You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@struts.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2005/01/07 13:48:22 UTC
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27239] -
bug in
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27239>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27239
------- Additional Comments From valtoni@prodepa.gov.br 2005-01-07 13:48 -------
(In reply to comment #12)
> > I don't understand why you would specify "dynamicJavascript='true'" for a
form that doesn't exist.
>
> Joe - I'm not trying to say that my code is right. All I'm saying is the way
the taglib handles a missing
> form has changed since 1.1. In 1.1, the taglib would gracefully ignore the
error - and the user would
> have no issues.
>
> I'm fine with using the *new* way, I just think it needs to be well documented.
Do you put the plugin validator in struts-config?
<plug-in className="org.apache.struts.validator.ValidatorPlugIn">
<set-property property="pathnames"
value="/WEB-INF/validator-rules.xml, /WEB-INF/validation.xml"/>
</plug-in>
--
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org