You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by "Ahmet Arslan (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/07/13 12:04:20 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7377) Remove ClassicSimilarity?

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15374882#comment-15374882 ] 

Ahmet Arslan commented on LUCENE-7377:
--------------------------------------

I think, an implementation of  TFIDF should stay in Lucene, but it  should extend SimilarityBase and it should have a simple, single line code in org.apache.lucene.search.similarities.SimilarityBase#score method. e.g.,
{code}
return tf * log2(((double) stats.getNumberOfDocuments() / (double) stats.getDocFreq()) + 1);
{code}

Current TFIDFSimilarity and ClassicSimilarity are hard to understand.

> Remove ClassicSimilarity?
> -------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-7377
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7377
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Task
>            Reporter: Adrien Grand
>            Priority: Minor
>
> ClassicSimilarity was relying on coordination factors in order to produce good scores. Now that coords are gone, it is quite a bad option compared to eg. BM25Similarity.
> Maybe we should remove ClassicSimilarity entirely in master and deprecated in 6.x in order to encourage users to move to BM25Similarity rather than stay on a Similarity impl of lesser quality?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org