You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@wicket.apache.org by Peter Ertl <pe...@gmx.org> on 2012/05/05 14:15:47 UTC

wicket-4533 please review

Hi wicket team,

I would like to fix WICKET-4533 but 6.0.0 is darn close. So could you possibly take a look at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-4533 and tell me if it will be okay to commit the patch?

Thanks and best regards
Peter

Re: wicket-4532 please review

Posted by Peter Ertl <pe...@gmx.org>.
so, this time with the correct link

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-4532

let me know what you think :-)


Am 06.05.2012 um 01:07 schrieb Peter Ertl:

> right, it's 453-2- :-)
> 
> 
> Am 05.05.2012 um 20:14 schrieb Sven Meier:
> 
>> We're probably talking about WICKET-453*2*, IMHO it can still be improved for the next 6.0 beta.
>> 
>> Sven
>> 
>> On 05/05/2012 07:00 PM, Emond Papegaaij wrote:
>>> The ticket you mentioned is already fixed in 6.0. I fixed it right after
>>> filing it.
>>> 
>>> Best regards
>>> Emond
>>> Op 5 mei 2012 14:16 schreef "Peter Ertl"<pe...@gmx.org>  het volgende:
>>> 
>>>> Hi wicket team,
>>>> 
>>>> I would like to fix WICKET-4533 but 6.0.0 is darn close. So could you
>>>> possibly take a look at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-4533and tell me if it will be okay to commit the patch?
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks and best regards
>>>> Peter
>> 
>

Re: wicket-4532 please review

Posted by Peter Ertl <pe...@gmx.org>.
right, it's 453-2- :-)


Am 05.05.2012 um 20:14 schrieb Sven Meier:

> We're probably talking about WICKET-453*2*, IMHO it can still be improved for the next 6.0 beta.
> 
> Sven
> 
> On 05/05/2012 07:00 PM, Emond Papegaaij wrote:
>> The ticket you mentioned is already fixed in 6.0. I fixed it right after
>> filing it.
>> 
>> Best regards
>> Emond
>> Op 5 mei 2012 14:16 schreef "Peter Ertl"<pe...@gmx.org>  het volgende:
>> 
>>> Hi wicket team,
>>> 
>>> I would like to fix WICKET-4533 but 6.0.0 is darn close. So could you
>>> possibly take a look at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-4533and tell me if it will be okay to commit the patch?
>>> 
>>> Thanks and best regards
>>> Peter
>

Re: wicket-4533 please review

Posted by Sven Meier <sv...@meiers.net>.
We're probably talking about WICKET-453*2*, IMHO it can still be 
improved for the next 6.0 beta.

Sven

On 05/05/2012 07:00 PM, Emond Papegaaij wrote:
> The ticket you mentioned is already fixed in 6.0. I fixed it right after
> filing it.
>
> Best regards
> Emond
> Op 5 mei 2012 14:16 schreef "Peter Ertl"<pe...@gmx.org>  het volgende:
>
>> Hi wicket team,
>>
>> I would like to fix WICKET-4533 but 6.0.0 is darn close. So could you
>> possibly take a look at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-4533and tell me if it will be okay to commit the patch?
>>
>> Thanks and best regards
>> Peter

Re: wicket-4533 please review

Posted by Emond Papegaaij <em...@gmail.com>.
The ticket you mentioned is already fixed in 6.0. I fixed it right after
filing it.

Best regards
Emond
Op 5 mei 2012 14:16 schreef "Peter Ertl" <pe...@gmx.org> het volgende:

> Hi wicket team,
>
> I would like to fix WICKET-4533 but 6.0.0 is darn close. So could you
> possibly take a look at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-4533and tell me if it will be okay to commit the patch?
>
> Thanks and best regards
> Peter