You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org by "Michael Dürig (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2012/07/24 14:56:34 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (OAK-197) oak-api ConflictHandler defines method
using oak.spi.state.NodeState
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-197?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13421369#comment-13421369 ]
Michael Dürig commented on OAK-197:
-----------------------------------
Since {{Tree}}s are mutable data structures I think its wrong to have them as arguments to those methods in place of the currently used {{NodeState}}s.
Instead of changing the signatures of the methods in {{ConflictHandler}} I think we should rather remove {{ConflictHandler}} from the Oak API and make it a plugin somewhere in the SPI space.
> oak-api ConflictHandler defines method using oak.spi.state.NodeState
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-197
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-197
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: core
> Reporter: angela
>
> similar issue than was reported in OAK-191:
> IMO the current ConflictHandler interface defined in the oak-api mixes
> different levels of abstraction by defining methods that refer both
> to Tree and NodeState. in particular because the latter is defined
> in the oak.spi.state package which IMO should not be exposed on the
> oak-api level.
> the methods i am referring to are:
> Resolution addExistingNode(Tree parent, String name, NodeState ours, NodeState theirs);
> Resolution changeDeletedNode(Tree parent, String name, NodeState ours);
> Resolution deleteChangedNode(Tree parent, String name, NodeState theirs);
> Resolution deleteDeletedNode(Tree parent, String name);
> wouldn't it be better to use Tree instead of NodeState?
> if that's not feasible i would either argue that the inteface doesn't belong
> to the oak-api or that the distinction between Tree and NodeState is artificial
> and we should try to get rid of it.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira