You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@struts.apache.org by "David H. DeWolf" <dd...@apache.org> on 2006/10/31 16:54:14 UTC
[tiles2] Logging Consistency
Tiles currently uses both commons-logging and jdk1.4 logging. I'd like
to make this consistent. Which one is preferred?
If I don't hear otherwise, I'll go with commons-logging so that it's
consistent with Struts2.
David
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [tiles2] Logging Consistency
Posted by Greg Reddin <gr...@apache.org>.
On Oct 31, 2006, at 9:59 AM, Martin Cooper wrote:
> On 10/31/06, David H. DeWolf <dd...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> Tiles currently uses both commons-logging and jdk1.4 logging. I'd
>> like
>> to make this consistent. Which one is preferred?
>
>
> IMO, Commons Logging. That way, people can have one coherent log
> for their
> entire application.
+1.
Greg
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [tiles2] Logging Consistency
Posted by Martin Cooper <ma...@apache.org>.
On 10/31/06, David H. DeWolf <dd...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Tiles currently uses both commons-logging and jdk1.4 logging. I'd like
> to make this consistent. Which one is preferred?
IMO, Commons Logging. That way, people can have one coherent log for their
entire application.
--
Martin Cooper
If I don't hear otherwise, I'll go with commons-logging so that it's
> consistent with Struts2.
>
>
> David
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
Re: [tiles2] Logging Consistency
Posted by "David H. DeWolf" <dd...@apache.org>.
ok. . .
Let's go with commons-logging for now and revisit this if we decide that
Struts2 will go in a different direction.
David
Antonio Petrelli wrote:
> Antonio Petrelli ha scritto:
>> David H. DeWolf ha scritto:
>>> Tiles currently uses both commons-logging and jdk1.4 logging. I'd
>>> like to make this consistent. Which one is preferred?
>>>
>>> If I don't hear otherwise, I'll go with commons-logging so that it's
>>> consistent with Struts2.
>>
>> There was just a similar discussion in Struts 1:
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@struts.apache.org/msg24184.html
>> Anyone knows what happened at the end?
>
> Anyway I am in favor of Commons Logging too, whatever other people did.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [tiles2] Logging Consistency
Posted by Antonio Petrelli <ap...@apache.org>.
Antonio Petrelli ha scritto:
> David H. DeWolf ha scritto:
>> Tiles currently uses both commons-logging and jdk1.4 logging. I'd
>> like to make this consistent. Which one is preferred?
>>
>> If I don't hear otherwise, I'll go with commons-logging so that it's
>> consistent with Struts2.
>
> There was just a similar discussion in Struts 1:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@struts.apache.org/msg24184.html
> Anyone knows what happened at the end?
Anyway I am in favor of Commons Logging too, whatever other people did.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [tiles2] Logging Consistency
Posted by Antonio Petrelli <ap...@apache.org>.
David H. DeWolf ha scritto:
> Tiles currently uses both commons-logging and jdk1.4 logging. I'd
> like to make this consistent. Which one is preferred?
>
> If I don't hear otherwise, I'll go with commons-logging so that it's
> consistent with Struts2.
There was just a similar discussion in Struts 1:
http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@struts.apache.org/msg24184.html
Anyone knows what happened at the end?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org