thank you, Hyukjin.
>
> Dongjoon
>
> On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 19:07 Haejoon Lee <ha...@databricks.com.invalid> wrote:
>>
>> +1
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 10:15 AM Hyukjin Kwon <gu...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I'd like to start the vote for SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect)
>>>
>>> JIRA
>>> Prototype
>>> SPIP doc
>>>
>>> Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours:
>>>
>>> [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP
>>> [ ] +0
>>> [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because …
>>>
>>> Thanks.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect)
Posted by Gengliang Wang <lt...@gmail.com>.
+1
On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 8:24 PM Dongjoon Hyun <do...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> +1
>
> Thank you, Hyukjin.
>
> Dongjoon
>
> On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 19:07 Haejoon Lee
> <ha...@databricks.com.invalid> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 10:15 AM Hyukjin Kwon <gu...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I'd like to start the vote for SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark
>>> Connect)
>>>
>>> JIRA <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-47540>
>>> Prototype <https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/45053>
>>> SPIP doc
>>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Pund40wGRuB72LX6L7cliMDVoXTPR-xx4IkPmMLaZXk/edit?usp=sharing>
>>>
>>> Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours:
>>>
>>> [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP
>>> [ ] +0
>>> [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because …
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect)
Posted by Dongjoon Hyun <do...@gmail.com>.
+1
Thank you, Hyukjin.
Dongjoon
On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 19:07 Haejoon Lee
<ha...@databricks.com.invalid> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 10:15 AM Hyukjin Kwon <gu...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'd like to start the vote for SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark
>> Connect)
>>
>> JIRA <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-47540>
>> Prototype <https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/45053>
>> SPIP doc
>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Pund40wGRuB72LX6L7cliMDVoXTPR-xx4IkPmMLaZXk/edit?usp=sharing>
>>
>> Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours:
>>
>> [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP
>> [ ] +0
>> [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because …
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect)
Posted by Yuanjian Li <xy...@gmail.com>.
+1
Chao Sun <su...@apache.org> 于2024年4月1日周一 07:56写道:
> +1
>
> On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 10:31 PM Hyukjin Kwon <gu...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Oh I didn't send the discussion thread out as it's pretty simple,
>> non-invasive and the discussion was sort of done as part of the Spark
>> Connect initial discussion ..
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 1:59 PM Mridul Muralidharan <mr...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Can you point me to the SPIP’s discussion thread please ?
>>> I was not able to find it, but I was on vacation, and so might have
>>> missed this …
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Mridul
>>>
>>
>>> On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 9:08 PM Haejoon Lee
>>> <ha...@databricks.com.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 10:15 AM Hyukjin Kwon <gu...@apache.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> I'd like to start the vote for SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI
>>>>> (Spark Connect)
>>>>>
>>>>> JIRA <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-47540>
>>>>> Prototype <https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/45053>
>>>>> SPIP doc
>>>>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Pund40wGRuB72LX6L7cliMDVoXTPR-xx4IkPmMLaZXk/edit?usp=sharing>
>>>>>
>>>>> Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours:
>>>>>
>>>>> [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP
>>>>> [ ] +0
>>>>> [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because …
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>
>>>>
Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect)
Posted by Xiao Li <ga...@gmail.com>.
+1
Hussein Awala <hu...@awala.fr> 于2024年4月1日周一 08:07写道:
> +1(non-binding) I add to the difference will it make that it will also
> simplify package maintenance and easily release a bug fix/new feature
> without needing to wait for Pyspark to release.
>
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 4:56 PM Chao Sun <su...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 10:31 PM Hyukjin Kwon <gu...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Oh I didn't send the discussion thread out as it's pretty simple,
>>> non-invasive and the discussion was sort of done as part of the Spark
>>> Connect initial discussion ..
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 1:59 PM Mridul Muralidharan <mr...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Can you point me to the SPIP’s discussion thread please ?
>>>> I was not able to find it, but I was on vacation, and so might have
>>>> missed this …
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Mridul
>>>>
>>>
>>>> On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 9:08 PM Haejoon Lee
>>>> <ha...@databricks.com.invalid> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 10:15 AM Hyukjin Kwon <gu...@apache.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'd like to start the vote for SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI
>>>>>> (Spark Connect)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> JIRA <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-47540>
>>>>>> Prototype <https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/45053>
>>>>>> SPIP doc
>>>>>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Pund40wGRuB72LX6L7cliMDVoXTPR-xx4IkPmMLaZXk/edit?usp=sharing>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP
>>>>>> [ ] +0
>>>>>> [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because …
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect)
Posted by bo yang <bo...@gmail.com>.
+1 (non-binding)
On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 10:19 AM Felix Cheung <fe...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
> +1
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Denny Lee <de...@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Monday, April 1, 2024 10:06:14 AM
> *To:* Hussein Awala <hu...@awala.fr>
> *Cc:* Chao Sun <su...@apache.org>; Hyukjin Kwon <gu...@apache.org>;
> Mridul Muralidharan <mr...@gmail.com>; dev <de...@spark.apache.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect)
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 9:24 AM Hussein Awala <hu...@awala.fr> wrote:
>
> +1(non-binding) I add to the difference will it make that it will also
> simplify package maintenance and easily release a bug fix/new feature
> without needing to wait for Pyspark to release.
>
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 4:56 PM Chao Sun <su...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 10:31 PM Hyukjin Kwon <gu...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> Oh I didn't send the discussion thread out as it's pretty simple,
> non-invasive and the discussion was sort of done as part of the Spark
> Connect initial discussion ..
>
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 1:59 PM Mridul Muralidharan <mr...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
> Can you point me to the SPIP’s discussion thread please ?
> I was not able to find it, but I was on vacation, and so might have
> missed this …
>
>
> Regards,
> Mridul
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 9:08 PM Haejoon Lee
> <ha...@databricks.com.invalid> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 10:15 AM Hyukjin Kwon <gu...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to start the vote for SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark
> Connect)
>
> JIRA <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-47540>
> Prototype <https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/45053>
> SPIP doc
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Pund40wGRuB72LX6L7cliMDVoXTPR-xx4IkPmMLaZXk/edit?usp=sharing>
>
> Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours:
>
> [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because …
>
> Thanks.
>
>
Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect)
Posted by Mridul Muralidharan <mr...@gmail.com>.
+1
Regards,
Mridul
On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 11:26 PM Holden Karau <ho...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> Twitter: https://twitter.com/holdenkarau
> Books (Learning Spark, High Performance Spark, etc.):
> https://amzn.to/2MaRAG9 <https://amzn.to/2MaRAG9>
> YouTube Live Streams: https://www.youtube.com/user/holdenkarau
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 5:44 PM Xinrong Meng <xi...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> Thank you @Hyukjin Kwon <gu...@apache.org>
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 10:19 AM Felix Cheung <fe...@hotmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>> ------------------------------
>>> *From:* Denny Lee <de...@gmail.com>
>>> *Sent:* Monday, April 1, 2024 10:06:14 AM
>>> *To:* Hussein Awala <hu...@awala.fr>
>>> *Cc:* Chao Sun <su...@apache.org>; Hyukjin Kwon <gu...@apache.org>;
>>> Mridul Muralidharan <mr...@gmail.com>; dev <de...@spark.apache.org>
>>> *Subject:* Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect)
>>>
>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 9:24 AM Hussein Awala <hu...@awala.fr> wrote:
>>>
>>> +1(non-binding) I add to the difference will it make that it will also
>>> simplify package maintenance and easily release a bug fix/new feature
>>> without needing to wait for Pyspark to release.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 4:56 PM Chao Sun <su...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 10:31 PM Hyukjin Kwon <gu...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Oh I didn't send the discussion thread out as it's pretty simple,
>>> non-invasive and the discussion was sort of done as part of the Spark
>>> Connect initial discussion ..
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 1:59 PM Mridul Muralidharan <mr...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Can you point me to the SPIP’s discussion thread please ?
>>> I was not able to find it, but I was on vacation, and so might have
>>> missed this …
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Mridul
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 9:08 PM Haejoon Lee
>>> <ha...@databricks.com.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 10:15 AM Hyukjin Kwon <gu...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I'd like to start the vote for SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark
>>> Connect)
>>>
>>> JIRA <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-47540>
>>> Prototype <https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/45053>
>>> SPIP doc
>>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Pund40wGRuB72LX6L7cliMDVoXTPR-xx4IkPmMLaZXk/edit?usp=sharing>
>>>
>>> Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours:
>>>
>>> [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP
>>> [ ] +0
>>> [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because …
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>>
Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect)
Posted by Holden Karau <ho...@gmail.com>.
+1
Twitter: https://twitter.com/holdenkarau
Books (Learning Spark, High Performance Spark, etc.):
https://amzn.to/2MaRAG9 <https://amzn.to/2MaRAG9>
YouTube Live Streams: https://www.youtube.com/user/holdenkarau
On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 5:44 PM Xinrong Meng <xi...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1
>
> Thank you @Hyukjin Kwon <gu...@apache.org>
>
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 10:19 AM Felix Cheung <fe...@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> +1
>> ------------------------------
>> *From:* Denny Lee <de...@gmail.com>
>> *Sent:* Monday, April 1, 2024 10:06:14 AM
>> *To:* Hussein Awala <hu...@awala.fr>
>> *Cc:* Chao Sun <su...@apache.org>; Hyukjin Kwon <gu...@apache.org>;
>> Mridul Muralidharan <mr...@gmail.com>; dev <de...@spark.apache.org>
>> *Subject:* Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect)
>>
>> +1 (non-binding)
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 9:24 AM Hussein Awala <hu...@awala.fr> wrote:
>>
>> +1(non-binding) I add to the difference will it make that it will also
>> simplify package maintenance and easily release a bug fix/new feature
>> without needing to wait for Pyspark to release.
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 4:56 PM Chao Sun <su...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> +1
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 10:31 PM Hyukjin Kwon <gu...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Oh I didn't send the discussion thread out as it's pretty simple,
>> non-invasive and the discussion was sort of done as part of the Spark
>> Connect initial discussion ..
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 1:59 PM Mridul Muralidharan <mr...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Can you point me to the SPIP’s discussion thread please ?
>> I was not able to find it, but I was on vacation, and so might have
>> missed this …
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Mridul
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 9:08 PM Haejoon Lee
>> <ha...@databricks.com.invalid> wrote:
>>
>> +1
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 10:15 AM Hyukjin Kwon <gu...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'd like to start the vote for SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark
>> Connect)
>>
>> JIRA <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-47540>
>> Prototype <https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/45053>
>> SPIP doc
>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Pund40wGRuB72LX6L7cliMDVoXTPR-xx4IkPmMLaZXk/edit?usp=sharing>
>>
>> Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours:
>>
>> [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP
>> [ ] +0
>> [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because …
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect)
Posted by Xinrong Meng <xi...@apache.org>.
+1
Thank you @Hyukjin Kwon <gu...@apache.org>
On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 10:19 AM Felix Cheung <fe...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
> +1
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Denny Lee <de...@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Monday, April 1, 2024 10:06:14 AM
> *To:* Hussein Awala <hu...@awala.fr>
> *Cc:* Chao Sun <su...@apache.org>; Hyukjin Kwon <gu...@apache.org>;
> Mridul Muralidharan <mr...@gmail.com>; dev <de...@spark.apache.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect)
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 9:24 AM Hussein Awala <hu...@awala.fr> wrote:
>
> +1(non-binding) I add to the difference will it make that it will also
> simplify package maintenance and easily release a bug fix/new feature
> without needing to wait for Pyspark to release.
>
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 4:56 PM Chao Sun <su...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 10:31 PM Hyukjin Kwon <gu...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> Oh I didn't send the discussion thread out as it's pretty simple,
> non-invasive and the discussion was sort of done as part of the Spark
> Connect initial discussion ..
>
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 1:59 PM Mridul Muralidharan <mr...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
> Can you point me to the SPIP’s discussion thread please ?
> I was not able to find it, but I was on vacation, and so might have
> missed this …
>
>
> Regards,
> Mridul
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 9:08 PM Haejoon Lee
> <ha...@databricks.com.invalid> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 10:15 AM Hyukjin Kwon <gu...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to start the vote for SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark
> Connect)
>
> JIRA <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-47540>
> Prototype <https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/45053>
> SPIP doc
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Pund40wGRuB72LX6L7cliMDVoXTPR-xx4IkPmMLaZXk/edit?usp=sharing>
>
> Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours:
>
> [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because …
>
> Thanks.
>
>
Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect)
Posted by Felix Cheung <fe...@hotmail.com>.
+1
________________________________
From: Denny Lee <de...@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, April 1, 2024 10:06:14 AM
To: Hussein Awala <hu...@awala.fr>
Cc: Chao Sun <su...@apache.org>; Hyukjin Kwon <gu...@apache.org>; Mridul Muralidharan <mr...@gmail.com>; dev <de...@spark.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect)
+1 (non-binding)
On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 9:24 AM Hussein Awala <hu...@awala.fr>> wrote:
+1(non-binding) I add to the difference will it make that it will also simplify package maintenance and easily release a bug fix/new feature without needing to wait for Pyspark to release.
On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 4:56 PM Chao Sun <su...@apache.org>> wrote:
+1
On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 10:31 PM Hyukjin Kwon <gu...@apache.org>> wrote:
Oh I didn't send the discussion thread out as it's pretty simple, non-invasive and the discussion was sort of done as part of the Spark Connect initial discussion ..
On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 1:59 PM Mridul Muralidharan <mr...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Can you point me to the SPIP’s discussion thread please ?
I was not able to find it, but I was on vacation, and so might have missed this …
Regards,
Mridul
On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 9:08 PM Haejoon Lee <ha...@databricks.com.invalid> wrote:
+1
On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 10:15 AM Hyukjin Kwon <gu...@apache.org>> wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to start the vote for SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect)
JIRA<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-47540>
Prototype<https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/45053>
SPIP doc<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Pund40wGRuB72LX6L7cliMDVoXTPR-xx4IkPmMLaZXk/edit?usp=sharing>
Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours:
[ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP
[ ] +0
[ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because …
Thanks.
Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect)
Posted by Denny Lee <de...@gmail.com>.
+1 (non-binding)
On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 9:24 AM Hussein Awala <hu...@awala.fr> wrote:
> +1(non-binding) I add to the difference will it make that it will also
> simplify package maintenance and easily release a bug fix/new feature
> without needing to wait for Pyspark to release.
>
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 4:56 PM Chao Sun <su...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 10:31 PM Hyukjin Kwon <gu...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Oh I didn't send the discussion thread out as it's pretty simple,
>>> non-invasive and the discussion was sort of done as part of the Spark
>>> Connect initial discussion ..
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 1:59 PM Mridul Muralidharan <mr...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Can you point me to the SPIP’s discussion thread please ?
>>>> I was not able to find it, but I was on vacation, and so might have
>>>> missed this …
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Mridul
>>>>
>>>
>>>> On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 9:08 PM Haejoon Lee
>>>> <ha...@databricks.com.invalid> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 10:15 AM Hyukjin Kwon <gu...@apache.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'd like to start the vote for SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI
>>>>>> (Spark Connect)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> JIRA <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-47540>
>>>>>> Prototype <https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/45053>
>>>>>> SPIP doc
>>>>>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Pund40wGRuB72LX6L7cliMDVoXTPR-xx4IkPmMLaZXk/edit?usp=sharing>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP
>>>>>> [ ] +0
>>>>>> [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because …
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect)
Posted by Hussein Awala <hu...@awala.fr>.
+1(non-binding) I add to the difference will it make that it will also
simplify package maintenance and easily release a bug fix/new feature
without needing to wait for Pyspark to release.
On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 4:56 PM Chao Sun <su...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 10:31 PM Hyukjin Kwon <gu...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Oh I didn't send the discussion thread out as it's pretty simple,
>> non-invasive and the discussion was sort of done as part of the Spark
>> Connect initial discussion ..
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 1:59 PM Mridul Muralidharan <mr...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Can you point me to the SPIP’s discussion thread please ?
>>> I was not able to find it, but I was on vacation, and so might have
>>> missed this …
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Mridul
>>>
>>
>>> On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 9:08 PM Haejoon Lee
>>> <ha...@databricks.com.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 10:15 AM Hyukjin Kwon <gu...@apache.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> I'd like to start the vote for SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI
>>>>> (Spark Connect)
>>>>>
>>>>> JIRA <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-47540>
>>>>> Prototype <https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/45053>
>>>>> SPIP doc
>>>>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Pund40wGRuB72LX6L7cliMDVoXTPR-xx4IkPmMLaZXk/edit?usp=sharing>
>>>>>
>>>>> Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours:
>>>>>
>>>>> [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP
>>>>> [ ] +0
>>>>> [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because …
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>
>>>>
Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect)
Posted by Chao Sun <su...@apache.org>.
+1
On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 10:31 PM Hyukjin Kwon <gu...@apache.org> wrote:
> Oh I didn't send the discussion thread out as it's pretty simple,
> non-invasive and the discussion was sort of done as part of the Spark
> Connect initial discussion ..
>
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 1:59 PM Mridul Muralidharan <mr...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Can you point me to the SPIP’s discussion thread please ?
>> I was not able to find it, but I was on vacation, and so might have
>> missed this …
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Mridul
>>
>
>> On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 9:08 PM Haejoon Lee
>> <ha...@databricks.com.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 10:15 AM Hyukjin Kwon <gu...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> I'd like to start the vote for SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark
>>>> Connect)
>>>>
>>>> JIRA <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-47540>
>>>> Prototype <https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/45053>
>>>> SPIP doc
>>>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Pund40wGRuB72LX6L7cliMDVoXTPR-xx4IkPmMLaZXk/edit?usp=sharing>
>>>>
>>>> Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours:
>>>>
>>>> [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP
>>>> [ ] +0
>>>> [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because …
>>>>
>>>> Thanks.
>>>>
>>>
Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect)
Posted by Hyukjin Kwon <gu...@apache.org>.
Oh I didn't send the discussion thread out as it's pretty simple,
non-invasive and the discussion was sort of done as part of the Spark
Connect initial discussion ..
On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 1:59 PM Mridul Muralidharan <mr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Can you point me to the SPIP’s discussion thread please ?
> I was not able to find it, but I was on vacation, and so might have
> missed this …
>
>
> Regards,
> Mridul
>
> On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 9:08 PM Haejoon Lee
> <ha...@databricks.com.invalid> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 10:15 AM Hyukjin Kwon <gu...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I'd like to start the vote for SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark
>>> Connect)
>>>
>>> JIRA <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-47540>
>>> Prototype <https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/45053>
>>> SPIP doc
>>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Pund40wGRuB72LX6L7cliMDVoXTPR-xx4IkPmMLaZXk/edit?usp=sharing>
>>>
>>> Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours:
>>>
>>> [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP
>>> [ ] +0
>>> [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because …
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect)
Posted by Mridul Muralidharan <mr...@gmail.com>.
Can you point me to the SPIP’s discussion thread please ?
I was not able to find it, but I was on vacation, and so might have missed
this …
Regards,
Mridul
On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 9:08 PM Haejoon Lee
<ha...@databricks.com.invalid> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 10:15 AM Hyukjin Kwon <gu...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'd like to start the vote for SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark
>> Connect)
>>
>> JIRA <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-47540>
>> Prototype <https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/45053>
>> SPIP doc
>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Pund40wGRuB72LX6L7cliMDVoXTPR-xx4IkPmMLaZXk/edit?usp=sharing>
>>
>> Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours:
>>
>> [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP
>> [ ] +0
>> [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because …
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect)
Posted by Tom Graves <tg...@yahoo.com.INVALID>.
+1
Tom
On Sunday, March 31, 2024 at 10:09:28 PM CDT, Ruifeng Zheng <zr...@gmail.com> wrote:
+1
On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 10:06 AM Haejoon Lee <ha...@databricks.com.invalid> wrote:
+1
On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 10:15 AM Hyukjin Kwon <gu...@apache.org> wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to start the vote for SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect)
JIRAPrototypeSPIP doc
Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours:
[ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP
[ ] +0
[ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because …
Thanks.
--
Ruifeng Zheng
E-mail: zrflibra@gmail.com
Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect)
Posted by Ruifeng Zheng <zr...@gmail.com>.
+1
On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 10:06 AM Haejoon Lee
<ha...@databricks.com.invalid> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 10:15 AM Hyukjin Kwon <gu...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'd like to start the vote for SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark
>> Connect)
>>
>> JIRA <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-47540>
>> Prototype <https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/45053>
>> SPIP doc
>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Pund40wGRuB72LX6L7cliMDVoXTPR-xx4IkPmMLaZXk/edit?usp=sharing>
>>
>> Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours:
>>
>> [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP
>> [ ] +0
>> [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because …
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>
--
Ruifeng Zheng
E-mail: zrflibra@gmail.com
Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect)
Posted by Haejoon Lee <ha...@databricks.com.INVALID>.
+1
On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 10:15 AM Hyukjin Kwon <gu...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to start the vote for SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark
> Connect)
>
> JIRA <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-47540>
> Prototype <https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/45053>
> SPIP doc
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Pund40wGRuB72LX6L7cliMDVoXTPR-xx4IkPmMLaZXk/edit?usp=sharing>
>
> Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours:
>
> [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because …
>
> Thanks.
>