You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to general@incubator.apache.org by Matt Franklin <m....@gmail.com> on 2013/12/10 15:22:30 UTC
[SHEPHERD'S VIEW] Drill
Apologies for tardiness in completing the review.
I have reviewed the community and have concluded that it is very active
and
healthy. IMO, #3 in the issues to address before graduation is not
critical
and can be successfully mitigated by documenting the tasks that are
currently
being executed by single individuals. My recommendation is that the
Drill
podling begin the graduation process after completion of the next
release.
Re: [SHEPHERD'S VIEW] Drill
Posted by Marvin Humphrey <ma...@rectangular.com>.
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 6:22 AM, Matt Franklin <m....@gmail.com> wrote:
> Apologies for tardiness in completing the review.
>
> I have reviewed the community and have concluded that it is very active
> and healthy. IMO, #3 in the issues to address before graduation is not
> critical and can be successfully mitigated by documenting the tasks that
> are currently being executed by single individuals. My recommendation
> is that the Drill podling begin the graduation process after completion
> of the next release.
Glad to hear that Drill is doing so well!
The reason we have the Sunday deadline for shepherd reviews and the Monday
email before the Wednesday report filing is to allow time for a podling to
respond, as Drill did a few months ago. I doubt this review will prove
controversial, but I see you've also addressed this email to both
general@incubator and Drill's dev list just in case -- good thinking.
Thanks for coming through, Matt!
Marvin Humphrey
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [SHEPHERD'S VIEW] Drill
Posted by Marvin Humphrey <ma...@rectangular.com>.
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 6:22 AM, Matt Franklin <m....@gmail.com> wrote:
> Apologies for tardiness in completing the review.
>
> I have reviewed the community and have concluded that it is very active
> and healthy. IMO, #3 in the issues to address before graduation is not
> critical and can be successfully mitigated by documenting the tasks that
> are currently being executed by single individuals. My recommendation
> is that the Drill podling begin the graduation process after completion
> of the next release.
Glad to hear that Drill is doing so well!
The reason we have the Sunday deadline for shepherd reviews and the Monday
email before the Wednesday report filing is to allow time for a podling to
respond, as Drill did a few months ago. I doubt this review will prove
controversial, but I see you've also addressed this email to both
general@incubator and Drill's dev list just in case -- good thinking.
Thanks for coming through, Matt!
Marvin Humphrey