You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@httpd.apache.org by thomas2004 <th...@yahoo.de> on 2009/10/19 10:46:31 UTC
[users@httpd] relationship btw. socket_keepalive and socket_timeout
Can I set a worker to use both of these properties or just one? I mean if I
use the socket_keepalive=true, is it meaningful to add property
socket_timeout=300?
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/relationship-btw.-socket_keepalive-and-socket_timeout-tp25955021p25955021.html
Sent from the Apache HTTP Server - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
" from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org
Re: [users@httpd] relationship btw. socket_keepalive and socket_timeout
Posted by André Warnier <aw...@ice-sa.com>.
thomas2004 wrote:
> Can I set a worker to use both of these properties or just one? I mean if I
> use the socket_keepalive=true, is it meaningful to add property
> socket_timeout=300?
Can you give us some idea of the context you are talking about ?
Apache httpd ? version ? mod_jk ? something else ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
" from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org